Media Search:



New Current coach Vlatko Andonovski hopes to repay city’s … – KSHB 41 Kansas City News

KANSAS CITY, Mo. Vlatko Andonovski was dejected after the U.S. Womens National Team, which he had coached for four years leading up to the 2023 FIFA Womens World Cup, went 1-0-2 during group play and then lost on penalty kicks in their first knockout game.

It didnt matter that Sweden, which eliminated the USWNT, went on to finish third or that the team was a strange mix of aging stars nearing retirement and teenagers.

The USWNTs worst-ever finish at the World Cup fell on Andonovskis shoulders, so he resigned on Aug. 17, 2023 11 days after the loss, ending a tenure that included a bronze medal at the Tokyo Olympics and a 51-5-9 overall record.

The World Cup loss, a painful moment in an otherwise remarkable coaching career, came with a sliver of silver lining for Andonovski, who was announced Monday as the next head coach of the Kansas City Current.

One thing that hit me was how much this city the people in this city, the friends and my neighbors were behind me and supportive of me, he said. When I started the talks with Angie and Chris, I was very happy about the vision and the goals, but I was also happy that all those opportunities were in front of me in the city that gave me comfort in my hardest times. Im very thankful for it, and Im looking forward to repaying it.

Andonovski considered taking time off and he also fielded a handful of international offers, other NWSL offers and some offers to become an MLS assistant coach, but the opportunity with the Current was too perfect to pass up.

Walking out of there [for our first meeting], I was so excited, and the only thing I was thinking was, When do I start? How do I make this happen? And what can we do so I can start as soon as possible? Andonovski said. Right now, Im getting into this job refreshed and driven, hungry and motivated to create a club that will make a mark in womens soccer, not just in this country but internationally as well.

Originally from North Macedonia, Andonovski settled in Kansas City more than two decades ago.

He began playing for the Kansas City Comets indoor professional soccer team in 2001 and later coached the team before he was tapped as FC Kansas Citys first coach when the NWSL debuted in 2013.

Andonovski was the leagues 2013 Coach of the Year and led The Blues to back-to-back NWSL titles in 2014 and 2015 before the franchise folded after the 2017 season.

He spent the next two seasons with the now-OL Reign, where he again won NWSL Coach of the Year in 2019, before he was hired as the USWNT coach in October 2019.

Andonovski acknowledged that NWSL has changed since he left but noted that his USWNT role kept him close to the league, so he hopes to replicate his past success and bring new co-owners Chris and Angie Long along with Brittany Mahomes a few championships.

Im coming back to an organization that has a clear vision of what this team is going to look like and a clear vision of the path where this team needs to go, Andonovski said. Im humbled for the opportunity to be part of an organization like this, and I cant wait to get on the field and start building a team that will make this city proud.

Launched in 2021, the Current strive to be a mold-breaking franchise for womens professional sports.

Weve talked many times about our goal to be the best womens football club in the world, and everything that we do has that ambition, in my mind, Angie Long said. For me, though, its even more exciting when the best in the world is in your own backyard and the perfect fit for the club.

The Longs termed Andonovskis hiring as another step and investment as well as a momentous day in the franchises journey.

Were just really fortunate that timing-wise the stars aligned to make this happen, Angie Long said.

During a press conference last week to announce the naming rights for the clubs new home CPKC Stadium, which opens in March the Longs got to hear some of the feedback [on the hire] and it was unequivocally, unanimously positive, Chris Long said.

He said it spoke volumes to get that unsolicited feedback shortly after Andonovskis first meeting with the players.

Hes widely respected by players and soccer leaders across the landscape, Chris Long said. He has an endless work ethic and strives to not only win but also inspire and facilitate the development of his players.

Andonovski said hard work is not negotiable, noting that its part of Kansas Citys DNA and he wants it to be part of the Currents DNA as well.

But with players like Debinha and last seasons first-round pick Michelle Cooper, the Current will play with some flair, too.

Once you join this organization, it feels like you have no choice but to be bold and brave with the decisions that youre making, Andonovski said. This ownership group has shown us that in the past.

He pointed to launching the franchise in four months after the NWSL expanded back to Kansas City in December 2020, building a multi-million training facility, and constructing the worlds first stadium purpose-built exclusively for womens professional sports.

