Media Search:



Letter: Don’t believe either of the Big Lies – Eagle-Tribune

To the editor:

Which is the bigger lie? Which is more deadly? That No. 45 won the 2020 presidential election or that you have a constitutional right to an assault rifle?

One destroys our democracy; the other snuffs out our lives. Reject both poisons. Demonstrate and vote!

To quote (in a combination of two quotes) Conservative Supreme Court Justice Warren Berger, the former Republican governor of California:

The Gun Lobbys interpretation of the Second Amendment is one of the greatest pieces of FRAUD I repeat the word fraud on the American People by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies the militia would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires.

Greg Davis

Salem, N.H.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Go here to read the rest:
Letter: Don't believe either of the Big Lies - Eagle-Tribune

What happened when Dick’s Sporting Goods took a stand on guns – Axios

When CEOs from more than 220 U.S. companies released a letter demanding the Senate "take immediate action" on gun violence, it was the first time weve seen a large coalition of executives make a unified plea.

Why it matters: It signals a shift in corporate Americas tolerance for gun violence. But individual companies, like Dick's Sporting Goods, have been at it for a while and Dick's experience can give us an idea of what's ahead for the other companies.

Flashback: After the Parkland shooting in 2018, CEO Ed Stack told stakeholders, I dont want to be part of the story anymore and methodically pulled assault-style weapons from the shelves for good.

Between the lines: It's obviously risky for a gun retailer to wade into the Second Amendment debate, and these corporate actions initially cost the retailer millions, but Dicks made up for it over time through apparel sales, according to a Harvard Business School case study.

State of play: Dicks has continued to lobby and donate to groups like Sandy Hook Promise and Everytown, but a spokesperson declined to elaborate on future actionable steps, beyond signing the letter.

The bottom line: The current CEO letter has 50% more signatures than it did in 2019. It will be harder for other large consumer brands to dodge the issue as more executives weigh in and more companies, like Dicks, take action.

View original post here:
What happened when Dick's Sporting Goods took a stand on guns - Axios

GUEST COLUMN: A rallying cry for fathers on Father’s Day – WCF Courier

AMY LOCKARD

The father of our country, George Washington, had a resume beyond impressive: commander of the Continental Army (1775-83,) president of the Constitutional Convention (1787) and first president of the United States (178997.) By every historical account he was one of the most influential leaders in the formation of our country and in shaping our ideals and precedents. He was also a man of tremendous courage, of common sense and decency.

Ironically, the father of our country was not himself a father, a biological one anyway. He was a stepfather and raised two of his stepgrandchildren, one whom was named after him. His 14-year-old stepdaughter, Patsy, died of a seizure in his arms. He and his wife never recovered from the loss. Parents in Newton, Connecticut, Parkland, Florida, and Uvalde, Texas some of the many communities enduring mass school shootings would understand his grief, although they deal with an additional burden. Their children were senselessly murdered.

As all people are influenced by their times, so too was Washington. He owned slaves. So far, theres been little discussion of bulldozing his bust off Mount Rushmore or renaming the capital of the United States. In the time and place Washington lived, slavery was accepted. Although our nations conscience was changing, it would take a Civil War, lead by the man with whom he shares Presidents Day, to outlaw slavery. A long and continuing struggle, yet that which was morally reprehensible was outlawed. We are capable of change.

People are also reading

It is time for the misaligned and much-touted defense of our Second Amendment rights to be reevaluated. While there are many legitimate reasons for gun ownership and the majority of gun owners are responsible citizens, these rights are now twisted into interpretations our forefathers could never have envisioned. It is unconscionable not to scrutinize them in the light of the 21st century, especially as firearms related deaths are now the leading cause of death among children and adolescents. (New England Journal of Medicine, May 19, 2022).

Sen. Charles Grassley, in an appeal for campaign contributions, writes: I know the Second Amendment to the Constitution is not a relic from the past its a God-given constitutional right to protect and safeguard our homes and property. How about a childs God-given right not to be assassinated in his kindergarten classroom?

Expressing the viewpoint of many legislators more intent on protecting these convoluted rights than their constituents, Grassley also writes, Our God-given rights are under attack in Washington every day. So, being allowed to buy an AR-15 without a waiting period is a God-given right? What about parents God-given right to protect their children? Or what about protecting our citizens human rights? This is not a liberal attack, as Grassley claims. What is under attack are human rights.

It is ludicrous to quote, or more likely, misquote our forefathers on their views of Second Amendment rights. The most advanced weapon of the late 18th century was the flint-lock musket. It required three steps and about a minute to load, lock, stock and barrel. An AR-15 can fire a 30-round clip in seconds.

Washington did not promote arming the population as a matter of course, but as a means of national defense. The United States was a struggling new country, its sustainability unproven, and the threat of war very real. Although that threat may be no less prevalent today, an AR-15 is not effective against a cyber-attack.

Before any more children die at the hands of gun-wielding assassins, lets insert common sense into this debate. It is time to stop citing the Second Amendment as the reason not to take action. It is only a smokescreen obscuring the horrific reality. The call to arms to heed is to arm ourselves with the facts, and to demand those who represent us at the local, state, and federal level also do so.

There is hope. A coalition of congressmen, Democrats and Republicans, are now proposing changes to gun laws. While these changes are not monumental, they are a move in the right direction. We cannot let this momentum die, as our countrys children have, on the floor of a public building.

