Media Search:



Fox News mentions of Donald Trump this year far outpace those of Mike Pence or Ron DeSantis – Media Matters for America

Since January 1, Fox News has referenced former President Donald Trump far more often than former Vice President Mike Pence or Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in every single month of the year. The three are the top potential Republican primary candidates for the 2024 election; according to a Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll survey, Trump was first with 52% support, DeSantis second with 19%, and Pence third with 7% in an eight-person mock primary that included the former president.

From January through July, the network mentioned Trump at least 8,556 times while DeSantis and Pence clocked in at least 1,083 and 589 mentions, respectively. The largest disparities appeared in the last three months, when Trump received 1,757; 1,664; and 1,381 mentions in May, June, and July, respectively. By contrast, DeSantis received 125, 96, and 179 mentions in those months, and Pence received 86, 218, and 140 mentions in the same time period.

Go here to see the original:
Fox News mentions of Donald Trump this year far outpace those of Mike Pence or Ron DeSantis - Media Matters for America

2024 GOP voters to pick ‘the party of me or the party of us’: Chris Christie – Business Insider

Onetime Trump ally and possible 2024 presidential contender Chris Christie said the top of the next GOP ticket will probably feature Donald Trump, former Vice President Mike Pence, Sen. Ted Cruz, or maybe a half dozen others, and will be a test of who'll guide the party into the future.

"My guess is it'll be somewhere between six and eight. And I think that you'll see people talking about whether the future of the Republican Party is as the party of me or the party of us," the former New Jersey governor told conservative talk-show host Hugh Hewitt on Thursday.

Christie also tossed Trump-appointed former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas into the potential mix with the embattled former president, Trump's estranged, two-time former running mate, and the Texas Republican Trump trounced in the 2016 presidential contest.

Other possible aspirants Christie apparently discounted include Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, Sen. Rick Scott of Florida, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska, and former South Carolina governor and Trump-appointed United Nations ambassador, Nikki Haley. Christie also left himself off the list, though he ran in 2016 and has been making the rounds with other GOP leaders trying to wrest back control of the party from Trump.

Trump keeps hinting that he'll run again but has yet to make a formal announcement. That's left the door open for others to float their own agendas like Rick Scott's provocative "Rescue America" plan and Pence's sweeping "Freedom" platform while Trump continuously fumes about his loss to Joe Biden.

While stumping for Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp in May, Christie laid out the binary choice facing GOP voters, warning MAGA world that Trump's "party of me" mentality isn't a winning formula. "We have to be the party of tomorrow, not the party of yesterday," Christie said. During a pre-primary rally for Kemp in Georgia, Pence stressed that "elections are about the future."

Kemp faced a primary challenge from the former senator David Perdue, whom Trump dragged out of retirement to punish Kemp for not backing his baseless 2020 election-fraud claims. Kemp beat Perdue by nearly 50 points.

Read the original here:
2024 GOP voters to pick 'the party of me or the party of us': Chris Christie - Business Insider

Ex-Trump Lawyer Says Congress Already Has Evidence That Should Easily Result in Disqualification From Office Forever (Video) – Yahoo Entertainment

Former attorney to Donald Trumps White House Ty Cobb says that Congress has already been handed the evidence they need to disqualify the twice-impeached former president from ever running for any office again.

Appearing on CNN Wednesday, Cobb noted that testimonies presented during the Jan. 6 hearings which painted a picture of Trump sitting in the White House watching TV while insurrectionists were storming the Capitol combined with him tweeting that former vice president Mike Pence didnt have the courage to do what was necessary after refusing to overturn the 2020 election results create a pretty clear path to criminal charges.

Also Read:Donald Trump Jan. 6 Criminal Investigation Launched by Department of Justice (Report)

The Pence tweet, coupled with the three hours of inaction, in my view, easily fits into the definition of giving aid and comfort to the insurrectionists, and that is the standard under Article 3 of the 14th Amendment, which Congress has at its disposal, Cobb explained. I dont for the life of me understand why instead of telling the Justice Department what to do, that they arent acting on that alone, because if they have a sense of the Congress, the penalty of finding Trump guilty of giving aid and comfort to an insurrection is disqualification from office forever.

