Media Search:



The State of Crypto Regulation in the US – Eye On Annapolis

Greetings, fellow voyagers of the crypto sphere! As we meander through the labyrinthine realm of digital currencies, deciphering the regulatory edifice that overlays it proves perplexing. This structure assumes an extraordinary intricacy in the United States, emblematic of the nations stance as a linchpin in the global economy. This manuscript endeavors to illuminate this perplexing network, furnishing an exhaustive synopsis of the cryptocurrency supervisory framework in the US. So, secure your harness and embark upon this enlightening expedition!

Inception of Bitcoin

Our odyssey commences in 2009, a momentous epoch in the annals of financial chronology. This was the juncture at which an enigmatic entity, Satoshi Nakamoto, unshrouded Bitcoin to the worlds gaze. Transcending a mere novel currency, Bitcoin embodied a seismic paradigm shift poised to destabilize conventional monetary systems. As the pioneer cryptocurrency, Bitcoin unfurled the potentiality of decentralized, peer-to-peer economic exchanges, promulgating a radical reimagining of the financial concept.

After Bitcoins advent, many altcoins (alternative cryptocurrencies) rapidly burgeoned. Ethereum debuted, introducing the groundbreaking notion of smart contracts, while Ripple aspired to expedite international transactions, proffering a feasible substitute to sluggish, costly global bank transfers. This surge of ingenuity instigated an exponential proliferation of the cryptocurrency market.

In the sphere of US regulation, theSECcommands a conspicuous standing. Its mandate is to ascertain whether a digital asset qualifies as a security. If deemed so, the support comes under the SECs purview, compelling the issuer to adhere to various regulatory and reporting stipulations to uphold transparency and safeguard investors.

The CFTC is pivotal when a cryptocurrency is classified as a commodity. This entity oversees futures and derivatives markets, asserting that it perceives Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as commodities within its jurisdiction.

FinCEN emerges as another key contender in the regulatory theatre, concentrating on averting money laundering and fraudulent conduct. This entity requires cryptocurrency exchanges and wallet providers to conform to its rules, thereby striving to curb the illicit utilization of cryptocurrencies. If you are looking to trade crypto you should always look for a secure exchange likeCEX.IO

The IRS has stipulated that cryptocurrencies are recognized as property from a taxation perspective. Users must declare their capital gains or losses from cryptocurrency transactions in line with other property dealings.

A series of pivotal events have sculpted the regulatory terrain. One of the most consequential was the SECs 2017 proclamation that certainICOs(Initial Coin Offerings) could be classified as securities. This assertion placed numerous ICOs under the SECs scrutiny and established a benchmark for future token offerings.

Despite prevailing ambiguity, the forthcoming regulatory landscape will usher in enhanced lucidity. As the administration endeavors to balance nurturing technological advancement and assuring consumer protection, we can anticipate the regulatory topography to undergo corresponding evolution.

The impending regulatory modifications could profoundly impact cryptocurrency enterprises and investors. More remarkable regulatory lucidity could spur institutional involvement and expedite the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies. However, stringent regulations pose considerable obstacles for nascent crypto startups due to the escalating cost of regulatory adherence.

A dominant challenge within the crypto sphere is the requisite for regulatory precision. With diverse regulatory bodies interpreting cryptocurrencies variably, businesses and investors may need help navigating the regulations. For instance, while the CFTC perceives Bitcoin as a commodity, the SEC has hinted that specific cryptocurrencies could be securities.

Another considerable challenge is the transnational character of cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency transactions can effortlessly transcend borders, raising the question: which nations regulations should prevail? This issue grows exponentially intricate when considering regulatory structures for initial coin offerings (ICOs) or in cases of criminal activities such as fraud and money laundering.

The ascension of DeFi, or decentralized finance, has added a new dimension to the regulatory discourse. DeFi platforms function sans intermediaries, leveraging smart contracts on the blockchain. As DeFi continues its upward trajectory, regulators grapple with applying conventional financial statutes to this emergent technology.

