Media Search:



Accelerating innovation: Israel welcomes cutting-edge supercomputer – Ynetnews

The American semiconductor giant, NVIDIA, unveiled on Monday morning a supercomputer named Israel-1, estimated to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

According to the company, it is the most powerful supercomputer in Israel and one of the most powerful on earth. It includes 2,048 H100 graphic processors and 2,560 BlueField-3 DPU chips, all developed locally.

The stated purpose of the new supercomputer is to facilitate collaborations with industry, support internal R&D, and serve as a showcase for building high-performance computers based on NVIDIA's new Spectrum-X platform.

A supercomputer is an exceptionally powerful entity, composed of thousands of processors, used for performing highly complex tasks, including the development of generative artificial intelligence applications and quantum computing, as well as running scientific simulations.

The main advantage to having a supercomputer in Israel is primarily that local users no longer need to pre-order processing time on scattered supercomputers worldwide.

Currently, supercomputer facilities rent out their usage time to external clients. Of course, availability corresponds to payment, making the use of this technology expensive and cumbersome.

An Israeli supercomputer can greatly streamline processes for local entities and accelerate their research and development endeavors.

The establishment of the supercomputer in Israel marks a significant milestone, introducing an internationally recognized infrastructure that surpasses the standard capabilities found in the local industry.

Israel-1, unveiled at the recent Computex conference in Taiwan, is poised to deliver exceptional AI performance, reaching up to 8 exaflops (equivalent to 10 raised to the power of 18, a quintillion). This achievement positions it among the world's fastest supercomputers for executing artificial intelligence computations.

The timing of this announcement is significant. In recent years, Israel has successfully attracted prominent tech giants like Google, Amazon, Oracle and Microsoft, all of whom have established their own local cloud computing systems.

To facilitate the establishment of these data centers, local telecommunications companies have partnered with these tech giants to create high-speed fiber-optic communication infrastructures, connecting Israel to both Asia and Western Europe with remarkably low latency.

Although NVIDIA's primary focus for Israel-1 is on demonstrations and internal usage, when asked by Ynet, the company did not rule out the possibility of also catering to customers in neighboring countries within the region.

Nvidia's initiative is distinct in that it does not involve any state investment, despite the previous announcement by the Bennett-Lapid government last year regarding the allocation of funds for an Israeli supercomputer project, estimated at approximately $78 million.

However, given the typical uncertainties that arise following a change in Israel's government, it remains unclear to what extent this budget will be used for the development and construction of the supercomputer.

In fact, Nvidia's announcement could potentially further postpone the establishment of the supercomputer, as the government may prefer to encourage private sector investments in the field rather than relying solely on the current state budget, which may not be sufficient.

By year's end, the company plans to have Israel-1 up and running at its own facility. While Nvidia has not disclosed comprehensive details concerning the expenses and specific functions of the supercomputer, as the launch date draws near, more information likely will be made available.

Read the original post:
Accelerating innovation: Israel welcomes cutting-edge supercomputer - Ynetnews

How Miguel’s ‘Sure Thing’ Topped Pop Airplay 12 Years After Its … – Billboard

In early 2011, Miguel was a rising R&B singer who had just released his debut album, All I Want Is You, and was seeing his single Sure Thing gain traction on the R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay chart. The song would eventually reach No. 1 that May, while also climbing to the summit of Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs and peaking at No. 36 on the Hot 100, where it spent 23 weeks between March and August, when it fell from the chart. After 59 weeks on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, it eventually fell from that chart in 2012.

And that was the extent of its chart run until this year, when a TikTok trend led to an explosion in streams, catapulting it back onto the charts and to entirely new territory. Earlier this month, Sure Thing broke the record for most weeks on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart at 76 (it is now at 78), and this week it achieved a mainstream crossover, 12 years after its initial debut on the charts, by reaching No. 1 on Pop Airplay, the longest trip to the top of that chart from a songs release in history.

Its the latest example of older songs being reinvigorated and reaching new chart heights in recent months, following The Weeknds Die For You (after a remix featuring Ariana Grande) and Lady Gagas Bloody Mary, which also benefited from a TikTok trend. And it helps RCA senior vp of digital marketing Tarek Al-Hamdouni earn the title of Billboards Executive of the Week.

