Mediaboss Marketing

Other members of the task force include Gabrielle Bray, a fourth-year student who chairs the Honor Committee; T. Kenny Fountain, an associate professor of English and director of Writing Across the Curriculum in the College and Graduate School of Arts & Sciences; Briana Morrison, an associate professor of computer science in the School of Engineering and Applied Science; Reza Mousavi, an assistant professor of commerce in the McIntire School of Commerce; and Michael Palmer, director of the Center for Teaching Excellence.

The task force will hold a series of virtual town hall meetings, organized by school. Faculty and students may attend any session. Participants may register for each session on the task force website. Each session is limited to 300 participants. If there is enough demand, more sessions may be added.

The scheduled sessions are: Arts & Sciences (natural sciences), March 27, 3 to 4:30 p.m.; Architecture, Batten, Education and Human Development, and Nursing, March 29, noon to 1:30 p.m.; Engineering and Applied Sciences and Data Science, April 10, 3 to 4:30 p.m.; Arts & Sciences (social sciences), April 11, 12:30 to 2 p.m.; Arts & Sciences (arts and humanities) and Professional and Continuing Education, April 12, noon to 1:30 p.m.; and Darden, Law and McIntire, April 14, 2 to 3:30 p.m.

The link to its questionnaire is available on the task force website.

Both faculty and students are invited to these online town halls, Heny said. We will provide some information and then ask them critical questions that get them to engage, and they will record their responses in a form we will use as a source of data.

We want to learn how students and faculty are actually using this technology in courses, Pennock said. We hear anecdotal evidence from the faculty members who are closest to us, but we really want to understand how our students using it to study as well as to complete assignments. Theres a real opportunity for faculty to make their classes better, to be able to get more work done in the same amount of time.

View original post here:
Task Force To Convene Conversations on Artificial Intelligence's ... - UVA Today

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. In celebration of Womens History Month, Penn State University Libraries will host a virtual monthlong Wikipedia editathon focusing on Native American women activists and environmentalists from March 27 through April 18.

Wikipedia editathons are organized events held with the intention of increasing representation on Wikipedia of identified underrepresented groups and providing basic training to new editors.First-time Wikipedia editors are welcome to join the virtual event regardless of level of technology knowledge or experience. Experienced editors will be on hand to answer questions and suggest articles to edit and references to use.

Links to all event programs, including those listed below, will be available on the Penn State Libraries Wikipedia Editathon Dashboard. Participants can access the dashboard and contribute to the selected pages anytime throughout the period.

For information about getting started with a Wikipedia account, visit theWikipedia meetup pagefor the event. For information about this event or accommodations, contact Marty Coyle, music and AV cataloger, at mcc5012@psu.edu, or Ana Enriquez, scholarly communications outreach librarian, at aee32@psu.edu.

Go here to read the rest:
Libraries to host virtual Wikipedia editathon focusing on Native ... - Pennsylvania State University

COMMERCIAL BREAK

SCROLL TO CONTINUE READING

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been in the news in recent months with many questioning whether it will replace humans in the workforce in the future. Many people globally have started using AI for tasks such as writing emails, article summaries, cover letters, etc. AI is also being used in the field of medicine to search medical data and uncover insights to help improve health outcomes and patient experiences.

Cancer- a disease in which some of the bodys cells grow uncontrollably and spread to other parts of the body- continues to plague countries. And among all types of cancer, breast cancer is the most common type of canceroccurring in women globally. Several factors including genetics, lifestyle, and the environment have contributed to the rise in the prevalence of breast cancer among women.

Proper screening for early diagnosis and treatment is an essential factor when combating the disease.

According to a report published in the PubMed Central (PMC) journal in October last year, faster and more accurate results are some of the benefits of AI methods in breast cancer screening.

Breast cancer is more effective to treat if diagnosed early and the effectiveness of treatment in the later stages is poor. The report in the PMC titled- "Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis" says that the incorporation of AI into screening methods is a relatively new and emerging field thatshows a lot of promise in the early detection of breast cancer, thus resulting in a better prognosis of the condition.

