Media Search:



The Top Web Design Companies In March, According To DesignRush – PR Web

252,000 new websites are built every day

MIAMI (PRWEB) March 23, 2023

According to Siteefy, around 175 new websites are built every minute. Thats 252,000 new websites every day. It is increasingly important to invest in professional and authentic web design to stand out from the crowd and attract the audience's attention.

DesignRush, a B2B marketplace connecting businesses with agencies, outlined the leading web design companies that help organizations build fully functional and visually appealing websites that allure the audience and outperform competitors.

The top web design companies in March are:

1. Market Tactics - market-tactics.com Expertise: Web Development, Content Strategy, SEO and more

2. 69pixels - 69pixels.com Expertise: Interface Design, Branding & Identity, Digital Design and more

3. DigiHunk - digihunk.com Expertise: UI/UX Design, Web Development, eCommerce Solutions and more

4. Blase - blase.design Expertise: Web Design, Web App Development, SEO and more

5. Webzguru - webzguru.net Expertise: Web Development, Web Design, App Development and more

6. Digital Kangaroos - digitalkangaroos.com Expertise: Web Design & Development, Content Marketing, SEO and more

7. Bright Pink Agency - brightpinkagency.com Expertise: Graphic Design, Web Design, Brand Identity and more

8. PixelMongers - pixelmongers.com Expertise: Web Design, Graphic Design, Digital Marketing and more

9. Varga Girl Design - vargagirldesign.com Expertise: Logo Design, Web Design, Graphic Design and more

10. Declick Agency - declickagency.com Expertise: UI/UX Design, Brand Design, Copywriting and more

11. Paul & Marigold - paulandmarigold.com Expertise: Brand Development, Web Design & Development, Corporate Communications and more

12. Concentric Wellness - concentricwellness.com Expertise: Web Design, Website Audit, Branding and more

13. Kinematic Digital - kinematic.digital Expertise: UX Services, Web Design & Development, eCommerce Development and more

14. Anzarkhan.com - anzarkhan.com Expertise: Web Design, Web Development, SEO and more

15. HyperCube - hypercube.co.nz Expertise: WordPress Development, eCommerce Development, SEO and more

16. ev+ AGENCY - evhq.ca Expertise: Web Design, Video Production, Content Marketing and more

17. Vertient Technologies - vertient.com Expertise: Web Development, Graphic Design, Web Design and more

18. Pixelative - pixelative.co Expertise: Branding, UI/UX Design, Web Development and more

19. Lewis Media Group - lewismediagroup.net Expertise: Web Design, SEO, Video Production and more

20. Fast Web Design - fastweb.design Expertise: SEO, Web Design, Reputation Management and more

21. Compile Marketing - compilemarketing.com Expertise: Web Design, Web Development, SEO and more

22. SilverClouding Consultancy - silverclouding.com Expertise: Headless Commerce, Shopify Development, WordPress Development and more

23. 99Vision - wnhdigital.com Expertise: Graphic Design, Brand Identity, Web Design and more

24. Propelled It - propelledit.com Expertise: Web Design, Business Consulting, Brand Strategy and more

25. Revamp.design - revamp.design Expertise: Logo Design, Web Design, Graphic Design and more

26. Mayfair IT Consultancy - mayfairitconsultancy.com Expertise: Web Design, Video Animation, IT Training and more

27. 99 Robots - 99robots.com Expertise: Shopify Development, SEO, Advertising and more

28. The Digital Hacks - thedigitalhacks.com Expertise: Web Support, Web Hosting, Shopify Development and more

29. Mandasa Technologies - mandasa.in Expertise: Shopify Development, Theme Customization, App Development and more

30. Devstars - devstars.com Expertise: Magento Development, Shopify Development, WordPress Development and more

Brands can explore the top web design companies by location, size, average hourly rate and portfolio on DesignRush.

About DesignRush:

DesignRush.com is a B2B marketplace connecting businesses with agencies through expert reviews and agency ranking lists, awards, knowledge resources and personalized agency recommendations for vetted projects.

See the original post:
The Top Web Design Companies In March, According To DesignRush - PR Web

White Fragility author Robin DiAngelo is accused of being pro-segregation – Daily Mail

'White Fragility' author Robin DiAngelo has been accused of advocating for racial segregation in a bid to combat racism, prompting bewilderment from critics.