Here, Al-Hamdouni explains how the track came back after such a long break, and how RCA helped spur it into a new realm. We know activity can spring up at a moments notice, and when it does, the best labels are able to move quickly and turn a spark into a flame before it goes out, Al-Hamdouni says.

This week, Miguels Sure Thing reached No. 1 on Billboards Pop Airplay chart, 12 years after its initial chart run. What key decisions did you make to help make that happen?

The climb to No. 1 began in November of 2022 when we first saw the signs of organic growth and engagement on Sure Thing across socials and streaming services. The first major decision came in us validating the opportunity and investing in sustaining the activity across TikTok, Reels, Shorts & Snapchat. The initial goal was to see how far we could take the trend, knowing every jump in creations and streams was broadening our listener base and building familiarity, which would eventually result in bigger opportunities.

We knew the record was already a favorite among fans since its release, but the key component to this new activity is that it was coming from new listeners. This led us to make the key decision to treat Sure Thing as a new record in our marketing efforts, also giving us the new task of turning listeners into fans. To connect the dots, we worked closely with Miguel who deserves all the credit in the world for leaning in with curiosity, passion and optimism around this new activity to start to engage with fans and content across socials.

Our promotion team did a fantastic job in following along with all the activity we were generating and timed their impact such that we were already receiving pull from the markets and stations. The last key decision Ill offer up is the move to leverage the activity around Sure Thing to prime the market for new music from Miguel, something that we kicked off with his new single, Give It To Me.

In its original run, the song was an R&B/Hip-Hop Airplay hit. Why did the song work at Pop radio this time around?

I think the beauty of an artist like Miguel is that hes always been ahead of his time. While often thrown into the R&B box, his music and artistry have always pulled from diverse corners of the music spectrum. And when you look at the freedom streaming has given Gen Z to bounce from record to record and genre to genre with such ease, its no wonder they gravitate towards a forward-thinking artist like Miguel.

Its also worth noting that the dynamic between data and radio has strengthened at a rapid pace over the last few years. This has given us the opportunity to build our case in advance of an impact, showing the audience potential and, in a lot of ways, letting the story and streams reach critical mass with core Gen Z music fans before taking it to the broader audiences that only radio can reach.

The songs resurgence originated on TikTok with a sped-up version. How did that come about? How often are these sped-up versions of tracks spawning new life for songs?

The sped-up version of Sure Thing emerged purely as organic UGC on TikTok. It wasnt necessarily a surprise to see the activity come from such an edit, as sped-up sounds have been a trend on TikTok and across UGC for quite some time now. That said, I do think its fair to say that sped-up sounds hit a bit of critical mass in early 2023 as we started to see platforms like TikTok create specific playlists centered around the phenomenon, all of which gave us more editorial placements and ways for Miguel to lean in.

The opportunities to breathe new life into a record through a sped-up sound are plentiful, but its important to note the viral success of a record like Sure Thing is still a huge outlier in terms of how much effect a campaign could have. At this point, I expect most singles to be accompanied by a sped-up version at some point in their life cycle.

This is the latest example of an older track coming back to be a force at radio and in pop culture something that almost never used to happen. Are you guys increasingly focused on working catalog songs in a similar manner to new songs?

We dont focus solely on the catalog aspect of any record at this point as much as were focused on using the influx of data we receive from social and streaming platforms to ensure we never miss an opportunity. We know activity can spring up at a moments notice, and when it does, the best labels are able to move quickly and turn a spark into a flame before it goes out.

The reliance on data is important because our core mission as marketers is to create this activity and engagement out of the gate. By collaborating with our internal data teams, we can build tools to monitor the key aspects we believe drive streaming growth while spending the majority of our time and energy collaborating with our artists and building next-level marketing campaigns.

Although to be fair, I think the rediscovery of music by the next generation of listeners is something that has happened for quite some time. Prior to shortform video, syncs played a huge role in this rediscovery, going back to examples like Nick Drakes Pink Moon in Volkswagens 2000 Cabrio commercial to the much more recent lift of Kate Bushs Running Up That Hill off the back of its inclusion in season four of Stranger Things.

The song also broke the record for most weeks ever spent on Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs, now at 78. How did you help market the track beyond radio and TikTok?

