Media Search:



Titus fends off progressive challenger in Nevada House primary – The Hill

Incumbent Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.) is projected to win her primary for the states 1st Congressional District on Tuesday, successfully fending off a progressive challenge from Amy Vilela.

The Associated Press called the race at 1:05 a.m. ET.

Tituss victory marks yet another loss for progressives, who have fallen short in a number of primary contests this cycle. Vilela served as Sen. Bernie Sanderss (I-Vt.) co-chair on his 2020 presidential campaign. Sanders endorsed her last week.

Titus has represented the 1st District, which includes most of Las Vegas and parts of North Las Vegas, since 2013. Republicans consider the seat to be a prime pick-up opportunity, with the National Republican Congressional Committee including it on its target list.

Titus won her latest reelection bid in 2020 with more than 60 percent of the vote.

Both parties face a tough race in November. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report rates the district as a toss-up, along with Nevadas 3rd and 4th congressional districts, Senate race and gubernatorial contest.

See the original post here:
Titus fends off progressive challenger in Nevada House primary - The Hill

Asman rips Democrats for indulging progressive ‘brats’ on economy: ‘The house has burned down’ – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FOX Business host David Asman ripped the Democrats for indulging progressives "who don't know a thing about the economy," warning the "house has burned down" as a result of the far-left policies. Asman joined "America's Newsroom" Tuesday to discuss how the policies have impacted the state of the economy as inflation continues to soar.

VARNEY: BIDEN'S ATTACKS ON BUSINESSES ONLY APPEAL TO AOC, BERNIE SANDERS AND THE FAR LEFT

DAVID ASMAN: You go back to December and November of last year, and you look at what they were saying about Joe Manchin, how he was a traitor to the cause and feeding into the progressives' line that you could print money until the... end of time without having any inflation. It was B.S. ... It was kind of like these spoiled kids in the Upper West Side of Manhattan. I'm going to do a Greg Gutfeld analogy. You know, where you see these mothers that are indulging their children. "Oh, it's all right. Oh, look at that. Oh, honey, don't kick that old woman in the knee," and they were indulging the young progressives who don't know a thing about the economy.. .and eventually they went a step too far, and they bought into the whole plan, whether it was in spending or in the Federal Reserve... And the house has burned down as a result of indulging these brats.

WATCH THE ENTIRE SEGMENT FROM "AMERICA'S NEWSROOM" BELOW:

This article was written by Fox News staff.

See the original post here:
Asman rips Democrats for indulging progressive 'brats' on economy: 'The house has burned down' - Fox News

Reactionary ‘Progressives’ Strike Again – The Jewish Press – JewishPress.com

A few ignoramuses with rainbow flags gathered on Sunday at New York Citys Chelsea Piers to protest the participation of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in theJewish Leadership Conference, held annually by the conservative Tikvah Fund. Other speakers at the event included former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer, former U.S. Deputy National Security Advisorand current Tikvah chairman Elliott Abrams, and a slew of conservative Jewish intellectuals.

The timing, at the height of Pride Month, couldnt have been better from a propaganda perspective for the demonstrators present and behind the scenes. While countries around the Free World are going out of their way to celebrate the LGBTQ+ movement through parades, public-service announcements and all vehicles that highlight choice and identity, the very idea that any venue would dare to let DeSantis darken its premises presented a golden opportunity for bitching and moaning about victimhood.

The trouble is that this reactionary method of manipulation to silence all voices that dont align perfectly with a progressive point of view worksat least, on liberals. Afraid to be labeled as Neanderthal right-wingers, the latter cave to pressure at the drop of a threat.

This is how the above conference, titled Jews, Israel and the Future of the West,got bootedlast month from the agenda of its originally planned location: The Museum of Jewish HeritageA Living Memorial to the Holocaust. The excuse for the travesty was that the institution doesnt do politics. Leaning on this phony assertion, the museum ultimately refused to sign a contract with Tikvah.

Given that the site had no problem welcoming Democratic politicianssuch as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and former New York Mayor Bill de Blasiothe claim was clearly bogus. Still, no official documents had been inked, so the museum was able to reject Tikvah, despite its initial assent.

This wasnt the case with Chelsea Piers, however, which not only agreed to accept oodles of cash to host the conference, but was contractually bound to do so by the time that left-wing activists got wind of the arrangement and complained. To cater, retroactively, to the anti-free-speech screechers, the major Manhattan recreation center announced that it would be donating the proceeds to LGBTQ+ causes.

