Media Search:



Fear and Loathing in Dane County – The Bulwark

Once a month, the local Republican Party of Dane County, Wisconsin gathers for an evening event called Pints and Politics. Tonights gathering is taking place on a June night at a small public park with a pavilion in Sun Prairie, Wisconsin, one of several cities besides Madison in the heavily Democratic county. Some years back I was banned from the groups events for having written an accurate public account of one of them, but all has since been forgiven, and now I am as welcome as anyone.

Tonights lineup of speakers features seven candidates, including state representative and gubernatorial contender Tim Ramthun, who will be speaking last. The event organizer is Rolf Lindgren, a local libertarian of my long acquaintance. We talk soon after I arrive. He calls Donald Trump the most libertarian president weve had . . . ever: He got rid of the reviled Section 215. (Remember Michael Moore yelling about the Patriot Act?) He didnt start any new wars. He presided over a large drop in the number of federal prisoners. He banned the shackling of pregnant women in prison. And so on. Lindgrens priorities speak well of him.

About 50 people mill about, and even though they were invited to bring or cook food, hardly anyone is eatingor even drinking, which is unusual in Wisconsin. Scott Grabins, the local party chair, starts things off at 6 p.m.

We have an opportunity here, he tells the gathering. We have that . . . red wave coming. All you have to do is go down to the gas station. Rim shot, please.

Grabins is one of the ten Wisconsin Republicans who met in secret on Dec. 14, 2020after Trump lost Wisconsin by nearly 21,000 votesto sign an official-looking document purporting to declare Trump the winner on the authority of the states Republican electors. (At the same timein the same state capitol buildingthe states real electors were holding an official ceremony to authorize the states votes for Biden.) Republicans attempted the ruse in several states with the goal of giving Vice President Mike Pence an excuse to throw the election to Trump, which he declined to do. Two of Wisconsins actual electors recently filed suit against the pretend ones in the hope that doing so would prevent the losing side from attempting to subvert election outcomes in this manner in the future.

Notwithstanding the pending lawsuit against him, Grabins is jazzed tonight about the role that local Republicans will play in key races. Dane County has the third-largest number of Republicans in the state of Wisconsin, he says. We will determine who the next governor is, who the next attorney general is, who the state treasurer is, the secretary of state. We will determine whether Senator [Ron] Johnson goes back to the Senate.

He might be right. While Dane County is heavily Democraticin the 2020 election, Joe Biden beat Trump 77 percent to 22 percentthe level of enthusiasm that the people at this gathering can bring to bear on behalf of Republican candidates in the August 9 primary could prove pivotal in the November election.

Another speaker, candidate for state treasurer John Leiber, notes that the upcoming elections represent the GOPs best chance in half a century to clinch total control of Wisconsin state governmentnot just both houses of the legislature, but the offices of governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, state treasurer, and secretary of state. Its a distinct possibility.

In fact, what happens in this falls elections in Wisconsin could sway the outcome of the next presidential election, should Republicans regain the governors office and seize control of the states electoral apparatus. That is their stated intent. All anyone has to do is listen.

Early in the program, Lindgren points out to the audience me and journalist Dylan Brogan, playfully reminding everyone present that whatever they say might end up in the news.

The speakers are not noticeably inhibited.

Andrew McKinney, a candidate for state assembly and Sun Prairie School District employee, explains that Democrats conned him into running as a Democrat in a previous race and have since made him keep his mouth shut. No more: McKinney shares that when the HR director at a nonprofit he worked for pressed him to give his pronouns, the ones he gave her were motherfucker and motherfuckers.

Another speakerMatt Sande, legislative director of Pro-Life Wisconsincalls the likely repeal of Roe v. Wade a great first step, adding that his group will then work to remove the exception for saving the life of the mother from the 1849 Wisconsin anti-abortion law that could go back into effect if Roe is overturned. This is a spiritual battle, he says, urging people to just pray they stick to this [leaked draft] Alito decision.

Secretary of state candidate Jay Schroeder, who came close to beating the longtime incumbent, Democrat Doug La Follette, in 2018 and is now one of three Republicans vying for the chance to oppose him in November, tells the gathering that the person holding this office has to sign a sheet of paper to certify the states electors in the presidential election. Had he had this power in 2020, I would not have signed it. (Its not clear whether this would make the document invalid. La Follette, who signed it in 2020, tells me in an email that he doesnt know.)

But the nights most extraordinary speaker on the issue of election security is Jefferson E. Davis, chair of an ad hoc committee on voter integrity. Davis directs his attention to me and fellow reporter Brogan, hoping to end up in the news. He points to his car, a black Saab parked on the street. That car, he announces, is full of receipts and data that he would share afterward with the two of us to show how the election was stolen in Wisconsin.

