Media Search:



Lizzo Accusers Say First Amendment Is No Reason To Throw Out Assault, Sexual Harassment & Discrimination Suit Against Grammy Winner – Yahoo…

(Updated with Lizzo spokesperson statement) The legal battle over assault, harassment and discrimination claims between Lizzo anda trio of former tour dancers and reality show contestants has turned into a constitutional squabble, at least for now.

Can a global celebrity be forever insulated from civil liability because all their conduct is protected as free speech under the anti-SLAPP statute? rhetorically ask lawyers for Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams and Noelle Rodriguezin an opposition filing this week to the Grammy winners attempt to have the matter tossed out of court. Defendant Lizzo asks this Court to rule in exactly that fashion. Fortunately for all victims of celebrity malfeasance, the law says otherwise.

More from Deadline

(Read the opposition memo to Lizzos anti-SLAPP filing here)

The recipient of the Record of the Year at the 65th Grammys, Lizzo plus her Big Grrrl Big Touring Inc and dance team head Shirlene Quigley have been accused by formerLizzos Watch Out for the Big Grrrlscontestants Davis and Williams, along with Rodriguez, of body-shaming and being put through what the trio call an excruciating audition for their jobs.

Placed in the docket at LA Superior Court on August 1, the suit also alleges that the dancers were forced to attend and participate in sex shows at venues like Paris Crazy Horse cabaret while on tour, had their virginity made fun of, suffered false imprisonment and were subjected to religious tirades. The suit goes on to claim racial discrimination from the all-white management team against Davis, Williams and other non-African American dancers.

Followed in short order by another suit from Asha Daniels, a wardrobe designer who worked on Lizzos 2023 tour and claims of disrespect by Lizzos camp from Oscar nominated filmmaker Sophia Nahli Allison, the nine-claim complaint from Davis, Williams and Rodriguez seeks unspecified damages.

In addition to denials by Lizzos reps, declarations from staffers and other dancers to her good character, and the October 27 anti-SLAPP motion theJuicesinger herself (real name Melissa Jefferson), Lizzo has pushed back against the claims. She went online in early August to deride the allegations as sensationalized and coming from former employees who have already publicly admitted that they were told their behavior on tour was inappropriate and unprofessional.

This week, it is Team Lizzo thats essentially accused of being unprofessional or at least strategically selective.

In an apparent effort to dupe this Court, Defendants either cherry-pick allegations or out-right omit allegations inconvenient to their position, instead sanitizing them with euphemisms, the November 8 filing from the plaintiffs lawyers continues with an implied swipe at Lizzos heavyweight lawyer Marty Singer and his team at Lavely Singer.

None of Plaintiffs claims arise from conduct implicating a public issue or interest, the memorandum from attorneys at West Coast Lawyers APLC goes on to state. The document continues, How exactly does Quigley relaying how she masturbates or performing oral sex on bananas implicate public interest? Or when Lizzo attempted to strike Plaintiff Rodriguez? Or when Plaintiff Davis was deprived of her phone and confined to a room? These acts, which give rise to the claims at issue here, do not implicate public issues, and thus cannot be protected.

In closing, the 19-page filing insists Lizzos Special Motion to Strike should be denied in its entirety as Plaintiffs claims do not rise from conduct that is protected under Code of Civil Procedure.

The celebrity-can-do-what-they-want argument was shut down previously by the Court of Appeal in a case [in which] Marty Singers firm represented Shia LaBeouf, plaintiffs lawyer Ron Zambrano told Deadline today. They should know better.

Last month, 18 independent witnesses stood by Lizzos work ethic and character, a spokesperson for the performer said Friday. It is clear since then, these plaintiff lawyers have come up with exactly zero to refute these facts.

Lizzos Special Tour started on September 23, 2022, and ended on July 30 in Japan. With the exception of receiving the Quincy Jones Humanitarian Award in LA in September, Lizzo has kept a pretty low profile of late.

The anti-SLAPP battle in this case is set for a November 22 court hearing in downtown LA.

Best of Deadline

Sign up for Deadline's Newsletter. For the latest news, follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Go here to read the rest:
Lizzo Accusers Say First Amendment Is No Reason To Throw Out Assault, Sexual Harassment & Discrimination Suit Against Grammy Winner - Yahoo...

Attend discussion with Cody Keenan, former speech writer for … – SALVEtoday

The Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policys will host a discussion with Cody Keenan, former White House director of speech writing when Barack Obama was president of the U.S. This event will take place on Tuesday, Nov. 14, at 7 p.m. in the Bazarsky Lecture Hall in OHare Academic Building. To register, go here.

