Media Search:



Playing chess with thugs. Brittney Griner, Paul Whelan and the Wests challenge in combating hostage diplomacy by dictators – Toronto Star

His name makes headlines around the world. His plight is a cause clbre in Washington. But its in Moscow that his fate hangs in the balance.

On Friday, the family of Canadian-born Paul Whelan met U.S. President Joe Biden, who is seeking the former Marines freedom from a Russian prison, where he is serving a 16-year-sentence for espionage.

Whelan has decried the case against him as political theatre. But the star of this geopolitical thriller and his anxious family have never been so powerless.

There is a need to do something, anything, his twin brother, David Whelan, told the Star. What a lot of people do not bother to understand is that, unlike normal hostage takers, nation states that engage in arbitrary detention are free to do whatever they want.

Free, in other words, to open the cell door for the likes of Whelan and American basketballer Brittney Griner, who is serving a nine-year Russian sentence on drug charges, and swap them, perhaps for a Russian drug trafficker, perhaps for a spy and assassin.

Or, perhaps not.

President Biden has acted, making an offer to the Russian government, David Whelan said. Now we all have to wait to see if the Russians have the concessions they want, or if theyre going to keep Paul in their exchange fund for some other purpose.

Last April, after a concerted campaign to engage the U.S. government and convince Washington to negotiate with Moscow, the Russians agreed to free former Marine Trevor Reed, who was jailed for assaulting two police officers, in exchange for Konstantin Yaroshenko, a Russian pilot arrested in Liberia and convicted in New York for his role in a multinational drug trafficking plot unravelled by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency.

The exchange took place on the tarmac of a Turkish airport, like a scene from a Cold War spy film except that, in that bygone era, the two sides would heed to a diplomatic code of conduct an eye for an eye, a spy for a spy.

The most famous of those classic prisoner exchanges was the 1962 swap of the downed American spy-plane pilot Gary Powers for the convicted British-born Soviet spy Rudolf Abel, retold in the 2015 film Bridge of Spies.

The most recent was the 2010 exchange of 10 Russian sleeper agents living under assumed identities in the U.S. for four double agents held in Russian prisons. Among them was Sergei Skripal, the former spy who later survived an assassination plot carried out by Russian military intelligence agents using the nerve agent Novichok.

But the days of prisoner exchange as a settling of accounts, as an act of zeroing the geopolitical scales between the CIA and the KGB, have been replaced by the troubling trend of hostage diplomacy in which westerners are wrongfully detained and harshly sentenced by authoritarian regimes who seek the upper hand in their dealings with other nations.

Theres no rules here, said Jonathan Franks, a crisis management adviser who was a spokesperson for Trevor Reeds family. The taking of civilians as leverage in state-to-state relations is the next frontier in international arm-wrestling.

The Cold War resulted in numerous cases of western tourists, students or business travellers being arrested on trumped-up charges only to later be exchanged for captured Soviet spies, said David Silbey, an adjunct associate professor of history at Cornell University. But it was still a more organized situation under the Communist Party of the Soviet Unions watch than under Putin, who was himself a former KGB agent director of its successor agency, the FSB.

The Russia that exists now is a lot more of a single-person state, as opposed to a single-party state (under the Soviet Union), and I think its much more subject to the kind of chaotic behaviour of Putin especially.

The most glaring example of hostage diplomacy is that of the two Canadian Michaels former diplomat Michael Kovrig and consultant Michael Spavor who were arrested in China in retaliation for the arrest in Vancouver of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou on a U.S. extradition warrant.

The Canadian citizens were only released from prison in September 2021, after almost three years, when Meng struck a deferred prosecution agreement with American prosecutors and was allowed to return to China.

But their dystopian legal odyssey Kovrig told his wife upon being released he felt like he was coming into another world wasnt without consequence.

Gathering support from other nations

Outraged and powerless to secure the release of its detained citizens, Canada drafted a Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations as the tactic of hostage diplomacy is referred to in official circles.