As a coach, I go with the mindset that I will be expected to make brave decisions, Andonovski said. I will be expected to make difficult decisions and face those decisions and challenges head-on, to embrace those challenges.

Andonovski said he believes the roster can compete for a championship and he wants to prove hes a championship coach still.

I may be even more driven and eager to start now and more motivated, Andonovski said.

Here is the original post:
New Current coach Vlatko Andonovski hopes to repay city's ... - KSHB 41 Kansas City News

The AI Revolution From Evolution to Super intelligence – Cryptopolitan

TLDR

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly evolving, and it has the potential to surpass human intelligence in the near future. This article explores the AI Domino Effect, outlining the trajectory from current AI capabilities to the possibility of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and even Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). It also highlights the critical role of human intervention and the need for regulation to ensure a safe and beneficial AI future.

AI is transforming our world, and its development is accelerating. Tech companies are in a race to create more advanced AI models, like ChatGPT, which is evolving at an unprecedented pace. AI already outperforms humans in various tasks, from stock analysis to medical diagnosis.

Capitalisms profit-driven incentive fuels AIs progress. Historically, capitalism has driven the improvement of various technologies, and AI is no exception. This raises the question: How intelligent can AI become? There is a strong likelihood that AI will soon surpass the brightest human minds, achieving AGI the ability to excel in any cognitive task.

The AI Domino Effect is a concept that illustrates how AI will evolve over time. Its like a chain of dominoes, where each represents a cognitive task of increasing complexity. Early AI could perform basic calculations, but as technology advances, AI conquers more demanding tasks like art creation, coding, and scientific research.

Before reaching AGI, were likely to see specialized AI in various domains. These AIs, like Midjourney and DALL-E 3 for art or OpenAI Codex for programming, will outperform humans within their niches. This specialization is a step towards AGI.

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is the pivotal point in the AI Domino Effect. AGI is not about mastering a single task but excelling in any cognitive task that a human can perform. It matches or exceeds human intelligence across a wide range of tasks.

One ominous domino is the concept of recursive self-improvement, where AI systems improve their code autonomously. This could lead to rapid, unpredictable advancements in AI capabilities.

Beyond AGI lies Artificial Superintelligence (ASI), where AI surpasses all human intelligence combined. ASI is the final frontier, and its potential is both exhilarating and terrifying. Its a realm where AI could solve complex problems or pose unprecedented risks.

Understanding the journey from AI to AGI and potentially ASI is crucial. It shapes our future in unimaginable ways, from solving challenges humanity faces to the unknown risks posed by superintelligent AI. Technologies like quantum computing could accelerate AGI to ASI.

The possibility of AI evolving into ASI raises ethical and technical questions. We have no precedent for superintelligence, making it impossible to predict AIs actions accurately. This underscores the importance of careful consideration and regulation.

While technological progress seems unstoppable, human intervention plays a vital role. Collective efforts can shape AIs development to benefit humanity, addressing challenges like climate change and disease. Ethical considerations and regulations act as barriers, slowing AIs advance when necessary.

Ensuring appropriate guardrails for AI development is essential. Without them, there is a risk that an ASI could become hostile. Its crucial to manage AI skillfully, balancing its benefits and risks.

AIs evolution is a double-edged sword. While it offers tremendous potential for good, it also carries the potential for harm. As AI progresses towards AGI and ASI, humanity faces unprecedented challenges and opportunities. To navigate this journey successfully, we must unite, exercise wisdom, and implement effective regulations. Its time to level up in our approach to AI, acknowledging its limitless benefits while mitigating substantial risks.

Disclaimer.The information provided is not trading advice.Cryptopolitan.comholds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

View original post here:

The AI Revolution From Evolution to Super intelligence - Cryptopolitan

AI Symposium Explores Flaws and Potential of Artificial Intelligence – The Skanner

The mainstream discussion around artificial intelligence tends to speculate about its dangers: That students will no longer have to complete their own coursework, and will therefore learn nothing. That text-based conversations with people will become indistinguishable from chats with bots. That AI will automate jobs and eventually replace most human skills, even creativity.