Outside of those two platforms, we worked to ensure this record and Miguels content was spread far and wide across the internet. We built custom campaigns for Instagram and YouTube, we drove awareness and engagement through savvy ad spends and boost campaigns. And we worked closely with media accounts and press outlets to drive consistent presence in front of a wide range of audiences.

What have you learned from the songs surprise success that you can use moving forward on other projects and songs?

When you zoom out far enough, you start to see that the equation were chasing with a resurgence is new context for a great record with a new, young and engaged audience. Additionally, the benefits of driving engagement through a catalog record doesnt require the type of success were seeing on Miguel to be meaningful. Going forward, we see this as a key way to drive engagement and build demand for new music for any artist with an established catalog.

Follow this link:
How Miguel's 'Sure Thing' Topped Pop Airplay 12 Years After Its ... - Billboard

Global Online Reputation Management Market is Segmented by … – The Navajo Post

Absolute Markets Insights published a new research publication on GlobalOnline Reputation Management Marketoffering a detailed analogy that gives the reader an insight into the intricacies of the various elements like the growth rate, and impact of the socio-economic conditions that affect the market space. An in-depth study of these numerous components is essential as all these aspects need to blend-in seamlessly for businesses to achieve success in this industry.

Major Market Players Profiled in the Online Reputation Management Market Report include:

Argent Media, Digital Marketing Agency, EZ Rankings, Go Fish Digital, KLonsys, Marketing Blitz Inc., Reputation Defense Network, Inc., Reputation Management Consultants, Inc., Reputation Rhino LLC, Reputation X, Reputation.ca Ltd., SEO Inc., Tarkia group, Inc., TechWyse Internet Marketing, Thrive Internet Marketing Agency, WebiMax.com, WSI.

Request to Get the PDF Sample of the Report:https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/request_sample.php?id=817

North America online reputation service market accounted for US$ 301.50 Mn in 2023, and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.9% during the forecast years (2023-2030).

The report analyses the Online Reputation Management market and gives an intricate examination of its applications. The report includes a detailed cost evaluation analysis of products that are available in the worldwide market with regard to existing manufacturer profit margins. It helps figure out the primary driving forces of the market in significant end-use organizations around the world. It likewise constitutes a broad investigation of the restraints on the market, business sector structure and the business pattern of the Online Reputation Management market. Meetings and interviews with the leading market participants have been used in order to present primary information regarding the market.

Trusted current state analysis tools, such as Porters five forces analysis and SWOT analysis are employed in the report to assess the Online Reputation Management market data to deploy a complete overview of the market. Furthermore, this report gives a complete review of the magnitude and application scope of the market around the world. A detailed overview of the purchasing criteria and difficulties confronted in the Online Reputation Management business sector is also elaborated in this report.

The report provides a basic overview of the industry including definitions and classifications. The Online Reputation Management market analysis is provided for the international markets including development trends, competitive landscape analysis, and key regions development status.

Ask for Discount on this Report:https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/ask_for_discount.php?id=817

Market Segmentation:

ByServices

Reputation Building

Reputation Monitoring and Repair

Content Development & Promotion

Search Engine Optimization (SEO)

Social Network Analysis

Review Management

Negative Content Suppression

Legal Services

Others

By EndUser

Individuals

Enterprises

Small and Medium Enterprises

Large Enterprises

Online Reputation Management Market ReportGeographic Coverage:

The report on the Online Reputation Management market provides a detailed country-level cross-sectional analysis across various regions around the globe. The report contains detailed market size and forecast for 5 geographic regions: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.

In the end the Global Online Reputation Management Market Report delivers conclusion which includes Research Findings, Market Size Estimation, Market Share, Consumer Needs/Customer Preference Change, Data Source. These factors will increase business overall.

Enquiry Before Buying this Premium Report:https://www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/enquiry_before_buying.php?id=817

Customization of the Report:

This report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with our sales team, who will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs.

Contact Us:

Company: Absolute Markets Insights Email Id:sales@absolutemarketsinsights.com Phone: IN +91-740-024-2424 , US +1-510-420-1213 Contact Name: Shreyas Tanna Website:www.absolutemarketsinsights.com/

Original post:
Global Online Reputation Management Market is Segmented by ... - The Navajo Post

Why podcasters are selling subscriptions through third-party vendors – Digiday

As more podcasters offer subscriptions around their shows to build a more direct relationship with listeners and an additional revenue stream, many podcasters are looking beyond Apple and Spotifys subscription platforms to third-party vendors like Supporting Cast and Supercast.