If you think Joe Biden won the state of Wisconsin by 20,682 votes, if you think hes the sitting president . . . then Im the starting quarterback for the Green Bay Packers, he tells the gathering. Davis is not the Packers starting quarterback.

While a smooth speaker with plenty of ready-to-hand figures and percentages, Davis doesnt have much in the way of evidence to share with the larger group. He claims that Democrats visited tens of thousands of nursing home residents on election day to steal as many of their votes, their dignity, and their identity as possible. They also connived to send out as many absentee-ballot request forms as they could, even to people who didnt ask to receive them. Theyre gonna do it again in 2022, he warns.

Davis is immediately followed by Orville Seymer, a longtime conservative activist, who circulates a handout outlining an exciting new idea for Republican electoral success: Make a list of people you know, look up their voting history on the Wisconsin Elections Commissions website, and request that they be sent absentee ballot request forms; then swoop in to do everything for them except sign it. Youve just doubled your vote, and youve done it completely legally, he notes, correctly.

At last, the floor goes to the candidate Lindgren introduces as Radical Tim Ramthun. Ramthun gives a long, rambling talk that rotates like an elliptical around an idea he puts this way: When election integrity doesnt happen, and nefarious acts and illegal acts result in [the] wrong people being in seats, youve got problems like we have now in our society. Its a big deal.

Ramthun is vying for the GOPs gubernatorial nomination against former Lieutenant Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch and businessmen Kevin Nicholson and Tim Michels. He tells the group he spoke with Trump for seven minutes and 45 seconds in December (He said, Youre my kind of guy.) and again at Mar-a-Lago in April, after which he heard from others that he would be getting Trumps nod. Instead, in May, Trump endorsed Michels. Ramthun is still scratching his head: I heard Reince Preibus was involved. Moneys probably involved.

Ramthun also recounts his clashes with Robin Vos, the Republican who is speaker of the Wisconsin assembly. At Trumps instigation, Voslaunched a probe into the 2020 election result that had already survived a recount and a state supreme court ruling. The probe that has thus far cost taxpayers nearly $900,000 and uncovered no fraudexcept the unsupportable claims made by those conducting it. After Ramthun falsely accused Republicans of signing a pact with Hillary Clinton to authorize voting dropboxes, Vos stripped him of his sole staff member. Radical Tim assures the gathering that he is undaunted.

People continue just to tell me, Well, Tim, youre a conspiracy theorist or Its not constitutional. The only word that comes to mind for me is ignorance. The facts, he says, continue to pour out: You cant dispute the data. The geospatial ping data qualifies [as] fact. Period.

Ramthun at one point refers to the Democrat-orchestrated riot that happened on January 6thYes, I said it that way; write that down, he notes to me and Broganbut he doesnt elaborate on the claim. So, at the end of his talk, I raise my hand and ask Ramthun to explain what he meant. Here is what he says:

In my opinion, I am aware of seven states that were coming to that certification event on January 6th to object to it. It is my opinion that Democrat leadership knew of that and did not want the objection to happen. The seven states were the swing states, including Nevada and New Mexico, Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin. So the reason I said it is because the plan is clear: They were going to object to the certification on January 6th on the floor, and every state was going to have to vote independent. It was going to string it out and be a big deal and it was going to be chaotic for the side that wanted it donethey wanted to rubber stamp it, they didnt want that, so lets cause a deflection. Lets create something, and well just make it happen automatic and no one will know better, because theyll be focused on the other thing that happenedwhich, by the way, worked very well. My opinion.

Who needs congressional hearings when you can have the events of January 6th explained as clearly as this?

By the way, at no point during the event does anyone concerned about election integrity mention Grabinss participation in an actual plot to subvert the 2020 election result.

As the event concludes, Jefferson Davis tries to follow through on his offer to show me and Brogan the receipts and other evidence hes keeping in his Saab that the states 2020 election was stolen. Its late, the Brewers are playing, and Im hungryas is everyone else who came to this cookout but didnt eat, I imagineso I leave. Later, Brogan texts a photo of Davis with some of the papers and offers this disappointing report: guy talked to me for 40 mins, pulled out a bunch of binders with spreadsheets but finally admitted nothing he showed was proof, but thats coming.

I can hardly wait.

Read the original post:
Fear and Loathing in Dane County - The Bulwark

These 27 Democrats voted against protections for Supreme Court justices …

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The House passed a bill Tuesday to increase security for Supreme Court justices' immediate families, with 27 Democrats voting against, less than a week after a man was arrested for allegedly plotting to kill Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The bill that's now headed to President Bidens desk for final approval provides for 24-hour protection for Supreme Court justices' families, similar to what is already provided for some members of the executive and legislative branches.