'People of color need to get away from White people and have some community with each other,' DiAngelo said during a March 1 webinar, 'Racial Justice: The Next Frontier.'

DiAngelo then went on to suggest that people who do not concede to antiracist teachings do not belong in modern workforces.

'In 2023, we have to see the ability to engage in these conversations with some nuance and some skill as a basic qualification and if you can't do that, you're just simply not qualified in today's workplace,' DiAngelo said.

'What I want to do is create a culture that actually spits out those who are resistant.'

DailyMail.com has contacted DiAngelo for comment.

The racially charged comments enraged conservatives on Twitter.

'Robin DiAngelo sounding like an old-line segregationist,' anti-CRT expert Chris Rufo tweeted in response to the clip.

Conservative podcast host Allie Beth Stuckey said DiAngelo's comments sounded like racial comments made by Dilbert creator, Scott Adams, that caused several newspapers to pull his long-running cartoon.

'When Robin DiAngelo says it, it's inspirational and she gets paid $20k. When Scott Adams says it, it's racist and he loses his job,' she tweeted.

Darrell B. Harrison, director of digital platforms at Grace to You Ministries, argued that DiAngelo's comments revealed her own racist attitudes.

'For people like Robin DiAngelo, it's always other white people who black people need to 'get away from,' but never her. DiAngelo is a woke Bull Connor, only instead of dogs and fire hoses, she uses the divisive and factious tenets of critical race theory to keep blacks in their place,' he tweeted.

The left-wing activist was on a panel with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) consultants Mary-Frances Winters and Mareisha N. Reese discussing the future of DEI when she made the comments.

Her most recent book title, 'The Facilitator's Guide for White Affinity Groups: Strategies for Leading White People in an Anti-Racist Practice,' also suggests she believes Whites should stay within their own racial social circles.

DiAngelo has published a number of academic articles on race, privilege, and education and written several books.

In 2011, she co-wrote with Ozlem Sensoy, 'Is Everyone Really Equal? An Introduction to Key Concepts in Critical Social Justice Education.'

The book won the American Educational Research Association's Critics' Choice Book Award in 2012 and the Society of Professors of Education Book Award in 2018.

DiAngelo later that year published a paper titled 'White Fragility' in The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, thereby coining the term.

She defined the concept of white fragility as 'a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves'.

Since 2016, DiAngelo has regularly led workshops on the topic. In 2017, the term 'white fragility' was shortlisted by the Oxford Dictionary for Word of the Year.

An in June 2020, during the George Floyd protests, White Fragility reached number one on the New York Times list.

DiAngelo makes an estimated $728,000 a year from speaking engagements and workshops and is charging an average of $14,000 per speech to talk about 'utlra-woke' concepts.

DiAngelo, who has a PhD in Multicultural Education from the University of Washington has written multiple books about confronting racism including New York Times bestseller 'White Fragility.'

When 'White Fragility' debuted in 2018, her average speaking fees were $6,200, according to her website.

From there they steadily climbed to to $9,200 in 2019 and $14,000 by August 2020.

Now, she said her agency - Big Speak - negotiates her fees, which are listed on the the company's website as $30,000 to $40,000.She also makes 7.5 percent in royalties from 'White Fragility.'

Her main focus is 'accountability within antiracist work is the understanding that what I profess to value must be demonstrated in action,' according to her website.

DiAngelo's 'Confronting Racism' LinkedIn presentation to Coca-Cola in February, which included slides that encouraging people to 'try to be less white,' was met with backlash.

The slides in question, which went viral on social media after they were revealed by a 'whistleblower' working for the soft drink giant in the US, told viewers that being 'less white' meant being 'less oppressive', 'less arrogant' and 'less ignorant'.

After calls for boycotts and lawsuits against Coca-Cola, the firm said it merely provided access to the slides on the LinkedIn Learning site as part of its diversity training, rather than making them required viewing. They've since been taken down.

It is unknown how much she was paid for the presentation.

Other speaking engagements included a $12,750 presentation at the University of Wisconsin in October 2020, which was reported by The Washington Free Beacon, a $12,000 two-hour lecture at the University of Kentucky, which was reported by The Daily Signal, and the Tulsa City-County Library paid her $15,000 for a 90-minute Zoom discussion, according to ocpathink.org.

All the outlets filed Freedom of Information requests to find out how much she was paid.

It's unclear how much money she makes per year from her book, speaking arrangements and as a tenured professor at Westfield State University in Massachusetts and an Affiliate Associate Professor of Education at the University of Washington, Seattle.