Naturally, this ridiculous attempt at kowtowing to bullies wasnt sufficient for the DeSantis detractors who turned out to express their displeasure. Whether those who vowed to boycott Chelsea Piers will make good on their promise remains to be seen. It might be difficult for all the gay couples with upcoming weddings scheduled at Pier 60 to find an alternative in short notice.

But the sentiment that no Republicans, least of all DeSantis, should have the right to talkin this case, about Jewish issueswas shared by the apoplectic, reactionary hordes. An additional common thread linking them to one another and to their apologists was a total lack of familiarity with the legislation that united them in hate against the governor of the Sunshine State.

This is giving them the benefit of the doubt, of course, since anyone who has read the bill and refers to it as dont say gay is a bald-faced liar. Indeed, its not DeSantis who should hang who considers it unreasonable, let alone egregious, ought to undergo a head examination.

First of all,House Bill (HB) 1557is titled Parental Rights in Education. It prohibits classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity in kindergarten through thirdgrade, and prohibits instruction that is not age-appropriate for students and requires school districts to adopt procedures for notifying parents if there is a change in services from the school regarding a childs mental, emotional or physical health or well-being.

Its hard to fathom that even the most woke of American society would wish to have his/her/their/its (forgive me if I left out the rest of the zillion possessive pronouns out there) toddlers taught about sex at all. Enabling teachers to instruct kids after the third grade is also stretching the boundaries beyond what is acceptable to the parents I know, including those in the LGBTQ+ community.

Secondly, this doesnt and shouldnt apply only to sex. It is just as relevant to all topics raised in pre- and elementary-school classrooms.

Parents of youngsters who are barely able to tie their own shoe laces or cross the street by themselves are responsible for family decision-making. This is their right and their duty.

Educators are tasked with what the name of their profession suggests. And if they were to focus on the skills that matter to little tykes, such as reading and telling time, everyone would benefit.

No good comes of inundating 5- and 6-year-olds with subjects that they are not ready to handle. This is why they arent forced to study calculus or the origins of communism until much later, whether or not they receive indoctrination in either or both at home from birth. DeSantis simply gave this concept an official stamp of approval, much to the delight of his constituents.

They cant cancel me; Im going to speak my mind, DeSantis said in his opening remarks to the conference. You know, I saw that there was a little opposition to me coming here. All I can tell you is this: When the left is having a spasm, that just tells you that, in Florida, we are winning.

Which brings us to the real impetus for the attempt to muzzle his unmasked mouth: the assumption that he will run in the Republican Party presidential primaries, coupled with the fear that his bid could lead him to the White House.

Their trepidation that the next person to occupy the Oval Office will not be a Democrat is justified. Its what comes of their having gone off the ideological deep end into woke la-la land.

Ironically, the fact that it wont be Jewish voters tipping the scales in that direction best illustrates the importance of the conference in question.

Follow this link:
Reactionary 'Progressives' Strike Again - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com

Mayor Breed-backed SF affordable housing measure expected to qualify for the ballot, sparking fight with progressives – San Francisco Chronicle

Supporters of a proposed San Francisco initiative that would speed up some housing development say they expect to qualify for the November ballot.

Called Affordable Homes Now, the measure seeks to cut several years off the approval timeline for qualifying housing projects that are 100% affordable, are for teachers or are mostly market-rate but have 15% more below-market rate units than the city would otherwise require under affordability mandates.

The measure is backed by Mayor London Breed, who tried and failed to get the Board of Supervisors to put it on the ballot first. It was her third attempt to streamline housing production through an amendment to the City Charter.

After a supervisors committee rejected Breeds proposal in January, in part because they said community stakeholders hadnt vetted it, supporters began circulating petitions instead. Theyll need 52,000 valid signatures to make the November ballot. The campaign says it has 48,000 confirmed signatures so far but is collecting 600 to 700 a day, so it expects to clear the threshold on Tuesday and submit the signatures on June 27.

The ballot measure is part of a broader fight between Breed and some supervisors over San Francisco residential development as the city continues to face an acute housing and homelessness crisis and looming state mandates over home building. The city is now detailing how it expects to meet its housing goals of accommodating 82,000 units between 2023 and 2031, a threefold increase over the current eight-year cycle.

Amid the pressure, Breed has accused supervisors of getting in the way of much-needed home construction. Some supervisors have backed a competing ballot measure to streamline some housing development. Even if that measure doesnt make it on the ballot, they may campaign against the Breed-backed streamlining push.