Cody Keenan will discuss the ten most dramatic days of Obamas presidency when a hate-fueled massacre happened at a Black church in 2015 and looming Supreme Court decisions put the character of the country on the line and how a presidents words can bring a nation together or tear it apart. The discussion will be based on a book hes written entitled Grace: President Obama and Ten Days in the Battle for America.

Keenan wrote with Barack Obama for nearly fourteen years, rising from a campaign intern in Chicago to director of speechwriting at the White House and Obamas post-presidential collaborator. Hes been named the Springsteen of the Obama White House, Obama calls him Hemingway, and British GQ once listed him as one of the 35 Coolest Men under 38 (and a Half).

Keenan got his start in public service as a young aide to the legendary senator Edward M. Kennedy. He holds a masters degree from Harvard Universitys John F. Kennedy School of Government and a B.A. from Northwestern University, where he teaches a course on speechwriting.

A sought-after expert on politics, messaging and current affairs, he is now a partner at leading speechwriting firm Fenway Strategies and teaches a popular course on political speechwriting to undergraduates at Northwestern University.

To register for the event on Tuesday, Nov. 14, at 7 p.m, go here.

Featured image by Shane Collins

View post:
Attend discussion with Cody Keenan, former speech writer for ... - SALVEtoday

Obama center museum director talks about balance in the exhibits – Chicago Tribune

The tower of the Obama Presidential Center is getting a lot of attention as it rises in Jackson Park on the South Side. Meanwhile, Louise Bernard is trying to build the centerpiece museums interior: balancing former President Barack Obamas philosophy and his namesake foundations mission with historical accuracy in a time of corrosive partisanship.

While plans for the centers outer shell have been known (and litigated over) for years, its insides and the narrative Obamas team plans to present over four floors of distinct exhibits have largely been unknown.

The woman leading that narrative charge is Bernard, a native of the United Kingdom who was named museum director in the spring of 2017.

During an exclusive interview, Bernard said she has grappled with how to approach Obamas history and the controversies and challenges from his two terms in office, and present them at an institution critics worry will turn into yet another of the presidential temples of spin instead of an unbiased reflection of the time.

Among those Obama-era controversies: the rise of drone warfare, occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, failure to close Guantnamo Bay, and the more fragile aspects of the landmark Affordable Care Act and nuclear agreement with Iran.

Bernard said while the center has an emphasis on the values-based leadership of the president and Michelle Obama, her team leaned hard into using primary source documents that help show the Obamas thinking at the time they made decisions in the White House. And she noted the historical interpretation is almost certain to shift and evolve with time.

Of drones, for instance, Bernard said the museum team sought to place them in the context of the administrations goals for national security certainly there was critique from both the left and the right. The president wanted for us, in terms of exhibit-making, to engage around the complexities of decision-making, the differing perspectives and the idea that work always remains beyond one given president or the work of administration.

There are things that he simply couldnt accomplish during his time in office, and hes very open in acknowledging that and tasking people to continue the work, she said.

Obviously, were telling the story of a particular president and no museum is ever neutral in its storytelling. Theres a particular point of view, Bernard said.

But the fact-checking and sourcing have been rigorous, she said. Every single word is weighed, every date is checked, every name, every face in an image is checked for accuracy. And at the end of the day, the history is still playing itself out. Its still very recent history.

Bernard is no stranger to big, complex public exhibits that invite scrutiny.

Louise Bernard at the Barack Obama Foundations headquarters in Hyde Park on Oct. 26, 2023. Bernard was named museum director in 2017. (Terrence Antonio James/Chicago Tribune)

Plucked from her spot as director of exhibitions at the New York Public Library, Bernard is an Americanist with a Ph.D. in African American studies and American studies from Yale and a masters in English from Indiana University.

She was previously on the design team for the national Smithsonian Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington and advised on the International Museum of African American History in Charleston, South Carolina.

She and the president a Harvard grad praised and derided as an intellectual speak a similar language, Bernard said.

I come out of a cultural, literary kind of background, academically, and so engaging with a president who is himself a writer, in the best tradition of American letters, is something that sits very well with me, she said. She also understands the global dynamics of his thinking and how its brought to bear on this particular project, even though its rooted in Chicago and in this idea of the Black metropolis.

Bernard said the foundation has worked with a series of subject matter experts, including presidential historians Doris Kearns Goodwin (author of the Abraham Lincoln biography Team of Rivals) and Douglas Brinkley, also a history professor at Rice University. They are part of a Storytelling Council that has advised the museums narrative.

President Obama has been engaged with reading the script, so to speak, the narrative that we tell in the museum, providing feedback but also deferring to other subject matter experts in the field and certainly to the historians who he respects and admires, Bernard says.

Obama has not vetoed any content, foundation spokesperson Courtney Williams said.

While Bernard describes their consultants as a Team of Rivals of sorts, there are friendly faces among the ranks: The fact-checking firm the museum is using, Silver Street Strategies, was founded by former leaders in the Obama White Houses research department.

