Media Search:



What is happening with pets in Ukraine? – North Shore News

The West Van philanthropist is trying to get ahead of a looming crisis in the animal world in Ukraine.

Daniel Fine is fixing the dogs of war.

The retired West Vancouver tech executive and founder of the Ukraine War Animals Relief Fund is recently back from his fifth trip to the war-torn country, trying desperately to get ahead of a looming crisis in the animal world.

Right from the time of Russias invasion, Fine felt compelled to go help the four-leggeds. He quickly wound up volunteering at a shelter on the Polish border, walking rescue dogs for 18 hours a day. It was in speaking with volunteers on the ground there that he was clued into the bigger picture.

Ukrainians are a pet-loving people but, eight million residentsbecame refugees in 2022. Fine said estimates are one million animals were abandoned and left to go stray, the vast majority of them not spayed or neutered. Without outside intervention, the population of feral dogs and cats is going to explode.

If you do the math on it, and weve had some data scientists take a look at it, the numbers are a little bit unbelievable. Its going to leave about 124 million pets in five years, Fine said. What Im trying to do is vaccinate, sterilize and microchip as many of these animals as fast as I can. And weve done, today, just about 7,750 of them.

When the war does end, there will be no choice but to begin culling stray animals, which Fine cant bear the thought of.

With gunfire and shelling in earshot, Fine has had to deal with the logistics of securing vaccines and veterinary supplies, kibble, and volunteers to catch dogs and bring them to vets assisting in the effort.

Its a nightmare, he said with a laugh.

With so many humanitarian crises in Ukraine and elsewhere in the world, Fine said he often feels he has to defend his efforts to help animals.

There are dozens of non-profits and NGOs with much deeper pockets mobilized to help refugees, but almost nothing available for dogs and cats, he notes. And the way Fine sees it, humans domesticated dogs thousands of years ago for our own benefit, which puts certain obligations on us today.

We owe them something, he said. Now its our turn to help.

Fine said he met one woman in Ukraine who spent six months hiding in a basement, coming outside only to fetch food from her gardenand to help take care of nine stray dogs. For some, that existencemay be hard to fathom, but Fine gets it. Caring for animals is a window into the human spirit.

She felt hopeless. But the animals are even more hopeless. They cant even help themselves. Giving that help to them gives you hope, he said.

But even for those who struggle with the concept of the mission forthe sake of the animals, its also a matter public health, Fine is quick to note. As that feral dog and cat population grows, it will inevitably result in the spread of zoonotic pathogens, most frightening among them, rabies, which kills upwards of 60,000 people per year already. Two of the vets hes working with have already been bitten by rabid cats, he said.

There is no question that venturing into a warzone is dangerous, and even Fines family members have told him hes a bit nuts.

Fine said they take calculated risks but still, there are close calls, including on the most recent trip when he wandered into an area off the beaten path only to find himself surrounded by Russian land mines poking through the surface of the soil.

Im not really frightened. I feel stupid sometimes, like I should be paying more attention, he said. Every time, I learn a little bit more.

They routinely have to cross military checkpoints, but with a frontline that shifts every day, they sometimes dont know who is in control of a given area when they arrive.

Its Russian, youre dead, right? Or theyre going to hold you for ransom he said.

Fine has seen first-hand the devastated towns and villages, the Kerson Airport in ruins, and the Ukrainian people weary of a brutal war. Just days ago, the Russians bombed a central marketplace filled with civilians, he noted.

But fine said he also seesa steely resolve in the people of Ukraine.

Theyre under a lot of stress right now. They havent been working. The economy is in tatters. They never know when drones or missiles are coming. Kids cant go to school, he said. But the Ukrainians have their heart into the game. They are super optimistic. And everyone you talk to men and women are willing to fight. Theyre into it. Theyre going to protect their country.

Fine said the most optimistic he can be is for Russias leadership to see what hes seen and realize that the war is ultimately unwinnable for them.

Its impossible to know when Russia will end its invasion or whether the Ukrainians will push them back across the borders, but Fine saidtaking care of Ukraines animals is a winnable battle and he plans to keep mustering donations.

Every time [people]donate,we can sterilize more animals. We can fix this, he said. We have a huge job ahead of us. Weve got to do hundreds of thousands more animals. Otherwise it wont be successful.

