Media Search:



Why Democrats aren’t winning elections in Arkansas (and how the tide could turn) – Arkansas Times

Ten years ago, if youd have suggested that Id someday write a piece for the Arkansas Times, Id have enjoyed a good laugh at your expense. The laugh, in fact, is on me. For those of you reading this who are blissfully unaware, theres a history of enmity. Ive referred to this publication as the litter box liner for more than a decade and have been oft described by its writers as a troglodyte who despises the poor, wants Arkansans to die and a litany of other backhanded compliments. Butthe publisher asked if Id like to share my point of view and after thinking it over, I agreed. Now that the obligatories have been dispensed with, heres some background perspective.

I became active in Arkansas politics in 1999 after moving back home following a few years living in other states. Democrats held legislative supermajorities, four of the six in our federal delegation were Democrats, every constitutional officer was a Democrat and 100% of my local officials in Polk County were Democrats. As a lifelong Republican, I didnt see Democrats being in charge of everything as a positive. I joined my local GOP committee and went to work with the goal of electing Republicans. Brevity prohibits most of the details but over the next decade we elected a few Republicans to local office and even elected Jay Dickey as 4th District Congressman. Despite many telling me Theres no way you can win running as a Republican, in 2010 I became the first member of Arkansas GOP elected to represent my region in the legislature. The events of 2010-2015 led to my becoming politically homeless, the details of which I spoke about at a recent Arkansas Times luncheon.

Today, elected offices in the Natural State are almost uniformly Republican territory. The party domination is even more pronounced than the Democrat domination was in 1999. Republicans hold legislative supermajorities, all six federal positions and every statewide elected office. Most counties are as Republican today as they were Democratic barely a decade ago. This leads one to ask the question: why arent Democrats winning most elections in Arkansas? Both parties have their own partisan versions of the reasons. Itll come as no surprise that my politically homeless independent point of view aligns with neither partys position.

Arkansans are fiercely independent people. For decades we were known for having the highest percentage of split-ticket voting in the nation, often supporting GOP candidates nationally while voting straight Democratic tickets closer to home. Left-of-center wisdom attributes the radical shift in our political patterns to the election of a Black President in 2008 and while theres correlation, the shift in other southern states predates the Obama election significantly. There IS a small element of racism that drove the shift, but its minor compared to the larger shift on social issues that occurred almost simultaneously within the Democratic Party of Arkansas.

Mike Beebes politics illustrate this well. Modern Arkansas Democratic politics are perhaps best described as pre-Beebe and post-Beebe. He won overwhelmingly in 2006 and was solidly re-elected in 2010, the same year Tea Party Republicans came within a handful of seats of taking control of both chambers of the legislature. The biggest difference between Gov. Beebe and most current Arkansas Democrats is how he handled issues like abortion, guns, gay marriage, etc. If you heard Mike Beebe talk about a social issue at all, it was usually done quietly and in private. He avoided those issues, likely because he knew they wouldnt work in his favor, choosing to focus on fiscal and operational issues. This was in stark contrast to his predecessor Mike Huckabee, who raised taxes drastically and nearly tripled Clintons budget but was fiercely socially conservative.

Democrats won elections in Arkansas longer than in most other southern states mostly by remaining silent on social issues and tolerating dissenting views on them within their ranks. Back when 3G was cutting edge technology, I occasionally referred to God, Guns and Gays as the 3Gs of Arkansas politics. Arkansas voters tend to have visceral reactions to each of the three. Once they perceived, fairly or unfairly, that the national Democratic Party was becoming unfriendly to their religious beliefs, their hunting culture and was embracing gay-friendly policies such as licensing same sex marriage, many felt personally attacked. President Obama deeply embedded this perception with his comment about rural Americans bitterly clinging to their religion, guns and xenophobia. More than any other single thing, that comment was the disjunction that separated many Arkansas voters from the party theyd long supported. Ive heard it referenced in many a small town caf, feed store or sporting event conversation. Many Arkansans will vote for candidates with whom they totally disagree on the economy, healthcare, government programs, etc. because of the 3Gs. When forced to prioritize, they do, and thats not working out in favor of Democratic candidates most of the time.