Another historian on the team, Kenneth Mack, was an Obama classmate at Harvard Law who the president appointed to the Permanent Committee for the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise, which documents the history of the Supreme Court.

NYU history professor Nikhil Singh was also tapped to advise on museum content in 2021. He considers himself one of the more critical voices from Obamas time: For one, he thinks the former president failed to be as transformative on the foreign policy stage as his supporters hoped and was an ambivalent figure, in a way when it came to the issues of policing and mass incarceration that ignited the Black Lives Matter movement. He hopes the museum grapples with that.

Singh was not asked to consult on any of the floors that involve Obamas presidency directly, but did weigh in on the sections that deal with American history pre-Obama, including the anti-Vietnam War, civil rights and student movements of the 1960s, what Obama considers a very formative period for him, Singh said.

Singh pressed for an emphasis on the importance of the labor movement at the time, which he said foundation officials were receptive to.

Clearly they werent afraid to consult broadly, I appreciate that Team of Rivals would be Obamas style, Singh told the Tribune. I think he does believe in history, more than a lot of other American presidents. Not just the kind of canned American history as myth, American exceptionalism, city on a hill ... but a history from below, of ordinary people making history.

I think thats what theyre trying to do with the museum, that he himself is a product of history, or a set of histories. Thats interesting, potentially, and instructive ... how it exists within a historical context rather than on high, Singh said. The idea of a history museum is one they took seriously and as a historian, I appreciate that.

Obama already eschewed the tradition of privately-funded but publicly-maintained presidential libraries, opting in 2017 not to build a library for the National Archives and Records Administration to house the presidencys paper records and physical artifacts. Instead, his private foundation is paying NARA to digitize the paper records from his presidency and simultaneously amassing its own collection of artifacts.

The break from NARA spurred worries from some historians and a former presidential museum director about the ease of access to information and potential partisanship in storytelling. Others argued it was better that complexes with a reputation for presidential propaganda were no longer propped up by federal taxpayers.

NARA will lend documents and artifacts from Obamas time in the White House for the museums exhibits, according to a foundation spokesperson. That includes paper documents for display as well as gifts from heads of state, objects from state dinners and other White House events, and Mrs. Obamas garments.

Bernard said interested historians will be able to access information online, including at the small Chicago Public Library branch that will be part of the OPCs campus.

The Obama Presidential Center under construction in the 6000 block of South Stony Island Avenue on Aug. 10, 2023. (Trent Sprague/Chicago Tribune)

The lantern-shaped building that will house the museum, meant to evoke four hands coming together, will be wrapped in a screen of text from Obamas speech marking the 50th anniversary of the police attacks on civil rights protesters in Selma, Alabama, known as Bloody Sunday.

Its the first of several references on the campus and museum to those on whose shoulders we stand, Bernard said. President Obamas story was only made possible because of the people who went before him, she said, a reflection about the power of everyday people willing to put their lives on the line for American democracy.

The museum itself will be housed in the middle of the building. Visitors will start on the ground floor and ascend through four floors of exhibits before reaching a sky room atop the structure, looking through the screen toward the South Side or north east to the lake and the Museum of Science and Industry.

In between will be a private presidential suite, where the President and Mrs. Obama can host VIPs, donors, world leaders and foundation program participants. Unlike the Clinton library, the building will not have a living space or apartment for the former first family.

The first floor exhibit will be Toward a More Perfect Union, Bernard said, referring to the building blocks of American democracy that would lead to the election of the nations first Black president ... the founding contradictions, abolition and reconstruction, the Progressive Era, womens suffrage, the New Deal, Great Society, and the modern civil rights movement.

Moving upward, next will be Working for the Common Good, recapping the Obama administration across two terms, tackling domestic and foreign policy, the push and pull of progress and key initiatives that the administration was working through, Bernard said.

Weekdays

Chicago Tribune editors' top story picks, delivered to your inbox each afternoon.

It will touch on the fallout from the Great Recession, the Affordable Care Act, Obamas immigration and education policies, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and Obamas vision for foreign policy as it connects to a broader understanding of security and peace, Bernard said.

The third level will be the palate cleanser known as The Peoples House. It will have the replica of Obamas Oval Office (which visitors will be able to walk through and touch) as well as other replica White House rooms shrunk down and in the style of the Thorne Miniature Rooms at the Art Institute of Chicago.

The final level, We the People, picks up some of the key storytelling around the administrations work for the common good, including tribal, disability and LGBTQ rights; gender equity; criminal justice and policing reform; science, innovation and climate change.

The floor also revisits Obamas farewell address in Chicago, where he spoke about the importance of civic engagement and passing the baton back to the people to continue the work.

