Media Search:



Trump, Johnson want to halt noncitizen voting. It’s already illegal – NPR

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks as former President Donald Trump listens during a news conference Friday at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla. Wilfredo Lee/AP hide caption

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., speaks as former President Donald Trump listens during a news conference Friday at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla.

Former President Donald Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., appeared together Friday to tout legislation aimed at stopping something that is already illegal in America: noncitizens voting in federal elections.

Johnson gave a broad overview of a bill House Republicans will soon introduce that would implement new citizenship documentation requirements for people to register to vote, which experts have said would make voting harder for many eligible voters like naturalized citizens and young voters.

"We cannot wait for widespread fraud to occur," he said at a news conference at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort. "Especially when the threat of fraud is growing with every single illegal immigrant that crosses that [southern U.S.] border."

The myth that immigrants are exerting undue influence on American elections has been floating around U.S. politics for more than 100 years.

Individual states began banning noncitizens from voting more than a century ago, and Congress passed a law in 1996 that explicitly banned the practice in all federal elections.

Numerous studies have also confirmed that it almost never happens, but as more conservative voters say immigration is a key issue for them, it's become clearer that election misinformation in 2024 will center on the topic as well.

Last month, NPR acquired a two-page memo being circulated by conservative attorney Cleta Mitchell, a former adviser to Trump, that pushed a number of false narratives around noncitizens voting. The document focused mostly on the implementation of a 1993 law that made registering to vote easier, and Johnson mentioned the law in his remarks Friday as well.

They both have also pushed the unfounded idea that the Biden administration is allowing migrants to cross the southern border for political gain.

"We believe one of the reasons for this open border ... is because they want to turn these people into voters," Johnson said, without providing any evidence.

Election officials verify citizenship in different ways in different states, but federal law requires voters to provide a unique identification number when they register to vote and because that is usually either a driver's license or Social Security number, election officials can usually work with those agencies to verify citizenship status.

"Most applicants use their [driver's license] to register," Tammy Patrick, a former local election official in Arizona who is now the CEO of the nonprofit Election Center, wrote in an email. "This number often serves as the validation of citizenship since most DMVs retain citizenship status in their databases."

Experts say introducing legislation, however, is a way for lawmakers to indicate to voters this issue is something to be concerned about, even as there's never been evidence to support the idea noncitizens are voting at anything other than miniscule numbers.

Since 2020, nine states have enacted new laws aiming to identify and remove noncitizens from their voter rolls, and legislation is currently active in 16 states, according to the Voting Rights Lab.

"Perception is 9/10 of reality," Ron Hayduk, an expert on noncitizen voting at San Francisco State University, said in an interview with NPR earlier this year. "Putting the solution on the table suggests there was a problem. And I think that's part of the point. [These laws] create a solution to a problem that doesn't exist."

Georgia's Republican secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, had his office perform a citizenship audit in 2022 that found fewer than 2,000 suspected noncitizens registering to vote in the state over the prior 25 years. None were actually able to cast a ballot.

"Noncitizens are not voting in Georgia," Raffensperger said in a recent interview with NPR, though he did laud Johnson and Trump's remarks Friday.

And a recent study in Arizona (first reported by The Washington Post) found that less than 1% of noncitizens attempt to register to vote, and even in those cases, the vast majority are thought to be mistakes.

Adding confusion to the issue, however, is the fact that a few local jurisdictions have moved to allow noncitizens to vote in local elections. San Francisco, for instance, allows resident noncitizen parents and guardians to vote in school board elections, and some cities in Maryland and Vermont allow noncitizens to vote in municipal elections.

Election officials in those jurisdictions implement practices to make sure those voters don't cast ballots in races they aren't supposed to.

But Hayduk says even in places where noncitizens can legally vote, they often don't. People he's interviewed about their experience in these places don't want to risk their status in the U.S. just to cast a single ballot further proof, in his eyes, that this isn't an actual problem.

"Time and time again in the interviews we did, we heard from immigrants who said they were super excited about this new law to allow them to vote, and it felt like it affirmed their voices. ... But, you know, put themselves at risk? Not worth it," Hayduk said. "So clearly, they're not going to do that for a federal election where there's an explicit law passed in 1996 that would impose very serious felony crimes ... and that would certainly lead to their detention and deportation."

Visit link:
Trump, Johnson want to halt noncitizen voting. It's already illegal - NPR

Illegal immigration ticks down at the border – Washington Times

Homeland Security reported a slight drop in illegal immigrants trying to sneak in across the southern border in March, suggesting the department may have turned a corner in the border chaos thats reigned since the start of the Biden administration.