The declaration condemns such tactics as a breach of human rights law and calls on governments who detain foreign nationals to respect the rule of law, ensure consular assistance, and take steps to prevent mistreatment and torture.

In the year since the declaration was introduced, it was endorsed by 70 states a little more than one-third of the world.

The use of joint declarations and diplomatic condemnations to combat what, in its crudest form, amounts to state-sanctioned kidnapping is part of the problem.

Part of it is that we play by rules, we have standards, rule-of-law principles, and part of it is and Im sure its true in Canada, too a lot of the people who make policy decisions here are the best and the brightest, said Franks. Theyre not necessarily equipped for playing chess with thugs.

If you want to fight back against thuggery, you might need different guys.

If a Canadian, American or British citizen is taken hostage somewhere in the world by al-Qaida, the Islamic State or Boko Haram, the governments have a full range of lethal military options to draw on as they attempt a recovery.

But swooping down under the cover of night on a foreign government is a recipe for war.

To address this limitation, the U.S. adopted the Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act in 2020, a law obliging Washington to assist wrongfully detained U.S. citizens abroad.

The law established internal guidelines for handling the cases, but also authorizes travel bans and sanctions against foreigners responsible for or participating in the ordeal of American prisoners.

Around the same time as Canada released its declaration against arbitrary detentions, Sarah Teich, a Toronto-based human rights lawyer, came out with a similar legislative proposal for Canadian lawmakers that was released through the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, a think-tank.

Teich said she drew up the proposition not in response to the detention of the two Michaels but after hearing about Kylie Moore-Gilbert, an Australian academic and colleague of Teich who was jailed in Iran for two years, from 2018 to 2020, on charges she was an Israeli spy.

Moore-Gilbert was ultimately released in a prisoner swap for three Iranians jailed in Thailand for a 2012 bomb plot that targeted Israeli diplomats.

The key tools in Teichs legislative proposal are sanctions against foreign nationals, an obligation for the government to work with and inform families of wrongfully detained Canadians, and the ability to co-operate with foreign states and reward helpful foreign citizens with asylum or Canadian citizenship.

The federal Conservatives included all three points in their 2021 election platform, but the political momentum for the legal changes weakened when Prime Minister Justin Trudeaus Liberals were re-elected on Sept. 20, 2021, and, four days later, Kovrig and Spavor were released from Chinese custody.

Your guy for my guy

For now, prisoner swaps are the fastest method for a country to free its arbitrarily detained citizens though still not the simplest.

The negotiations, I would say, are not what one might expect if you went to business school, cause the other side, at times, did not go to business school, Roger Carstens, the U.S. special presidential envoy for hostage affairs, said this summer in a hostage diplomacy panel discussion organized by the International Bar Association.

Whether negotiating with officials in Yemen, Myanmar, Venezuela or Iran, every case is strangely and uniquely different, he told the panel.

In the U.S., Carstenss team seeks input from family members and non-governmental organizations and U.S. lawmakers before assembling a hostage resolution team that consists of CIA and military, the Treasury Department and other government agencies to develop possible courses of action and determine what branch of a foreign government, or specific officials, have the power and willingness to engage in talks.

And even with all that expertise and preparation, Carstens said, the most important part of any negotiation plan is flexibility to adapt to the demands of the other side.

Fifty per cent of the time we walk out of the negotiation on the first go-around saying Oh my gosh! We absolutely did not see that coming, he said. No matter how much information we gather, the other side always has a trick up their sleeve that theyre going to employ.

In the case of Paul Whelan and Brittney Griner, the U.S. took the rare step this summer of confirming that it had made a significant proposal to the Russians reportedly offering to exchange arms trafficker Viktor Bout, a former Soviet military officer, for the Americans.

CNN later reported that Moscow was came back with a demand that a Russian spy named Vadim Krasikov, convicted by a German court of killing a former Chechen rebel commander in Berlin in 2019, be added to the deal.

From Moscows perspective, the impetus to repatriate its jailed intelligence agents is akin to the dictum that wounded soldiers should never be left behind on the battlefield, said Silbey, the historian.