How do Democrats start winning again in Arkansas? Although its mostly too late for 2024, Republican overreach and corruption have left the door wide open for 2026.Ill share my opinion on that in my next column.

Read the original here:
Why Democrats aren't winning elections in Arkansas (and how the tide could turn) - Arkansas Times

Illinois Democrat: Speaker Johnson should not be punished for doing the right thing on Ukraine – The Hill

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) said Tuesday he does not think Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) should be ousted from his position for “doing the right thing” by letting Ukraine aid to the floor for a vote.

Krishnamoorthi also predicted, in an interview with CNN’s Jim Acosta, that enough Democrats would vote to save the Speaker if Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) followed through on her threat to force a vote on a motion to vacate.

“Look, if Speaker Johnson brings Ukraine aid to the floor and other aid packages to the floor and does the right thing — and then Marjorie Taylor Greene seeks to remove him or moves to remove him — I think that Democrats would join in a motion to kill such a maneuver,” Krishnamoorthi said.

“Because he should not be punished for doing the right thing,” he added.

Krishnamoorthi’s remarks come on the heels of other Democrats similarly signaling an openness to vote to save Johnson if Greene tries to oust him.

Greene filed a motion to vacate in late March, shortly before lawmakers returned home to their districts for a two-week holiday recess.

The measure did not force an immediate vote on Johnson’s hypothetical removal, but Greene, throughout the recess period, has continued to threaten to force an ouster vote. She has warned Johnson explicitly against bringing Ukraine aid to the floor for a vote.

Krishnamoorthi said Tuesday he was not sure Greene would ultimately decide to force an ouster vote, noting some Republicans have indicated they did not have an appetite for another Speakership battle.

“It could,” he said, when asked about the likelihood of Greene forcing a vote on the motion to vacate. “Although very interestingly — among my Republican colleagues, especially moderates and others — they feel that there isn’t a lot of support for her motion, and therefore she may not make it.”

“But all that being said, we should be prepared for anything. And we’ve seen this movie before. And so, you know, we’ll be, I think, not surprised if it happens, but I’m hoping that if he does the right thing, he won’t be punished for doing that,” Krishnamoorthi said.

See the original post here:
Illinois Democrat: Speaker Johnson should not be punished for doing the right thing on Ukraine - The Hill

Leading Democratic congressman says he wants ‘assurances’ before approving sale of fighter jets to Israel – JTA News – Jewish Telegraphic Agency

(JTA) Rep. Gregory Meeks, the leading Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has said he would not approve a U.S. sale of F-15 fighter jets to Israel without assurances on what the jets would be used for.

Im waiting for assurances, Meeks, who represents a district in New York City, told CNN on Tuesday. It is enough of the indiscriminate bombing. I dont want the kinds of weapons that Israel has to be utilized to have more death.

Meeks is one of four lawmakers on Capitol Hill with the power to hold up weapons sales. He has previously supported Israels battle against Hamas and called in the CNN interview for Hamas to immediately release hostages.

His statement is the latest signal that support for Israels war effort is eroding among Democratic lawmakers, particularly following an Israeli strike that killed seven aid workers earlier this month and even as the Biden administration has signaled its support as Israel anticipates Iranian retaliation for its killing of a senior Iranian commander this month.

Days before Meeks interview, more than 50 Democratic members of Congress including leading progressives and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed a letter calling on President Joe Biden to halt weapons transfers to Israel. Meeks was not one of the signatories.

If this strike is found to have violated U.S. or international law, we urge you to continue withholding these transfers until those responsible are held accountable, the letter says. We also urge you to withhold these transfers if Israel fails to sufficiently mitigate harm to innocent civilians in Gaza, including aid workers, and if it fails to facilitate or arbitrarily denies or restricts the transport and delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza.

