Media Search:



War Profiteering Benefits a Few But Hurts Most of Us – LA Progressive

Just imagine! The words are those of Robert Weissman, president of the organization Public Citizen, in response to the legislative efforts of Reps. Barbara Lee and Mark Pocan, who are the co-chairs of glory hallelujah! the Defense Spending Reduction Caucus. They recently introduced legislation that would cut Pentagon spending by $100 billion and divert the money to programs that actually helped the country . . . e.g., universal health care, ending child poverty, saving the environment.

Yeah, just imagine. One can also quickly, unavoidably imagine the cynicism that rushes in whenever someone tosses out the word peace. Then its all pushed to the margins, both political and social, as America continues its business as usual, which is all about protecting itself from enemies (most of whom it creates). The sales pitch is fear. The motive, hidden in the shadows, is extraordinary profit for some.

The problem begins with the words themselves, which turn two complex, infinitely different enterprises war and peace into two items on a knick-knack shelf . . .a plastic G.I. Joe, lets say, and a cute little angel. Thats the essence of the American debate about what matters and what it should do with its wealth. The debate is cynicism-fueled and simplistic, reducing peace, in particular, to a weaklings counterpart to war. When the focus is on war, you always know what to do next. Say the wrong guy (Joe Biden, for instance), gets elected president:

We will have to do a bloody, massively bloody revolution against them. Thats whats going to have to happen.

The speaker is the currently incarcerated Elmer Stewart Rhodes, founder of the Oath Keepers, who, of course, played a major role in the Jan. 6 insurrection. His words are both stunning and completely ho-hum normal. Declare an enemy, then kill it. What about that do you not understand?

The thing is, this attitude isnt just rightwing nutballicosity. This is red, white and blue, mission accomplished, ever-increasing-defense-budget America. Just imagine for once if we led the world in funding peace and not wars. Everybody knows this is virtually impossible to imagine beyond the realm of the fairytale. What would that even mean? Funding peace, creating peace this is deeply complex, and too many Americans, certainly too many of those in leadership positions, dont have time for complexity.

How, for instance, do we deal with all those inconvenient mass shootings, at schools, shopping malls, churches, etc.? Gun control isnt the answer because people need access to assault rifles and such in America we have the freedom to protect ourselves (just ask George Zimmerman).

The guys who do those mass shootings are lone wolves and usually mentally ill, so we need to amp up our mental health efforts, which, mind you, doesnt actually mean funding mental health programs (the Pentagon needs that money). Is there another option?

The aftermath of the attack also unleashed a call by several prominent Republicans to arm teachers, according to Common Dreams.

Scroll to Continue

And to that end, Ohios Republican governor, Mike DeWine, recently signed a bill permitting teachers to carry a gun to class after just 24 hours of firearms training. This is down from the 700 hours of training previously required of school personnel. What could possibly go wrong with that?

A madness has taken hold, tweeted the NAACPs Sherrilyn Ifill.

That seems to be the case or so it seems beyond the world of guns and violence and easy solutions. In his book The Powers That Be, Walter Wink talks about the myth of redemptive violence: the belief that violence saves us. Indeed, It doesnt seem to be mythic in the least, he wrote:

Violence simply appears to be in the nature of things. Its what works. It seems inevitable, the last and, often, the first resort in conflicts. If a god is what you turn to when all else fails, violence certainly functions as a god.

This is a helluva god to worship and obey. Here are some stats: In 2020, the most recent year that data is available, 45,222 people in the United States were killed by guns. Nearly 53 people are killed by guns every day.

And across the various oceans, at least a million people have died in recent American wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen and other countries. And, oh yeah, more than 30,000 American veterans have committed suicide in the wake of those wars, according to the Costs of War Project, seeming to indicate that the god of redemptive violence isnt the only one we worship. For many people, another God appears in the wake of war and violence, especially when someone is all alone with himself/herself. Suddenly lives lost lives may start to matter.

Wasteful defense spending does not make our communities safer it only weakens our ability to respond to crises, said Congresswoman Lee.

Shes referring, of course, to complex responses: providing food and health care for the hungry, the ill; addressing the deep causes of crime and social instability; listening to people and healing wounds rather than being content with punishment and armed self-defense; allowing our empathy to transcend national borders; rethinking our relationship with Planet Earth and placing our priorities on sustaining rather than exploiting it.

Just imagine for once if we led the world in funding peace and not wars.

Crossposted fromPeaceVoice

Go here to see the original:
War Profiteering Benefits a Few But Hurts Most of Us - LA Progressive

Citizens for Judicial Fairness, Reverend Al Sharpton, and Local Activists Denounce Planned Confirmation of Another White Male Justice to All-White…

DOVER, Del..--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today, grassroots advocacy group Citizens for Judicial Fairness joined forces with famed civil rights leader Reverend Al Sharpton and local activists Pastor Blaine Hackett and Kendra Ray, sister of Jeremy McDole, to denounce the scheduled confirmation of Nathan Cook to the Delaware Court of Chancery.