To contribute to the Ukraine War Animals Relief Fund, visit petfundr.com/campaigns/12CIU0.

brichter@nsnews.com twitter.com/brentrichter

Go here to read the rest:
What is happening with pets in Ukraine? - North Shore News

There’s a Battle Over Carbon Emerging from the War in Ukraine – POLITICO

In contrast to de Klerks initiative, the State Environmental Inspectorates methodology isnt designed to tally indirect emissions like those from the displacement of Ukrainian victims of the war. Neither does it account for prospective emissions from the eventual reconstruction. Rather, for now, the draft methods will inventory emissions from only hostilities-related wildfires, damages to industrial facilities and fuel consumption by military equipment and nothing else. (The methods might be expanded in the future, for instance, to include emissions from infrastructure fires). Its the difference between making scientifically sound estimations the Initiative on GHG Accounting of Wars present domain and only collecting data that will meet a particular legal threshold and withstand the scrutiny of a judge picking them apart during a court case. The draft methods of the State Environmental Inspectorate of Ukraine are meant to fulfill the latter goal. They will, therefore, measure only those direct greenhouse gas emissions that can be calculated precisely and with what information is currently available, said Andrii Moroz, a lawyer who is advising the State Environmental Inspectorate.

For instance, wildfires from shelling often must meet criteria that ensure they arent naturally occurring. An atypically shaped blaze that follows a streak-line pattern characteristic of shelling, for instance, is a sign that it has not occurred randomly but is due to anthropogenic influence, as Savenets sometimes calls acts of war out of scientific habit. Meanwhile, the destruction of industrial property, say a pipeline or a power plant, must be formally attributed to Russian troops by official bodies like the State Emergency Service of Ukraine or the State Environmental Inspectorate of Ukraine, in order to attribute those emissions to Russia.

Alina Sokolenko, a sustainability expert who analyzes the legal questions arising from the wars environmental damages for Ukraines State Environmental Inspectorate, sums it up this way: Its not only a matter of how to measure, but [also] how to prove and how to receive compensation for these losses.

Should Ukraine go ahead with claims for greenhouse gas emissions, it would mark the first time a country seeks compensation for such damages resulting from an all-out war, Rutgers Law School professor Cymie Payne, an expert on international environmental reparations, told me. It would push our understanding of the harms of war to the environment in new directions.

The road to compensation would likely follow the usual legal procedures. First, the plaintiff Ukraine would have to show that it was injured because the defendant Russia broke the law. It would then have to show the extent and kind of harm it suffered, and also that the law is one that requires compensation.

Yes, the climate claims would be a long shot, largely because it will not be easy for the plaintiffs to establish that the greenhouse gases have caused Ukraine harm that is specific enough to be compensated. Still, Ukrainian experts point to a relevant precedent in international courts where a handful of lawsuits have resulted in the awarding of environmental damages from cross-border conflict. In the foremost of these cases, Kuwait accused Iraq of breaching the international law doctrine prohibiting unprovoked attacks when it spilled massive amounts of oil across the Kuwaiti desert during the Gulf War of the early 1990s. The United Nations Compensation Commission awarded Kuwait about $3 billion in monetary compensation just for those claims. In 2018, the International Court of Justice ruled that Nicaragua had to pay Costa Rica a few hundred thousand dollars in environmental compensation for illegally dredging a canal that damaged its wetlands.

Karen Hulme, at the University of Essex School of Law, thinks one possible, but never-before-tested path that Ukraine could take to make its claims would involve arguing that, like with Iraq, Russias invasion constitutes a breach of the prohibition on states to use unprovoked force against one another. That doctrine is enshrined in the United Nations Charter. Ukraine would need to further argue that Russia must make amends for all the resulting damage to the climate with monetary damages. Alternative arguments could claim breaches of the global climate rules tied to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or of states duty to prevent significant transboundary environmental damage, a doctrine of international law, Hulme said. It is so far unprecedented in international law for greenhouse gas emissions to qualify as damage in such claims, she warned. And so there would be many legal hurdles to pass.

View post:
There's a Battle Over Carbon Emerging from the War in Ukraine - POLITICO

ChatGPT breaks down 9 factors that can end Bitcoin as we know it – Finbold – Finance in Bold

Proponents of Bitcoin (BTC) argue that its decentralized nature offers protection against threats encountered by traditional financial systems. Nevertheless, like any other financial or investment product, Bitcoin is not immune to various threats that could potentially affect its existence.

