Mediaboss Marketing

Its been a while since I watched Bill Mahers show on HBO, Real Time. There were times when many of Mahers opinions and views coincided with mine; while at others we were totally opposite. Which is fine with me. Mahers television personality is very strong: a comedian who enjoys making people laugh and generating controversy and being proud of it, like when Donald Trump sued him for $5 million because Maher made a joke that had to do with the possibility of Trump being the son of an orangutan. On the show, it doesnt matter the guest or the panel, the most important voice is that of old Bill. And that exhausted and bored me. But when over a year ago he announced that he would do a podcast, well, I got curious and so I began to see this surreal world called Club Random every single week.

Why? Because I wanted to prove something the only way possible: I once heard someone say that you only knew someone when they were drunk and after watching many episodes of Club Random, I can say that I know Bill Maher and he is a complete idiot.

A few months ago, in June, I read an article published in Mens Journal (obviously, Venezuelans favorite magazine) that said: Bill Maher rewrites the rules of podcasting the way he did on television in this series of one on one, hour long conversations with a wide variety of unexpected guests in the undisclosed location called Club Random. And I was like: this couldnt be for real. I later understood that it was part of an advertising campaign between Mens Journal and Bill Maher. But it doesnt matter. I am going to deconstruct and destroy this announcement.

The problem with Club Random is that no matter whos the guest, its always the same. It doesnt matter if its Carrot Top or the man who knows everything about anything you ask him and if he doesnt know it, he invents it (Jordan Peterson). The tone of the show and even the topics, conversations, always end up pointing to the same things.And this happens because by the time the podcast filming begins, Bill Maher is already high and nearly drunk. Meaning its almost impossible for any guest to express their ideas without Bill interrupting them.

Even a talking machine like Quentin Tarantino couldnt handle Mahers boring, goofy interruptions. So forget about Real Times sharp Bill Maher. From the first minute of Club Random, Bill Maher is wasted. And theres no way hes sharp, funny, or shows a higher level of intelligence thanBingo! An orangutan. And right from scratch, everything goes downhill.

Now lets go with what Mens Journal claims:

1. Bill Maher rewrites the rules of podcasting the way he did on television. I didnt know there were rules in podcasts because precisely the idea of making a podcast is not to have rules and to speak and do whatever you want. And when it comes to television, I have never seen something like: And if you want to make a television show you must apply the following rules created by the great Bill Maher.

2. Hour-long conversations with a wide variety of unexpected guests. True, the podcast lasts an hour or a little more. unexpected guests? Here I think its hard to believe Richard Dreyfuss or Ice Cube will appear out of nowhere, without warning. and Bill reacts: Oh, I didnt expect you, but welcome to this hour when I wont let you talk but instead will enjoy smoking and drinking and laughing at my own jokes!

3. Undisclosed location called Club Random. Well, I dont know if the Mens Journal reporter had ever seen an episode of Club Random, but he doesnt know that in each of the episodes, Bill takes pride in Club Random being the basement bar of his obscenely huge property. So about the secret location thingwhatever.

Bill Maher has been effusive and passionate about the legalization of marijuana and glorifies himself by announcing that he is a great pothead. So I also wanted to see how big Maher was while he was high. Lets just say: this guy should never smoke even a chocolate cigarette ever again in his life. Why? He turns disrespectful, egomaniacal, slow, confused and lacking topics of conversation that have nothing to do with Screw the Woke and the COVID vaccine. He couldnt be more random and lost than this. Hes a far cry from Tommy Chongs supe powers when it comes to weed. And unfortunately the chance of what could have been great conversations with very interesting people has been lost.

Of course, there are always funny moments, like the episode with Woody Harrelson that I stopped watching because neither of them simply understood what the other was saying. But if I recommend any episode, its the one with Bella Thorne, who actually has her own brand of weed. And I recommend this episode for the following: here we see Maher trying to make sexual comments, which he does every time he interviews a young woman, but in front of a Bella who puts him in his place by making him look like a slimy old man. And what I find most important and valuable: Bella showed him to his face that she is the true pothead champion: funny, articulate, shameless but always smart. Bravo to Bella, who wrote a real new rule: never try to beat me by smoking weed, Bill Maher!

Read more:
Don't Party With Bill Maher - Book and Film Globe

CANADA

Conducted by the Montreal, Quebec-based company Lger, a marketing and analytics company, the study surveyed 12,948 students in Albertas 26 public colleges and universities, and found that only 6% of students who have suffered sexual and gender-based violence (SG-BV) bring it to the attention of school authorities.

The main reasons victims gave for not accessing on-campus support are shame (9%), fear of retaliation by the perpetrator (7%), and not being believed, taken seriously or being gaslighted (14%).

At 74% the rate of SG-BV is highest among queer students who account for 638 of the students surveyed, which means that 472 of them have been victims of SG-BV since arriving on Albertas campuses. Around 93% of these students had been victimised before entering higher education.