The idea is embedded throughout the space, Bernard said.

For people who are coming to the center and are coming to the museum, and they want to see the replica of the Oval Office, and they want to see Mrs. Obamas dresses, and they want to learn more about the Affordable Care Act, or whatever it may be, we want them to think about the change that they can make, however small. It really is those kind of small radical acts that add up to something bigger.

aquig@chicagotribune.com

Continue reading here:
Obama center museum director talks about balance in the exhibits - Chicago Tribune

Trump Appeals Gag To Protect First Amendment Right To Intimidate … – Above the Law

(Photo by Brendan McDermid-Pool/Getty Images)

In 1991, the Supreme Court ruled that it is a legitimate exercise of state power to ban trial participants from speech which poses a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing a judicial proceeding. That case,Gentile v. State Bar of Nevada, involved a ban on attorneys commenting on pending trials. But for 30 years,Gentile has been understood to set the standard for imposing gag orders on all parties to a case, not just the attorneys.

What Donald Trumps appeal of his gag order in the election interference prosecution presupposes is maybe it didnt?

MaybeGentile only applies to lawyers. Maybe the proper test is theBrandenberg incitement standard. Maybe under Supreme Court decisions from 1976 and1978, Trump has the same rights as any member of the press to discuss a pending case. Maybe his status as a presidential candidate allows him to intimidate witnesses at will.

Or maybe not.

These are arguments which Trumps lawyers made at the trial level with Judge Tanya Chutkan. Quite frankly, they sucked then, and they continue to suck now. The only difference is that Trump has became even more brazen in his insistence that prosecutors did not include any evidence that any witness, prosecutor, or court staff had experienced any threats or harassment from third parties after President Trumps statements.

Trump repeats this claim several times, carefully stepping around the fact that a woman named Abigail Shry is under indictment after leaving a voicemail for Judge Chutkan saying Hey you stupid slave n You are in our sights, we want to kill you. Yes,technically, thats not a threat to any witness, prosecutor, or court staff. But its not speculative, as Trump argues repeatedly.

In fact, prosecutors and the trial court both noted that Trumps social media posts provoked waves of harassment for election officials and poll workers in the wake of the 2020 election as he sought to sow the claims of vote fraud which formed the basis of the election interference charged in this case. Trumps lawyers scoff that this was almost three years ago, and long before this case was brought, which is basically like a sealed juvenile record, if you think about it. (But not too hard.)

Trump continues to mischaracterize the hecklers veto, claiming that his free speech rights cannot be abridged just because his goons might hear him say that Gen. Mark Milley ought to be executed and then take it upon themselves to make it happen. Which is wildly offensive, but perhaps less so than Trump likening himself to civil rights protestors wrongly arrested for disturbing the peace by exercising their First Amendment rights. After all, this is a case which charges Trump with violating a Reconstruction Era statute by seeking to toss out 20 million votes on an inchoate theory that there must have been vote fraud in majority-Black cities.

Trump also argues that Judge Chutkans order violates the sacred right of 100 million Americans to hear Trump call Bill Barr a sluggish loser:

The Gag Order violates President Trumps most fundamental First Amendment rights. Even worse, it gives no consideration to the First Amendment rights of President Trumps audience, the American public, to receive and listen to his speech.

Never mind that that statistic includes the 94 million bots and actual users from platforms Trump got booted off of in January of 2021.

These are profoundly unserious arguments, all of which failed at the trial court. Although, to be fair to Lauro, once your client has forced you to defend his right to attack the prosecutors wife on social media, youre a little bit boxed in when you try to argue that he has a fundamental First Amendment right to call Special Counsel Jack Smith Deranged.

Theres also the bad fact that the second Judge Chutkan administratively stayed the gag order, Trump took to Truth Social to complain that cooperative witnesses are weaklings and cowards, and so bad for the future our Failing Nation. I dont think that Mark Meadows is one of them, but who really knows?

And Trumps vicious attacks on Michael Cohen, who testified against him in New York, are a pretty fair indicator of how hell behave in this case if allowed to persist unmuzzled.

The gag order remains stayed through oral argument on November 20. Whether Judges Millet, Pillard, and Garcia will be swayed by the same arguments which failed to convince Judge Chutkan is unclear. But perhaps this brief is aimed a little further down First Street after all.

US v. Trump[Circuit Docket via Court Listener]

Liz Dye lives in Baltimore where she writes about law and politics.

More here:
Trump Appeals Gag To Protect First Amendment Right To Intimidate ... - Above the Law

Michelle Obama’s Apple Cobbler Is Barack’s Favoriteand Now It’s … – Gwinnettdailypost.com

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

See more here:
Michelle Obama's Apple Cobbler Is Barack's Favoriteand Now It's ... - Gwinnettdailypost.com