This idea that you protect your own and not just for good-hearted reasons but also so that the next person who goes out to spy for you knows that youre not going to abandon them, he said.

From the western perspective, Sibley said, there are three types of prisoners: captured spies; ordinary citizens arrested on genuine or trumped-up crimes; and celebrity prisoners.

Someone like Griner, a two-time Olympic gold medalist, does create more leverage for the Russians because she is famous, she has celebrity and the ability of getting her story into the press in a way that ordinary Americans dont necessarily have, Silbey said.

In the cold calculus of prisoner-exchange poker, Griner might be the ace that shifts the balance and allows Moscow to increase its demands.

American officials are broadly confident that Whelan and Griner will eventually be released. They just dont know whether it will be sooner or later, or what price Washington will be forced to pay.

Others worry that a higher price tag paid for their freedom will increase the risk for other westerners by incentivizing and inspiring rogue and ruthless regimes to continue jailing innocents. Russian investigative journalists Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan suggested recently that the Kremlin was creating a bank of hostages to be used in future negotiations.

Franks said the West must find its own way to match the ruthlessness of the regimes in Tehran, Caracas, Beijing and Moscow while also respecting the rule of law and keeping its moral high ground.

We are never going to solve the problem until we find the courage to cause these people and the people that they love pain, he said, referring to government officials, prosecutors, judges, police officers, investigators and others who facilitate hostage diplomacy.

I mean that if youre an elite from a hostage-taking country you dont get to hide your kids in the West anymore. No more fancy boarding schools in the U.S. or the U.K. You dont get to seek safe harbour That sounds cruel, but there is no uncruel way to do this.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Anyone can read Conversations, but to contribute, you should be registered Torstar account holder. If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now (it is free)

Sign In

Register

Original post:
Playing chess with thugs. Brittney Griner, Paul Whelan and the Wests challenge in combating hostage diplomacy by dictators - Toronto Star

A Crisis Coming: The Twin Threats to American Democracy – The New York Times

  1. A Crisis Coming: The Twin Threats to American Democracy  The New York Times
  2. Five Strategies to Support U.S. Democracy  Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  3. Let's not give up on democracy but agree on how to make it better Oregon Capital Chronicle  Oregon Capital Chronicle
  4. Republicans and Democrats agree that democracy is in trouble. They just don't agree on its definition.  America Magazine
  5. Letters: Democracy  Ukiah Daily Journal
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Originally posted here:
A Crisis Coming: The Twin Threats to American Democracy - The New York Times

Democracy, are you OK? What recent history tells us about the state of politics – NPR

There are any number of reports to suggest democracy is in trouble. So what can citizens do about it? Win McNamee/Getty Images hide caption

There are any number of reports to suggest democracy is in trouble. So what can citizens do about it?

When Liz Truss took power last week in London, she became the United Kingdom's fourth prime minister in six years. In Israel, voters are about to hold their fifth election in less than four years.

And in the U.S., many Americans still refuse to accept the results of the 2020 presidential election, prompting President Biden to recently warn that "equality and democracy are under assault."

All over the world, democracy seems to be experiencing indigestion.

First, the bad news.

A raft of reports in recent years have documented democracy in decline around the world and the U.S. Here's just a small selection:

"Major democracies turned inward [in 2020], contributing to the 15th consecutive year of decline in global freedom, according to Freedom in the World 2021," Freedom House reported.

The figures from Our World in Data paint a graphic picture.

"The number of democracies in the world reached an all-time high in 2012, with 97 electoral democracies. A decade on, their number has fallen to 89 countries," it reported this month.

Democracies are embattled both by internal factors and external shocks, says Moiss Nam, a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

"Democracies are having a very hard time fulfilling the dreams, expectations and needs of the population," he said. "And then they have to cope with external shocks that change things dramatically. What we're seeing with inflation, for example, or of course, climate change, terrorism."

A vendor hangs electoral merchandise of Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro, who is running for reelection next month. Eraldo Peres/AP hide caption

Nam adds Italy and Brazil alongside Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. as countries currently grappling with this situation.