But after George Floyd's murder in May 2020, anti-racism speeches and training became a booming industry.

A July 1 story on Reason.com estimates she makes about $728,000 a year from speeches and workshops alone, with would put her in the top-earning 1 percent.

In her 'accountability' section on her website, DiAngelo defended her speaking fees, saying fees are rarely fixed and 'rise and fall based on the type of organization and fluctuations in demand.'

'My fee is on a sliding scale; I am paid more by corporate orgs, and much less by non-profits, particularly non-profits that are focused on anti-racist work and/or are BIPOC-led,' she said on her website, adding that she does a lot of reduced-rate, pro bono and fundraising work.

'This year thus far, with the popularity of my book and more work in the corporate sector, my fee has ranged from pro bono (zero) to upwards of $30,000, which is well within the standard range for a best-selling author who is in high demand,' she says on her website.

Her listed speaking fee is at the top end of anti-racism speakers listed on allamericanspeakers.com, including Martin Luther King Jr.'s daughter Dr. Bernice King, whose speaker fees are listed as $20,000 to $30,000.

But DiAngelo isn't the only person who's making money as the country has become more sensitive to race and race-based issues.

For example, Robette Ann Dias has been training people how not to be racist for nearly 20 years, but her organization - Crossroads Antiracism Organization and Training - would previously get about nine requests a month, according to a July 2020 Washington Post story.

The fight over critical race theory in schools has escalated in the United States over the last year.

The theory has sparked a fierce nationwide debate in the wake of the Black Lives Matter protests around the country over the last year and the introduction of the 1619 Project.

The 1619 Project, which was published by the New York Times in 2019 to mark 400 years since the first enslaved Africans arrived on American shores, reframes American history by 'placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the center of the US narrative'.

The debate surrounding critical race theory regards concerns that some children are being indoctrinated into thinking that white people are inherently racist or sexist.

Those against critical race theory have argued it reduces people to the categories of 'privileged' or 'oppressed' based on their skin color.

Supporters, however, say the theory is vital to eliminating racism because it examines the ways in which race influence American politics, culture and the law.

Within two weeks of Floyd's murder, her organization received 110 requests.

The organization charges $4,000 per day plus the expenses for trainers for introductory workshops, which run four to eight hours and includes 25 to 100 people.

For 'in-depth workshops,' the organization charges $9,000 per workshop plus the expenses for two trainers. Workshops typically run 2.5 days for a maximum of 45 participants.

The Washington Post story mentions DiAngelo's book as one of four examples of anti-racism training books that have climbed the bestseller list as the country became more 'woke' and sensitive towards race.

She and several other anti-racist authors and civil rights activists have been paid tens of thousands of dollars by higher learning institutions for lectures, fireside chats or keynote addresses.

Boston University professor and author Ibram Kendi, who wrote the NYT's bestseller 'How to be an Antiracist' among other books, was payed more $300,000 over the past few years to deliver speeches, mainly in universities, according to reporting by The Fix.

The outlet reported all the contracts with Kendi were worth at least $10,000 since 2019, and payments jumped after Floyd's death.

Kendi received $12,500 to $24,000 from five schools for anti-rasist lectures, most of which were 45 minutes plus a 15-minute Q&A section, between August and November 2020, The Fix reported.

The outlet is still waiting on multiple Freedom of Information requests for other public speaking engagements.

One of Kendi's most recent speeches was a $25,000 endeavor paid for byCharlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which angered two top North Carolina Republicans.

Republican Senate Leader Phil Berger and Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson issued a joint press release on June 23 condemning presentation while admitting they didn't watch it or read his book.

'The state's second-largest school district paid $25,000 to leading Critical Race Theory proponent Ibram X. Kendi for an event just last week,' Berger said in a statement.

'This is clear and direct evidence that Critical Race Theory is being pushed in North Carolina. The fact that a public school district would pay someone who chooses to teach others that 'the only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination' is unimaginable, Robinson said.

Another high profile speaker is Nikole Hannah-Jones, a Pulitzer-prize winning journalist and lead author of the New York Times '1619 Project.'

She was paid $50,000 by the Oregon State Education Department for two seminars and $25,000 for an online Zoom lecture given to the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication.

Both were revealed through Freedom of Information requests. She's represented by the Lavin Agency, but her speaking fees aren't listed.