"Human intelligence has always triumphed over every other form of intelligence on this planet. The defining feature of human intelligence is the ability to use previous knowledge, adapt to new conditions, and identify meaning in patterns. The success of AI lies in the capacity to reproduce the same abilities," it adds.

Incorporating AI into the screening methods such as the examination of biopsy slides enhances the treatment success rate. Machine learning and deep learning are some of the important aspects of AI which are required in breast cancer imaging.

Machine learning is used to store a large dataset, which is later used to train prediction models and interpret generalisations. On the other hand, deep learning- the newest branch of machine learning- works by establishing a system of artificial neural networks that can classify and recognise images, as per the report.

Regarding breast cancer treatment, the use of AI for early detection by making use of data obtained by radiomics and biopsy slides is done. This is backed by a global effort to manufacture learning algorithms for understanding mammograms by reducing the number of false positives as an outcome.

"AI has increased the odds of identifying metastatic breast cancer in whole slide images of lymph node biopsy. Because people's risk factors and predispositions differ, AI algorithms operate differently in different populations," the report further says.

AI seems a very helpful tool when it comes to treating cancer. It has shown impressive outcomes and there is a possibility that it can change every method of treatment which is used presently. However, there are some challenges.

The report, published in the PMC journal in October last year, says that a concerning question is where can one draw the line between AI and human intelligence. "AI is based on data collected from populations. Therefore, a disparity is sure to rise when it comes to the development of data from people belonging to different socio-economic conditions," it adds and points out that cancer is one particular disease that has indices that vary across different races.

Studies relating to the efficiency of AI have certain set outcomes that can be used to assess their standards and credibility. And for AI machines to be accepted, people must be able to independently replicate and produce the machine like any other scientific finding. This implies a common code must be available to all, and it is only possible if data is shared with everyone equally.

AI models used for managing cancer are centred on image data, and the report says the problem with this aspect is the underutilisation of patient histories saved as electronic health records in hospitals.

"Easy-to-access databases and user-friendly software must be incorporated into the software systems of hospitals worldwide, which is a difficult task at the moment."

One of the biggest challenges is building trust among doctors to make their decisions with the help of AI, and adequate training must be provided to doctors on how to use this technology.

Another challenge is that there are a lot of ethical risks to consider while using AI methods which include data confidentiality, privacy violation, the autonomy of patients, and consent. But the report said that many measures are taken to prevent any violation of confidentiality and legislation to keep a check on malpractices.

WATCH WION LIVE HERE

You can now write for wionews.com and be a part of the community. Share your stories and opinions with us here.

See more here:
Explained | Artificial Intelligence and screening of breast cancer - WION

Look, you're busy people, it's Friday, you're already thinking about logging off for the daywe won't bury the lede here. When we chatted with You're Wrong About host Sarah Marshall earlier this week ahead of her show at the Cedar Cultural Center on Saturday, she hit us with a shocking local angle regarding her exceedingly popular podcast.

"The show was like, born in Minnesota, because the first ever episode I recorded was in my friends Mike and Sally's house in Minneapolis," she says. In fact, Marshall adds, she recorded a number of the early episodes while visiting another friend in Winona. "It's got Minnesota all over it."

"It's not common knowledge," she chuckles. "People don't ask very often."

If you're not sure why that surprise bit of intel might be a big deal to this reporter, it's becauseYou're Wrong About is among the most-listened-to podcasts in the U.S. The biweekly show, which takes a look at things that history has gotten wrong, was co-created by Marshall and journalist Michael Hobbes in 2018, when Hobbes first reached out to her about a new idea.

"At the time, I think the working title was I Misremember the '90s," Marshall says. She had one note: Could they open it up to all periods of history?

Back then, Marshall was freelancing, and struggling to place stories about these very thingslike, what if she re-examined the case of Amy Fisher, for example? "The response I got typically was like, 'No! There's nothing there! No one cares! No one wants to hear you scold the media about how it handled Amy Fisher,'" she says.

The result was that Marshall had a backlog of unplaceable stories, an "attic-worth of material" that dovetailed wonderfully with the podcast's premise.

