Media Search:



Scottish National Party makes renewed right-wing independence pitch – WSWS

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has published a draft bill for a second referendum on Scottish independence. It specifies October 19, 2023 as the date for the poll, defines the question to be put, Should Scotland be an independent country?, and outlines who can vote.

Since the power to legally call a referendum lies with the Conservative government in Westminster, which has ruled out doing so, Sturgeon has requested a ruling from the Supreme Court on whether the Scottish government can act unilaterally.

Loading Tweet ...

She told the Scottish parliament in Holyrood Tuesday that a defeat would prove, No matter how Scotland votes, regardless of what future we desire for our country, the UK Government can block and overrule. The UK Government will always have the final say. This would mean, Sturgeon continued, if the law says that is not possible, the General Election [due 2024] will be a de facto referendum.

Sturgeon and the Scottish National Party (SNP) are orchestrating a reactionary stunt on behalf of a section of the bourgeoisie in Scotland.

Particularly under the brutal and boorish rule of Boris Johnson, there has undoubtedly been a growth in support for independence from the government in Westminster. The last Scottish independence referendum in 2014 delivered a 55 to 45 percent No vote. According to the latest Ipsos Mori poll, 51 percent are in favour.

But such polls only underscore the deeply divisive nature of an effort to make Scottish nationalism the dominant issue on both sides of the border.

With the working class throughout the UK coming into struggle against the Johnson government, and amid the NATO war against Russia in Ukraine, the pro-austerity, pro-war SNP advances a nationalist policy of divide and rule.

There is no progressive content to the call for Scottish independence. No one has ever seriously tried to explain how workers in Scotland are specifically oppressed over and above workers in England by British imperialism. The furthest the argument goes is that Scotland is forced to accept governments and policies it does not choose. But not voting for Johnson or his predecessors is something the bulk of the working class in Scotland share with their counterparts in England and Wales.

Moreover, the main issue of concern for the SNP is Scotland remaining within the European Union, not as a democratic issue but from the standpoint of the economic interests of the Scottish bourgeoisie and a privileged layer of the upper middle class. Speaking to Sky News this week, Sturgeon referred to Scotland voting 65 to 35 percent against Brexit and said, Back then [2014], Scotland was told we would lose European Union membership if we voted for independence and now we are out of the European Union because we didnt become independentthats happened against our will.

The surprise victory of the Brexit campaign of the most right-wing elements of the Tory Party in the 2016 referendumanimated by fantasies of a global renewal of British imperialism through Thatcherite deregulation, a deepened alliance with US imperialism and the freedom to strike global trade relationhas undoubtedly acted as a spur to social reaction, trade and military war. But this was only one expression of the deepening of inter-imperialist and national antagonisms that have reached such malignant and deadly dimensions today.

The SNPs anti-Brexit stance in 2014 was in fact shared by most of the British bourgeoisie, whose agenda was to pursue trade war from within the EU, not outside of it, and to spearhead a drive to war as Washingtons point man in Europe acting to police the independent global ambitions of Germany and France.

As has been proved by the savage austerity measures and attacks on democratic rights throughout the continent, and the lineup of all the EU powers behind the US-NATO war with Russia, both alternatives in the referendum on EU membership were then and are now hostile to the fundamental interests of the working class.

A Scotland freed from Westminster would be independent in name only. Home to just five and a half millionpeople, it would be even more ruthlessly subordinated to international finance capital than it already is, with the SNP charged with enacting tax and spending cuts and scrapping regulations to make the region attractive for investment.

The SNP wants to regain membership of the EU while preserving access to the UK market. But the threatened collapse of the Northern Ireland Protocol amid an explosion of sectarian tensions is a warning of the political realities that national divisions create.

Economically, such a policy would facilitate a ferocious race to the bottom between Scotland and the UK, with attacks on workers of the kind already set out in the SNPs spending review to 2027. According to the Institute of Fiscal Studies, the axe is set to fall on a wide range of public service areas. These include a savage 8 percent in real terms cut over the next four years for local government, universities, prisons and rural affairs. According to the Unison trade union, this will equate to around 40,000 job losses, with the public workforce reduced to pre-pandemic levels. Cuts on this scale made in England and Wales would be equivalent to 480,000 jobsa perspective Johnson would happily embrace.

Public bodies are to find annual efficiencies of 3 percent. Even prior to the spending review, National Health Service workers were offered a well below-inflation 5 percent pay rise and local government workers a grindingly low 2 percent.

An independent Scotland would also remain a loyal member of the imperialist war camp. Sturgeon commented in May in reference to the war in Ukraine, Im even more firm in my view today that coupled with a strong relationship with the United Kingdom, membership of the European Union and NATO will be cornerstones of an independent Scotlands security policy.