Other antiracist speakers paid thousands of dollars for lectures or talks are Tim Wise, who was paid $10,000 by the University of Michigan for Martin Luther King Jr. celebration, and Dena Simmons, who was paid by the Naperville, Illinois school district in February for a 60-minute presentation.

Critical race theory and anti-racist literature have been polarizing topics, with some admonishing the idea, claiming it divides people of different races.

DiAngelo's work is no exception.

On her website, she said, 'We work towards creating a culture in which not engaging in antiracist practices within a racist society is what is actually uncomfortable.'

Critics, likeSteve QJ, a black writer whose story titled 'Robin DiAngelo Is The 'Vanilla Ice' Of Anti-Racism' was published by Illuminated-Curated, flat out called DiAngelo a 'racist.'

'Robin DiAngelo's 'White Fragility'has singlehandedly confused millions of people about race. It manages to talk down to black people andwhite people, all whilst offering nothing in the way of solutions,' he wrote.

'The most valuable contribution most people can make is to change their world. To stop treating black people as a field of study and start treating us like ordinary human beings.'

See the rest here:
White Fragility author Robin DiAngelo is accused of being pro-segregation - Daily Mail

Republican Ted Cruz introduces bill to block US supreme court expansion – The Guardian

US supreme court

Texas senator claims court dominated 6-3 by conservatives after ruthless GOP power plays must remain independent

The Republican senator Ted Cruz, whose party defied convention to delay then rush conservatives on to the supreme court, has introduced a constitutional amendment to stop Democrats expanding the court in response.

The Democrats answer to a supreme court that is dedicated to upholding the rule of law and the constitution is to pack it with liberals who will rule the way they want, Cruz said.

The supreme court should be independent, not inflated by every new administration. Thats why Ive introduced a constitutional amendment to permanently keep the number of justices at nine.

There is no constitutional provision for how many justices sit on the court.

Democrats say the current court is not independent of the Republican party.

In 2016, when the conservative Antonin Scalia died Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, held the seat open until a Republican president, Donald Trump, could replace a Democrat, Barack Obama, and nominate Scalias replacement. Neil Gorsuch filled that seat.

In 2020, Democrats were helpless again when Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a liberal lion, died shortly before the presidential election and McConnell changed course, rushing Amy Coney Barrett on to the court before Trump lost to Joe Biden.

Those changes and the replacement of the retiring Anthony Kennedy with Brett Kavanaugh produced a court dominated, 6-3, by conservatives.

Conservative justices including Coney Barrett and Clarence Thomas have claimed not to be influenced by political considerations.

Coney Barrett notably did so, saying the court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks, while standing next to McConnell at a political studies centre named for the Republican leader.

Among conservative rulings passed down by the new super-majority, a May 2022 decision saw the court side with Cruz in a case concerning personal loans to campaigns. The three liberal justices said the ruling paved the way for corruption.

But the Dobbs decision of last year, removing the right to abortion, most enraged Democrats and progressives.

On the left, plans have been floated to increase the size of the court and thereby redress its ideological balance.

Writing for the Guardian last year, David Daley, author of Ratf**ked: Why Your Vote Doesnt Count, said: The courts hard-right majority has neither popular support for its agenda nor institutional legitimacy.

It is the product of a hostile takeover of the courts 50 years in the planning by conservatives who have long understood that unpopular policies can be thrust upon Americans by an unaccountable and unelected judiciary.

The court must be expanded and reformed to counter a rightwing power play that threatens to remake American democracy and life itself.

Biden ordered a commission to study options for reform. It found bipartisan support for term limits for justices but reported profound disagreement on whether the court should be expanded. Biden has said he is not a fan of expanding the court.

Cruzs amendment has little chance of passing a Democratic-held Senate but 10 Republican senators supported it nonetheless.

Josh Hawley of Missouri said: For years the left has been desperate to pack the court to promote their radical agenda. We must ensure that we stay true to the courts founding principles, maintain the precedent of nine justices, and keep the Democrats from their brazen attempts to rig our democracy.

{{topLeft}}

{{bottomLeft}}

{{topRight}}

{{bottomRight}}

{{.}}

More:
Republican Ted Cruz introduces bill to block US supreme court expansion - The Guardian

Republicans Say Spending Is Fueling Inflation. The Fed Chair Disagrees. – The New York Times

WASHINGTON The chair of the Federal Reserve, Jerome H. Powell, has repeatedly undercut a central claim Republicans make as they seek sharp cuts in federal spending: Government spending is driving the nations still-hot inflation rate.

