Media Search:



Not Afraid to Be Themselves King Richard Actor Reflects on the Great Honor of Portraying Venus Williams and Sasha Obama On-Screen – EssentiallySports

The movie King Richard encompasses the struggles and achievements of Serena and Venus Williams from their fathers perspective. It was a mega-success both in terms of box office earnings and awards.

Recently, the actress who played Venus Williams sat down for an interview with Teen Vogue. There, she spoke about how she prepared herself for portraying the legend and how the seven-time Grand Slam champions story has helped her grow.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

The 15-year-old actress who performed the part of a young Venus Williams said, Oh, man. Something that I love so much is getting to prepare for those roles. I focus on doing good research. For Venus (Williams), I think I studied anything and everything about her. But I fell in love with who she is, and I fell in love with who Sasha (Obama) was and how just free they were.

Thereafter, she added, They were not afraid to be themselves. You know what Im saying? They had such an amazing team around them and great parents. So, there are so many similarities. It wasnt really hard just to fall in love with who they were.

DIVE DEEPER

Who Is More Successful- Serena or Venus Williams?

about 2 months ago

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Saniyya Sidney will soon portray Sasha Obama, the daughter of former US president Barack Obama, in the upcoming movie The First Lady alongside the renowned American actress Viola Davis.

With the recent announcement from the former World No.1s coach, the chances of seeing her in the grass swing have decreased even further. Eric Hechtman took to Instagram to inform tennis fans that he will travel alongside Serena Williams for the upcoming grass based tournaments.

ADVERTISEMENT

Article continues below this ad

Watch this story: How many Williams sisters are there besides Venus and Serena Williams

Hechtman has been training Venus since 2019 and as Serenas coach of almost 10 years, Patrick Mouratoglou has joined hands with Simona Halep for the grass-court season; though the duration of this partnership is still unclear. Do you think the American legend will return to the tour this season?

Read more:
Not Afraid to Be Themselves King Richard Actor Reflects on the Great Honor of Portraying Venus Williams and Sasha Obama On-Screen - EssentiallySports

CAL THOMAS: How children are taught to become progressives

How are progressives made? By cooking them in a public school six hours a day, five days a week where they are seemingly indoctrinated with an ideology that contradicts the values and beliefs of many of their parents.

It began as a trickle, but now is approaching a flood as activist groups notably LGBTQ organizations have infiltrated public schools and demanded their views on sexuality and gender be taught.

Here are a few of many examples. In Montgomery County, Maryland (where I received a good education without the culture war stuff), Cedar Grove Elementary School posted this message on its PTA Facebook page: [we] will be celebrating love, respect, and tolerance: by use of video with students holding Pride flags while pledging, Love, Respect, Freedom, Tolerance, Equality, and Pride. What happened to pledging to the American flag?

Also in Montgomery County, a once conservative suburb of Washington, D.C., The Washington Times reports a group of parents are waiting for a federal judge to rule on their lawsuit directed at overturning a school district policy that requires teachers to hide how gender-transitioning students identify at school by reverting to birth names and pronouns with unsupportive caregivers.

Erin Lee, the mother of a 12-year-old girl in Fort Collins, Colorado, complained when an after school arts club her daughter attended turned out to be a Genders and Sexualities Alliance Club. Lee said the club taught that heterosexuality and monogamy are not normal. She also claimed students were told not to tell their parents. Lee pulled her daughter out of the middle school and enrolled her in a private Christian school where she says she is doing much better.

Its not just gender and sexuality that is being taught in public schools. A group of Jewish parents has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the teaching of what they claim are anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist materials in Los Angeles public schools. The materials, they say, refer to Israel as a settler state founded on genocide.

In their book Get Out Now: Why You Should Pull Your Child from Public School Before Its Too Late, Mary Rice Hasson and Theresa Farnan detail at great length with hundreds of documenting footnotes the progress activist groups have made in manipulating the minds of young people whose ability to think critically has yet to be even marginally developed.

This one paragraph sums up the challenge: Public education has been incredibly successful in one area churning out youthful progressives growing numbers of men and women in the grips of existential confusion, perpetual victimhood, and political intolerance ... The system takes full advantage of their most formative years in early elementary school, and the indoctrination continues through high school. Thanks to Americas public schools, they show up to college already prepped and ready to play on the progressive team.

The authors have an appendix in which they answer most of the questions raised by parents including how to deal with the cost of private education and whether their kids can play sports if they dont attend a public school.

Refusing to protect ones children from this stuff is a form of moral, spiritual and intellectual abuse. As this school year comes to an end, the summer would be a good time for parents of public school children to consider what is truly best for their offspring. They can start by investigating what is taught in their local school and they can finish by getting them out.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Readers may email Cal Thomas at tcaeditors@tribpub.com. Look for Cal Thomas latest book Americas Expiration Date: The Fall of Empires and Superpowers and the Future of the United States (HarperCollins/Zondervan).