In this context, Finbold sought insights from the artificial intelligence platform ChatGPT developed by OpenAI to understand the factors that could potentially bring about the end of Bitcoin as we know it. We posed the question, What can end Bitcoin as we know it? to the most advanced ChatGPT-4 premium AI version. Through this analysis, it became apparent that the pioneering cryptocurrency faces a spectrum of challenges, both external and internal, which are highlighted below:

The tool suggested that one of the most discussed vulnerabilities is the dreaded 51% attack. If a single entity gains control of over 50% of the Bitcoin networks computational power, it could potentially wreak havoc. Such an entity could double-spend coins or halt transactions. ChatGPT acknowledged that although this type of attack is expensive and unlikely to be financially practical, stating that at the moment, it remains a theoretical threat.

Another technical vulnerability is quantum computing. ChatGPT states that if quantum computers become powerful enough, they could break Bitcoins cryptographic security measures. It is worth noting that the crypto community has since identified this risk with plans to quell it.

Bitcoins decentralized nature has made it an attractive option for those looking to circumvent traditional financial systems. However, this very characteristic puts it in the crosshairs of governments worldwide. As per ChatGPT, regulatory crackdowns and bans on Bitcoin could significantly impact its adoption and drive users toward other digital assets or traditional currencies. In general, regulatory uncertainty is a constant shadow that the cryptocurrency world must navigate, making it a persistent concern for the future of Bitcoin.

Bitcoins value and adoption have been intricately tied to economic factors for years. Therefore, ChatGPT pointed out that a significant loss of confidence in Bitcoin due to major financial losses, large-scale fraud, or other scandals could lead to reduced adoption and value. At the same time, it cited threats such as a newer cryptocurrency or technology emerging with vastly superior features, which might overshadow Bitcoins first-mover advantage.

The viability of Bitcoin has been questioned over the cryptocurrencys Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus. Against this backdrop, the AI tool pointed out that critics argue that its energy consumption is unsustainable and harmful to the planet. Therefore, if concerns about its energy consumption continue to grow, there may be a substantial shift towards more eco-friendly cryptocurrencies or consensus mechanisms, potentially eroding Bitcoins dominance. As the world becomes increasingly conscious of environmental issues, Bitcoins environmental footprint remains a point of contention. However, it is worth noting that major miners are trying to turn to renewable energy sources for Bitcoin mining.

ChatGPT acknowledged that Bitcoin has faced persistent challenges in terms of transaction speed and costs, especially during heightened demand. While initiatives such as the Lightning Network have been introduced to tackle these issues, the risk of an inadequate scaling solution could potentially hinder Bitcoins ability to achieve wider adoption. The ongoing challenge of scaling is a critical issue that the Bitcoin community must continue to tackle to uphold its status as a viable digital currency.

Internal disputes within the Bitcoin community have sporadically arisen, particularly concerning its development trajectory. ChatGPT warns that should these disagreements escalate, they have the potential to result in additional forks, similar to the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) split, which could ultimately erode the communitys cohesion. The tool notes that sustaining a unified vision for Bitcoins future is imperative for its enduring success in the long run.

The AI tool suggests that the Bitcoin network is not immune to global disruptions. Natural disasters, widespread infrastructure failures, or global-scale cyber-attacks could disrupt the Bitcoin network, causing temporary or long-term damage. The resilience of the Bitcoin network in the face of unforeseen events remains an ongoing concern.

Governments such as the United States and China are actively exploring the potential of digital currencies, which could lead to the introduction of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) as potential substitutes for cryptocurrencies. In this case, ChatGPT opines that if prominent nations successfully deploy and endorse their CBDCs, these could present a more secure and regulated option compared to Bitcoin for everyday transactions, potentially diminishing Bitcoins attractiveness. The advent of CBDCs poses a notable competitive challenge to Bitcoin.

It is worth noting that the cryptocurrency ecosystem relies heavily on exchanges and wallet providers. Therefore, ChatGPT suggested that if a major exchange or wallet provider collapses or faces severe security issues, it could undermine confidence in the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem and impact Bitcoin. Therefore, safeguarding the infrastructure of the cryptocurrency world is essential to maintaining trust and stability.

In conclusion, while Bitcoin has withstood numerous challenges and has a resilient community of users and developers, it remains vulnerable to various internal and external factors. Staying abreast of these potential threats and actively addressing them will be crucial for the continued success and relevance of Bitcoin as a global digital currency.

Read the rest here:

ChatGPT breaks down 9 factors that can end Bitcoin as we know it - Finbold - Finance in Bold

Owner of 8K bitcoin lost in landfill threatens to bankrupt local council – Protos

A Welsh bitcoin investor who accidentally lost 8,000 bitcoin a decade ago after throwing the hard drive into the trash is now threatening to sue the local council overseeing the landfill its in and potentially bankrupt them, as he seeks to win $557 million in legal fees.