The House voted 396-27, approving a measure that had already been passed by unanimous consent in the Senate in May just days after a leaked draft Supreme Court opinion suggested it intends to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, N.Y., was one of the Democrats to vote against providing additional protections for Supreme Court justices and their families. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Democrats who opposed the bill argued that it also needed to include protection for court staff, including clerks, and their families.

ISSA SLAMS AOC, PELOSI OVER SCOTUS SECURITY BILL STALL: IT IS ASTONISHING

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., boasted in an Instagram video on Saturday about initially blocking the bill.

"I wake up this morning and I start to hear murmurs that there is going to be an attempt to pass the Supreme Court supplemental protection bill the day after gun safety legislation for schools and kids and people is stalled," she said in the video.

"Oh, so we can pass protections for us and here easily, right? But we can't pass protections for everyday people?" she continued. "I think not."

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

All those who voted "no" on the Supreme Court Police Parity Act on Tuesday were Democrats. They are:

Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio

Rep. JamaalBowman, D-N.Y.

Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo.

Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas

Rep.Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y.

Rep. Chuy Garcia, D-Ill.

Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Texas

Rep.Joshua Gottheimer, D-N.J.

Rep.Ral Grijalva, D-Ariz.

Rep.Steven Horsford, D-Nev.

Rep.Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.

Rep.Brenda Lawrence, D-Mich.

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif.

Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J.

Rep. MarieNewman, D-Ill.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.

Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J.

Rep.Donald Payne, D-N.J.

Rep. Ed Perlmutter, D-Colo.

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.

Rep.Mikie Sherrill, D-N.J.

Rep.Albio Sires, D-N.J.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.

Rep.Norma Torres, D-Calif.,

Rep.Nydia Velazquez, D-N.Y.

Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif.

Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

Jessica Chasmar is a reporter for Fox News Digital. Story tips can be sent to Jessica.Chasmar@fox.com and on Twitter: @JessicaChasmar.

The rest is here:
These 27 Democrats voted against protections for Supreme Court justices ...

Nancy Mace calls out 27 ‘insane’ House Democrats who voted against Supreme Court security bill – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., blasted a group of 27 House Democrats who voted against a bill to provide 24-hour protection for Supreme Court justices' families, similar to what is already provided for some members of the executive and legislative branches.

THESE 27 DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST PROTECTIONS FOR SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

NANCY MACE: It's insane, but it's also probably the same 27 that want to defund the police. But it's unbelievable that they did not want to protect the third branch of government, the judicial branch. And it's illegal, actually, to show up at the justices' homes and protest. Someone who showed up last week at Justice Kavanaugh's home trying to assassinate him was armed and dangerous. This is not where we should be going in this country. We've had a lot of violence over the last two years by Antifa and armed anarchists. And you've seen Chuck Schumer and others ratchet up the rhetoric and encourage this sort of thing. You have a president who will not tamp it down and it's a huge issue. But we've got to make sure that our justices are protected, that are law enforcement, not just on this hill, but everywhere across the country, that they're fully funded and they have the resources they need to keep our communities, everybody safe.

WATCH THE FULL INTERVIEW BELOW:

This article was written by Fox News staff.

The rest is here:
Nancy Mace calls out 27 'insane' House Democrats who voted against Supreme Court security bill - Fox News

South Carolina governor primary results: Cunningham and McMaster – NPR

Former U.S. Rep. Joe Cunningham arrives at a debate for Democrats seeking their party's nomination in South Carolina's governor's race on Friday, June 10, 2022, in Columbia, S.C. Meg Kinnard/AP hide caption

Former U.S. Rep. Joe Cunningham arrives at a debate for Democrats seeking their party's nomination in South Carolina's governor's race on Friday, June 10, 2022, in Columbia, S.C.

In South Carolina, former Congressman Joe Cunningham has won the Democratic primary for governor, according to a call by The Associated Press.

Cunningham will face incumbent Republican Gov. Henry McMaster in November who also won his Tuesday primary, according to the AP.

Voters in the deep-red state haven't elected a Democratic governor in nearly 25 years, but Cunningham has a history of upsetting the political status quo. In 2018, he flipped the state's 1st Congressional District red to blue. His tenure lasted only one term before losing to Republican Congresswoman Nancy Mace. For some, though, it's a sign that Cunningham can win against Republicans in South Carolina.

Defeating McMaster in November will be a challenge, to say the very least. He's been endorsed by former President Donald Trump and remains popular in the state where Republicans control both houses of the state legislature, both U.S. Senate seats and six out of seven seats in Congress.

"I can tell you it's gonna be a tough race," Cunningham said at a Democratic debate Friday, "but I can tell you that I am up for that challenge."

Last week, Vice President Kamala Harris appeared at a party fundraiser in Columbia, S.C., and gave Democratic voters and candidates alike an enthusiasm jolt. "Let us fight to get Democrats up and down state ballots," she said.