While regulation presents hurdles for DeFi, it also aids in conferring greater legitimacy and trust, attracting an expanded user base to DeFi platforms. The code further stimulates traditional financial institutions to integrate with DeFi platforms, fanning the flames of innovation and growth within the sector.

Regulating cryptocurrencies is akin to a tightrope walk. Conversely, regulation is indispensable to safeguard consumers and curtail illicit activities. On the flip side, excessive regulation could smother innovation and impede the crypto industrys growth. The regulators task is to strike an optimal balance.

Some propose that the US adopt a pro-innovation regulatory stance, mirroring nations like Singapore and Switzerland. This could involve the creation of a regulatory sandbox wherein startups could experiment with their services under regulatory supervision. Such an approach could stimulate innovation while ensuring consumer protection.

Interpreting the constantly evolving panorama of cryptocurrency regulation in the US is complex, necessitating a delicate equilibrium between spurring innovation and ensuring consumer protection. As the crypto industry matures and ventures into uncharted territories like DeFi, well likely witness further regulatory architecture developments. Whether youre a crypto enthusiast, investor, or entrepreneur, keeping pace with these changes is vital for successfully navigating the crypto sphere.

Related

Read more from the original source:

The State of Crypto Regulation in the US - Eye On Annapolis

What are the repercussions of Bashaghas suspension in Libya? – Al Jazeera English

Video Duration 28 minutes 25 seconds 28:25

He was appointed prime minister in eastern Libya with a mandate to take over Tripoli.

Read more

Libya has been divided between two governments and two prime ministers.

One of them has now been suspended.Some analysts are warning that another power struggle could emerge.

How will this affect Libyas other government, which is based in Tripoli? And could the move lead to new alliances, both in politics and on the battlefield?

Presenter: Adrian Finighan

Guests:

Anas el Gomati Founder and director of Sadeq Institute

Mustafa Fetouri Journalist, academic and commentator on Middle East and North African affairs, specialising in Libya

Jason Pack President of the Libya-Analysis consultancy and author of, Libya and the Global Enduring Disorder

Read less

Published On 17 May 202317 May 2023

Click here to share on social media

View original post here:
What are the repercussions of Bashaghas suspension in Libya? - Al Jazeera English

The history of money: from silver coins to credit cards – FOREX.com US

Money has been around almost as long as we have. Its evolved from a simple system of exchange to a guiding element of almost every action we make. In this timeline we cover all types of money.

Money is an essential medium of exchange that can take many forms. Whether money is represented by a bead, metal coin, paper note, or string of code generated by a computer, its value is not determined by its form. The value of all money is determined by the importance other people place on it as a tool of exchange.

Money is primarily used as a medium of exchange, unit of measurement, and a storehouse for wealth. Totaling the many uses and forms of money, the entire global wealth count was estimated by Credit Suisse to be $463.6 trillion at the end of 2022.

The term money may be interchanged with the word currency. Some people use currency to refer to a more tangible concept of money, like paper notes or debt contracts, but the terms are generally used to mean the same thing.

Money has long been an integral part of human civilization. As weve advanced, money has also become a complex instrument to help us navigate and structure our world. In the rest of this article, we dive into the history of money and how it has evolved with our needs over thousands of years.

The concept of money has been around for thousands of years, so its invention is difficult to pinpoint. There is evidence of money being used in ancient civilizations in Mesopotamia and Egypt, where they used clay tablets to record debts and transactions. However, the first physical forms of money are believed to have emerged in China around 1000 BC in the form of cowrie shells as currency.

Money has been around for at least 5,000 years, with the earliest forms being in the form of commodities such as shells, salt, and livestock. Over time, the concept of money evolved, and new forms of currency were introduced.

The earliest form of money existed only as a concept through the practice of bartering. In a barter system, people exchange goods and services directly without the medium of money. When bartering, two parties must agree on a fair exchange rate of goods and services. For example, one person might trade two chickens for a new pair of sandals or a bag of rice.