Breeds housing fights with progressive supervisors grabbed headlines when they rejected nearly 500 units at the site of a Nordstrom parking lot near Sixth and Market streets. That site is where Breed and supporters announced the signature milestone on Thursday.

Standing in front of the Stevenson Street parking lot surrounded by workers in bright vests and hard hats, Breed said her support for the measure came from what she saw as a native San Franciscan.

I watched as we saw this city grow and as we saw this city become way too expensive, Breed said. As it grew, there wasnt enough housing that grew with it.

Breed also drew a straight line between the citys uneven housing development and the recent redistricting controversy, in which the task force drawing new supervisor districts broke up the Tenderloin and SoMa. She said she would have liked to see the Tenderloin and SoMa remain in District Six. But she called the split a necessary result of housing growth being too concentrated on the east side of the city which made District Six far too populous.

Thats what you get. Thats what happens, Breed said. So we have 10 years to fix this. Ten years for the next redistricting process to see other parts of the city grow, too.

Progressive supervisors who have opposed the mayors housing policies generally argue that theyre trying to make sure San Francisco is building as much truly affordable housing as possible, rather than allowing too much market-rate development that could further gentrification in traditionally low-income areas.

Last month, Supervisor Connie Chan introduced her own ballot measure to streamline some housing development, with support from at least two of her colleagues. Chans measure includes stricter affordability requirements than the measure backed by Breed. At least six supervisors would have to vote to put it on the ballot, where it could compete with Affordable Homes Now.

Chan said in a statement that her measure would accelerate the process to build real affordable housing that San Francisco working families can afford.

This measure will be a safeguard against any deceitful attempts to mislead San Franciscans about market-rate housing as affordable, and further displace working people, Chan said.

Ron Rowlett of the Nor Cal Carpenters Union dismissed the potential competing measure as an attempt to tank the one his union and Breed are supporting.

Theyre not looking to build homes, he said of the rival ballot measure. It was more another political thing to try and confuse the voters and make sure that (Affordable Homes Now) doesnt pass.

In addition to Nor Cal Carpenters Union, the coalition backing Affordable Homes Now includes GrowSF, Habitat for Humanity, the Housing Action Coalition, SPUR and YIMBY Action.

J.D. Morris is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: jd.morris@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @thejdmorris

Excerpt from:
Mayor Breed-backed SF affordable housing measure expected to qualify for the ballot, sparking fight with progressives - San Francisco Chronicle

NSA Ajit Doval calls for cooperation against terrorism ‘without any reservations’ at BRICS – Republic World

National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval attended a BRICS meeting with his Chinese counterpart NSA Yang Jiechi on Wednesday wherein he emphasised on the need to bolstercooperation against terrorism "without any reservations". Hewelcomed the cooperation among the five-nation grouping of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa to address the issue of terrorism, as per news agency ANI sources. During thevirtual meeting which was hosted by China on the second anniversary of the Galwan Valley clash, bothDovaland Jiechi affirmed "strengthening political and security cooperation" with other members of the union as officials fromBrazil, Russia and South Africa were also present in the meeting.

It is to mention that during the Galwan Valley clash, the Chinese and Indian troops engaged in aggressive melee, face-offs, and skirmishes at locations along the Sino-Indian border.Russian news agency TASS claimed that at least 20 Indian soldiers and 45 Chinese servicemen were killed during the clashes in eastern Ladakh.

Further, both Indian and Chinese NSAs underscored the importance of reforming the multilateral system in order to address global issues with credibility, equity and accountability. Meanwhile, Doval also talked about the COVID-19 pandemic and the drastic shift in climate change and called on the world to work collectively to address the global challenges. The Indian NSA urged the BRICS members to strengthen their cooperation in the areas of Information & Communication Technology (ICT) and outer space and maritime security in order to prevent any terror attacks.

The meeting of NSAs came a week ahead of the BRICS summit which is due to be held on June 24 with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping and leaders of Brazil and South Africa. Though the Indian PM and Putin had held several telephonic conversations after the onset of the war, this would be the first time when the trio -- India, China, and Russian leaders-- would meet on a common platform along with other BRICS leaders.

Last week, the Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors of the BRICS nations published a joint statement during a virtual conference wherein the members agreed to increase financial collaboration and boost macroeconomic policy coordination. The summit urged the global community to expand partnerships, highlighting that macro-policy coordination is essential in guiding the world economy out of crisis and constructing a robust, sustainable, balanced, and inclusive post-pandemic economic recovery.

Visit link:
NSA Ajit Doval calls for cooperation against terrorism 'without any reservations' at BRICS - Republic World