Republican lawmakers say spending programs signed into law by President Biden are pumping too much money into the economy and fueling an annual inflation rate that was 6 percent in February a decline from last years highs, but still well above historical norms. Mr. Powell disputed those claims in congressional testimony earlier this month and in a news conference on Wednesday, after the Fed announced it would once again raise interest rates in an effort to bring inflation back toward normal levels.

Asked whether federal tax and spending policies were contributing to price growth, Mr. Powell pointed to a decline in federal spending from the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.

You have to look at the fiscal impulse from spending, Mr. Powell said on Wednesday, referring to a measure of how much tax and spending policies are adding or subtracting to economic growth. Fiscal impulse is actually not whats driving inflation right now. It was at the beginning perhaps, but thats not the story right now.

Instead, Mr. Powell along with Mr. Biden and his advisers says rapid price growth is primarily being driven by factors like snarled supply chains, an oil shock following Russias invasion of Ukraine and a shift among American consumers from spending money on services like travel and dining out to goods like furniture.

Mr. Powell has also said the low unemployment rate was playing a role: Some part of the high inflation that were experiencing is very likely related to an extremely tight labor market, he told a House committee earlier this month.

But the Fed chairs position has not swayed congressional Republicans, who continue to press Mr. Biden to accept sharp spending reductions in exchange for raising the legal limit on how much the federal government can borrow.

Over the last two years, this administrations reckless spending and failed economic policies have resulted in continued record inflation, soaring interest rates and an economy in a recessionary tailspin, Representative Jodey C. Arrington, Republican of Texas and the chairman of the Budget Committee, said at a hearing on Thursday.

Republicans have attacked Mr. Biden over inflation since he took office. They denounced the $1.9 trillion economic aid package he signed into law early in 2021 and warned it would stoke damaging inflation. Mr. Bidens advisers largely dismissed those warnings. So did Mr. Powell and Fed officials, who were holding interest rates near zero and taking other steps at the time to stoke a faster recovery from the pandemic recession.

Economists generally agree that those stimulus efforts carried out by the Fed, by Mr. Biden and in trillions of dollars of pandemic spending signed by Mr. Trump in 2020 helped push the inflation rate to its highest level in 40 years last year. But researchers disagree on how large that effect was, and over how to divide the blame between federal government stimulus and Fed stimulus.

How Times reporters cover politics.We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. So while Times staff members may vote, they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. This includes participating in marches or rallies in support of a movement or giving money to, or raising money for, any political candidate or election cause.

One recent model, from researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the University of Maryland and Harvard University, estimates that about a third of the inflation from December 2019 through June 2022 was caused by fiscal stimulus measures.

Much of that stimulus has already made its way through the economy. Spending on pandemic aid to people, businesses and state and local governments fell sharply over the last year, as emergency programs signed into law by Mr. Biden and former President Donald J. Trump expired. The federal budget deficit fell to about $1.4 trillion in the 2022 fiscal year from about $2.8 trillion in 2021.

The Hutchins Center at the Brookings Institution in Washington estimates that in the first quarter of 2021, when Mr. Bidens economic aid bill delivered direct payments, enhanced unemployment checks and other benefits to millions of Americans, government fiscal policy added 8 percentage points to economic growth. At the end of last year, the center estimates, declining government spending was actually reducing economic growth by 1 percentage point.

Still, even Biden administration officials say some effects of Mr. Bidens and Mr. Trumps stimulus bills could still be contributing to higher prices. Thats because Americans did not immediately spend all the money they got from the government in 2020 and 2021. They saved some of it, and now, some consumers are drawing on those savings to buy things.

Increased consumer spending from savings could be pushing the cost of goods and services higher, White House economists conceded this week in their annual Economic Report of the President, which includes summaries of the past years developments in the economy.

If the drawdown of excess savings, together with current income, boosted aggregate demand, it could have contributed to high inflation in 2021 and 2022, the report says.

Some liberal economists contend consumer demand is currently playing little if any role in price growth placing the blame on supply challenges or on companies taking advantage of their market power and the economic moment to extract higher prices from consumers.

High prices are not being driven by excess demand, but are actually being driven by things like a supply chain crisis or war in Ukraine or corporate profiteering, said Rakeen Mabud, chief economist for the Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal policy organization in Washington.