McMaster was the state's lieutenant governor and assumed the office of governor in early 2017 after former President Donald Trump nominated then-Gov. Nikki Haley as ambassador to the United Nations.

When it comes to the issues heading into November, Cunningham and McMaster couldn't be further apart:

A top issue for Cunningham is Medicaid expansion. South Carolina is one of just 12 states most of which are in the south that have not expanded Medicaid to individuals up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level, or $17,774 for an individual in 2021. Doing so in South Carolina would insure approximately 100,000 additional people, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Republicans, including Gov. McMaster, have spent years holding out against expansion. "Expanding Medicaid would cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars every year," the governor wrote on Twitter last year, "and I will fight any effort to do it here."

South Carolina has a six-week abortion ban waiting in the wings if Roe v. Wade is overturned. After receiving McMaster's signature, the law was quickly blocked by a federal court and is awaiting a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court.

After the draft opinion showing justices were leaning towards reversing Roe leaked from the high court last month, Democrats moved to make abortion a central issue of their campaigns in South Carolina. Cunningham released this ad. "The stakes in this election could not be higher," he says in the video, "because these healthcare decisions should be between women and their doctors."

The primary election falls seven years nearly to the day after nine Black church-goers were killed by a domestic terrorist in Charleston in a racially motivated mass murder.

Gun rights remain a key campaign issue for McMaster, who is endorsed by the National Rifle Association. Just last year, the governor signed a law allowing South Carolinians to openly carry their firearms, even with some law enforcement hesitation.

"Our gun violence is out of control," Cunningham said at the Democratic debate last week, touting his record of helping to push gun control legislation through the U.S. House.

This year, Gov. McMaster quietly signed a bill into law that prevents transgender students from playing girls' or women's sports.

At Friday's debate, Cunningham said that the issue should be dealt with using "compassion" and "empathy," emphasizing the importance of looking after kids' mental health.

"We need to care for our kids and send a clear message to our politicians to leave our kids alone," he said.

Acacia Squires is NPR's state government editor.

More South Carolina primary coverage

Visit link:
South Carolina governor primary results: Cunningham and McMaster - NPR

GOP: Democrats choose Fido and Muffy over inflation-shocked public – Washington Examiner

At a time when many are looking for help on raging inflation and who to blame for record-high gas prices, oversight Democrats are turning to pet collars, drawing fire from frustrated Republicans.

On Wednesday, with gas at an all-time high of $5.014 a gallon and inflation at 8.6%, the House Oversight and Reform Committees subcommittee charged with looking out for consumers will hold its first hearing of the year to discuss Serestos flea collar for dogs and cats.

On Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. ET, Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, chairman of the Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy, will hold a hearing to examine the findings of the Subcommittees report entitled 'Seresto Flea and Tick Collars: Examining Why a Product Linked to More than 2,500 Pet Deaths Remains on the Market,' revealing that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) knew of the dangers associated with the Seresto flea and tick collar for several years, but failed to take action to protect pets and their owners, the committee announced.

While an important issue, Republicans said the subcommittee should first address what is hurting people the most.

Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX), the top Republican on the subcommittee, told Secrets: Democrats are barking up the wrong tree and holding a hearing on pet collars. We need to use the committees resources to conduct oversight of the many Biden-made crises impacting Americans everyday lives.

He added: Americans are suffering from 40-year high inflation, record-breaking gas prices, an ongoing border crisis, and out-of-stock baby formula. Republicans have conducted oversight and called for hearings on these issues, but Democrats refuse to do the same.

Rep. James Comer (R-KY), the full committee's top GOP dog, added: The Oversight Committee under Democrat leadership has gone to the dogs. Democrats have not held a single hearing on record inflation or rising gas prices, but theyve managed to find time to hold a hearing this week on pet collars. Americans are paying more for just about everything because of President Biden and Democrats out-of-control government spending. Its past time for this committee to get back to its mission and deliver accountability and solutions for the American people.

In its defense, the subcommittee has been probing a report of dog deaths and the collar for over a year. It plans to hear from two former dog owners and the Center for Biological Diversity, which recently received internal Environmental Protection Agency emails suggesting the government tried to quiet the pet scandal.

Republicans, meanwhile, are eager to focus on high gas prices and inflation, which Democrats and the Biden administration have failed to curb.

Oversight committee Republicans had some fun with the issue this week, quizzing the public on Twitter over the focus of Democrats.

What do you think Committee Democrats are holding a hearing on this week? the group asked. Most, 89.1%, chose the right answer, dog collars, prompting Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) to tweet: Considering this Committee has spent their time examining the Washington Football Team, environmental justice, the so-call assault on voting rights in Texas, baby playsets, and birthing while Black, I'd say the answer is Pet Collars.

Continued here:
GOP: Democrats choose Fido and Muffy over inflation-shocked public - Washington Examiner