Queer students also have the highest rates of sexual harassment: 71%. Two-thirds of students who identify as bisexual (1,380) or pansexual (265) are also survivors of SG-BV; between 59% and 65% of gay, lesbian, pansexual, two-spirited or questioning students, or 2,256 (14.4% of the 1,2948 students surveyed) also report being victims of SG-BV.

10% of all students, or 1,295, are victims of intimate partner violence; the percentage rises to 14% of lesbians and 15% of queer, pansexual and two-spirited people.

Awful, but not surprising

Generations of student leaders have been fighting for the provincial government to confront the pervasive impact of sexual violence within the post-secondary education system, says Chris Beasley, vice-president external of the University of Albertas Student Union.

So, when the results came out, they sickened me. They are awful, horrible. But they werent surprising. The data is reflective of the surveys weve run internally [at the University of Alberta in Edmonton], surveys that have been run in Ontario and other parts of Canada, he said.

According to Mary Jane James, CEO of the Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton, the statistics in the report align not only with those from the University of Alberta (U of A) but also with international studies.

At first glance, it might appear that the studys finding that 86% of respondents agreed that consent was necessary before beginning sexual activity and 80% believed that you have to check in with sexual partners during sex to determine if they remain enthusiastic suggests that the existing consent training programmes run in Albertas colleges and universities are largely successful.

However, Beasley noted, it is important to look at what he called the negative.

The figures seem good. The report presents it as though 86% of people believe that consent during sexual activity is a good thing. But theres also the negative side. 14% do not agree with this and 20% do not agree with stopping to check in with their sexual partners if theyre physically or mentally unenthusiastic. These numbers are too high, said Beasley.

In Canadian law consent has a number of parameters, which are taught in the universities consent education programmes.

Consent cannot be given when intoxicated; it must be voluntary; it cannot be coerced. Consent is specific, that is, for specific acts and people; it cannot be given ahead of time. Consent is not the absence of no.

Rather, in the words of Consent 101: The (Sexual) Basics prepared by the Saskatoon (Saskatchewan) Sexual Assault and Information Centre and provided to University World News by Alexandra Ages, executive director of the Council of Alberta University Students: Consent must be enthusiastic. Consent is someone communicating yes with their words, tone and actions.

No easy answers

Beasley, James and Deborah Eerkes, the sexual violence response coordinator in the Office of the Provost at U of A and chair of the universitys working group responsible for the survey, told University Wolrd News just how difficult it is to explain how consent works to the last 14%-20% of 18- to 24-year-olds.

We have people at the university doing consent education. We have people at the sexual assault centre in Edmonton doing consent education. And the real struggle we have is that we have people coming to the training who already know consent is important, right? Were singing to the choir. We need to figure out how you bring in that other 14%. How do you get them interested, first of all, and second, convinced?

I dont have a good answer for you. I dont think we have one, before drawing attention to one of the key parts of what goes under the name of emotional intelligence, said Eerkes.

Consent is about making sure the other person is good with whats happening. If you have no empathy, if you cant muster that sort of care for another person, if you are more self-focused than other focused, then we are going to continue to have this problem, said Eerkes.

Campaigns against sexual harassment and sexual violence differ, Eerkes further explained, from the campaigns against smoking or drunk driving, which have pushed the percentage of Canadians who smoke down to 10% and drive impaired to 8%. These behaviours are easily detectable by people, which made making them socially unacceptable much easier.

But the social pressure that we get for the public type of bad behaviour doesnt exist with intimate partner violence and other forms of sexual violence that are very, very private. One of the things out of the playbook [of sexual assault] is to isolate the person and get them away from everyone else, said Eerkes.

Beasley, who is 24 and remembers what was taught in his high school, says, in theory, Alberta has a decent amount of sex education in its high schools. But it can be hit or miss between different school boards or even within a school, he said, before adding that this is why Alberta needs a provincially run programme that leads to the prevention campaigns in colleges and universities.

You have students from all over Alberta, who may or may not have had good sex ed, that may or may not have focused on consent culture. Then you layer in students that come from out of the province, who, again, have different sex ed curriculums and different understandings of consent that may or may not have been taught, Beasley told University World News.

Then you layer in international students that will come from all over the world with different understandings of consent. And, so again, ensuring that we create a broad-based culture of consent here on campus starts day one.

One option Beasley was keen on is used at the University of Lethbridge (Alberta) where, before you can even sign up for class, you need to complete a module on consent and healthy relationships.

Having a programme like that can help move the needle on consent culture, he said.

A survivor-centered approach

Beasley, James and Eerkes stressed the importance of both campus police and sexual assault centres taking a victim (or survivor)-centered approach. This approach begins with the police or sexual assault centre crisis worker believing the report.