The confirmation hearing is scheduled for 1:30 PM and Cook is expected to be confirmed easily, despite the fact that his appointment to the Chancery means it will remain all-white. Ray, Hackett, and a representative from Sharptons National Action Network will make public comments at the hearing demanding the Senate not confirm Cook given the lack of diversity and equity on the Court.

Said Reverend Al Sharpton, I am deeply disappointed that today, equity will once again be denied on the Court of Chancery. It is shameful for the Chancery Court to remain all-white in 2022 when Delaware is 40% people of color and the decisions the court makes affect millions of Black and brown employees across the country. It is imperative that Delawares leaders, starting with Governor Carney, recognize this egregious wrong and begin taking meaningful steps to restore trust in its justice system through diverse court appointments.

Said police reform and racial justice activist Keandra Ray, Im testifying before the Senate Executive Committee today because the lack of diversity in our courts is disgusting. Governor Carney and his cronies in the Senate should be ashamed of this appointment. Im not going to stop fighting until our courts actually look like us and deliver the justice we deserve.

230 years of an all-white Chancery Court and only a single Black justice in the courts entire history is a stain on the state of Delaware and an indictment of Governor Carneys failed leadership, said Citizens for Judicial Fairness Campaign Manager Chris Coffey. Delawareans deserve leaders who talk the talk, not just walk the walk, on judicial equity and fairness. Were going to keep up our efforts to fight the Delaware Old Boys Club that excludes and ignores the states most vulnerable communities until we see real progress and accountability.

Read this article:
Citizens for Judicial Fairness, Reverend Al Sharpton, and Local Activists Denounce Planned Confirmation of Another White Male Justice to All-White...

How many Trump insiders pleaded the Fifth in the Jan. 6 probe? – MSNBC

It was nearly six years ago when Donald Trump made a comment at a Florida rally he probably wishes he could take back.

The mob takes the Fifth Amendment, the then-candidate said at the time, deriding those who assert their right against self-incrimination. If youre innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?

It was a rhetorical question that came to mind during yesterdays Jan. 6 committee hearing, as Vice Chair Liz Cheney thanked the witnesses for participating in the proceedings. From the transcript:

[I]ts been an honor to spend time with you and with our previous witnesses here today. To date, more than 30 witnesses called before this committee have not done what youve done, but have invoked their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

That number stood out, in part because its such a large total, and in part because its much higher than we previously knew.

Circling back to our earlier coverage, there are several high-profile figures from Team Trump whom we already knew pleaded the Fifth:

If Cheneys comments were accurate, however, were not talking about five people from Team Trump who were concerned about giving self-incriminating answers; were talking about 30 such people.

To be sure, Americans have these rights under the Constitution. If members of the former presidents team have reason to be concerned about possible prosecution, its not too surprising that their legal counsel would encourage them to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights.

Whats more, its also worth noting that Cheney wasnt specific about who these people were, and its at least possible that some of the group didnt work for the Trump administration or the former presidents political operation.

Nevertheless, it now appears that the total number of people taking the Fifth is much higher than previously known.

As for the context, the top Republican quickly added that she has a specific witness in mind whom shes eager to speak with.

The American people have not yet heard from Mr. Trumps former White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, Cheney said. Our committee is certain that Donald Trump does not want Mr. Cipollone to testify here. Indeed, our evidence shows that Mr. Cipollone and his office tried to do what was right. They tried to stop a number of President Trumps plans for Jan. 6. Today and in our coming hearings you will hear testimony from other Trump White House staff explaining what Mr. Cipollone said and did including on January 6th. But we think the American people deserve to hear from Mr. Cipollone personally.

A person close to Cipollone told NBC News late yesterday, Pat has been cooperative with the committee with President Trumps permission, but there are serious institutional concerns and privilege issues and those have been recognized by the committee.

Watch this space.

The House Jan. 6 committee is holding its fifth public hearing on Thursday, June 23 at 3 p.m. ET. Get expert analysis in real-time on our liveblog atmsnbc.com/jan6hearings.

Steve Benen is a producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show," the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of "The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics."