"Italy is going to have an election very soon, and a candidate that has its origins in the fascist movement is likely to win," he said. "The president of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, has said he's questioning the system, and he probably wouldn't leave the government if he loses the election."

In many of these countries, we see larger-than-life figureheads at the center of the drama.

There's Boris Johnson in the U.K., Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel, Donald Trump in the U.S. and Bolsonaro in Brazil.

Nam said there was a connection between that kind of reality TV style-leader and political instability in a democracy.

"They all are victims of the expectations they cannot fulfill by traditional methods," he said. "They have become populists in terms of stoking divisions that the country has."

"Trying to divide and conquer becomes a requirement to survive in politics. Then fueling polarization and the wedges and amplifying and multiplying the wedges that fragment society."

This view is echoed by Shawn Rosenberg a professor of political science and psychology at UC Irvine who warns that opportunistic leaders can strike because liberal democratic politics is complicated.

"Populist alternatives offer a vision that is much simpler," he told Salon. "All that populism demands is a simple story of cause and effect. All one needs to do is act: Authoritarian power is the solution."

In his widely covered speech in Philadelphia at the beginning of the month, Biden warned that democracy was under assault, and he took particular aim at Donald Trump and election deniers.

"Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic," Biden said.

"But while the threat to American democracy is real, I want to say as clearly as we can: We are not powerless in the face of these threats. We are not bystanders in this ongoing attack on democracy."

Biden delivered his prime-time "democracy" speech at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia on Sept. 1. Alex Wong/Getty Images hide caption

Biden delivered his prime-time "democracy" speech at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia on Sept. 1.

On this last point, Nam agrees. And if people really want to protect democracy, then they need to take ownership, he said.

"Citizens need to start thinking that democracy is not cheap in terms of real time and commitment and engagement," he said. "Voting every four years may not be enough. They need to strengthen their ability to detect charlatans and lies and populist behaviors. Citizens need to be more citizens and just less of the dwellers of a country."

The radio interview with Moiss Nam was produced by Michael Levitt and edited by Justine Kenin.

See original here:
Democracy, are you OK? What recent history tells us about the state of politics - NPR

Statement by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. on the International Day of Democracy – The White House

Fifteen years ago, nations from around the world came together to declare an International Day of Democracya day to reflect on our collective support for representative, transparent governance; equality; respect for human rights and dignity; and the rule of law. In the years since, democracy the world over has experienced significant challenges, with autocrats and illiberal forces increasing the pressure on those who fight for human rights and fundamental freedoms. We see it in Russias brutal and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine. And here at home, we are called to renew our commitment to defend and protect the core tenets of American democracy.Our founders established a government of, by, and for the people, built on the unique idea that all people are created equal. They recognized that the strength of a democracy rests in the ability of its people to make their voices heard. And today, Im proud to be hosting at the White House the United We Stand Summit to counter hate-fueled violence, reaffirming that we all have a role to play in fostering a safe, inclusive, and democratic society. In recent months, weve also demonstrated that our democracy can still deliver for the American people. Working together with Congress, Ive been proud to sign into law transformative legislation that will grow the American economy and create more good-paying jobs for American workers, invest in infrastructure, reduce gun violence, improve access to health care, and protect our climate.The United States is also working closely with fellow democracies around the world to tackle the greatest global challenges of our time, and I look forward to building on the progress next year at the second Summit for Democracy. This second gathering of world leaders from governments, civil society, labor, and the private sector will be an opportunity to demonstrate how democracies are working to make life better for people everywhere, and to redouble to our efforts to defend against authoritarianism, combat corruption, and advance human rights.

On this International Day of Democracy, we pause to reflect on the power that we hold in our in our hands and our sacred charge to preserve the soul of our Nation. To preserve that idea of America. To respect the rule of law, and defend free and fair elections. And we renew our dedication to uphold and strengthen our precious democracy and to keep faith with future generations.