You're Wrong About has proven all those assigning editors from Marshall's past wrong; it turns out people do want to hear someone scoldwith humor and warmtha media and a public that has historically misunderstood and misremembered everyone from Courtney Love to Kitty Genovese to Marie Antoinette.

"Most people I know love Wikipedia deep dives, but there's only so many you can go on," Marshall says. The experience of listening to You're Wrong About is like someone cracked a few beers, booted up their MacBook, and hopped down that Wiki rabbit hole for you.

Many of its subjects are women who've been wronged, like Terri Schiavo and Monica Lewinsky. (And yes: There is an Amy Fisher episode.) "Especially growing up in the '90s, your media diet, you look back on it later and you're like, 'What were we doing?'" But it's not always figures from history; You're Wrong About digs into cultural phenomena, from the Satanic Panic to the rise of email ("two equally scary things," Marshall quips), and events from The Jonestown Massacre to The Wardrobe Malfunction.

Since co-host Michael Hobbes departed the show in 2021, Marshall has been bringing on guests, working with people she knows already and those she admires from afar. She's recorded a few popular episodes with the writer and adventurer Blair Braverman (also some of my personal favorites), including a recent look at the life of Chris McCandless, the subject of Jon Krakauer's Into The Wild.

One frequent collaborator is Jamie Loftus, the weirdo podcasting genius behind shows including Lolita Podcast, Aack Cast, and Ghost Church, who joined Marshall during her first tour dates last year and returns for this tour.

"I love working with Jamie specifically," Marshall says. "I think she's equally talented as a podcaster, as a live performer, as a comedian, as somebody who is doing the best, weirdest, smartest performance art that's happening right now."

Saturday's live show will combine a few topics: Marshall is presenting to Loftus on the subject of the Reagans (her current obsession), and Loftus plans to present on Bonnie and Clyde. There'll also be some show-stopper elements thrown in there... not to set expectations too high, but during their live shows last fall, Loftus's talk on competitive hot-dog eating culminated in a hot-dog eating contest between the two. The loser got mustard poured on them; the "winner" got ketchup.

Saturday's show is currently sold out, though Marshall imagines a limited number of will-call tickets will be released day-of; keep an eye on the Cedar's social channels for updates.

Marshall sees the live shows as an extension of the podcast itself, "taking the spirit of the show and make it into theater in some way." From the beginning, You're Wrong About has been conversational, and casual, and that's part of its successit's just a (deeply researched) chat between two (very smart, very funny) people where the audience gets to listen in.

"The sound of a human voice does something... reading even the most wonderful sentences on a page doesn't have the same effect, at least for me," Marshall says. (But don't let that stop you from finishing this story!) "There's something about the intimacy of it, the feeling of someone speaking directly to you, feeling like they're inside your head, that can allow you to feel comforted by the presence of this other human being."

But, most importantly, let's make a point of setting our own record straight: Marshall recorded You're Wrong About's first episode here. It's basically a Minnesota original. She gets it.

"I'm from Oregon," she says, "and I feel like it's a similar vibe, where you can tell me the boringestlike, I learned that Linus Pauling was from Oregon, and ever since I've been like, 'I love Linus Pauling!'"

An Evening With You're Wrong AboutSaturday, March 25 at Cedar Cultural Center416 Cedar Ave. S., MinneapolisDoors: 7 p.m. / Show: 8 p.m.All ages

See the rest here:
Sarah Marshall of 'You're Wrong About' on Wikipedia Deep Dives ... - Racket

Are you ready to see AI doing work in Hollywood?

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing the world as we know it, and the film industry is no exception. Hollywood, as a major player in the industry, is increasingly using AI as a tool to enhance the creative process, streamline production, and improve decision-making.

From writing and directing to producing and marketing, AI is being used in various ways to make Hollywood more efficient and effective. However, with these advancements come potential risks and challenges, such as the loss of creative control and the homogenization of output. It's kind of scary to think your job may not be safe because they're going to bring in a computer to do it.

In this article, we will explore how AI is affecting Hollywood and what the future may hold for this evolving relationship between technology and creativity.