A group of Portland City College faculty and administrators is more interested in having a public conversation about the ethics and reality of AI. To that end, PCC's AI and Cultural Computing cohort is hosting the AI Symposium, a three-day event that is grounded in both the science of computing and larger ethical considerations.

By giving folks an understanding of what the technology is, we can have a discussion around it and thus have more control over it, David Torres, new media art instructor, told The Skanner.

How are we able to use this tool and manage it, ethically, morally?

It is a question the group felt wasnt being widely explored.

Having that equity lens was really something we wanted to bring into the conversation, Anne Grey, teaching and learning coordinator at PCC, told The Skanner, noting that human-developed algorithms have already been shown to reflect racism and misogyny. For example, we dont question our databases: Where do they come from? How do they collect data? Thats the premise, that unless we go back to really examine existing inequities, existing flaws, we will be perpetuating the racismits about, how we are inputting that data? And then talking about the other part of ethics: What is considered ethical? What are the lines we are willing to cross? How are we going to be voicing these things?

To explore this, the group created a three-day program with daily themes: Oct. 18 covers AI and Education, Oct. 19 explores AI and Industry, and Oct. 20s focus will be AI in Everyday Life.

Kicking off the event is a keynote by a leading computer science ethicist and thought leader.

Brandeis Marshall is a computer scientist and former college professor who founded DataedX Group, a data ethics education agency that takes aim at "automated oppression efforts," instead introducing culturally responsive approaches. It is a rebuttal to Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg's breezy "move fast and break things" philosophy.

The cohort used Marshalls Data Conscience: Algorithmic S1ege on our Hum4n1ty as a textbook when exploring how best to prepare students for a changing tech landscape.

There are really few people who are actually talking about it, and not really talking about the impact this would have not just culturally but in re-establishing or magnifying some of the inequities that we already see, Grey said.

Marshall focuses on the need for transparency in how AI is developed and applied, accountability in AI development and strategies for how AI might be governed in law and algorithms. Her work has been described as the meeting of social justice and science presented in an accessible, even engaging, way.

She really changed my thinking in a way that it hasnt been changed in a while, cohort member Melissa Manolas, composition and literature instructor, told The Skanner.

Marshall helped her understand, for example, large language models the major algorithms that use extensive data sets to understand language and eventually generate text.

You start to understand why the large-language models end up being so misogynistic and racist its how theyre trained, Manolas said.

Marshall is knowledgeable about the culture of programming, and points out there are already ethical issues coming up that are being rushed through, but which are really crucial to what you get as an end product. So we need to slow down and really call for that kind of thinking mindfulness about the equity at that stage, not just when you release something and then you deal with it but when youre creating it and programming for it.

Alongside her critiques, Marshall offers hope, she said.

Its her vision of accountability, Manolas said.

(These flaws) are not inevitable.

"Sometimes we hide behind the sense of the inevitable as a way to be non-active about it, and she really doesnt let people off the hook like that.

One idea is that an immediate fix could easily happen in computer science education.

Marshall pointed out time and again that very few curricula and programs that are producing programmers have ethics classes, Manolas said. If they did, if you stopped and slowed it down, you wouldnt have to wait until you already have these problems. She makes you realize, theyre completely aware that might happen when theyre doing the programming, but theres such an impetus to rush through that phase and then deal with it once its out there.

Alongside concerns about AI is excitement for its potential as a creative tool and a means of access.

Technology and new media arts has this history with access, Torres said. When the camera was given to the public in the 60s, usually you had to have a lot of money to make your own films, and then the common folk were able to use the camera to make their own content. Fast forward to now, YouTube is mostly people just making their own videos. AI is doing something similar. We start asking, ok, what actually is art? Like when it came to cinema during the 60s when folks had the camera: Beforehand, because Hollywood had cameras, they could just call cinema whatever. Now were much more critical, because someone on YouTube could do the same thing.

Torres continued, I go back to when Photoshop first came out: Everybody was using it in a very cheesy way, and it was for all the effects it did. But over time, what ends up happening is you fine-tune how the tool can still be used with the human hand, and I think creatively, thats how things happen in the arts. You look at it in movies, there was a huge craze when it came to 3D in cinema, it was this cheesy thing, and it kind of went away. Its like that with a lot of technology: Usually artists find a way to include that as an extra brush in their toolkit that they use. There was an era where we thought VR was the new thing. In actuality, VR has these specific moments, whether its in healthcare, but its not everywhere.