Barter systems have many limitations. For a successful barter, you must find someone who has the exact thing you need and is willing to trade it for something you can provide. If there is more than one person who is willing to barter, there is no way to standardize the value of a barter. One cobbler may demand three chickens for a pair of shoes, while another cobbler in a neighboring town may only want one chicken in exchange for a similar pair of shoes.

The cost of traveling one town over for a better exchange rate adds another element to bartering, especially if youre already in need of new shoes. To better quantify the costs of various goods and services, people began using commodity forms of money.

Commodity money is the first tangible form of currency. Popular types of commodity money include salt, shells, beads, or other valuable items that could not easily be reproduced. With the development of commodity money, a person no longer needed to find someone who wanted to enter a one-for-one barter. Instead, they could exchange commodity money for a good or service, and the person paid was then able to use the commodity money they received for any future transactions.

As societies became more complex, people began using precious metals like gold and silver as commodities. These precious metals were harder to come by and more difficult to produce than previous commodity monies. They were also durable and held inherent value depending on the metals properties. The use of precious metals as commodity money eventually gave way to coin minting.

As well see later with representative money, gold and silver will continue to play a large part in the value of currencies despite moving further from commodities towards paper money. In fact, many people still speculate on the value of precious metals today through trading gold and silver.

Learn more about gold and silver trading, or practice trading the unleveraged precious metals with a FOREX.com demo account.

Coin minting is the formation of metal currency produced to a standard weight and size. Coin minting first began in 600 BC Lydia, a kingdom in ancient Greece. The uniformity of metal coins made money much easier to carry and trade while also reducing the risk of fraud. They also allowed for a divisional table of coins, where one coin equals the value of five less coins, and so on.

Coin minting marked a significant moment in the history of money. No longer was the value of money derived just from the object of exchange. Instead, money began to represent a value ascribed to it by the government issuing the coins.

Representative money was developed as an easier way to conduct financial transactions without having to always carry weighty coins. Representative money is often printed on paper and represents something of value without holding intrinsic value.

Unlike the next form of money, fiat, representative money has a direct tie to a commodity or other physical asset with a tangible measure of value supporting the face value of representative money.

The gold standard is an example of representational money used throughout many countries in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It linked a countrys currency to the value of gold, backing each unit by a specific amount of gold. This system directly ensured the value of paper currency notes. As more countries adopted the gold standard, it also provided an easy exchange rate among countries and helped keep inflation in check by preventing any sharp changes in value.

However, the demand for more money eventually outstripped the supply of gold. To satisfy this change, dozens of countries convened to establish the Bretton Woods system. The system was a negotiated monetary order intended to regulate economic relationships between 44 different countries, encouraged by the economic collapse of many countries following World War II. A collective agreement was reached that some new order needed to be established to maintain global economic security. Hence the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement.

Countries included in the Bretton Woods system agreed to peg their currencies within 1% of fixed parity rates to the US dollar. The dollar was then backed by bullion gold at a rate of $35 per troy ounce of gold. The countries also established the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to monitor exchange rates and ensure no countrys foreign reserves diminished too low to maintain its set dollar peg.

In the summer of 1971, The US ended the dollars fixed conversion rate to gold, effectively ending the Bretton Woods system as well. This converted the US dollar and many other major currencies into fiat money. The IMF still monitors economic health of countries, but it can only recommend policies and facilitate transactions between countries to promote global financial stability.

Fiat money is similar in form to representative money, but instead of being backed by a real commodity, its value is established by the backing of a government. Fiat money holds no intrinsic value, and it can even hold risk when a government is unable to support the value of its fiat money.

The value of fiat currency is determined by floating exchange rates, which rise and fall in response to economic events and manipulation by central banks. This is different to the fixed exchange rates common during the Bretton Woods system.

Floating exchange rates function by changes in supply and demand of other currencies. In a floating exchange rate, a countrys currency demand is balanced by its international trade to maintain equilibrium in its balance of payments (BoP). You can learn more about the differences between fixed and floating exchange rates here.