We are seeing an appetite for subscriptions, But we need more competition than just Apple in the market, said Sony evp and co-head Steve Ackerman.

The main reasons for this are threefold: more access to listener data, not being beholden to one platform in particular and more favorable revenue share deals, podcast executives told Digiday. Apple and Spotify dont share data like subscribers email addresses or credit card information with podcasters. Apple takes 30% of subscription revenue from podcasters. Spotify takes 5%.

Supporting Cast and Supercast share listener data with podcasters, giving them the ability to directly reach out to listeners. Supercast charges a flat fee of 59 cents per subscriber a month, said Jason Sew Hoy, co-founder and CEO at Supercast. Supporting Cast takes on average about half the cut that Apple does, said founder and CEO David Stern.

Being able to access more data was absolutely a part of why Crooked Media chose Supercast to host their subscription business, which launched last week, said Dariush Brizuela-Nothaft, svp of community & partnerships at Crooked Media. Crooked uses their own Stripe account on their website to take subscription payments. They get access to analytics on who is listening to what episodes, and can make content decisions based on that data, Brizuela-Nothaft said. He declined to share how many people had signed up for Crookeds three-tiered subscription around its Pod Saves America franchise.

However, the issue with launching a subscription somewhere other than Apple or Spotify is friction. Most podcast listeners are on the Spotify or Apple Podcasts app. Buying a podcast subscription on those apps is straightforward, and can be done in just a few clicks (especially on Apple Podcasts, and for those who use Apple Pay).

The challenge with other platforms is listeners have to click through to a podcasts show notes and find a link to a landing page, or go directly to a podcasts website to sign up. Its also why nearly all the podcast networks interviewed for this story (other than Crooked Media) sell subscriptions on Apple or Spotify in addition to supplementing it with other third party platforms like Supporting Cast or Supercast.

It can also mean more work for the publisher, said Stern at Supporting Cast. They have to be diligent about putting the link in their show notes, and about reading the URL where they can subscribe [in the podcast], he said.

But that doesnt seem to be a huge concern for podcasters.

Betches Media is introducing a subscription offering with Supporting Cast, Slates podcast membership business, next month to coincide with a relaunch of its website. Betches CRO David Spiegel said driving listeners to the website is an advantage it brings more eyeballs to its pages.

The partnership gives us more flexibility with pricing, bundling and a range of different options. It also gives us more control of the relationship with the customer from retention or for messaging or marketing or giving them incentives to other parts of our business, Spiegel said.We could message every U.S. subscriber in Chicago and say, Hey, you have live coming in three months, before it goes live to the public, heres a special pre-sale, he added.

While most of Sonys subscribers come through Apple, the company also works with Supporting Cast and Patreon as additional subscription platforms, said Sonys svp of business development & ops Emily Rasekh.

Sony averaged 10% month-over-month growth in its podcast subscriber count, and 150% year over year., Rasekh said. The company introduced podcast subscriptions in 2021, but in the past year put them into two buckets: individual subscriptions for always-on chat shows and a bundle called The Binge for limited-run, narrative shows and true crime shows with new series every month. This two-pronged offering has helped it grow its overall subscriber base, said the Sony execs who declined to share by how much exactly.

The number of subscribers on Supercasts platform has tripled in the last year, according to the company.

Subscriber downloads at Supporting Cast were up 205% from April 2022 to April 2023 and paying listeners were up 180%, Stern said. In the last six months, the company has launched subscriptions with networks like QCode, Tenderfoot and Kast Media and works with over 1,000 podcasts. Vox Media is launching a subscription with the company soon, Stern added.

While Stern declined to share how much revenue their podcast partners are making, he said, We have a lot of subscriptions on the hundreds of thousands of revenue per year, and a growing handful that are in the millions of dollars a year.

NPR also works with Supporting Cast to sell its NPR+ bundle of 17 shows to 34 U.S. markets. NPR plans to roll the bundle out nationwide by early 2024, said Joel Sucherman, vp of audio platform strategy. The bundle launched last November to a limited number of markets. NPR also sells individual show subscriptions to 16 of its podcasts (up from six shows last year) through Apple Podcasts or the NPR+ website (though Planet Money, Planet Money Summer School and The Indicator are packaged together into a single subscription).