More:
CAL THOMAS: How children are taught to become progressives

Progressives looking to change the narrative – The Hill

Progressives are ready to change the storyline that their wing of the party is losing Democrats civil war.

Candidate defeats and a rash of negative headlines have caused soul searching on the left, prompting some to recalibrate what they need to do to maintain credibility going into a challenging midterm cycle.

Two top progressives in the House Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) believe Democrats still have a shot at keeping Congress. But to do that, they told The Hill, the party must deliver economically in the short term for their voters, while putting more candidates in office who can push their progressive message into the future.

Every time someone brings up a loss, Im like, let me give you two for that. Two wins, Jayapal said in a wide-ranging conversation Monday in her Capitol Hill office.

Its a narrative that benefits the people that are in power or have power in our political process. But the reality is the progressive movement is ascendent in this country, she said. We have completely changed the narrative of what it means to invest in working people.

To be sure, that view may be a rosy one. Painful primary losses have offset some of the excitement of early wins, and Republicans are widely expected to take control of the House with the midterm elections, driven in large part by the economic pain many are feeling.

But Jayapal and Khanna warn that pain, largely from the sky-high inflation that hits lower- and middle-class Americans the hardest, wont improve without more intervention from Congress and the White House the type of intervention progressives have long pushed for, and President Biden has promised.

During the last election, Biden wooed many reluctant voters by pitching an FDR-style vision he said would move people out of debilitating circumstances. In turn, enough people believed in that promise to send him to the Oval Office.

But much of that pledge has since faded, frayed or completely fallen apart, causing lawmakers and activists on the left to push more strongly than their moderate counterparts to lead with a populist vision. If they dont, some argue, they risk giving the GOP control in the fall and beyond.

I am convinced a bold, populist, aspirational economic message can inspire and win, said Khanna, another top House progressive searching for new ways to address the current problems. We need to rebuild our economy around high-wage jobs for all and future industries. That should be the core of our mantra.

The three-term congressman, who was elected in 2016 when former President Trump rose to prominence, has been expressing concerns for months, most recently in a New York Times op-ed that resisted the desire to ding the other side for the stagnation.

There is no patience for incrementalism or political spin about economic numbers in these times, he wrote. Democrats cant just blame the Republicans for lacking a plan.

Khannas preferred path out of the danger zone includes forming a special inflation task force and using a World War II-era measure called preemptive buying, which gives the government authority to buy necessary items such as food and oil globally when prices drop. The idea of populist economic reform expands on what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) focused on during the presidential election, when Khanna co-chaired his campaign, and was prevalent in former President Clintons administration.

He and Jayapal both enjoy a close working relationship with the current White House.

As chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Jayapal pointed to several accomplishments she believes Democrats can campaign on in the fall.

Bidens embrace of tax reform thrilled skeptical liberals who initially wondered if hed be too fiscally moderate to push for it. When he cut stimulus checks to address inequalities exacerbated by COVID-19, even more were happy that Americans daily struggles from the pandemic could be eased. And hes canceled tens of millions of dollars in student debt with the possibility of more to come, partially checking off one of liberals biggest wish list items though falling far short of what many would like to see.

The president has said to me, personally, the Progressive Caucus has had the presidents back on many, many things, Jayapal said.

What Jayapal considers one of the lefts biggest wins, however, didnt quite come to fruition. The House passed Bidens massive social spending and climate change Build Back Better package, but it didnt move in the Senate after two moderate Democrats refused to back it. Still, the congresswoman from Washington says the lower chambers passage shows progressives were able to move a popular agenda backed by Biden. On top of that, she said, the White House has already enacted many of their most important executive actions.

This bigger narrative shift has not been covered very much, she said. And I think its really important.

Would we like them to move even faster? Jayapal conceded, Definitely.

While she and others in the House are still willing to work closely with administration officials, others are sharpening their criticism of the president, whose approval rating is now below 40 percent. In the Senate, Sanders recently called for a broad change of direction on vision and policy, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) recently wrote its not too late to get some wins on the books, aiming to offer a more optimistic tone. Both were in the context of the midterms.

But while the focus in Congress has been searching for a way out of the muck no easy task with a narrow majority and history working against their favor progressives on the outside are facing their own series of challenges.

We need to be telling folks that we arent losing steam, said Connor Farrell, the founder of Left Rising, a group aimed at electing more liberal Democrats to office. We have won several high-profile primaries while being outspent by the establishment.

The most recent was a surprise victory in Oregons 5th Congressional District, where progressive Jamie McLeod-Skinner ousted conservative Democratic Rep. Kurt Schrader, who was backed by Biden.