Sturgeon is in addition offering her threadbare status as a politician seeking national self-determination to portray NATOs imperialist war aims in Ukraine in a similar light, declaring with reference to the war, At its heart the Scottish independence movement is an internationalist project.

The SNPs vestigial opposition to Trident nuclear submarines being based at the Faslane naval base near Glasgow would, like previous opposition to NATO, be swiftly jettisoned. Stewart McDonald, the SNPs defence spokesperson, told the BBC regarding NATO, We would join on similar terms of Norway or Denmark in that we dont want to permanently host nuclear weapons from other states but we certainly would take our commitments as members of the alliance seriously.

The operative word in McDonalds statement is permanently. Phillips OBrien, professor of strategic studies at the University of Andrews told the Daily Express, If it defined anti-nuclear as at no time will nuclear weapons be allowed on a naval ship in Scottish waters then that indeed would probably make Scotland not eligible for NATO, but I dont think theyre defining it that rigidly.

Former SNP defence spokesperson and Lieutenant-Colonel in the British Army, now a Liberal Democrat, Stuart Crawford suggested in the same paper that the nuclear naval base, might be the biggest bargaining chip Scotland might have in any possible future independence negotiations.

Workers in an independent Scotland would confront the same political challenges as they do today but would do so while cut off from their class allies in the rest of the UK.

A politically criminal role is being played by the pseudo-left in providing a left cover for the SNP and its scheming for a Scottish capitalist state.

Writing for the Scottish Socialist Party in the pro-independence National, Ritchie Venton claimed, the subservient relationship with Westminster, and financial straitjacket under devolution, means that like the Tories the SNP/Green government is operating the same pay restraint. Freed from such subservience, he insinuated, the SNP could honour a peoples mandate to defy and defeat Tory cuts to pay, jobs and services.

The Socialist Party Scotland, affiliated to the Committee for a Workers International, claims in its statement responding to Sturgeons announcement, We stand for a united struggle of the working class in Scotland, England and Wales against the Johnson government and for a socialist alternative, before adding, Thats why Socialist Party Scotland fights for an independent socialist Scotland.

Slapping the slogan an independent socialist Scotland on the SNPs push for a referendum makes independence no more progressive than calling for a left exit did for Brexitits sister Socialist Partys policy in 2016.

Equally so adding the call for a voluntary socialist confederation with England, Wales and Ireland as part of the struggle for socialism internationally. No explanation is ever offered as to why encouraging national divisions here and now facilitates a future struggle for socialism either in the UK or internationally. The SSP, SPS et al have long ago written off any prospect of unified working-class struggle, let alone a programme of social revolutionroutinely branding workers in England as politically backward and championing the creation of a Scottish state as a supposedly more accountable vehicle for passing various limited social reforms.

The fight for socialism requires a joint struggle by the British, European and international working class.

As the Socialist Equality Party wrote ahead of the 2014 referendum, The unity and independence of the working class is the criterion against which every political party and every political initiative must be judged. This is essential under conditions in which the planet is being befouled with nationalist poison.

Separatism, the SEP explained, only weakens and divides the working class in its struggle against capitalism. Moreover, if national identity outweighs class unity in Britain, then it outweighs it everywhere. It means that the fake left are the advocates of the creation of innumerable mini-states based on ethnicity, language or religion, the Balkanisation of the world.

In their struggle against the austerity and war policies of British imperialism, workers across the UK must fight for the overthrow of the Johnson and Sturgeon governments and the building of a socialist Britain within a United Socialist States of Europe and the world.

Sign up for the WSWS email newsletter

The rest is here:
Scottish National Party makes renewed right-wing independence pitch - WSWS

toms river motorcycle officer involved in crash – Ocean County Prosecutor Office

Ocean County Prosecutor Bradley D. Billhimer announced that on June 30, 2022, at approximately 1:30 p.m., the Lakewood Township Police responded to the area of New Hampshire Avenue and Route 70 for a report of a Toms River Police Department Motorcycle that was involved in a crash.

An investigation by the Ocean County Prosecutors Office, Lakewood Township Police Department and Ocean County Sheriffs Office Crime Scene Investigation Unit determined that a Toms River Police Officer, who was on duty and operating his department issued motorcycle, was traveling eastbound on Route 70 and entered the on-ramp to continue onto New Hampshire Avenue. Shortly after entering the on-ramp, the Officer lost traction with the road surface and dropped to the roadway. In the process, the Officer was ejected from the motorcycle. The Officer was air-lifted to Jersey Shore University Medical Center in Neptune. The Officer was treated for his injuries and released.