Other economists, though, say Mr. Biden and Congress could help the Feds inflation-fighting efforts by doing even more to reduce consumer demand and cool growth, either by raising taxes or reducing spending.

Mr. Biden proposed a budget this month that would cut projected budget deficits by $3 trillion over the next decade, largely by raising taxes on high earners and corporations. Republicans refuse to raise taxes but are pushing for immediate cuts in government spending on health care, antipoverty measures and more, though they have not released a formal budget proposal yet. The Republican-controlled House voted this year to repeal some tax increases Mr. Biden signed into law last year, a move that could add modestly to inflation.

Republican lawmakers have pushed Mr. Powell on whether he would welcome more congressional efforts to reduce the deficit and help bring inflation down. Mr. Powell rebuffed them.

We take fiscal policy as it comes to our front door, stick it in our model along with a million other things, he said on Wednesday. And we have responsibility for price stability. The Federal Reserve has the responsibility for that, and nothing is going to change that.

Read more from the original source:
Republicans Say Spending Is Fueling Inflation. The Fed Chair Disagrees. - The New York Times

Republicans’ best hope for Wisconsin Senate is a Trump critic – POLITICO

Mike Gallagher, a 39-year-old former Marine, is widely viewed as a rising star in the GOP thanks to his vocal stance on China policy and prolific fundraising. | J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo

A public break with former President Donald Trump has been career suicide for many an ambitious GOP lawmaker in recent years. It might just be a boon for Rep. Mike Gallagher.

Top party officials in D.C. and back home in Wisconsin maintain the fourth-term congressman and new head of the China Select Committee represents their best shot at flipping the battlegrounds Senate seat in 2024.

There is just one thing they have to do first: convince him to run.

The 39-year-old former Marine is widely viewed as a rising star in the GOP thanks to his vocal stance on China policy and prolific fundraising. Beyond that, key Republicans say his criticism of Trump might just bolster his credibility with the very voters theyve lost in recent cycles. His nomination would be a strong indication the party is shifting gears and learning the lessons from 2022.

Gallagher has been evasive about his plans. But people close to him say hes not inclined to challenge Democratic Sen. Tammy Baldwin, a formidable campaigner and fundraiser in her own right. And they also recognize that Gallaghers break with Trump over Jan. 6, and recent insistence that the former president lost [his] support, will be tricky to navigate, particularly in a potentially messy primary, given Trumps immense sway over the party in recent years.

Should Gallagher pass on the contest, it could not only hurt Republicans chances of claiming the Senate in 2024, it would further underscore the hurdles the party faces in finding a winning electoral formula in a post-Trump world.

In their bid to oust Baldwin, senior Wisconsin Republicans are eager to find a candidate who can bring back the independent and moderate Republican voters in key suburbs who broke with the former president in 2020 and several of his top picks in 2022.

There are some signs that the former presidents grip on the GOP is beginning to slip. He has failed to scare away other presidential primary candidates and recent polling shows hed face stiff competition from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, among other potential contenders. In Wisconsin, where Ted Cruz beat Trump in the 2016 GOP primary, DeSantis led Trump in a hypothetical 2024 matchup with Biden, according to a Marquette Law Poll from late January. But Trumps standing in national primary polls has improved since then. And an impending indictment in a hush-money case has compelled many in the party to rally around the former president once more.

One Wisconsin Republican close to Gallagher, who was granted anonymity to talk about their private conversations with him, brushed off the notion that his public break with Trump would hurt him significantly in a future GOP primary. The person noted that the congressman didnt vote to impeach Trump or approve an independent commission to investigate the attack on the U.S. Capitol. Instead, the person said Gallaghers relatively lean legislative record on Wisconsin issues is his biggest vulnerability.

He hasnt been all that focused on whats been going on at home, said the Republican, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. If theres an Achilles heel, its there, not Trump.

Gallaghers profile in the party has risen rapidly since he was first elected to Congress in 2016, the same year Trump took the White House especially in his role as a leading voice on China policy. He burnished his hard-nosed stance as Trump took aim at Chinas unfair trading practices and other malign activities, though the economic fallout from the ensuing trade war fell on U.S. agriculture, a top industry in Gallaghers home state. Asked if he supported Trumps recent campaign proposal that would levy more tariffs on Chinese goods, something that has raised alarm among some other farm state Republicans, the new head of the House China Select Committee said he wasnt aware of the former presidents proposal to overhaul U.S. trade with China.