After a victim comes forward, said Beasley, you can take different routes. You can be more punitive [that is, press charges] or if, say, it was sexual assault by a classmate, you can be separated from that classmate or stay in the same class with them. Or, you can say, I want this noted on their record or I want something else to happen from a spectrum of consequences. Or you can come forward to the sexual assault centre and decide to do nothing or have counselling.

We are not to judge whether that particular act of harm is something that the person should be concerned about, said James.

Cultural change

The responses in the part of the survey on beliefs about sexual or gender-based violence underscore the depth of the problem facing sexual consent educators. Almost 30% are uncertain about whether False reports of sexual assaults are rare. One half disagrees with the statement that If an individual is drunk, they might sexually assault someone, even though Canadian courts do not accept that intoxication is a defence in a sexual assault case.

61% of respondents are unsure of whether People are too easily offended by sexual jokes or comments (in other words, depending on the situation, they might think offence was perfectly alright). Even more striking is the fact that 14% three out of every 20 students believe that there is nothing wrong with a sexual joke that makes someone feel uncomfortable.

The high tolerance of sexual jokes indicated to James that little has changed from when she started working in the late 1970s, when she and her female peers endured a range of inappropriate behaviour including being leered at and being subjected to sexual jokes.

We still have a certain demographic that says, It was just a joke. Were just having fun. Why do you have to be such a prude? Why are you taking it so seriously? But it is serious. Its very serious. We have to recognise that that kind of behaviour is not okay. We dont have to accept it and just move on, said James

When discussing the surveys question about jokes Beasley was quick to shut the door on right-wing ideologues like Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson.

To oppose this is not Cultural Marxism or ideological purity. That 14% of postsecondary students across Alberta think that that others have to accept being uncomfortable or taking offence is one more indication of why we need more cultural change and prevention of sexual harassment on our campuses, said Beasley.

Possible understatement

According to Statistics Canada approximately 4% of the population or 1 million people are LGBTQ2+. Canadian law forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation or expression. Same sex marriage has been legal in some provinces since 2003 and nationwide two years later. There have been a number of openly gay or lesbian politicians, including Kathleen Wynne, Ontarios premier from 20132018, who is married to a woman.

The high rates of sexual harassment and violence against the LGBTQ2+ community stand out. But, as high as they are, Beasley told University World News, the study may be understating them because the survey was self-reporting.

My guess is that the numbers are quite a bit higher. What were seeing is people who self-identify or self-report as having experienced sexual- or gender-based violence. When we look at questions of stigma, obviously that stigma applies quite heavily for folks that are femme (that is, present as feminine), but for different reasons, it also applies quite heavily for folks that are masc., said Beasley.

Queer men are subject to the generalised machismo culture and internalised sexism or strongman ideals that pervade our culture and, thus, Beasley said, like straight men, socialised in a way that would depress reporting.

Eerkes also warned that while the study is a good indicator of the sexual health of Albertas campuses, the fact that it was voluntary creates an important weakness seen when comparing the percent of students who were victims of gender or sexual violence (50%) and those who admit to committing these acts (4%).

Theres a pretty serious mismatch here. My assumption is that those students who may have committed some forms of sexual violence would be less interested in responding to this survey, said Eerkes.

Its not about sex

The high rates of SG-BV, including 40% of straight students who reported having been sexually harassed, the 60% of questioning students who reported the same, or the 54% of asexual students who were victims of SG-BV, the 25% of bisexual and queer students who reported being stalked or the 15% of straight students who reported having been stalked, are not dealing with sexual situations, James emphasised. Rather, the harassers are asserting power.

At the end of the day sexual violence, sexual assault, rape is not about sex. Its about power and control; its about someone having power over another person, said James.

Sexual violence, perpetrated against straight students or members of marginalised sexual communities, as well as intimate partner violence in any community, has nothing to do with sexual gratification.

Its about someone who feels they have the right and the power to take advantage of someone else. This is a very hard thing to get people to understand because they want to think, Its just, you know, I got a little carried away with that person. I really didnt mean any harm. I just . . . I was just really needing to have sex. Well, what you really needed was to have power over a person you felt you could control. The sooner we can get our heads around that the better, said James.

A template to use elsewhere

Although the study focuses only on Alberta post-secondary students, Ages believes it can be a useful template internationally.

Sexual and gender-based violence is a global issue. Someone living elsewhere might very well have a different context of violence. But, they can look at this and say: Oh, yes. There is this community in Canada, and they conducted a survey which is going to help create a statistical picture of what the issue is, so that they can then work on solutions. Perhaps we can enact something similar and create a survey of our home to find out what are the areas that we need to work on to create policy solutions, said Ages.

There are a lot of different solutions to gender-based violence. We should all take the time to learn from one another and learn best practices so that we can find ways to end the crisis of sexual and gender-based violence.