This appears to be an accident caused by a substance on the roadway that caused the Officer to lose traction and subsequently control of the motorcycle. We are thankful that the Officer involved was treated and released and should make a full recovery, Prosecutor Billhimer stated.

The crash remains under investigation by the Ocean County Prosecutors Office, Lakewood Township Police Department and Ocean County Sheriffs Office Crime Scene Investigation Unit

View post:
toms river motorcycle officer involved in crash - Ocean County Prosecutor Office

The Boston Tea Party you never read about – Lewiston Morning Tribune

Country

United States of AmericaUS Virgin IslandsUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsCanadaMexico, United Mexican StatesBahamas, Commonwealth of theCuba, Republic ofDominican RepublicHaiti, Republic ofJamaicaAfghanistanAlbania, People's Socialist Republic ofAlgeria, People's Democratic Republic ofAmerican SamoaAndorra, Principality ofAngola, Republic ofAnguillaAntarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S)Antigua and BarbudaArgentina, Argentine RepublicArmeniaArubaAustralia, Commonwealth ofAustria, Republic ofAzerbaijan, Republic ofBahrain, Kingdom ofBangladesh, People's Republic ofBarbadosBelarusBelgium, Kingdom ofBelizeBenin, People's Republic ofBermudaBhutan, Kingdom ofBolivia, Republic ofBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswana, Republic ofBouvet Island (Bouvetoya)Brazil, Federative Republic ofBritish Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago)British Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgaria, People's Republic ofBurkina FasoBurundi, Republic ofCambodia, Kingdom ofCameroon, United Republic ofCape Verde, Republic ofCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChad, Republic ofChile, Republic ofChina, People's Republic ofChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombia, Republic ofComoros, Union of theCongo, Democratic Republic ofCongo, People's Republic ofCook IslandsCosta Rica, Republic ofCote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of theCyprus, Republic ofCzech RepublicDenmark, Kingdom ofDjibouti, Republic ofDominica, Commonwealth ofEcuador, Republic ofEgypt, Arab Republic ofEl Salvador, Republic ofEquatorial Guinea, Republic ofEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFaeroe IslandsFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Fiji, Republic of the Fiji IslandsFinland, Republic ofFrance, French RepublicFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabon, Gabonese RepublicGambia, Republic of theGeorgiaGermanyGhana, Republic ofGibraltarGreece, Hellenic RepublicGreenlandGrenadaGuadaloupeGuamGuatemala, Republic ofGuinea, RevolutionaryPeople's Rep'c ofGuinea-Bissau, Republic ofGuyana, Republic ofHeard and McDonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)Honduras, Republic ofHong Kong, Special Administrative Region of ChinaHrvatska (Croatia)Hungary, Hungarian People's RepublicIceland, Republic ofIndia, Republic ofIndonesia, Republic ofIran, Islamic Republic ofIraq, Republic ofIrelandIsrael, State ofItaly, Italian RepublicJapanJordan, Hashemite Kingdom ofKazakhstan, Republic ofKenya, Republic ofKiribati, Republic ofKorea, Democratic People's Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwait, State ofKyrgyz RepublicLao People's Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanon, Lebanese RepublicLesotho, Kingdom ofLiberia, Republic ofLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtenstein, Principality ofLithuaniaLuxembourg, Grand Duchy ofMacao, Special Administrative Region of ChinaMacedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascar, Republic ofMalawi, Republic ofMalaysiaMaldives, Republic ofMali, Republic ofMalta, Republic ofMarshall IslandsMartiniqueMauritania, Islamic Republic ofMauritiusMayotteMicronesia, Federated States ofMoldova, Republic ofMonaco, Principality ofMongolia, Mongolian People's RepublicMontserratMorocco, Kingdom ofMozambique, People's Republic ofMyanmarNamibiaNauru, Republic ofNepal, Kingdom ofNetherlands AntillesNetherlands, Kingdom of theNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaragua, Republic ofNiger, Republic of theNigeria, Federal Republic ofNiue, Republic ofNorfolk IslandNorthern Mariana IslandsNorway, Kingdom ofOman, Sultanate ofPakistan, Islamic Republic ofPalauPalestinian Territory, OccupiedPanama, Republic ofPapua New GuineaParaguay, Republic ofPeru, Republic ofPhilippines, Republic of thePitcairn IslandPoland, Polish People's RepublicPortugal, Portuguese RepublicPuerto RicoQatar, State ofReunionRomania, Socialist Republic ofRussian FederationRwanda, Rwandese RepublicSamoa, Independent State ofSan Marino, Republic ofSao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic ofSaudi Arabia, Kingdom ofSenegal, Republic ofSerbia and MontenegroSeychelles, Republic ofSierra Leone, Republic ofSingapore, Republic ofSlovakia (Slovak Republic)SloveniaSolomon IslandsSomalia, Somali RepublicSouth Africa, Republic ofSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSpain, Spanish StateSri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic ofSt. HelenaSt. Kitts and NevisSt. LuciaSt. Pierre and MiquelonSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudan, Democratic Republic of theSuriname, Republic ofSvalbard & Jan Mayen IslandsSwaziland, Kingdom ofSweden, Kingdom ofSwitzerland, Swiss ConfederationSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwan, Province of ChinaTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailand, Kingdom ofTimor-Leste, Democratic Republic ofTogo, Togolese RepublicTokelau (Tokelau Islands)Tonga, Kingdom ofTrinidad and Tobago, Republic ofTunisia, Republic ofTurkey, Republic ofTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUganda, Republic ofUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited Kingdom of Great Britain & N. IrelandUruguay, Eastern Republic ofUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofViet Nam, Socialist Republic ofWallis and Futuna IslandsWestern SaharaYemenZambia, Republic ofZimbabwe