It is, of course, expected that Trump intends to run again in the 2024 presidential race and that its only a question of whether hell formally announce his campaign before or after Novembers midterms. Congress moving forward with Cobbs proposal would all but put a halt to those efforts.

I think Congress has the lane here, Cobb said.

Also Read:Rob Reiner: Archie Bunker Would Have Jumped Off the Trump Train After Jan. 6

Elsewhere in the segment, the Trump White Houses former defense attorney noted that the existing evidence makes it exceptionally difficult for the former president to claim he didnt see what was going on for what it was. Trumps citing of willful blindness just doesnt add up, considering he had briefings on the rally prior to Jan. 6, the election results had already been challenged and determined he must have known they were acting on a frivolous legal theory, Cobb said.

Story continues

Theres considerable evidence out there that his own legal advisors, including [John] Eastman on Jan. 4, acknowledged that, you know, they were acting on a frivolous legal theory, he said. I think thats very damaging to somebody who wants to argue willful blindness.

No matter the continued content of the Jan. 6 investigations, however, Cobb noted that Trump is going to continue to act the way he always has and use the attention as an opportunity to promote his self-serving messaging.

While Trump may argue that defense, I think hes more likely to use the trial in an effort to deal with his themes that hes all-powerful, he got cheated [and] hes the only one standing up for the country, Cobb said.

Also Read:Jan. 6 Rioters Children Respond to Record Sentence: Trump Deserves Life in Prison if My Father Is in Prison This Long

See the original post here:
Ex-Trump Lawyer Says Congress Already Has Evidence That Should Easily Result in Disqualification From Office Forever (Video) - Yahoo Entertainment

Barr says grand jury seems to be focusing on Trump and his inner circle – Yahoo! Voices

Former Attorney General Bill Barr called the newest federal grand jury subpoenas probing the Jan. 6, 202, Capitol riot "a significant event," one that suggests that government prosecutors are probing high-ranking Trump administration officials and allies, and even former President Donald Trump.

"This suggests to me that they're taking a hard look at the group at the top, including the president and the people immediately around him who were involved in this," Barr told CBS News' Catherine Herridge in an interview Friday.

The grand jury has been meeting weekly; in late July, Marc Short, former Vice President Mike Pence's chief of staff, testified, and according to The Washington Post, Greg Jacob, Pence's chief counsel, was also interviewed by the grand jury.

The Justice Department's criminal investigation into Jan. 6 now includes questions for witnesses about the communications of people close to Trump and his reelection campaign, though it is not evident from CBS News' reporting that Trump himself is a target of the investigation only that that prosecutors have been asking questions related to him and his aides.

Barr also surmises that it looks like prosecutors are "going to try to get a ruling on the issue of executive privilege," given reportsby ABC News and other news outlets that former White House counsel Pat Cipollone has been subpoenaed to appear before the grand jury. The former attorney general noted that Cipollone, as then-counsel to the Office of the President, "has the strongest claim to executive privilege."

"That's sort of the biggest mountain for them to climb, and the fact that they lead off with that to me suggests that they want a definitive resolution not only on Cipollone but you know, this would affect [former White House chief of staff Mark] Meadows and some of the other people, too," he said.

Barr also spoke with Herridge about why he doesn't think Trump should be the 2024 GOP presidential nominee and why a possible prisoner swap with Russia is ill-advised.

Story continues

Watch more of Catherine Herridge's interview with former Attorney General Bill Barr on streaming on theCBS Newsapp at 7 p.m. ET.

Barr says Justice Department appears to be "taking a hard look" at Trump and his inner circle

Markets react to strong July jobs report

White House reacts to latest jobs report

Read more:
Barr says grand jury seems to be focusing on Trump and his inner circle - Yahoo! Voices

Republicans Begin Adjusting to a Fierce Abortion Backlash – The New York Times

Republican candidates, facing a stark reality check from Kansas voters, are softening their once-uncompromising stands against abortion as they move toward the general election, recognizing that strict bans are unpopular and that the issue may be a major driver in the fall campaigns.