Come senators, congressmen

The battle outsides ragin

For the times they are a-changin

COOLING DOWN

Children seek refuge from the heat at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo on Tuesday as the temperature soared into the upper 90s. A heat advisory was in effect throughout the afternoon.

061422jr-wild-art-splashpad-2

Paisley Ackerson, 11 months, enjoys the water at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo during a heat wave on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

061422jr-wild-art-splashpad-3

Jacob Towsley races through the spray at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo during a heat wave on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

061422jr-wild-art-splashpad-4

Jacob, left, and Jeremy Towsley at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo during a heat wave on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

061422jr-wild-art-splashpad-5

Kaysin Ackerson, age 2, gives his shark a sip at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo during a heat wave on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

061422jr-wild-art-splashpad-6

Children seek refuge from the heat at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

061422jr-wild-art-splashpad-7

Children seek refuge from the heat at Marks Park and Splash Pad in Waterloo on Tuesday, June 14, 2022.

Read the rest here:
GUEST COLUMN: A rallying cry for fathers on Father's Day - WCF Courier

Iran responds to UAE concerns over Tehran’s nuclear plans – Reuters

DUBAI, June 18 (Reuters) - Iran on Saturday told the United Arab Emirates that Tehran gave a high priority to improving ties with its neighbours, Iranian state media reported, a day after the UAE voiced concern over Tehran's nuclear programme.

The UAE's envoy at the United Nations' nuclear watchdog on Friday said he hoped Iran would work with the body to provide reassurances to the international community and the region about Tehran's nuclear programme. read more

In a phone call with his UAE counterpart, Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian "pointed to the priority of neighbours in Iran's foreign policy and called for more consultation ... to expand bilateral ties," state media said.

In 2019, U.S.-allied UAE started engaging with Iran after years of tense relations. read more

Indirect talks between Tehran and Washington to revive a 2015 nuclear deal have stalled since March and Tehran has restricted the International Atomic Energy Agency's ability to monitor the Iranian nuclear programme after a dispute with the U.N. watchdog. read more

Register

Reporting by Dubai newsroomEditing by Paul Simao

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Excerpt from:
Iran responds to UAE concerns over Tehran's nuclear plans - Reuters

Pundits In Tehran Say Iran May Be Headed For War –

A prominent Iranian analyst, often referred to as an expert on US affairs, says political threats against Tehran are changing and taking a military form.

Mehdi Motaharnia, told Didban Iran website on June 18 that threats coming particularly from the US Central Command (CENTCOM) in the region are no longer political in nature and can be characterized as military.

Speaking in the cryptic language of Iranian analysts, Motaharnia added that "these threats are coming through Israel's security tunnel." He added that Tel Aviv's moves are becoming increasingly elaborate and that they can change the situation in the region and push it toward a collision.

Motaharnia said indications show that a military confrontation is not only "possible" but "probable".

He argued that US President Joe Biden's upcoming visit to Saudi Arabia is meant to tackle the Arab-Israeli problem and bring about meaningful strategic changes, including bringing Saudi Arabia closer to Israel. All this, he said will have serious repercussions for Iran.

In fact, Israel this week called for a regional alliance against Iran under the aegis of the United States.

Iranian analyst, Mehdi Motaharnia

It could also lead to Iran's further isolation and create an anti-Iranian alliance. Motaharnia said that a Gulf Cooperation Council meeting will be also held during Biden's visit to the region, and this is likely to lead to a regional order against Tehran.

Meanwhile, the former editor of hardline daily Kayhan, Mehdi Nasiri also said on the same day that the Islamic Republic is moving toward a war.

Nasiri wrote in an article: "Evidence including the suspension of nuclear negotiations in Vienna and the escalation of tensions between Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) might indicate that the Islamic Republic is interested in war and such a war is likely to start."

Nasiri added: "If such a war starts, it could lead to major humanitarian and economic catastrophe for Iranians who still have not recovered from the scars of the 8-year war with Iraq in the 1980s."

Former editor of conservative Kayhan daily, Mehdi Nasiri

Nasiri warned Islamic Republic officials that this war is in contradiction with Iran's national interests and that they have no right to impose such a conflict on the people even if they believe it would be an anti-imperialist move. "They have no right to start a war based on ideological and religious justifications without first seeking the consent of the Iranian people."

In a blunt statement by someone living in Iran he said: "While clerics and others in the government are living an aristocratic life, they have no right to impose war and aggression on the people and bring about poverty and misery with the pretext of resistance."

Nasiri added that if leaders believe most Iranians support an aggressive and belligerent foreign policy, they should prove this by holding a referendum.

The warnings about the Islamic Republic's interest in a probable war come while according to a report published by reformist daily Sharq, there is no consensus among Iranian and US officials whether "an agreement is within reach," or all the chances for a deal have been lost.

The report said that the realities on the ground point to the fact that currently there is no chance for a deal, adding that during the past 10 days since the IAEA Board of Governors condemned Iran's lack of cooperation with the agency and Irans reaction to the IAEA resolution have been discouraging. The report stressed that chances for an agreement have been practically reduced to nil.

Sharq's report said, "The nuclear agreement (JCPOA) is dead, but the Raisi administration lacks the courage to bury it."

See the original post:
Pundits In Tehran Say Iran May Be Headed For War -