Central banks and the banking system at large play a huge role in controlling the value of fiat money. Most notably, these banks control interest rates and the money supply to manage how quickly inflation occurs. Inflation is the rate at which prices rise and is generally caused by more workers entering the market and earning higher wages. In a successful economy, a steady level of inflation is expected.

However, inflation too high or too low can cause serious trouble for free-floating fiat currencies. Typically, imbalanced production in one country can create rapid inflation, causing one currency to depreciate against another. If inflation were to skyrocket, foreign goods and services will become cheaper relative to domestic ones. This change influences consumer preferences and causes imports to increase, causing more of that currency to spread among the global forex market.

Crude banking establishments have existed at almost all points in history. As early as 2000 BC, empires in China, India, Assyria, and Greece all set up some type of banks that issued loans and held deposits. But these systems disappeared with the collapse of each empire. Banks as we know them today have only existed since the 16th century. Their functions include holding deposits, exchanging currencies, issuing debts, and practicing fractional reserve banking.

With the free float of national currencies, traders and investors were able to begin speculating on the future value of currencies. Forex traders buy and sell currencies to take advantage of fluctuations in exchange rates. They study national economies and make trades based on future projections.

Forex trading is the largest financial market in the world, with over $7.5 trillion changing hands every day. It experiences a lot of volatility, giving trades ample opportunities to enter the market. However, the large swathe of factors affecting a currencys value make forex a complicated market for traders to learn.

Interested in trading foreign exchange? Learn more about forex in our Trading Academy, then practice with a free demo account.

The innovation of fiat money has also allowed for online transactions, as now financial exchanges can be logged digitally through verified financial institutions without physical representations ever changing hands. Digital money is characterized as any money transaction that only takes place electronically, with no physical money being exchanged. Digital money greatly improves the monetary system, allowing for instantaneous transactions across borders and speeding up the implementation of monetary policy through central banks.

Digital money can represent fiat currencies exchanged using credit cards or online banking apps. More often though it is used to describe cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrencies are decentralized, digital currencies that can be used and speculated on like other currencies.

Cryptocurrencies were first created in 2008 with the introduction of bitcoin, a decentralized currency created by the anonymous founder Satoshi Nakamoto. To be decentralized, bitcoin transactions are recorded on a public blockchain hosted by independent computers around the world. This network of computers individually verifies every exchange made with bitcoin and authenticate legitimate transactions.

There are now tens of thousands of different cryptocurrencies in use with each one various uses and governance depending on who created them. Some cryptos are occasionally burned by developers to tighten the supply; others known as stable coins are backed by fiat currencies like the US dollar. Many cryptocurrencies are made for use on their own blockchain to pay for related applications, creating miniature financial ecosystems.

The advantages of digital money have prompted some countries to experiment with cashless economies. Countries like Sweden, China and the Bahamas have all done major research into a national digital currency or eradicating fiat currencies completely. Some brick-and-mortar businesses have also done away with cash payments to dissuade counterfeit bill concerns or potential register hold ups.

There are downsides to cashless societies though. Implementations of such would widen the economic disparity between those with easy access to digital tools and those without. It may also hinder people traveling across countries whose own economies are more traditional. There are also frequent fees associated with digital banking or currency conversions that dissuade some people from going cashless.

Follow this link:

The history of money: from silver coins to credit cards - FOREX.com US

Libyan parliament replaces its appointed PM, spokesperson says – Reuters

BENGHAZI, Libya, May 16 (Reuters) - Libya's eastern-based parliament voted on Tuesday to replace Fathi Bashagha as prime minister, its spokesperson said, after he failed to take office in Tripoli where the incumbent Abdulhamid al-Dbeibah has refused to cede power.

The parliament assigned Bashagha's finance minister Osama Hamad to take over his duties, parliament spokesperson Abdullah Belhaiq said, part of an apparent new push to oust Dbeibah and install a new government in Tripoli.

Bashagha was appointed in March 2022 but his efforts to enter Tripoli and take office ended in battles between factions aligned with him and others aligned with Dbeibah, and he has had to operate outside Tripoli with no control of state finances.