Let's take a look at how artificial intelligence can affect Hollywood as a whole.

Let's take a gander at the general way artificial intelligence will change things. Some of this stuff is already happening.

Personalized Content: AI algorithms can analyze data about viewer preferences and make recommendations based on those preferences. This could lead to more personalized content being produced, as studios can use AI to tailor their movies to specific audiences.

Improved Special Effects: AI can be used to create more realistic and impressive special effects. For example, AI can be used to create more realistic facial expressions and movements in computer-generated characters.

Cost Reduction: AI can be used to automate certain aspects of the filmmaking process, such as editing or sound design, which could reduce costs and increase efficiency.

Storytelling: AI could be used to generate storylines and plot points, which could help filmmakers develop new ideas and create more compelling narratives.

Data Analysis: AI can be used to analyze data from box office sales and viewer feedback to help studios make more informed decisions about what types of movies to produce and how to market them.

AI is already having an impact on the film industry and is likely to continue to do so in the future. In terms of writers in Hollywood, AI could potentially have both positive and negative effects.

On the positive side, AI could be used as a tool to help writers with tasks such as generating ideas, developing characters, and even writing dialogue. For example, some companies are already using AI algorithms to analyze audience data and make recommendations about what kind of movies or TV shows are likely to be successful. AI could also be used to create more efficient and effective writing processes, allowing writers to focus more on the creative aspects of their work.

However, there are also potential negative effects of AI on writers in Hollywood.

One concern is that AI could be used to replace human writers altogether, leading to job losses and a loss of creativity in the industry. Another concern is that AI could be used to create content that is formulaic or lacks originality. It might be bad at the nuance of human experience and be limited with how it perceives life.

'Metropolis'Credit: Parufamet

Writers won't be the only ones affected by this new trend. Directors also should have some worries. On the positive side, AI could be used as a tool to help directors with tasks such as pre-visualization, shot planning, and post-production.

For example, AI could be used to create virtual sets, which could help directors to visualize their scenes and make decisions about camera angles and lighting before filming begins. AI could also be used to analyze and edit footage, making the post-production process more efficient and cost-effective.

However, there are also potential negative effects of AI on directors in Hollywood.

One concern is that AI could be used to replace human directors altogether. We would instead have computers trying to tell us about the human experience or estimating emotions they are not complex enough to feel. This could lead toward an overreliance on tropes or the points of view of the people who created the AI, which may not be reflexive as a whole.

'Mr. Robot'Credit: USA Network

When it comes to producing, AI could be used as a tool to help producers with tasks such as predicting audience response, optimizing marketing strategies, and even identifying potential investment opportunities.

For example, AI algorithms could analyze audience data to predict which types of films or TV shows are likely to be successful, helping producers make more informed decisions about what projects to pursue. AI could also be used to analyze marketing data and make recommendations about how to reach and engage audiences more effectively.

In reality, this kind of intelligence might completely eliminate producers. Who needs someone to make calls to package when a computer can send form emails to agents or use its metrics to decide which projects it should be greenlighting?

That just is the start.

'Ex Machina'Credit: A24

I hate being a constant fearmonger on this website, but I don't like the cavalier way people have been talking about artificial intelligence and its applications in Hollywood. It's going to take jobs away from artists and people with taste, and we have to nip that in the bud now before it is too late.

People keep saying that AI is further in the future than you think, but what if I told you that if you read this article, every paragraph up until this section was mostly written by a computer? Yes, I had to go through and polish it and, yes, there were a few mistakes, but we are not as far off from this being the norm as you think.

I legitimately just added the headings and let Chat GPT do the rest, mostly as an experiment. And I think we can agree those answers are well thought out and mimic the way I usually write. They even mimic our website format.

The fact is, when giant corporations buy a bunch of Hollywood companies, they are looking for ways to strip the movie and TV process down. How can we employ fewer people and maximize profits? Well, I think they will do it with computer-generated stories and positions.

That spells less creativity and originality and work for us all.

Let me know what you think about all this in the comments.

Read the original post:
How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect Hollywood? - No Film School