Go here to see the original:
Report offers hope for moving the needle of consent culture - University World News

Central control

In chess the tactics may change but the strategic fundamental principles are always the same, so that Chess Fundamentals is as good now as it was thirteen years ago.

Jos Ral Capablanca

Control of the centre has been considered to be the heart of chess strategy from time immemorial. But as the Cuban World Champion has pointed out, the fundamentals remain the same, though application may change in the course of time. Above I quote Capa from the 1934 edition of his Chess Fundamentals.

When Chess Fundamentals was released for the first time in 1921, the hypermodern era in chess had not flourished in full flow, whereas thirteen years later it had a great number of adherents: Reti, Nimzowitsch, Tartakower to name a few, and not to be left behind were the world champions Alekhine and Capa himself!

The hypermodernists, as they liked to call themselves, came up with the idea that centre control need not be achieved only by pawn occupation of central squares, but can equally be done from pieces controlling the centre from flanks.

Coming back to the Cuban genius comment, the fundamental principle of central control is all-inclusive and gives one room for improvement as and when the situation arises. This is a typical feature in any artistic endeavour.

While taking a look at a recent game of Indian super talent Arjun Erigasi, these thoughts about central control by various means were sparked. What if a flank pawn was given up in return for a central one in ordered to acquire control of central squares? Surely this must be a method envisioned by hypermodernists, right?

This is a position from the game Erigasi versus Aronian from the Goldmoney Asian Rapid 2021. This is a normal-looking position in a hanging-pawn structure. Here Erigasi continued with...

16.b4!

...which sparked added interest into a position with dynamic equilibrium. This is a real sacrifice of a pawn, which cannot be regained by any forced sequence of moves. So, what is the logic behind such a venture?

White wants to secure the central d4 square firmly in his control for occupation of his dark-squared bishop. The opened c-file can be a factor later on in the game. In the shorter run, White gains a few tempi with which he can build upon his initiative on the kingside. Of course, he also runs the risk of remaining a pawn down for the whole course of the game against none other than Aronian.

And bearing in mind that this was a rapid game, the intuitive decision is even more commendable!

16...cxb4 17.Bd4 Qd8 18.Rc1 Bb7 19.Qf3 Qd6

In the last few moves White has gained a few tempi to bring his pieces into the striking zone of Blacks kingside. He continued amassing more forces with

20.h4!?

However, at this moment White had a veiled tactical opportunity by means of 20.Nf5!? gxf5 21.Bc5! Qxc5 22.Rxc5 Bxc5 23.Qg3 check, followed by 24.Qc7 winning material similarly to the Lasker-Bauer theme using a double attack. But Black can avoid this with 21...Qd8 22.Bxe7 Qxe7 23.Qg3+ Kh8 24.Rc7! with another double attack. Black can survive, though, with 24...Ne4! and the game goes on.

20...Rfc8 21.h5 a5 and now White continued with

22.Bf5!

Not a difficult tactic based on overload, but nevertheless a pretty one! Of course, Black cannot recapture with 22...gxf5 because of 23.Nxf5 and Blacks queen is powerless to stop either a deadly check on g3, or defend his bishop on e7. The game continued with

22....Rxc1 23.Rxc1 Ne8?!

Perhaps it is here that Black starts drifting. Maybe Black could try to contest the c-file via the sixth rank with 23...Ra6!? and I have a feeling White has positional compensation for the pawn deficit, but this is debatable!

24.Qg4

White has slowly but surely moved his pieces near the striking zone, and Black falters, falling prey to a cute though not a standard tactic. Black continued with

24...Ng7?

Black apparently can still hold his fort with 24...Nf6 25. hxg6!? hxg6 26.Qg5 Nh7! which shows that the position is still in equilibrium, though the character of the game has been widely transformed! What William Cluley postulated in the 1850s still remains true: Chess is a game of equilibrium.

25.Bxg6?!

White was alert to win a pawn using a double attack. However if he had chosen the right order of moves, e.g. 25.Bxg7! Kxg7 26.Bxg6 Blacks position is due to collapse surprisingly quickly. But since this was a rapid game, one is not warranted to criticise a players decisions with an eagles eye.

25...fxg6 26.Bxg7 Rc8!

This is the difference compared to the variation 25.Bxg7, as Black is not forced to recapture.

27.Rd1

Master Class Vol.4: Jos Ral Capablanca

He was a child prodigy and he is surrounded by legends. In his best times he was considered to be unbeatable and by many he was reckoned to be the greatest chess talent of all time: Jose Raul Capablanca, born 1888 in Havana.

However, from a practical point of view, White has regained his lost material and Blacks king lacks a proper pawn cover. When short of time, this usually tilts the balance in favour of the attacker, which happened after further interesting moments, when Erigasi Arjun was able to crown his highly creative play with a well-deserved victory.