We have expanded the squad and its allies despite a major regressive backlash from corporate establishment forces, he said.

Liberal strategists and allied groups are nonetheless upset over other primary losses, and progressives who were once bullish on their chances to oust top-tier incumbents are worried public defeats have halted their momentum.

They watched their biggest and most high-profile race, a rematch in Texass 28th Congressional District, slip away by just a few hundred votes, when voters chose Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) over activist Jessica Cisneros. Earlier, they saw another big rematch in Ohios 11th Congressional District go to Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) over activist and Sanders ally Nina Turner. And in New York, a young Muslim women named Rana Abdelhamid, who was gaining traction in pockets of Queens, saw her chances extinguished after a complex redistricting process effectively pushed out lesser-known candidates from the 12th Congressional District.

To make matters worse, voters in San Francisco, one of the most liberal cities in the country, voted to recall District Attorney Chesa Boudin, a staunch progressive who sought to curb police influence.

Still, some progressives see success more holistically. They suggest theres a longer-term strategy at play, where recruiting and successfully slotting new members into office takes time.

Its about expectation setting, said Farrell. In 2018, we got [Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez] elected; in 2020, [Reps.] Cori [Bush] and Jamaal [Bowman]. In 2022, well send at least two new [progressive members] to Congress, despite the major pushback. We are winning.

Continue reading here:
Progressives looking to change the narrative - The Hill

Progressives are busy heading into midterms fighting each other – The Arizona Republic

Opinion: Elections are less than five months away and Democrats have a lot of ground to make up. But progressives are locked in drag-out internal fights.

Jon Gabriel| opinion contributor

As the midterms approach and discussions about Roe v. Wade and gun control dominate the news, progressive nonprofits should be busier than ever. Nows the time to organize activists, knock on doors and create viral social media campaigns.

The good news for Democrats is that these nonprofits are very busy.

The bad news: Theyre busy fighting against themselves.

Ryan Grim, a progressive reporter for The Intercept, reported on these miniature civil wars in a 10,000-word piece titled Elephants in the Zoom. Instead of moving the electorate to the left, many staff members are preoccupied with purging executives and co-workers who they dont think are liberal enough.

The premier research organization for abortion rights, the Guttmacher Institute, has been sidelined for two years with mutual recriminations stemming from what was considered by some a half-hearted effort to promote Black Lives Matter.

If your reproductive justice organization isnt Black and brown its white supremacy in heels co-opting a WOC movement, blared one dissent in an Instagram story. The release of the Alito draft decision to overturn Roe v. Wade hasnt distracted Guttmacher employees from their internal purge.

Unpopular with her party:Sen. Sinema faces backlash from liberals

According to Grim, Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America, and other reproductive health organizations had similarly been locked in knock-down, drag-out fights between competing factions of their organizations.

Its not just pro-choice groups, but also the Sierra Club, ACLU, Movement for Black Livesand Human Rights Campaign, among others. Its a nonprofit pandemic.

One organization leader finally quit but still kept his quotes anonymous. My last nine months, I was spending 90 to 95 percent of my time on internal strife, he told Grim. Its been huge, particularly over the last year and a half or so, the ability for groups to focus on their mission, whether its reproductive justice, or jobs, or fighting climate change.

None of this is new, of course. The French Revolution was launched by disaffected aristocrats wanting to reform their stodgy monarchy. Soon, a group of the bourgeoisie decided those modest goals werent sufficient, so they formed the Jacobin Club to steer France further to the left.

Some of the Jacobins then decided the club wasnt progressive enough, brought in the lower classes, and formed the Montagnards to steer the movement even further afield. They empowered Maximilien Robespierre to launch the Reign of Terror … before a group of Montagnards decided he was still too wishy-washy and formed the Hbertists.

Conservatives have been caught in similar purity loops. The fights between the Tea Party and Republicans-in-Name-Only is one example, and MAGA vs. Never Trump battles continue today.

Like the mythical Ouroboros, the snake keeps munching away on its own tail, never glancing around to see its partys fortunes evaporate. The Trump years unified the left into a sort of resistance fever. Its a grand time sticking it to The Man until the moment when The Man is you.

In Grims piece, one senior progressive congressional staffer (anonymous, of course) couldnt hide his frustration. There are wins to be had between now and the next couple months that could change the country forever, and folks are focused on stuff that has no theory of change for even getting to the House floor for a vote.

Im not saying its a right-wing plot, another executive chimed in, because we are incredibly good at doing ourselves in, but if you tried you couldnt conceive of a better right-wing plot to paralyze progressive leaders.

The midterms are less than five months away and Democrats have a lot of ground to make up. But progressives are too busy rolling tumbrels through their cubicles and admiring their own tails.

If November goes as expected, the left wont need to worry about new legislation distracting them from their main job: eating themselves alive.