The numbers are still higher than any month under Presidents Obama or Trump, but compared to the worst days of Mr. Bidens tenure, they are substantially better.

The Border Patrol reported catching 137,480 illegal immigrants in March, compared to nearly 250,000 in December, the worst month on record.

Overall, Customs and Border Protection tallied 246,432 unauthorized entries, including more than 107,000 of those coming at airports and other official border crossings.

Those numbers have surged as migrants take advantage of Mr. Bidens parole programs that allow unauthorized migrants into the U.S. despite lacking a legal visa for entry. The administration says the parole programs have taken pressure off the Border Patrol by shaping the flow of illegal immigrants, channeling them to ports of entry where they can be handled.

CBP Commissioner Troy Miller sounded cautiously optimistic about the overall numbers.

Encounters at our southern border are lower right now, but we remain prepared for changes, continually managing operations to respond to ever-shifting transnational criminal activities and migration patterns, he said.

Read the original:
Illegal immigration ticks down at the border - Washington Times

Reynolds signs illegal immigration bill – The Iowa Torch

DES MOINES, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday signed a bill, SF 2340, that makes illegal immigration a state crime under Iowa law.

The Biden Administration has failed to enforce our nations immigration laws, putting the protection and safety of Iowans at risk. Those who come into our country illegally have broken the law, yet Biden refuses to deport them. This bill gives Iowa law enforcement the power to do what he is unwilling to do: enforce immigration laws already on the books, Reynolds said in a released statement.

The Iowa Senate passed the bill in early March by a 34 to 16 vote followed by the Iowa House passing the bill days later by 64 to 30 vote.

Illegal immigration becomes an aggravated misdemeanor if the immigrant was denied admission to the United States, was deported from the United States, or departed the United States while a deportation order is outstanding and returned.

Under Iowa law, an aggravated misdemeanor carries a penalty of up to two years in prison and fine of no more than $8,500.

An immigrant in the United States can be subject to Class D felony charges after removal due to a misdemeanor conviction involving drugs or crimes against a person or was subject to alien terrorist removal procedures. State law states the penalty for Class D felonies is up to five years in prison and a fine between $1,025 and $10,245.

Class C felony charges would apply if the immigrant was removed after a felony conviction carrying a penalty of up to ten years in prison and fine of at least $1,375 up to $13,660.

Ultimately, the bill sets up a removal procedure for those found in the state of Iowa in violation of federal law.

The bill forbids law enforcement officers from arresting someone if the person is in a school, place of worship, a health care facility, or a facility for survivors of sexual assault.

Read SF 2340 below:

Read the original:
Reynolds signs illegal immigration bill - The Iowa Torch

Migrants were not secretly flown to Florida with taxpayer money – AOL

A parole program for people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela requires that they pay for their own flights to the U.S. Instagram posts

Statement: Taxpayer dollars were used to fly 326,000 migrants to Florida under a secret program begun by President Joe Biden.

A parole program for migrants from Latin American countries has been the target of misinformation online, with social media users claiming that taxpayers fund it.

The @NashvilleTeaParty Instagram account, which has 77,000 followers and links to the conservative groups website with the same name, posted a graphic about the program and captioned it "YOUR taxpayer dollars at work!"

The posts image includes a map from Fox News that says 326,000 migrants were flown to Florida and thousands more to other U.S. cities, attributing the figures to the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank advocating for reduced immigration.

This post was flagged as part of Metas efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed.

(Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

The map image aired April 2 on "Fox & Friends First."

But these flights were not paid for by taxpayers. Nor are they secret, as the Instagram post also alleges.

The migrants who flew to the U.S. did so as part of a parole program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans that is meant to reduce the number of migrants crossing the southern U.S. border. The U.S. grants parole based on "significant public benefit or urgent humanitarian reasons."

The Department of Homeland Security publicly introduced the program in October 2022, initially for 24,000 Venezuelans.U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Jan. 6, 2023, extended the program to admit 30,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti and Nicaragua each month. Under the program, applicants who meet certain qualifications, including having a U.S.-based sponsor who will support them financially and passing a background check, can request an "advanced authorization to travel and a temporary period of parole for up to two years for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit," according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

The agency also says that migrants in the program must pay for their own air travel to the United States. PolitiFact previously rated False a social media claim that "300,000 illegal immigrants were able to use a simple app to get a free flight to our country."

An April 1 report by the Center for Immigration Studies, which opposes this Biden administration program, said 326,000 migrants had arrived in Florida through the parole program since October 2022.

But the report does not say taxpayers paid for those flights. A March 7 article by the center says that taxpayers did not.