In another sign of tensions, last week Sen. Elizabeth Warren, commenting on Israels trial on the charge of genocide at the International Court of Justice, said, I believe they will find it is genocide, and they have ample evidence to do so. Israel vehemently rejects that accusation and says it takes measures to protect civilian life.

Following the strike on the aid convoy, the Biden administration expressed its outrage and called on Israel to do more to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Israel has since increased the flow of aid, stemming Bidens criticism. In recent days, his administration has rebuffed criticism of Israel and conveyed its support ahead of a possible Iranian attack. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said on Tuesday that the United States has not seen any evidence that Israel is committing genocide.

As I told Prime Minister Netanyahu, our commitment to Israels security against these threats from Iran and its proxies is ironclad, Biden said at a press conference on Wednesday. Let me say it again, ironclad. Were going to do all we can to protect Israels security.

Original post:
Leading Democratic congressman says he wants 'assurances' before approving sale of fighter jets to Israel - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic Agency

Biden Makes Numerous False Claims About Second Amendment During Univision Interview – The Daily Wire

President Joe Biden made numerous false claims about the Second Amendment during an interview that aired this week on Univision.

Biden made the remarks during the interview, which aired Tuesday, when asked by Enrique Acevedo about his anti-gun agenda, especially as it pertains to parts of the country that have large numbers of Latinos that have experienced mass shootings.

When asked if he would take executive action to limit Americas Second Amendment rights if he wins re-election, Biden responded: Absolutely. Look, I, along with Dianne Feinstein, passed the first limitation on assault weapons and the number of bullets that could be in a rifle. The idea anybody needs 100 rounds on a rifle and an AR-15.

Biden falsely claimed that we dont have background checks for anybody purchasing a weapon.

Biden, claiming that he taught the Second Amendment in law school, also falsely claimed that the Second Amendment was written with limitations on what Americans could own.

From the very beginning, there were limitations. You couldnt own a cannon, he falsely claimed. You couldnt. You could own a rifle or a gun. They werent weapons of war.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

WATCH:

Read more from the original source:
Biden Makes Numerous False Claims About Second Amendment During Univision Interview - The Daily Wire

exSat Unveiled: Pioneering the Future of Bitcoin Scalability and Interoperability with Layer 2 Solutions – FinanceFeeds

In the dynamic world of digital currencies, Bitcoin (BTC) stands as a pioneering force, embodying the revolutionary idea of decentralized finance.

Since its inception, Bitcoin has not only paved the way for the cryptocurrency movement but has also maintained its position as the cornerstone of this ever-evolving sector. Despite its monumental success and widespread adoption, Bitcoins journey has encountered roadblocks, particularly when it comes to scalability and interoperability. These challenges have underscored the need for innovative solutions that can propel Bitcoin into the next era of digital finance without compromising its core principles.

Ethereum emerged as a formidable player in the cryptocurrency arena, introducing the world to smart contracts and thereby unlocking a new realm of possibilities for decentralized applications. Its success in fostering Layer 2 solutions highlighted the potential for scalability and efficiency, setting a new standard in the blockchain community. However, Bitcoins unique architectural design and its commitment to security and decentralization posed significant challenges in adopting similar advancements directly.

Enter exSat, a revolutionary Docking Layer designed to bridge the gap between Bitcoins foundational protocol and the cutting-edge world of Layer 2 scaling solutions. This innovation aims to enhance Bitcoins ecosystem by addressing its scalability and interoperability challenges head-on, ensuring that Bitcoin remains at the forefront of the digital currency revolution.

The Pressing Need for Scaling Bitcoin

Bitcoins secure and innovative architecture has been its hallmark, ensuring the integrity and reliability of its network. However, this architecture inherently limits its scalability and the execution of complex smart contracts, which have become increasingly important in the blockchain space. The reliance on off-chain solutions and intermediaries to address these limitations has introduced potential risks related to centralization and security, deviating from Bitcoins original vision of a decentralized financial system.