Arjun Erigaisi | Photo:Aditya Sur Roy

This is the position after Whites sixth move from the game Sargissian-Bok from the European Team Championship 2017.

Here the Armenian Grandmaster continued...

7.b4!?

...with an idea, in spirit, similar to the game we have discussed earlier. White embarks on this flank pawn thrust/sacrifice in order to secure the complete control of the central d4-square. He also opens the c-file in the process and gains a few tempi for maximising his development.

7...cxb4 8.Bb2

It is important to note that White also stops Blacks normal development as he has to waste a further move in protecting his g-pawn before moving his dark-squared bishop, which would in turn delay his castling. Such factors also come into account while observing the pawn sacrifice.

8....Nc6 9.Rc1 a6?!

I have a feeling that Blacks position does not warrant such a luxury as to make a pawn move on the queenside in order to stop Bb5.

10.Nd4 Nxd4 11.Bxd4

I love this position: the bishop on d4 is super powerful. He also threatens to bring his other bishop to a dominating diagonal with Bd3 on the next move.

11...Bf5 12.Be2 Qd7 13.Qb3

By putting pressure on d5, White stalls any freeing ideas associated with Rc8 etc.

13...Be6 14.0-0 f6 15.Bh5+ Bf7 16.Bxf7+ Kxf7?!

Surely better was 16...Qxf7, and now perhaps 17.a3!? is worth considering as to meet 17...bxa3 with 18.Qb6!?

17.Bb6 Be7 18.Rc7

White has made full use of the gambit. He has captured the c-file and entered the seventh Rank. Black's King remains dodgy on f7 and Black's pawns are falling one after the other soon.

18...Qd6 19.Rfc1 Rhe8 20.Ba5

Middlegame Secrets Vol.1 + Vol.2

Let us learn together how to find the best spot for the queen in the early middlegame, how to navigate this piece around the board, how to time the queen attack, how to decide whether to exchange it or not, and much more!

White regained material with interest and soon enough won the game.

Gabriel Sargissian | Photo: Mark Livshitz

The next game we are going to deal with is one by the enigmatic genius Sultan Khan. How can I not include this example! In his game against Stahlberg from the Prague Olympiad in 1931, things have clearly gone wrong for the British Champion. He has wasted tempi in the opening, is on the verge of losing his bishop pair to Whites a3 and his knights on e7 and g8 have trouble even breathing.

Here he came with the spectacular wing gambit, which is the theme of our study. His excellent feel for squares and the statics of a position shine with clarity. Readers would of course know of his excellent win against Capa in a Queens Indian with a2-a3, which was a deep move to indirectly control the centre. The system which is currently named after Petrosian was first used by Mir Sultan Khan to indirectly control the e4-square by preventing Bb4.

He continued in the above position with

9....b5!

At the cost of one pawn, Black strives to stay in the game and not get run over immediately. He gains control of the d5-square, which is of paramount importance to complete his development. Only if one of the knights can come to d5 can the other go to e7 and the king can castle to safety. Without a doubt, this is Blacks best chance of a defence, and one that aesthetically looks good as well!

10.cxb5 Nd5 11.0-0 Nge7 12. a3 Ba5 13. Bg5 h6 14.Bxe7 Nxe7 15.Be4 c6!

The audacity of the move is stunning! Black wants to preserve his light-squared bishop, even at the cost of making his pawn structure more ugly. But he opens lines and creates more freedom for his pieces. Whites advantage remains, but Black is changing the character of the game and making a fight out of what he has within his means.

16.bxc6 dxc6!?

Sultan still wants to preserve his light-squared bishop. He absolutely knew no prejudice with regard to so called 'correct play' as he was completely self-taught like a future day Alpha Zero!

17.Na4 0-0 18.Nc5 Rb8 19.b4 Bb6

Whites advantage still very much remains, as both sides have not committed any sort of errors. But the nature of play has become different. Black fought and drew this game at the end! This is indeed creditable against such a formidable player as Gideon Stahlberg. White further won another pawn by playing

20.Nxb7 Rxb7 21.b5

I wonder if Sultan himself would have traded quality for the prospect of winning a pawn. The fact that Whites advantage remains just as before and only got transformed is an unshakable truth as is with energy in this universe!

Nevertheless, at a later point, White committed errors at the face of stiff and original resistance from the master craftsman wielding the black pieces. At the end, Black drew the game being one pawn down in an opposite-coloured bishop position. One can only wonder at the foresight of Sultan Khan at vehemently refusing to exchange his light-squared bishop for his opponents counterpart. Of course, it is not correct to reason out an artists masterpiece: its just there to be enjoyed. The rest of the game is a wonderful example of the beauty of staying in the moment, which Sultan did really well.