Newport City Council (NCC) has repeatedly said no to James Howells request to dig up the landfill and search for his bitcoin. However, as reported by the Telegraph, Howells is preparing to sue the council and stop them from carrying out other works on the site.

The proposed lawsuit aims to secure 446 million ($557 million) in damages, a value that matches the highest recorded price of his lost bitcoin.By asking for this amount, Howells is threatening to bankrupt NCC, saying that the recently declared bankrupt Birmingham City Council would not be the only Labour-run council to go bankrupt this year.

Ive tried everything I can for 10 years, they didnt want to play ball, so now we have to go down the legal route, he said.

In the open letter he sent to the council on September 4, Howells demanded they let him begin his landfill excavation work by September 18. Hes also asking for a judicial review into the lawfulness of the councils decisions throughout the bitcoin landfill ordeal.

James lost the BTC in 2013 after cleaning out his old office and throwing his bitcoin cold wallet into the trash. The 8,000 bitcoin was worth 446 million at its highest and roughly 166 million ($207 million) today.

For 10 years the council has not budged on its position, refusing Howells pleas to recover the lost bitcoin which the council says may or may not be in our landfill site.

A spokesperson said, The council has told Mr. Howells multiple times that excavation is not possible under our environmental permit, and that work of that nature would have a huge negative environmental impact on the surrounding area.

We will be offering no further comments on this issue as it takes up valuable officer time which could be spent on delivering services for the residents of Newport.

In 2022, Howells claimed to secure enough funding for the dig which documents from his legal team estimate would cost 11 million ($13.7 million).

He attempted to sway the council by promising 10% of his found bitcoin to be used in turning Newport into a crypto-mecca. He promised:

These promises, however, may not be welcomed by the residents of Newport if Howells does indeed bankrupt the Newport city council.

Do [NCC] want to spend 10,000 an hour to stop me digging a hole? How can you explain that to the taxpayers of Newport in the current climate? he said.

Got a tip? Send us an email or ProtonMail. For more informed news, follow us onX,Instagram,Bluesky, andGoogle News, or subscribe to ourYouTubechannel.

More:

Owner of 8K bitcoin lost in landfill threatens to bankrupt local council - Protos

Bitcoin all-time high in 2025? BTC price idea reveals ‘bull run launch’ – Cointelegraph

Bitcoin (BTC) is about to test hodlers with a mid cycle lull before starting a bull run in late 2024, a new BTC price model states.

According to its creator, popular analyst CryptoCon, the November 28th Cycles Theory demands the BTC price all-time high in 2025.

Amid debate over the nature of the current Bitcoin four-year price cycle, CryptoCon believes that all may be simpler than many imagine when it comes to how BTC/USD behaves at a given time.

Unveiling the November 28th chart on X (formerly Twitter), he delineated the date as a key pivot point in the year, along with a three-week period on either side.

Using 4-year time cycles against my Theory, produces Bitcoins exact behavior in time since its inception. Cycles are centered around the date of the first halving Nov 28th, he explained.

The chart describes November 28 as the date Bitcoin sees a bull run launch every four years. The last was in 2020 when BTC/USD broke beyond its prior all-time high (ATH) to hit its current $69,000 record a year later.

The next point of interest is thus November 2024. Until then, BTC price action will spend its time in a mid cycle lull.

After Bitcoin bottoms, price makes an early first cycle move (orange) and enters into a mid-cycle lull, CryptoCon continued.

He added that Bitcoin had almost certainly seen its early top, referencing the $31,800 local highs from July.

As Cointelegraph reported, opinions on where BTC price action will go into the 2024 block subsidy halving differ.

Related: Bitcoin halving can take BTC price to $148K by July 2025 Pantera Capital

Some argue that modest gains will be all that hodlers will see before the event, scheduled for April next year.

In an interview with Cointelegraph this week, Filbfilb, co-founder of trading suite DecenTrader, nonetheless delivered a $46,000 target for the halving, with $35,000 slated for year-end.

In his latest newsletter published on Sept. 5, meanwhile, CryptoCon summarized 2023 BTC price behavior as a bull market fakeout.

This makes it appear as if the bull market has begun with the trigger of many signals, but then at some point, price fails to continue, he wrote.

BTC/USD traded at $26,200 at the time of writing on Sept. 8, per data from Cointelegraph Markets Pro and TradingView.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Follow this link:

Bitcoin all-time high in 2025? BTC price idea reveals 'bull run launch' - Cointelegraph