In swing states and even conservative corners of the country, several Republicans have shifted their talk on abortion bans, newly emphasizing support for exceptions. Some have noticeably stopped discussing details at all. Pitched battles in Republican-dominated state legislatures have broken out now that the Supreme Court has made what has long been a theoretical argument a reality.

In Pennsylvania, Doug Mastriano, the Republicans ardently anti-abortion candidate for governor, has lately taken to saying the people of Pennsylvania will decide what abortion looks like in the state, not the governor. In Minnesota, Scott Jensen, a family physician who said in March that he would try to ban abortion as governor, said in a video released before the Kansas vote that he does support some exceptions: If Ive been unclear previously, I want to be clear now.

Republican consultants for Senate and House campaigns said Thursday that while they still believe inflation and the economy will drive voters to the G.O.P., candidates are going to have to talk about abortion to blunt Democratic attacks that the partys position is extreme. They have started advising Republicans to endorse bans that allow exceptions for pregnancies from rape or incest or those that threaten the life of the mother. They have told candidates to emphasize care for women during and after their pregnancies.

If we are going to ban abortion, there are things weve got to do to make sure the need for abortion is reduced, and that women are not endangered, said Representative Nancy Mace, Republican of South Carolina, who won an exemption for rape and incest in her states abortion law as a state representative. Now, she says Republicans need to press to expand access to gynecological and obstetrics care, contraception, including emergency contraception, and even protect the right of women to leave their states to get an abortion without fear of prosecution.

Messaging alone will not free the G.O.P. from accusations that it is out of step with voters. Several Republican-led states have passed abortion bans that do not include allowances for victims of rape or incest, including Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana and Texas. While all bans allow an exception to save the life of the woman, those in some states do not also cite protection of her health.

On Friday, after a prolonged debate, the Indiana House approved a ban that included exceptions for rape, incest and the life and physical health of the mother.

Republican are also contending with drumbeat of news after the Supreme Courts decision, including the story of a 10-year-old rape victim in Indiana who crossed state lines to receive an abortion, and headlines about women who confronted serious health problems under new, far-reaching restrictions or bans.

On Thursday, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, who has recently avoided talking about abortion, suspended a state attorney from Hillsborough County who refused to prosecute people who try to provide abortions prohibited by the states new 15-week ban, prompting angry recriminations from Democrats.

The recalibration for some began before voters of deeply Republican Kansas voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday against removing abortion rights from the states constitution. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, retracting the constitutional right to the procedure, many Republicans were slow to detail what would come next. As they rush to enact long-promised laws, Republican-led legislatures have learned how difficult banning abortion can be.

Not just the pro-choice movement but the pro-life movement was caught by surprise by the Supreme Court, said Brandon Steele, a West Virginia delegate who pressed for an abortion ban without exceptions in a special session of the legislature that ended this week with the Republican supermajority stymied. Without having the talking points, without being told what to do, legislators had to start saying what they were actually going to do. You could see the confusion in the room.

Were finding out who is really pro-life and who is pro-life only to get elected, not just in West Virginia but across the country, Mr. Steele said.

In Indiana, the special session of the state legislature to consider a ban has included brutal debates over whether to include exemptions and how far those exemptions should go.

For some its very black and white: if youre pro-life with no exceptions or if youre pro-choice with no restrictions, said State Senator Kyle Walker, an Indiana Republican who said abortion should be legal during at least the first trimester of pregnancy. When you are in the gray area, you are forced to reconcile in your own mind where your own limits are.

For months, Republicans have maintained that abortion rights would be a footnote in a midterm campaign driven by the worst inflation in 40 years, crime, immigration and a Democratic president whose approval ratings are mired around 40 percent.

That is still the public line, even after the Kansas referendum, where voters faced a single issue, not the multiplicity of factors they will be considering in November.

But the reality on the campaign trail is different. Sarah Longwell, a Republican pollster, said in her focus groups that swing voters do bring up inflation and the economy when asked what issues are on their minds. But when prompted to discuss abortion, real passion flares. That indicates that if Democrats can prosecute a campaign to keep the issue front and center, they will find an audience, she said.