###

Continued here:
Statement by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. on the International Day of Democracy - The White House

Biden says US democracy is under threat. Heres what he can do to help fix it – The Guardian

In the run-up to the midterm elections, liberal America is starting to realize how much danger its in. The right has been openly, defiantly stoking the fires of civil war since at least 2008 openly promoting secession, political violence and the overturning of electoral outcomes. Now the left, slowly, probably too late, is having some of the same discussions about the catastrophic failure of American political institutions. Bidens speech in Philadelphia, his attempt to set the agenda for the midterms, mattered in this respect if in no other. The Democratic leader has finally, against all instinct, acknowledged the risk of national collapse.

As I stand here tonight, equality and democracy are under assault, the president declared. We do ourselves no favor to pretend otherwise. He even allowed himself to be specific, going so far as to call the Republican party under Trump a threat to democracy. Biden has a gift for stating what has been obvious to everyone as if he were thinking it for the first time. Still, his diagnosis was accurate, which is what made his proposed solution to the threat so frighteningly shallow: Im asking our nation to come together, unite behind the single purpose of defending our democracy regardless of your ideology.

Thats not good enough. Its nowhere even close to good enough. If the president of the United States declares that democracy in his country is under assault, then he needs to announce in the next breath what hes doing about it, not try to exploit it for temporary political gain in a single election cycle.

A recent poll found that more than 40% of Americans believe that a civil war is likely with the next decade. The past two years have seen the rot of American government accelerate, even as Biden has made real legislative progress. Thats the irony of these midterms. Biden has made hugely significant strides on matters of policy, on climate crisis, on infrastructure, on education during his first two years. At the same time, the forces tearing America apart are more intense than they were during the Trump years.

Since the Dobbs decision, American women have come to exist in a patchwork of legal statuses, not only between states but even on county level. Just as before the first civil war, the question of free movement between different jurisdictions is once again unclear. The Mar-a-Lago raid has created a situation in which there are no good options: the government must either arrest an ex-president or allow classified secrets to fill up random closets. Already the fundamental question of civil war is in the air: how do you deal legally with citizens who want to destroy the basis of law? The success of election deniers across American states has created inevitable conflict over 2022 and 2024. The peaceful transition of power is more doubtful now than it has been at any period since the 19th century.

The drift towards disunion is not in Bidens control if, indeed, it is in anyones control at this point. Hyper-partisanship is increasing and increasingly violent. Trust in institutions continues to decline. The sense of legitimacy in the press and the courts continues its long slide. Bidens approach to the collapse of American institutions is institutionalist, and he is trying to make his faith in institutions the focus of the next election cycle. But the current crisis requires more than politics as usual, and more than Biden is providing.

If you want to take America off the high boil, promote open primaries, not vacuous calls to national unity. Independent redistricting commissions to fight partisan gerrymandering, campaign finance reform to pull America back from the black hole of dark money, and a general overhaul of the Federal Election Commission are, at this point, obviously necessary on the most basic level if American democracy is to survive. They are also against the interests of both parties. They are not on the table in 2022.

A pro-democracy agenda also requires a genuine reckoning with the opponents of democracy. The US supreme court is already dive-bombing into illegitimacy, passing through theocracy on its way to irrelevance. Biden is not preserving the legitimacy of the court by choosing not to stack it. He is only ensuring that an already illegitimate court will be opposed to democracy.

How far Biden can enact a pro-democracy agenda is dubious, of course, and every year, from now on, it will become more dubious. Biden seems to have nothing more to offer than the old soaring rhetoric that somehow still has people who will listen to it: This is where the United States constitution was written and debated. This is where we set in motion the most extraordinary experiment of self-government the world has ever known, he said, flanked by marines. Then he put the onus for defending that experiment on the American people.

Thats an alibi, an abrogation of responsibility. Biden was elected in 2020 to defend US democracy, but the solution to Americas crisis is not political but structural. It doesnt require the American people to vote one way or another in order to enact one or another legislative agenda but to find a different way to govern themselves.

The first portion of the Biden administration has revealed a clandestine tragedy: the president has loved American institutions so much that he cannot bring himself to do whats required to save them.

Go here to see the original:
Biden says US democracy is under threat. Heres what he can do to help fix it - The Guardian