The bundle has led to an influx of new member sign-ups to support NPRs member stations. On average, 64% of those signing up for an NPR+ bundle are new members, said Leda Marritz, NPR+ program manager. She declined to share how many NPR+ or individual show subscribers NPR has. Single subscriptions have more than doubled compared to this time last year, Marritz said. Bundles, the NPR execs noted, are trickier to sell on Apple or Spotify (Spiegel also echoed this).

Digiday asked podcast execs if this influx of podcast subscription launches is due to the current slowdown in podcast ad revenue, with CPMs and budgets contracting (a recent report found U.S. audio ad revenues fell 5% in Q1 2023 year over year). But all the executives interviewed for this story said there was not a direct correlation more so an evolution of their growing podcast businesses.

Podcasters arent aiming for large conversion rates, however. Even a small fraction of listeners converting into subscribers appears to be the goal for most.

We originally modeled out that if just 1% of our podcast listeners become subscribers there is a legitimate business. For some of our shows we are well ahead of that pace, others are not there yet, Sucherman said.

Sony considers a 2-5% conversion rate healthy, Rasekh said.

Originally posted here:
Why podcasters are selling subscriptions through third-party vendors - Digiday

Louisiana’s Sabine River Authority Not Entitled To Sovereign Immunity – The Energy Law Blog

In a recent opinion, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Sabine River Authority, State of Louisiana (SRA-L) is not entitled to Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.[1]

SRA-L was a named defendant in a suit by plaintiffs who own land in Louisiana and Texas. Plaintiffs levied allegations that years-long mismanagement of the Toledo Bend reservoir by SRA-L[2] culminated in damage to plaintiffs properties via flooding, violating their constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiffs alleged that despite advance knowledge of the likelihood for significant downstream flooding, SRA-L decided to open spillway gates freeing water from the reservoir into the Sabine River to alleviate elevated reservoir volumes from a cataclysmic rain storm in March of 2016.

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the federal district courts order denying[3] SRA-Ls Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by applying the Circuits well-established six-factor test of Clark v. Tarrant County, 798 F.2d 736, 744-45 (5th Cir. 1986). An entity classified as an arm of the state would be entitled to sovereign immunity provided by the Eleventh Amendment; in contrast, a political subdivision is not afforded the same protection. The burden of proof falls on the entity seeking immunity and SRA-L failed to meet its burden.

The six Clark factors are as follows:

(1) whether state statutes and case law characterize the agency as an arm of the state;

(2) the source of funds for the entity;

(3) the degree of local autonomy the entity enjoys;

(4) whether the entity is concerned primarily with local, as opposed to statewide, problems;

(5) whether the entity has authority to sue and be sued in its own name; and

(6) whether the entity has the right to hold and use property.[4]

In its opinion, the Fifth Circuit considered each factor in turn, focusing primarily on factor number twothe most significant of the six. Since one of the Eleventh Amendments primary objectives is preservation of the state treasury, the main question when determining whether an entity is considered as an organ of the State is its source of funding (i.e. who will be liable for payment of a judgment levied against it). By analyzing various Louisiana Statutes pertaining to the SRA-L,[5] the Fifth Circuit concluded that SRA-L appears to have near-total financial independence.[6] The Fifth Circuit found SRA-L failed to meet its burden of showing that the state would be liable for a judgment against it either directly or indirectly (via responsibility for general debt or because the state provides the majority of the levee districts budget).

As for the five other factors, only one weighed in favor of finding the SRA-L as an arm of the state as opposed to a political subdivision, and only slightly. The Fifth Circuit agreed with the lower court that state statutes and case law characterize SRA-L as an arm of the state; but caveated that the factor was restricted and given the inconsistent descriptions in the same statutes and the lack of a more-definite characterization in either statute or case law.[7] The Fifth Circuit noted that even though the SRA-L was made part of the umbrella of the executive branch via its placement in the Department of Transportation and Development after its creation, it maintained substantial control over its operations. That retention of autonomy tilted against finding SRA-L an arm of the state.