Jon Gabriel, a Mesaresident, is editor-in-chief of Ricochet.com and a contributor to The Republic and azcentral.com.Follow him on Twitter at@exjon.

Continued here:
Progressives are busy heading into midterms fighting each other - The Arizona Republic

Another ridiculous attack on SF progressives, this time by Nellie Bowles and The Atlantic – 48 hills – 48 Hills

I ran into an old friend that other day, at a store where we were buying a legal product that could have put us in prison not that long ago, and they asked if I was going to write about the Atlantic story that my friendand many others I knowwas said was making them somewhere between furious and sick.

I am furious and sick, too, and Im so, so tired of having to respond to these national media attacks on San Francisco that all follow the exact same, ridiculous narrative: The progressives have taken the city so far to the left that it is now a total failure, and a demonstration that progressive policies will do nothing but destroy cities.

Heres Nellie Bowles in The Atlantic:

San Franciscans tricked themselves into believing that progressive politics required blocking new construction and shunning the immigrants who came to town to code. We tricked ourselves into thinking psychosis and addiction on the sidewalk were just part of the citys diversity, even as the homelessness and the housing prices drove out the citys actual diversity. Now residents are coming to their senses. The recalls mean theres a limit to how far we will let the decay of this great city go. And thank God.

I dont know which San Franciscans Bowles, who has a background covering the technology industry, is talking about, but its not anyone I know.

Its not any of the tens of thousands of people who make up a progressive movement in the city.

And it starts with the fundamentally flawed premise that progressives the people with those crazy left-wing ideashave actually had control over city policy in the past decade.

As I have pointed out repeatedly, San Francisco has a strong-mayor system; the mayor controls the budget, appoints at least a majority of all the major commissions, and has the power to fill vacancies in any elective office.

The only real check on the mayors power is the district-elected Board of Supes, but it takes eight votes to override a veto, the supervisors by law cant interfere in department operations, and if the mayor decides not to spend money on the supes priorities, then the money doesnt get spent.

And yet, nobody is blaming Mayor London Breed, who appoints a majority of the Police Commission and hires the chief, for crime problems. (At least, not until now, that may be changing: When Breed appoints a new DA, and the problems continue, shes going to own the issue.)

From Bowles:

The other day I walked by Millennium Tower. Once a symbol of the push to transform our funky town into a big city, its a gleaming 58-story skyscraper in the heart of San Francisco, and its been sinking into the groundmore than a foot since it was finished in 2009. A group of men in hard hats was just standing there, staring up at it. The metaphor is obvious, but San Francisco has never been a subtle city.

Excuse me: The Leaning Tower of Soma was approved by a mayoral-dominated Planning Commission, and the construction scheme that failed was approved by the mayors Department of Building Inspection.

The corruption that has the FBI crawling all over City Hall involves the mayor, or people appointed by mayors.

And there hasnt been a remotely progressive mayor in San Francisco since the 1980s.

So those far-left progressives that Bowles complains about havent had the authority to put in place the policies she things are ruining the city.

More important, and this is most infuriates me: Bowles seems to want a city that is lovely and nice for rich people.

She waxes lovely and nostalgic about the beauty of her hometown:

The cliffs, the stairs, the cold clean air, the low-slung beauty of the Sunset, the cafs tucked along narrow streets, then Golden Gate Park drawing you down from the middle of the city all the way to the beach. Its so goddamn whimsical and inspiring and temperate; so full of redwoods and wild parrots and the smell of weed and sourdough, brightly painted homes and backyard chickens, lines for the oyster bar and gorgeous men in chaps at the leather festival.

But she doesnt mention the dominance of the real-estate and finance industries, which controlled the city for decades, or the tech industry, that does now.

And she doesnt talk about what its like for people who cant afford to go to the oyster bar.

The policies of the past 20 years, under mayors Gavin Newsom and Ed Lee, were driven by speculators, developers, and tech companies, and they helped cause the economic inequality that has made homelessness so endemic.

Progressives have never been against housing; weve been against offices that create a demand for new housing when developers ownt build affordable housing. We have been against development that creates only amenities for the rich and nothing for anyone else.

People who are not rich suffered tremendously under the policies of the pro-developer and pro-tech-industry mayors, and they continue to suffer today. People who are not rich have suffered tremendously under the criminal justice system that Chesa Boudin challenged. As far as I can tell, Bowles has no solution to homelessness and poverty, except to put more people in jail.

The reason the city has all of these problems has a lot more to do with the moderates who have run it than the progressives who have tried to fix it.

I emailed Bowles to ask about the story. I havent heard back.

I dont know how many times I am going to have to keep saying this; the national and local news media dont seem to be listening.

Go here to read the rest:
Another ridiculous attack on SF progressives, this time by Nellie Bowles and The Atlantic - 48 hills - 48 Hills