Check out the aforementioned games with some added thoughts in the replayer below:

Select an entry from the list to switch between games

See original here:
Hypermodern games of chess - ChessBase

I have no doubt that you've heard the saying, "Chess is 90% tactics" many times. It is so overused that it is impossible to trace who said it first. While in general I agree with this statement, I would still slightly modify it. So, channeling my inner Yogi Berra, I would say: "Chess is 90% tactics. The other half is pattern recognition."

As we start our journey into the beautiful world of chess, we learn thousands of different patterns. If I remember correctly, the very first pattern I learned was the "staircase checkmate." It is simple and beautiful in its geometry:

Notice that there was a much faster checkmate available, but beginners practically never do it because once they learn this method, they are happy to execute the familiar pattern. By the way, what was the first chess pattern that you learned? Please share it in the comments.

As we get stronger, we learn more and more patterns and they become more sophisticated than the "staircase checkmate" above. The more patterns you know, the easier it is for you to find good moves in your games.

Here is a good example. When I was 15 years old, I was lucky enough to be a student of the famous Botvinnik-Kasparov school and therefore had an opportunity to appreciate GM Mikhail Botvinnik's chess wisdom on many different occasions. Usually, it went like this: we showed the patriarch our games and somewhere in the middlegame, when the position was getting extremely complicated, GM Garry Kasparov would start shooting variations with machine-gun speed. Then, after a moment of silence when everyone was still filled with awe, Botvinnik would say softly that a similar position actually happened in some forgotten game from a Moscow Championship before WWII, between so and so, and this is what should be done here.

It was much easier to appreciate Botvinnik's recommendation, which was purely based on his pattern recognition, compared to the ultra-complicated Kasparov variations. To be fair, Kasparov's method is more precise, and that's why chess is 90% tactics!

In some positions, you cannot play a move just because this is what should be played in similar situations because in this particular case, the move would lose due to some tactics. But in order to learn how to play good chess in general, pattern recognition is invaluable. At some point, when you get experienced in chess, every single position reminds you of something! Let's take a look at a very recent brilliancy by GM Viswanathan Anand.

Many chess players would be surprised by Anand's last two moves. First he gave up his center with 9.dxc5 and then he played 10.a3 which doesn't help development. In general, moves like these shouldn't be played, so what's going on there? Well, this interesting pattern has been known for over 100 years and became quite famous after the following iconic game:

This is probably Pillsbury's most famous game. As you can see, the mysterious 7.a3 move takes away the b4 square from Black's pieces, and prepares the b2-b4 push which would significantly cramp Black's position. But let's get back to our main game:

Wait a second, wasn't White's idea to play b2-b4? Why did Anand castle on the queenside then? What's going on there? Well, let me explain. First of all, the b2-b4 idea is still valid here, and as a matter of fact, was played in this position by another world champion:

Nevertheless, I am not surprised by Anand's move at all since this is his favorite way to attack. It goes way back. When I was preparing for my first World Junior Championship in 1987, it was clear that Anand was one of the main contenders (which turned out to be true, since he won the tournament). When I analyzed his games before the tournament, I noticed that he loved to castle on the queenside and go straight for a checkmate. When the tournament started, the very first game where I actually saw Anand in action, confirmed my finding:

As you can see, even though judging by Anand's comment the position was new to him, he still found the most aggressive way to attack which of course involved castling on the queenside. In this tournament, I was lucky enough to play Anand as White and the game was a relatively boring draw, but later in our games Anand played White, castled on the queenside two times, and won both games! Now you can understand why I wasn't surprised by the move 12.0-0-0 played by Anand in our earlier example.

This pattern is also well-known and usually leads to a crushing attack. In the following game, world champion Emanuel Lasker used this pattern as early as he possibly could, before he even finished his development or castled!

The final cute little pattern would make an excellent Puzzle Rush problem. Can you solve it?

This pattern where you sacrifice a queen in order to get a new queen and checkmate an opponent is quite common. Yet, I find it funny that the very same day this pattern was played in another high-profile game. The only difference is that this time it was an American super grandmaster who beat a former world champion, and not vice versa as in the Anand-So game!

I hope I managed to convince you that knowledge of chess patterns is extremely important for any chess player. These patterns are everywhere, and the more you know, the easier it will be for you to win your own games!

View post:
Patterns, Patterns Everywhere! - Chess.com

KDlearns' first introduction to chess was the same as it was for many other people: he was mercilessly destroyed by his older family members and didn't play for years after that. His reintroduction to chess follows another familiar pattern: he started playing daily games with a friend after being inspired by The Queens Gambit.

What follows is a little less conventional. KD started streaming two months into learning chess, in order to keep himself accountable and play on a regular schedule. People started watching, he began collaborating with other chess content creators, and now he finds himself in the middle of the online chess world, with an audience of thousands looking to him for chess advice and entertainment.

Read on to get KD's top tips for chess improvement, ringside stories from the world's biggest chessboxing event, and an insight into the world of chess tennis.

Your YouTube description contains the phrase To learn is to live. Whats the importance of learning for you?