Moreover, the complexity of managing and enforcing state transitions on the Bitcoin blockchain has often led to compromised security and functionality. The fragmentation of asset formats across various scaling solutions further exacerbates these issues, hindering seamless interoperability and leading to the risk of liquidity dispersion. These challenges underscore the critical need for a groundbreaking solution that can enhance Bitcoins scalability and functionality without undermining its core values of security and decentralization.

exSat: Bridging Bitcoin with Layer 2 Innovations

exSat emerges as a beacon of innovation, offering a comprehensive Docking Layer that encapsulates a suite of protocols and mechanisms designed to extend Bitcoins data consensus. This platform facilitates a seamless flow of assets and information across diverse networks and Layer 2 scaling solutions, enhancing the Bitcoin ecosystems interoperability, scalability, and security.

Data Consensus Extension Protocol

At the heart of exSats innovation is the Data Consensus Extension Protocol, which employs a hybrid consensus mechanism combining Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS). This multifaceted approach ensures a secure and efficient extension of Bitcoins functionalities, enabling the synchronization of block data between Bitcoin miners and the exSat network. By leveraging EOS RAM, the protocol provides quick access and low-latency storage for decentralized state data indexing of Bitcoin ordinals and other ecosystem assets. This integration offers full Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) compatibility, allowing developers to craft complex smart contracts with reduced gas fees, thereby significantly enhancing the Bitcoin ecosystems scalability and utility.

Decentralized State Data Indexing

A pivotal feature of exSat is its capability for decentralized state data indexing for native assets, enabling efficient querying and bolstering interoperability within the Bitcoin ecosystem. This advancement facilitates true on-chain decentralized trust, supporting smart contracts with EVM compatibility and ensuring a more versatile and robust Bitcoin network.

Smart Contract Platform Integration

By integrating a smart contract platform, exSat addresses one of Bitcoins most significant limitations, offering a scalable solution to enhance the Bitcoin ecosystems functionality. This platform is fully compatible with EVM, allowing Solidity developers to create and deploy smart contracts with higher performance and lower gas fees. It supports transactions involving BTC Ordinals, ETH, and stablecoins, and introduces ZK Rollups based on the EVM platform, further expanding Bitcoins capabilities and applications.

The Backbone of exSat: Synchronizers and Validators

The integrity and functionality of exSat are underpinned by a network of synchronizers and validators. Synchronizers, which include BTC miners and mining pools, are crucial for bridging the gap between Bitcoin and exSat, ensuring the accurate and timely transfer of data. Validators play a vital role in verifying this data and maintaining the networks security, incentivized by $XSAT staking to participate and safeguard the ecosystem. This innovative system of synchronizers and validators establishes a secure, decentralized network that is resilient against malicious activities, further reinforcing Bitcoins foundational principles.

A New Chapter for Bitcoin

The introduction of exSat and its Data Consensus Extension Protocol represents a significant milestone in the evolution of Bitcoin, offering a solution that marries the original vision of decentralization with the advanced functionalities of Layer 2 scaling solutions. This union not only enhances Bitcoins scalability and interoperability but also opens up a plethora of opportunities for smart contract applications and beyond.

As exSat pioneers this innovative pathway, it marks the beginning of a new chapter in Bitcoins story, one that embraces the strengths of traditional blockchain technology while exploring the vast potential of modern innovations. In this new era, Bitcoin continues to lead the charge in the digital currency space, evolving to meet the demands of a rapidly changing world and reinforcing its position as a foundational pillar of the decentralized financial ecosystem.

In conclusion, exSat stands as a testament to the power of innovation and collaboration in the blockchain industry, offering a forward-thinking solution that bridges the gap between Bitcoin and Layer 2 scaling solutions. By addressing the challenges of scalability and interoperability head-on, exSat not only enhances the Bitcoin ecosystem but also sets the stage for a future where the core principles of Bitcoin and the expansive capabilities of Layer 2 solutions converge harmoniously. This pioneering effort promises to propel Bitcoin into a new realm of possibility, ensuring its relevance and utility in the years to come.

The rest is here:

exSat Unveiled: Pioneering the Future of Bitcoin Scalability and Interoperability with Layer 2 Solutions - FinanceFeeds