Read more from the original source:
The Boston Tea Party you never read about - Lewiston Morning Tribune

‘We need a Tea Party-style uprising’: Fuel protests divide opinion among Telegraph readers – The Telegraph

Readers in support of the fuel protests

@Peter Hicks:

I sympathise with the protesters. There does need to be a mass Tea Party-style uprising over the excessive tax this Government levies on the people. We are being oppressed and robbed, its that simple.

"Fuel duty is outrageously excessive and one of many totally unnecessary taxes. Britain will need a low-tax, hard-border revolution to save itself from its spiral of ruin and decay. Not to mention getting rid of 50 per cent or more of the civil service. The biggest cost to economic activity is the Government.

@Richard Lee:

I fully support this. Fuel prices are down to a greedy Government. 20 years ago the protests were about fuel hitting 1 a litre when a barrel of oil was $147. Now, fuel is 2 a litre and a barrel of oil is around $109, all due to tax.

The Government is in control of the price and is wilfully ruining people's lives, and for what? A badly thought-through useless green agenda. This is about the impoverishment and control of the masses.

@Stephen Rees:

My attitude to these protesters is entirely different to that of Insulate Britain protesters. They are protesting against ridiculous fuel prices that are wrecking their livelihoods, in many cases, and causing genuine hardship.

"More to the point, the Government can easily combat this by reducing fuel tax, removing green levies and scrapping VAT on fuel. Some of these may be reinstated when oil prices eventually settle down - but relief of the pain now will help the economy, reduce inflation and win brownie points from the electorate rather than further alienating them.

@Neil Owen:

Whilst I do not condone the action, it is beyond belief that any politician should be surprised by actions such as these by 'ordinary people'. We have had high crude prices before, but the price of everyday fuel has never rocketed like this. A lack of real action by the Government just comes across as them being duplicitous in these events. People will remember this come the election.

@Ricardo Montalban:

Good. The Government could help by reducing the point-of-sale tax taken to that before Russia invaded Ukraine, but it has not done that. Likewise for tax on energy companies, but tax needs to go out to businesses and individuals, not to the Treasury.

Care workers, for example - how are they supposed to make ends meet driving to clients? It is the Government's job to ease disruptions due to economic shocks, not to add to the woe.

@Simon Cox:

They protest at high fuel prices, but cause thousands of motorists to use more fuel in traffic jams across the UK, when the political elite do not suffer at all, so it has no impact on those few individuals who could change things. Other than the newspaper headlines, it's a waste of time, and other people's fuel.

@Dondon JJ:

I'm a little surprised to see so much support for this action, which seems to excuse it purely on the grounds of these people being members of the motorists tribe rather than anything else, and paints a rather sorry picture of modern political allegiances.

@John Vaccaro:

I agree wholeheartedly with the protesters sentiments. However, blocking the motorway network may be counterproductive to the cause of lowering prices. I'd prefer they take the protest directly to Johnson and those in power, whose policies account for around half of the cost of a litre of fuel.

@Gillian Burton:

As much as Ive grown to despise this Government, that I voted for, and all its hot air non-policies, I highly disagree with deliberately bringing the countrys main artery road routes to a standstill as a way to protest. This makes the grinning gentleman in the van and his accomplices no better than Extinction Rebellion.