So I equate learning with growth, and I know that if I'm growing, then I'm living; doing the opposite of dyingthat's probably a little bit overdramatic! But in any endeavorchess, tennis, academics, or anything elseif I am learning, it means that I'm making progress and I'm moving forward.

Moving forward in general is kind of what drives me. It's part of the whole the journey is greater than the destination cliche, but for me, making that progress is what makes life exciting. Anything I can do to help others also adopt a similar mentality, thats what Im here for!

Who are some of your favorite chess content creators? Is there anyone in particular who inspires you?

Honestly, over the last two and a half years, I think I've watched at least a little bit of just about everyone. Sometimes it's for research purposes, sometimes it's for pure entertainment, but usually it's for both reasons at the same time!

Obviously, anyone who is a chess content creator has to give a big shout-out to IM Levy Rozman (GothamChess) for being one of the people who's really exploded this whole scene.

But I've also followed a lot of the CSquared podcast, IM Eric Rosen, GM Ben Finegold, and other people like WGM Dina Belenkaya, ToshQueen, Witty_Alien, Gauri Chess The list can go on and on forever. But everyone has their own special voice or their way of presenting or creating or mashing together entertainment and education into a video. Just because I didn't list someone's name specifically doesn't mean I don't watch them and really value their participation in the chess world!

I try to take inspiration from everyone a little bit; I think if I try to take too much inspiration from one single person then it feels too much like I'm being a copycat. What I want to do is be involved in the chess community but also have my own voice.

You've had some interesting chess collaborations, including cardio chess and chess trivia. Whats been your favorite one so far?

You did name two very good ones! Cardio chess is essentially a little play on chessboxing where you combine the mental and physical aspects, but instead of punching each other it's a lot of physical exercises; the more reps you do, the better time odds you get against your opponent in the next round of chess.

I was lucky enough to compete against both chessboxing champion Dina Belenkaya and also against the world chessboxing champion from 2018, Mat Thomas, in that event Both of those are on YouTube. I won't give any spoilers but I'm pretty proud of how some of those went!

On collaborations within the chess world, between creators and even just between members of the chess community, this is one thing that I've been insanely impressed by. When I had a 600 blitz rating, I had people in my community who were 2000+ who were doing study group sessions with me and were just willing to share any and all chess knowledge.

Theres a similar vibe when I reach out to other content creators; everyone's been so receptive to collaborations or sharing information. To me that makes the online chess community such a unique and positive experience for so many people, myself included.

I think Checkmate Trivia Showdown is probably one of my favorite ones. Its a bit more recent but I've been trying to learn more about the chess world, and I feel like learning completely random trivia about chess has been a great way to do that. Its been a fun way to share things like Here's some famous games you might not have known or Here's some completely random grab-bag openings.

I'm researching a lot of stuff so I can put it into the show and then I'm testing all the contestants. That's been one of my favorite collaborations because I want to uncover as much as possible about the chess world and that's helped me do it. And not only do it for myself, but for other people as well!

Imagine you could do a chess-based collab on your stream with anyone in the world. Who would it be, and why?

So recently I've discovered that certain professional tennis players are also big fans of chess. The easy answer here would be Roger Federer, Carlos Alcaraz, and Andrey Rublev. I think Rublev made the opening move for one of the biggest women's chess tournaments a while back [the 2022 Astana Womens Grand Prix], Federer played with Tani, and Alcaraz has mentioned chess is an important part of his mental game

I played tennis for a couple of decades of my life, including college tennis. When Federer retired, I cried! I'm such a tennis fan, and it was a big part of my identity growing up. So to be able to do something chess-related or even chess-tennis-related with those three would be just absolutely incredible.

I might be crying as I shake hands with Roger; he may not be the official GOAT by the stats and numbers, but he'll always be my favorite. And that's never gonna change.

Speaking of Chess Tennis You recently took part in the Chess Tennis World Championship! How did it go?

It was intimidating, I will say, because I think the format in general favors chess players. So I knew I needed to really perform well in tennis, and then just scrape out a few wins in chess and hope for the best. Unfortunately, I scored four out of seven rounds in tennis and scored two out of seven in chess.

Honestly, two out of seven in chess was my goal, but for tennis I was hoping to get six or even possibly seven out of seven, having previous collegiate tennis experience. The only issue is that I've been playing too much pickleball!

If you're not in the U.S., that might make no sense to you, but it's a newer racket sport predominantly popular in the U.S. and I did not realize how much that was not going to translate back into my tennis game.

I do have to give all my opponents credit; I think this is where the mental toughness required to play chess really does translate to other games. I wasn't playing my best tennis, but these competitors were so mentally tough. They were willing to be gritty and compete as hard as possible, both over the chessboard and on the tennis court. So even though personally I think I should have won a couple more tennis matches, credit to my opponents for sticking it out and getting those wins over me.