To support its position regarding the third factorthe degree of local autonomy the entity enjoysSRA-L harped on the fact that its thirteen board members are gubernatorial appointees confirmed by the state senate with no involvement by local governing bodies or local legislators. The lower court found that although SRA-L board members were susceptible to state influence on account of their serving at the governors behest, the parish residency requirement for board members imposed sufficient limits on the governors control. The Fifth Circuit disagreed, finding that this factor weighed minimally against finding SRA-L as an arm of the state, but for a different reason. The Fifth Circuit focused on the autonomy the SRA-L enjoys in its functional decision-making such as acquiring property, incurring debts, borrowing money, entering contracts, and even establishing an enforcement division. To the extent that independent management authority mattered more than commissioner/board member autonomy, the Fifth Circuit found this factor ultimately weighed toward SRA-L being a political subdivision rather than an arm of the state.

Regarding whether the entity principally focuses on local (as opposed to statewide) issues, the Fifth Circuit found the case cited by SRA-L in support of this factor inappositewherein a state university was afforded Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity. The Fifth Circuit determined that the SRA-L primarily dealt with local or regional concerns, unlike a state university fulfilling statewide higher education demands.

The last two factors hold the least weight. SRA-L did not contest the lower courts finding that the fifth factor did not aid in a finding of SRA-L being an arm of the state. La. R.S. 38:232(B)(2) clearly delineates SRA-Ls authority to sue and be sued in its own name. As for the sixth and final factor, though SRA-L pointed to La. R.S. 38:2325(B) which states that it holds property as an instrumentality of the State of Louisiana[;] the Fifth Circuit pointed out that the statute also states [t]itle to all property acquired by the Authority shall be taken in its corporate name. The argument that the property ultimately belongs to the State and thus weighs in favor of sovereign immunity has been previously rejected by the Circuitand was rejected again here.[8] The pertinent issue is whether the entity has the power to hold property in its name and under state statutes, which the SRA-L clearly does.

The Fifth Circuits ruling in Bonin will impact future flood-damage litigation by making it easier for plaintiff landowners to bring claims against various State River Authorities for decisions made in the maintenance, conservation, and supervision of dams, reservoirs, rivers, and streams in their respective watersheds.

Disclaimer: This Blog/Web Site is made available by the law firm of Liskow & Lewis, APLC (Liskow & Lewis) and the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site for educational purposes and to give you general information and a general understanding of the law only, not to provide specific legal advice as to an identified problem or issue. By using this blog site you understand and acknowledge that there is no attorney-client relationship formed between you and Liskow & Lewis and/or the individual Liskow & Lewis lawyers posting to this site by virtue of your using this site. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.

Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Communications include firm news, insights, and events. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will be kept in a secured contact database. If at any time you would like to unsubscribe, please use the SafeUnsubscribe link located at the bottom of every email that you receive.

[1] Perry Bonin, et al., v. Sabine River Auth., State of Louisiana, No. 20-40138 c/w No. 22-40433 (5th Cir. 2023).

[2] After its creation by the Louisiana legislature in 1950 as a conservation and reclamation district, the SRA-L entered a joint venture with the Sabine River Authority, Texas (SRA-T) to build a dam and reservoir to provide electrical power, promote industrial development in both States, conserve water for agricultural purposes, and create fishing, recreation, and commercial development. Stallworth v. McFarland, 350 F. Supp. 920, 926 (W.D. La. 1972).

[3] Denials of motions to dismiss on sovereign immunity grounds fall within the collateral order doctrine, and are thus immediately appealable. Texas v. Caremark, Inc., 584 F.3d 655, 658 (5th Cir. 2009) (citing McCarthy ex rel. Travis v. Hawkins, 381 F.3d 407, 411-12 (5th Cir. 2004)).

[4] Voyt v. Board of Comrs of Orleans Levee Dist., 294 F.3d 684, 690 n. 4 (5th Cir. 2002).

[5] E.g. La. R.S. 38:2324 (B)(1) and 2325(A)(5).

[6] Bonin at 9.

[7] Bonin at 7.

[8] See Voyt v. Board of Comrs of Orleans Levee Dist., 294 F.3d 684, 696 (5th Cir. 2002).

Here is the original post:
Louisiana's Sabine River Authority Not Entitled To Sovereign Immunity - The Energy Law Blog