The centers April 1 report also said that although 326,000 migrants in the parole program landed in Miami, Florida might not have been their final destination. Miami International Airport is a large transit hub, particularly for flights between the United States and Latin America.

We rate the claim that 326,000 migrants were secretly flown to Florida with taxpayer money False.

Instagram post (archived), April 2, 2024

Fox News, Cory Mills sounds off on Biden admins secret migrant flights: Attempt to retaliate against red states, April 2, 2024

Department of Homeland Security, DHS Announces New Migration Enforcement Process for Venezuelans, Oct. 12, 2022

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, Jan. 6, 2023

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Frequently Asked Questions About the Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, Jan. 5, 2023

Center for Immigration Studies, The Florida Gateway: Data Shows Most Migrant Flights Landing in Gov. DeSantiss Sunshine State, April 1, 2024

Center for Immigration Studies, Fact Checking the Fact Check: CIS Reporting Stands, March 7, 2024

The Economist, If Latin America has a commercial capital, it is Miami, May 7, 2022

PolitiFact, Migrants in parole program do not receive free flights to the US, March 15, 2024

This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: PolitiFact: Migrants were not flown to Florida with taxpayer money

Link:
Migrants were not secretly flown to Florida with taxpayer money - AOL

Paris Moves Migrants Out Ahead of Olympics | FAIRUS.org – Federation for American Immigration Reform

The problems most visibly associated with mass immigration in the West, legal and illegal, can be addressed at their root if governments choose to act forcefully against them. Paris, which will host the Olympics in the summer of 2024, is now facing that situation head-on. Paris is now beginning a drive to push migrants out of the city ahead of the Olympics. The steps that the city and the French government are taking prior to the games show that states can deal with illegal immigration if they just choose to make it a priority or, more often, if their hand is finallyforced.

Paris is certainly in need of this action. The French capital is possibly the capital city in Europe worst impacted by mass illegal immigration. Many suburbs of Paris have become what the French police euphemistically call Zones Urbaines Sensibles (Sensitive Urban Zones), as migrant and migrant-descended gangs have made sections of the city into strongholds of crime and even terrorism. The French authorities even provide publicly available maps so that people can avoid these zones. Tourists rarely venture there. However, it is the impact mass immigration has on the favored spots for tourists, who will soon descend on Paris for the Olympics that has sparkedaction.

Tourist sites in Paris are now frequently haunted by often aggressive illegal alien vendors, mostly from Africa. These vendors have a reputation for physically harassing and abusing tourists who try to ignore their demands to buy overpriced and often unsafe souvenirs. The infamous friendship bracelet scammers, a gang of illegal African migrants who physically pounce on tourists at the Sacre-Coeur church, are among the most notorious and threatening, and tourist review websites of the Sacre-Coeur often mention the migrants and the levels of aggression they use. There have also been physical attacks on tourists and even rapes by migrants at the Eiffel Tower. The tower itself has been surrounded by a security wall as a precaution against terrorism, something else that mass migration has made an everyday threat inParis.

The city authorities are clearly worried. On the one hand, Paris has declared itself a sanctuary city that is reluctant to do anything about illegal migrants who commit crimes and illegally camp in the streets of the city of lights. On the other hand, it is rightfully concerned that visitors to the Olympics will notice these problems and never come back or discourage others. Olympic host cities often experience a post-Olympic tourist boom, and Paris hopes this will be the case for them, but negative experiences linked to migrants may impede that. Nobody likes to be physically manhandled or worry if they will be raped at a famous landmark, and the sight of large illegal encampments worthy of a Third-World shantytown is hardly a romantic memory. For the duration of the Olympics, the migrants will be moved on, but towns outside of Paris will be the places they end up in. The locals in these towns are unsurprisinglyupset.

The shifting of illegal aliens out of Paris for a few weeks will be a welcome respite for Parisians and tourists alike, but they most likely return once the Olympics are finished, and the social problems like crime, terrorism and public health concerns will return with them. The Potemkin strategy of temporarily moving migrants away to fool tourists into thinking Paris has no problem with illegal immigration is not a solution. France, like all advanced countries, must decide whether it is willing to continue this slide downwards, or whether it wishes to act decisively and reverse it forgood.

Many American cities now face the same problems, as New York, Chicago, and Denver among other places have all struggled with illegal migrant camps and the problems that surround uncontrolled illegal immigration. Whether it be the streets of Paris or the streets of the U.S., illegal immigration is a serious issue. Temporary solutions like moving migrants out of the way until they return, are not enough. More permanent solutions to secure our borders are needed. Citizens must demand that this be actedupon.

Originally posted here:
Paris Moves Migrants Out Ahead of Olympics | FAIRUS.org - Federation for American Immigration Reform