See original here:
How many Trump insiders pleaded the Fifth in the Jan. 6 probe? - MSNBC

Andy McCarthy: Cheney Pointing Out A Witness Taking The Fifth Amendment Is A Basic Constitutional Violation – RealClearPolitics

FOX News contributor Andy McCarthy reacts to Thursday's January 6th Committee hearing: "The last thing that Representative Cheney did was point out is that Jeff Clark took the Fifth when he was asked the same questions that they were asking the witnesses. If a prosecutor brought that out in a trial, that would be a mistrial. That's like a basic constitutional due process violation. For the life of me, I continue not to understand not only why this committee would not present a different perspective when they have witnesses that could clearly deal with cross examination if there were cross examination. And then why do this very powerful presentation, which I think this last hour certainly was, and then at the end point out that people are taking the Fifth Amendment which they have a constitutional entitlement to do and the courts have said if you let that infect a fact-finding proceeding, it's a constitutional violation. I don't understand it."

Originally posted here:
Andy McCarthy: Cheney Pointing Out A Witness Taking The Fifth Amendment Is A Basic Constitutional Violation - RealClearPolitics

Snyder to appear before Flint water crisis jury on June 30. Heres what to expect – MLive.com

FLINT, MI -- One way or another, Rick Snyder will answer questions under oath about his role in the Flint water crisis in a federal courtroom on June 30.

And if, as expected, the former governor invokes his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself, attorneys involved in the civil bellwether trial will turn to the next-best thing -- hours of previously unheard videotaped deposition testimony given by Snyder two years ago.

Attorneys for Veolia North America said Wednesday, June 22, that they intend to call Snyder to the witness stand on June 30 and an attorney for Snyder told MLive-The Flint Journal that his client will be present but has been advised not to answer questions.

Snyder is among nine indicted current and former city and state employees facing criminal charges tied to the water crisis. Five of those nine have also been called as witnesses in the civil trial that started 19 weeks ago in U.S. District Court in Ann Arbor.

Snyder and the four other potential witnesses were ordered to appear in court and to answer questions they were asked during their depositions by Judge Judith E. Levy, but each has appealed her decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments on the issue of whether the five men waived their Fifth Amendment rights when they sat for depositions but not until late July when the civil trial is expected to have concluded.

Attorneys for Snyder, former Flint emergency managers Gerald Ambrose and Darnell Earley, former Snyder aide Richard Baird, and former Flint Department of Public Works Director Howard Croft have said their clients will invoke the 5th Amendment when called to testify unless required to by the Court of Appeals.

Each of the five testified in depositions before they were charged with crimes in January 2021.

The civil case Levy is presiding over involves four Flint children who have sued Veolia and Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam for professional negligence.

The companies each advised the city during the water crisis, and attorneys for the children claim they are partially responsible for injuries their clients suffered after drinking Flint water, which had elevated levels of lead.

Veolia and LAN dispute the childrens injuries and have said government officials like Snyder are solely responsible for any damages they suffered.

Snyders testimony -- in person or through the use of his deposition -- should provide new information about the former governors knowledge of the extent of problems with Flints water system while he led state government in 2014 and 2015.

Hes said previously that the water crisis was a failure of government at all levels but has only publicly answered detailed questions about the situation in an appearance before the U.S. House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform six years ago.

In that testimony, Snyder said he was repeatedly assured by state environmental officials that Flints water was safe to drink even as residents insisted something was wrong with its color, taste and smell after the citys water source was switched from Lake Huron to the Flint River for 17 months in 2014 and 2015.

An expert at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency tried to raise an alarm about the potential for lead contamination in the water system but was silenced, and Snyder has said he only learned that our state experts were wrong (and) Flints water had dangerous levels of lead in October 2015.

Attorneys for the companies are particularly interested in putting Snyder and the other criminal defendants in front of the jury because their answers, including their refusal to testify, can be considered as jurors determine what degree of responsibility -- if any -- the consultants have for damages related to the water crisis.

Levey said earlier this month that she plans to handle that questioning of Snyder as she did when Ambrose and Croft appeared in court -- outside the presence of the jury -- invoking their 5th Amendment rights, and triggering the playing of their videotaped depositions for the jury.

On Wednesday, a part of Earleys deposition was also played for the jury, and the judge has said Ambrose, Croft, Earley, Baird and Snyder will each be required to appear in person with the jury present to tell them they wont answer questions that could later be used against them in their criminal cases.

Ambrose is expected to be the first of the five to appear before Levy with the jury present on Tuesday, June 28.

Snyder was charged in January 2021 with two misdemeanor counts of willful neglect of duty. His case is pending in Genesee District Court.

Earlier this month, a Veolia spokesman said the company was committed to bringing to the stand indicted officials such as Governor Snyder, former (Flint) Emergency Manager Darnell Earley, and other government officials so that Flint families and the public can finally hear the truth.

Read more at The Flint Journal:

Snyder can refuse to answer Flint water questions but only in front of jury

Former Flint water consultant vows to deliver Snyders testimony

Court of Appeals will hear Snyders arguments not to testify in Flint water case

Excerpt from:
Snyder to appear before Flint water crisis jury on June 30. Heres what to expect - MLive.com