He wrote to the parliament earlier on Tuesday saying he was handing his duties over to his deputy Ali Qatrani, without saying whether or when he planned to resume them. A source close to him said Bashagha was taking a personal leave.

Votes and other steps announced by parliamentary authorities have sometimes later been denied by other members of the chamber who accuse the speaker Aguila Saleh of pushing through policies without proper procedure. Saleh has denied this.

Libya has had little peace since the 2011 NATO-backed uprising against Muammar Gaddafi, and it split in 2014 between warring eastern and western factions, though major fighting has been paused since a ceasefire in 2020.

Dbeibah's government was installed through a U.N.-backed process in 2021 that was aimed at holding elections that year, but the vote was cancelled amid disputes over the rules.

Diplomacy now is focused on bringing the parliament and another legislative body, the High State Council, to agree on rules that would allow an election to take place.

However, senior figures in the parliament have pushed for a new interim government before any election, a move their opponents see as a delaying tactic to put off a vote and hang onto their positions.

By replacing Bashagha, figures who oppose Dbeibah may also hope they can win enough support from other factions in western Libya to replace him and gain access to state finances.

The High State Council, which never recognised the appointment of Bashagha, called the parliament's move to replace him a "political absurdity" in a statement.

Reporting by Ayman al-Warfali, writing by Angus McDowall; Editing by Alex Richardson

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read more:
Libyan parliament replaces its appointed PM, spokesperson says - Reuters

Libyas east-based parliament votes to suspend PM – Africanews English

One of Libyas two administrations voted Tuesday to suspend and investigate its prime minister, accusing him of failing to achieve his governments objectives, the parliaments spokesperson said. Fathi Bashagha was prime minister of Libyas eastern-based parliament, known as the House of Representatives, which operates in Tobruk.

Torn by civil conflict since 2011, Libya is divided between two rival governments, each backed by international patrons and numerous armed militias on the ground. Libyas Tripoli-based government is headed by Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah.

Mohamed Mansour, a spokesperson for Bashagha, said the former prime minister would soon publish an official statement regarding Tuesdays decision.

In a recorded statement , Abdullah Belhaiq, the parliament spokesperson, criticized Bashagha for failing to deliver on the governments pledge to enter the capital, Tripoli, the seat of the western rival administration.

Bashagha, who was elected as prime minister in February 2022, tried to seat his government in the capital last May, arriving in Tripoli with a number of his Cabinet ministers.

Clashes soon broke out between rival militias, forcing the former air force pilot to retreat to the city of Sirte.

A number of members of the House of Representatives asked in more than one session that the Prime Minister be investigated, Belhaiq said.

However, few details on Bashaghas other alleged failings were provided. The House of Representatives finance minister, Osama Hamada, took over Bashaghas duties, he said.

Earlier on Tuesday, however, Bashagha issued a statement to the parliament announcing that he was passing his duties to Deputy Prime Minister Ali Qatrani. No further details were given. The conflict between the two statements could not immediately be reconciled.

Despite Belhaiqs explanation, Jalel Harchaoui, a Libya specialist and associate fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, believes the suspended premier may have out-served his usefulness to Khalifa Hifter, commander of the self-styled Libyan National Army. The group is the dominant armed force in the countrys east and south.

Hifter and his family are seeking more influence in Tripoli and have been engaging in regular talks with Dbeibahs nephew along with militia leaders from the west, Harchaoui said.

The U.N.s special representative to Libya, Abdoulaye Bathily, unveiled a new initiative in late February aiming to usher the divided country to the ballot box before the end of 2023. Both parliaments have agreed on a joint committee to draft electoral law for the vote, however, progress has since slowed.

A previous U.N.-brokered process installed an interim government with Dbeibah at its head in early 2021 with the aim of guiding the country to elections later that year. The elections were never held following disagreements over several key issues, including the eligibility for presidential candidacy.

Link:
Libyas east-based parliament votes to suspend PM - Africanews English