But yeah, it was such an interesting combination. I went there alongside IM Eric Rosen, and Eric got to the semifinals, so it was a lot of fun to go through the experience with him throughout the tournament and then also cheer him on in the semis.

What do you think the overlaps are between the two sports (if any)?

I really do think that mental toughness is a huge benefit of chess, and I definitely saw that come through in this tournament.

Another huge aspect is ownership and accountability. Chess and tennis are both very individualistic sports, which means that if you win that is to your credit, but if you lose, that is also your fault. There's no hiding, you are the one responsible for both your success and your failure. I think that puts a lot more pressure on you, but learning to deal with that pressure and learning to be functional in the moment is so important for an athlete or competitor.

I feel like chess and tennis can both teach you super valuable life lessons in that sense.

I found a list of chess books you recommend for improving players. Can you describe the following books in five words each?

Ill do my best!

Silmans Complete Endgame Course. Best overall endgame book ever.

Dvoretskys Endgame Manual. I tried, until I couldnt.

My System by Aron Nimzowitsch. Friend recommended, never readexposed.

Artur Yusupov: Build Up Your Chess (2 & 3). These are great, my five words would be: I want all the stars.

At the end of every chapter, he gives puzzle exercises and their difficulties are 1, 2, and 3 starsyou have to get every variation correct to earn extra stars. But its an amazing series. My Discord community has gone through a lot of the Yusupov books in study group sessions, and its been immensely helpful for me and others in developing our chess.

You create some of the best chess merch out there; fans include Chess.coms very own IM Danny Rensch. Whats your favorite piece of merchandise that youve designed?

I know Danny was sporting the Excuse My French T-shirt while he was commentating on the Chess Clash event! I do like that shirt but I dont think its my favorite, mostly because I dont actually play the French Defense! I have two favorites, theyre kind of close: one is the "Sac! Sac!! Mate." shirt, which has a great move, a brilliant move, and then a period to symbolize that its over.

My other favorite is the one Im wearing right now; on the front theres a little KDlearns logo with a pawn wearing a graduation cap signifying the whole learning process, and on the back theres a pawn looking into a mirror... In the mirror theres a queen, and it says "Trust The Process." It goes with the theme of learning through failure and keeping the end goal in mind.

You were in Dina Belenkayas corner for her chessboxing match. What was that experience like?

Everything about that weekend was quite crazy! Dina is such a badass that I feel like I was more nervous than her. There were multiple times when I was getting starstruck because I was meeting Ludwig and GM Fabiano Caruana and Danny Rensch for the first time, and shes just coaching me through how to act normal around these people! It was like Im supposed to be helping you, not the other way around!

But honestly, I loved every bit of it, getting to meet all sorts of different chess personalities, as well as getting to know Dina better. She has her content personality which is very brash and trash-talking-centric, but shes insanely kind and just amazing to work with. So I was happy to be able to be her videographer and personal hype man in the corner!

Im glad I wasnt the one getting punched because Andrea looked quite scary. It was just an awesome culmination of the competition as well as meeting so many people in person for the first time, like WFM Anna Cramling and all the other people I mentioned earlier.

Overall it was a 10/10 experience except my rental car got stolen, so Im now forever banned from renting from Hertz.

Lastly, you've been quite serious (and successful) about chess improvement over the last couple of years. What advice do you have for people who want to improve their game?

I think I can break this down into three main tips: the first one is my favorite and hopefully everyone elses favorite when they embark on their chess improvement journey: puzzles. Youve gotta do your puzzles, ideally every day. You have to train your board vision, and eventually your puzzles can get more targeted. Recently Ive been doing more endgame puzzles because thats what Ive identified as one of my weaknesses.

Number two would be analyzing your games. Im guilty of this, but I don't mean just clicking the Game Review, smiling at the brilliant move or high accuracy, and moving on. Take the time to actually sit down, review it without the engine first, annotate it, and then double-check your analysis with the engine on. Thats what Ive found really, really helped. I cant do that with every single game that I play, but I try to tell myself I will play 2-5 rapid games throughout the week, and those games I will do a full analysis on. I can still just play random games for fun without any pressure, but 2-5 times a week Ill do my homework and try to push myself forward.

Number three is just consistency. Even if its a little bit every day, working on your chess a little bit is better than working on your chess whenever you feel like it. Building that foundation day by day goes a long way. I try to do five puzzles every day at minimum when pushing for chess improvement, and many days itll turn into a lengthier puzzle session, but getting into the habit of doing it every day really helps.

Consistency is one of the essential parts of delayed gratification. In the modern world of social media and constant dopamine hits, appreciating delayed gratification is something thats a good life skill to have.

You can find KDlearns on YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter/X, and Twitch.

Previous Streamer/Creator of the Month articles:

Link:
Learning And The Art Of Chess Tennis - Chess.com