Despite his tensions with Trump, many Republicans are now openly suggesting Gallagher may be the partys best chance to oust Baldwin, the battle-tested incumbent Democrat, who has already amassed a huge war chest.

Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is leading Senate Republicans effort to flip the chamber and has suggested he will help tap more mainstream candidates this cycle, did not hide his enthusiasm about the prospect of the congressman joining the race.

Mike Gallagher would be a great candidate, Daines said. Hes the kind of candidate that with his distinguished service and then time in Congress, could win both the primary and general election.

If Mike got in, everybody would know thats the total package, said Brian Schimming, the states Republican party chair.

Trumps specter looms, however. Republicans in Wisconsin expect the former president to campaign there around the time of the state GOP convention in June, if not earlier. And Republicans hold their national convention in Milwaukee in July 2024.

For now, Gallagher insists that he is focused on his high-profile new post as the House GOPs preeminent China hawk, and not any potential future campaign.

Wisconsin Republicans close to the congressman describe him as whip smart, but also incredibly risk averse and extremely deliberative, sometimes to a point where hes slow to make decisions. They expect him, however, to likely leave the House after his current or following term in Congress, given his push early in his congressional career to limit House members to six terms in office.

Those Republicans say Gallagher, who beat his last Democratic challenger by 30 points in one of the few semi-swing regions left in the state, is more interested in a 2028 bid to replace Ron Johnson, should the states current GOP senator retire as expected, or a possible 2026 gubernatorial run, rather than facing Baldwin, whose own retail politics and fundraising skills make her an intimidating foe.

Should a Republican other than Trump win the White House in 2024, Gallagher, a one-time foreign policy aide to former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walkers presidential campaign, may be inclined to pursue a role in the administration, according to a Wisconsin GOP lawmaker and another Republican who was granted anonymity to speak openly about their private conversations with Gallagher. A role like national security adviser, Navy secretary or secretary of State would allow him to better deploy his expertise on China and foreign policy.

The opportunities for Mike become pretty wide, said one of the Republicans.

As the Wisconsin GOP field waits on Gallagher to make his 2024 plans known, Baldwin has been making moves of her own. Shes preparing to formally launch her campaign shortly after Wisconsins closely-watched state supreme court race April 4, according to two people familiar with the plans who were granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. Long able to shake the national Democratic brand, Baldwin has consistently outperformed fellow Democrats in the state, including in Gallaghers home district in the northeast, which spans the city of Green Bay, nearby suburbs and vast stretches of dairy farms, small towns and tribal lands.

Despite Baldwins past campaign success, senior Wisconsin Democrats believe her upcoming reelection race will be much closer, and won or lost on the margins like most statewide contests in recent years. Baldwins longtime aide Scott Spector is poised for a senior role in her reelect effort according to the two people with knowledge of the campaign plans.

Other possible GOP challengers who may jump in should Gallagher choose not to run include former state Sen. Roger Roth, who won the states Republican primary for lieutenant governor last August, according to people familiar with the plans.

Current Reps. Bryan Steil and Tom Tiffany, who has recently been traveling more within the state, have also been floated as possible candidates, especially if redistricting squeezes some members out of their seats. (Since the news of Trumps possible indictment, Steil and other House GOP members have rushed to defend the former president through letters and on Twitter. Gallaghers office has meanwhile avoided the subject, tweeting about student loans and local school sports state champions.) Trumps former White House chief of staff Reince Priebus was heavily involved in the midterms, sparking questions as to whether he was laying the groundwork for a run of his own.

David Clarke, a Trump acolyte and former Milwaukee Sheriff; former GOP Rep. Sean Duffy; former Senate and gubernatorial candidate Kevin Nicholson; and Eric Hovde, a wealthy Republican businessman who waged an unsuccessful Senate bid in 2012 are other names that have come up in conversations with GOP officials.

But another Wisconsin Republican acknowledged that many of those candidates have already used up a lot of their political capital in prior races. Its not a very deep bench.

Gallagher now appears to be keeping everything in play.

Asked earlier this month on Capitol Hill if he had any interest in challenging Baldwin next year, Gallagher said, My sole focus is on the select committee on the CCP not thinking about 2024.

He took a few steps and added: And providing the best constituent services for northeast Wisconsin.

Here is the original post:
Republicans' best hope for Wisconsin Senate is a Trump critic - POLITICO