The symposium, funded by a federal AI education grant, is open to the public and, organizers hope, will constitute a large public conversation.

It is also the result of PCC facultys extensive research, study and conversations with experts like Marshall.

This is the culmination of the cohort coming together and wanting as an artifact to put this symposium together to share, to disseminate and to have a discussion within the community, Grey said.

Symposium events are either virtual or in-person. Video of virtual presentations will be made available after the symposium.

Symposium agenda below. For more information on Marshalls work, including free articles, visit https://www.brandeismarshall.com/medium.

Keynote Dr. Brandeis Marshall. 10 a.m. to noon, Virtual. Marshall is founder and CEO of DataedX Group, a data ethics learning and development agency for educators, scholars and practitioners to counteract automated oppression efforts with culturally-responsive instruction and strategies. Brandeis teaches, speaks and writes about the racial, gender, socioeconomic and socio-technical impact of data operations on technology and society. She wrote Data Conscience: Algorithmic Siege on our Humanity as a counter-argument reference for techs "move fast and break things" philosophy. An ASL interpreter will be present for this keynote speaker event.

AI and Education 12:30-2 p.m., Virtual. Ahead of the session, AI experts and researchers Cynthia Alby, Kevin Kelly, and Colin Koopman have submitted responses to questions from PCC faculty, staff, and students on the impact of AI on teaching and learning. Their responses will serve as the basis of an open discussion among PCC AICC cohort members and session attendees.

AI at PCC 2:30-4 p.m., Virtual. Presentation and Q&A with PCC AICC cohort members and Academic Affairs administrators on topics ranging from professional development, instructional support, academic integrity and AI, ChatGPT protocols and best practices. There will also be breakout groups to foster conversations and resource sharing.

AI Campus Workshop 4:30-5:30 p.m., Room 225, Technology Education Building. AICC cohort members will host an open lab for students and the general PCC community in order to showcase resources and equipment available on campuses and facilitate hands-on exercises with commonly-used AI tools.

AI in the Workplace 6-8 p.m., Moriarty Arts and Humanities Building Auditorium. Join us for an opportunity to network and listen to a panel discussion from industry experts about AI in the workplace. Panel guests include: Will Landecker, Data Science Tech Lead, Next Door, Emmanuel Acheampong, co-founder, RoboMUA, and Melissa Evers, Vice President - Software and Advanced Technology Group, General Manager of Strategy to Execution at Intel Corporation.

Spotlight Speaker Nick Insalata 10-11:30 a.m., Moriarty Arts and Humanities Building Auditorium. Join us as we hear from our spotlight speaker Nick Insalata, PCC Computer Science faculty and AICC cohort member talk about the impacts of AI in our everyday life. Nick is interested in the challenges of making complex problems accessible, properly contextualized, as well as interesting and fun to learners of all levels.

AI Campus Workshop 12:30-2 p.m., Room 225, Technology Education Building. Hands-on labs will include how to create text, images, and even music with AI tools and the different ways to incorporate ChatGPT. AI tools include DALL-E 2, Modo Screen, Soundraw, Looka, Legal Robot, and Deep Nostalgia.

AI in Everyday Life Panel Presentation 2:30-4 p.m., Moriarty Arts and Humanities Building Auditorium. Join us as the AICC Cohort members lead a discussion from dooms scrolling to deepfakes, personal assistants to the 'end of work', AI promises both subtle and stunning transformations to our daily lives. Some of the topics discussed will include super intelligence, virtual and augmented reality, ethical AI, and advanced humanoid robots.

See the original post:

AI Symposium Explores Flaws and Potential of Artificial Intelligence - The Skanner

Artificial intelligence has surprising pick to win 2024 Super Bowl – ClutchPoints

Can artificial intelligence really be better at predicting this year's Super Bowl than expects?

While most people turn to ChatGPT for answers on almost everything, this is beyond the software's capabilities. ChatGPT can give you answers to the greatest NBA players of all time and help you with your homework, but ChatGPT is unable to make predictions. In this test, Google's AI (Bard) was asked to predict the 2024 Super Bowl.