@Peter Miles:

What do these people actually want? They blame the Government, but it's not the Government which sets the price of fuel. That price is set by the retailers who, in turn, have to reflect wholesale prices which are rising due to Putin starting a war among other reasons.

I suppose some would say that the Chancellor should reduce or remove the duty on fuel, but then what? Protests at the rise in income tax needed to make that loss up, or maybe reduce expenditure on the NHS or benefits?

In reality, the protesters are just a tiny minority moaning they want something done without suggesting what, while making life difficult for everyone else.

Link:
'We need a Tea Party-style uprising': Fuel protests divide opinion among Telegraph readers - The Telegraph

Bay: On point: Flash mobs, tea parties and Tocqueville – Times-News

In February 2009, a young man posting on a website dubbed The Urban Prankster Network (Headquarters for Global Agents of Stealth Comedy!) suggested a novel way to cool off the city of Austin, Texas, when the inevitable hell of a Texas summer bakes streets and fries brains: a citywide water gun and water balloon war waged by a flash mob.

It could happen. American flash mobs often involve goofy stunts the digital social network and cellphone with text-message age equivalent of 1950s-era collegians cramming sophomores into a phone booth (when phone booths still existed).

A flash mob organizer might send four accomplices a message like this: Paint yourself blue and show up at Sixth and Congress in two hours. In concept, the ability to communicate quickly and virally (think exponents each friend contacts four more friends, and those friends four more) quickly multiplies the number of blue-painted crazies unexpectedly crowding a downtown sidewalk.

A couple of years ago, I overheard two mothers discussing a high school party that included a flash mob-like activity. A text message provided the insta-mob location. Alas, one of the moms had to drive her son to and from the mob scene. Thats an old lesson reinforced: Even improvised anarchy may require parental logistical support.

People are also reading

San Francisco, however, is fed up with flash mobs that leave litter. The San Francisco Chronicle assured its readers that the citys looming crackdown was not political, ideological or cultural, but a Valentines Day flash mob pillow fight left heaps of icky, sticky feathers for sanitation workers in other words, clean-up costs. The pillow brawl was billed as the fourth annual, which indicates less flash and more coordination. Unless event organizers take responsibility for the trash, the city may shut the next one down. Heres the bumper sticker: Leave Trash? No Flash.

One hundred seventy-four years after the publication of his Democracy in America, French aristocrat and author Alexis de Tocqueville remains the most insightful analyst of American political mores. Tocqueville didnt anticipate flash mob technology, but he understood them in Americas context. He noted in volume two of his masterpiece that Americans formed public associations for many reasons, including entertainment. Freedom of association flows from the First Amendments guarantee of freedom of peaceable assembly.

Tocqueville also noted that this freedom is dangerous. In Europe, crowds signaled revolt. American democracy had produced a paradox, one that had a subtle but profound national security dimension. Tocqueville concluded the liberty of association had become a necessary guarantee against the tyranny of the majority. Civil associations presumably even pillow fights facilitated political association, and free political association kept American democracy vibrant. Association was the dangerous means for thwarting the majoritys omnipotence.

Tocquevilles observations and San Franciscos impending trash-bred quash of flash mobs led me to the internet. I typed in flash mob and tea party. The Google search produced an article on anti-stimulus protests occurring throughout the United States. Scores of demonstrations against congressional pork spending, congressional earmark spending, lack of oversight in bailout spending and congressional corruption have sprung up around the United States.

In some cases, several hundred people have gathered organized using flash mob communications techniques. The tea party protesters connect their contemporary gripes with the same anti-tax and anti-autocrat sentiment that spawned the Boston Tea Party of 1773. The internet and cellphones are simply swifter couriers for delivering messages from bloggers and protest organizers, the rough contemporary equivalents of the committees of correspondence that linked American revolutionaries in the 18th century.

Yes, hyper-left San Francisco insists it has no ideological issues with flash mobs ... but tyrants do. In 2006, Zimbabwes military cracked down on cellphone companies because they provide independent connections (i.e., communications) inside and outside the country. This threatened national security. The military wanted to limit the outflow of information on Zimbabwes terrible internal conditions and deny demonstrators a tool for organizing.

Tocqueville wrote: It cannot be denied that the unrestrained liberty of association for political purposes is the privilege which a people is longest in learning how to exercise.

Americans, he concluded, had learned. The privilege, and its enabling knack, remains revolutionary.

Austin Bay is an author, syndicated columnist, professor, developmental aid advocate, radio commentator, retired reserve soldier, war game designer.

Get opinion pieces, letters and editorials sent directly to your inbox weekly!

Here is the original post:
Bay: On point: Flash mobs, tea parties and Tocqueville - Times-News