Ms. Mace agreed, saying that abortion is rising fast and that Republicans have to respond.

In Minnesota, Dr. Jensen, the Republican candidate expected to take on Gov. Tim Walz, suggested it was interactions with voters after the fall of Roe that, he said, prompted him to clarify his position on abortion.

Once the Roe v. Wade decision was overturned, we told Minnesota, and basically told everybody that we would engage in a conversation, he said. During that conversation, I learned of the need for me to elaborate on my position.

That elaboration included embracing a family and maternity leave program, promoting a $2,500-per-child adoption tax credit, and improving access to birth control, including providing oral contraceptives over the counter with a price ceiling. And, like Adam Laxalt, the G.O.P. Senate nominee in Nevada, Dr. Jensen pointed to abortion protections already in place in Minnesota to cast the matter as settled rather than on the ballot this year.

Mr. Walz said he would stay on offense, and not accept any softening of the Republican line.

I take them at their first word, he said of Dr. Jensen and his running mate, Matt Birk, a former N.F.L. player and anti-abortion rights advocate. If they get the opportunity they will criminalize this while were trying to protect it. So its become a central theme, obviously, I think that flip on their part was in response to that.

The Kansas vote implies that around 65 percent of voters nationwide would reject rolling back abortion rights, including a majority in more than 40 of the 50 states, according to a New York Times analysis.

Republicans believe their party can grab the mantle of moderation from Democrats, in part by conveying empathy toward pregnant women and offering exemptions to abortion bans, and casting Democrats as the extremists when it comes to regulating abortion. If Democrats insist on making abortion the centerpiece of their campaigns, they argue, they risk looking out of touch with voters in an uncertain economy.

But Republicans who moderate their views must still contend with a core base of support that remains staunchly anti-abortion. Abortion opponents said Thursday that Republican candidates should not read too much into the Kansas vote, a single-issue referendum with language that was criticized by voters on both sides as confusing.

Regardless of what the consultant class is telling the candidates, they would be wise to recognize that the right-to-life community is an important constituency and an important demographic of voters, warned Penny Nance, chief executive and president of Concerned Women for America, a conservative organization that opposes abortion rights.

After the Kansas vote, Democrats stepped up efforts to squeeze their opponents between a conservative base eager for quick action to ban all abortions and a broader electorate that wants no such thing. Representative Elaine Luria, a moderate Democrat running in a Republican-leaning district in southeastern Virginia, released a new advertisement against her Republican opponent, Jen Kiggans, painting her as too extreme on abortion. Ms. Luria had initially said she would campaign on her work for the district and her support for the Navy, a big force in the region, but the landscape has shifted. Ms. Kigganss campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

A group aligned with the Democratic Governors Association is already advertising off abortion-related remarks made by Tudor Dixon of Michigan, who won the Republican nomination for governor this week.

If you take Tudor Dixon at her word when it comes to outlawing abortion, shes told us exactly who she is, the spot, titled No Exceptions, intones, featuring clips of Ms. Dixon highlighting her opposition to a range of abortion-related exceptions. Ms. Dixon was unambiguous about her position earlier this summer, writing on Twitter, My only exception is to protect the LIFE of the mother.

In a lengthy statement that highlighted her opposition to an expected ballot measure in Michigan intended to protect abortion rights, Ms. Dixon also insisted that her race would be defined by jobs, schools, crime and being able to afford your gas and groceries.

For Republicans, one problem might be the extensive trail on the issue they left during the primary season.

In May, Mr. Mastriano was unequivocal in Pennsylvania as he courted Republican primary voters: That baby deserves a right to life whether it is conceived in incest or rape or there are concerns otherwise for the mom.

Last month, he said it was not up to him. You decide on exceptions. You decide on how early. And thats in the hands of the people, he said on Philadelphia talk radio. Thats a fact. Thats not a dodge.

Mitch Smith, Trip Gabriel and Reid J. Epstein contributed reporting.

See the article here:
Republicans Begin Adjusting to a Fierce Abortion Backlash - The New York Times