His answer? The Buffalo Bills and Philadelphia Eagles.

At first glance, not seeing Patrick Mahomes and the Kansas City Chiefs in the Super Bowl is odd, especially after all the publicity Travis Kelce has received dating Taylor Swift. Does Bard also predict the Kelce and Swift romance not to last by February 2024?

Going back to the matchup between the Bills and Eagles, the answer isn't far-fetched. When Super Bowl odds were released just before the season, the Eagles and Bills had the second- and third-best chance to win, respectively. Bard predicts that this will be the year Josh Allen finally gets over the hump, while the Eagles heading to back-to-back Super Bowls isn't much of a surprise given the depth of their roster.

Right after the Chiefs won their second Super Bowl in four years, 10 ESPN analysts were asked to predict the 2024 Super Bowl. Four of the analysts believe the Chiefs will head back to the Big Game, but will face the San Francisco 49ers (all four also predict the Chiefs to win it all).

Another four went with Joe Burrow and the Cincinnati Bengals in the game, while two others chose the Eagles. Of all the NFC teams, the 49ers were the most popular pick to make it, receiving 7-of-10 votes to be in Vegas next February.

Like with every list, theres always one outlier. In choosing teams to make the Super Bowl, one analyst had Tua Tagovailoa making the leap to lead the Miami Dolphins to their first championship in 50 years.

After gathering all the data from AI and humans to choose the winner for Super Bowl 58, the matchup everyone wants to see is the Chiefs and 49ers.

By asking Bard to simulate 100 matchups between the Chiefs and 49ers, the Chiefs will have a 70% chance to win if this matchup were to happen.

View original post here:

Artificial intelligence has surprising pick to win 2024 Super Bowl - ClutchPoints

Artificial Intelligence isn’t taking over anything – Talon Marks

Lets all take a deep breath and relax about all of this AI stuff because the worries of it taking over songwriting are ridiculous.

Artists do not need to worry about AI songwriting taking over because the difference in quality is hugely noticeable.

At first, AI music seemed to be something that real songwriters should be concerned about when somebody going by the name ghostwriter created a song with vocals of Drake and The Weeknd called, Heart on My Sleeve.

To be fair, when the song came out it left a lot of people amazed because of how close the sound was to the two artists.

The song was so good that it was even eligible for a Grammy Award which is super impressive but then again, the Grammy in recent years has been viewed by many as a joke due to some outlandish winners.

Since then, the AI songwriter ghostwriter hasnt had a song blow up as big as this one nor has there been an AI song that has come anyone near the quality of this one.

Thats simply because it is not the real artist, no matter how good it may sound people know its not the actual artist so why should we care?

Drake is going to be releasing his newest album For All the Dogs on Oct. 6 and do you think that if ghostwriter released an AI Drake album on the same day more people would tune into that album?

Of course, not because the AI music doesnt come close in terms of quality to the actual artist.

For the most part, AI music is being used in another way and that is AI covers, thats where people get an artist for example Juice WRLD and theyll do a cover of him singing Love Yourself by Justin Bieber.

The covers sound amazing, and those arent harmful to the artist because its a song that was already released what should the artist be worried about?

The only real reason an artist would get concerned over an AI cover is that if the cover is doing better than the actual song in terms of numbers that isnt going to happen.

Mainly because most covers that are being done are from popular songs that are already well-established in terms of numbers.

As for photos well that may be a different story but still something people shouldnt be too worried about.

You see with AI photos they can create a photo of anybody they want doing anything possible and it looks real almost too real.

The only reason why this is something to look out for is because they can take a photo of anything while an actual photographer has to bust their asses off to get a great photo or at least even a decent one.

It is for sure something to be concerned about but what will be the fall of this is that we have sources that include the actual person that is being used in the photo.

An AI photo editor could take a photo of a celebrity that is damaging to the celebritys reputation but all it takes is for the source to speak up and deny the photo is them.

The more and more the photos are viewed as false, the more and more people will catch on to this. The same goes for the music side of AI.

Story continues below advertisement

Read the rest here:

Artificial Intelligence isn't taking over anything - Talon Marks