Mediaboss Marketing

Meta, the American tech giant, is being investigated by European Union regulators for the spread of disinformation on its platforms Facebook and Instagram, poor oversight of deceptive advertisements and potential failure to protect the integrity of elections.

On Tuesday, European Union officials said Meta did not appear to have sufficient safeguards in place to combat misleading advertisements, deepfakes and other deceptive information that is being maliciously spread online to amplify political divisions and influence elections.

The announcement appears intended to pressure Meta to do more ahead of elections across all 27 E.U. countries this summer to elect new members of the European Parliament. The vote, from June 6-9, is being closely watched for signs of foreign interference, particularly from Russia, which has sought to weaken European support for the war in Ukraine.

The Meta investigation shows how European regulators are taking a more aggressive approach to regulate online content than authorities in the United States, where free speech and other legal protections limit the role the government can play in policing online discourse. An E.U. law that took effect last year, the Digital Services Act, gives regulators broad authority to rein in Meta and other large online platforms over the content shared through their services.

Big digital platforms must live up to their obligations to put enough resources into this, and todays decision shows that we are serious about compliance, Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, the European Unions executive branch, said in a statement.

European officials said Meta must address weaknesses in its content moderation system to better identify malicious actors and take down concerning content. They noted a recent report by AI Forensics, a civil society group in Europe, that identified a Russian information network that was purchasing misleading ads through fake accounts and other methods.

European officials said Meta appeared to be diminishing the visibility of political content with potential harmful effects on the electoral process. Authorities said the company must provide more transparency about how such content spread.

Meta defended its policies and said it acted aggressively to identify and block disinformation from spreading.

We have a well-established process for identifying and mitigating risks on our platforms, the company said in a statement. We look forward to continuing our cooperation with the European Commission and providing them with further details of this work.

The Meta inquiry is the latest announced by E.U. regulators under the Digital Services Act. The content moderation practices of TikTok and X, formerly known as Twitter, are also being investigated.

The European Commission can fine companies up to 6 percent of global revenue under the digital law. Regulators can also raid a companys offices, interview company officials and gather other evidence. The commission did not say when the investigation will end.

Social media platforms are under immense pressure this year as billions of people around the world vote in elections. The techniques used to spread false information and conspiracies have grown more sophisticated including new artificial intelligence tools to produce text, videos and audio but many companies have scaled back their election and content moderation teams.

European officials noted that Meta had reduced access to its CrowdTangle service, which governments, civil society groups and journalists use to monitor disinformation on its platforms.

Read the rest here:
Meta Faces EU Investigation Over Election Disinformation - The New York Times

In ancient Greece poetry was regulated so as to prevent excessive passions from corrupting the social order. Rhyming couplets have long since lost their ability to sway politics. And yet. On April 29th a small crowd in Aachen, a German town near the Belgian border, turned out for ein Poetry Slam in which amateur bards were asked to riff on, of all things, the European Union. A few dozen mostly grey-haired types, including Charlemagne (your columnist, not the medieval emperor who once ruled from the city), listened tactfully as a trio of youngsters rhymed one elongated compound word with another. Some light rapping was attempted. A local TikTok political influencernot a profession Plato would have recognisedserved as host and ensured the social order was indeed not corrupted (the risk seemed slim in retrospect). The lyrical battle having been settled amicably, the audience was treated to another Greek civic art. Streamed from down the road in Maastricht, eight politicians from Denmark, Luxembourg and beyond engaged in an old-fashioned contest of rhetoric ahead of the upcoming European elections on June 6th-9th.

To latter-day Aristotles, this half-filled theatre on a Monday night was a sign of another phenomenon with Greek roots: the emergence of a European demos, or common political culture. For centuries in Germany and beyond, civic life has been the stuff of municipalities, provinces or nation-states. Yet in Europe power is increasingly wielded by EU institutions in Brussels. Whether this centralising arrangement can be anything more than a souped-up intergovernmental body, a sort of regional UN on steroids, depends in part on whether citizens of countries across the EU viscerally feel they belong to the same polity. From such a unified demos might emerge a unified European democracy.

Original post:
Europeans lack visceral attachment to the EU. Does it matter? - The Economist

(Bloomberg) -- Almost four decades after the Soviet Union collapsed, living standards in the countries that broke free from its orbit to join the European Union are set to leapfrog the blocs south.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Per capita income in Slovenia will surpass that of Italy by 2029 when adjusted for purchasing power, according to the latest International Monetary Fund projections. Lithuania will draw level on that metric, while Poland wont be far behind.

The shift would make good on promises for wealth in the nations that became EU members from 2004 to grow closer to the currency unions richer west. That process didnt happen as rapidly as envisaged, with convergence suffering repeated setbacks from the volatile 1990s period to 2008s global crash and the ensuing debt crisis.

Perhaps the latest progress, too, is the result of trends that werent foreseen by economic planners: While the central and eastern European newcomers have seen output surge thanks to foreign investment, access to EUs market and funds, its also been helped by slower growth in Italy.

The more affluent footing is already reaping benefits: Outflows of workers craving fatter pay checks elsewhere has begun to reverse. Governments in the region also hope that proportionally larger economies will translate into heftier political clout as they lobby Brussels over things like increased defense spending.

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

2024 Bloomberg L.P.

Read more here:
Europe's East Will Soon Overtake Club Med for Living Standards - Yahoo! Voices

EU enlargement is vital for Europes long-term security, but the project also requires EU member states to give up perhaps the biggest guarantor of their sovereignty. Thats the latest claim from German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, in a recent opinion piece published on Tuesday, April 30th, celebrating the anniversary of the 2004 EU enlargement.

In order for our Union of Freedom to accomplish this task for our generation, we must reform it. To my mind, this includes reducing the scope for vetoes in the Council, Baerbock wrote. We must remain capable of action also in a future Union potentially numbering over 35 members.

Such a move would serve to isolate the more sovereigntist governments of the Union, while further centralizing power in Brussels.

To be honest, Baerbock is not the first to have this revolutionary idea. Replacing unanimity with qualified majority voting in the EU Council effectively scrapping veto powershas been a central theme of most EU reform proposals circulating in Brussels in recent months.

The logic is always the same: look at conservative troublemakers like Hungary and (formerly) PiS-led Poland, daring to use their vetoes to stop EU legislation that they deem counterproductive to their national interests. Imagine the mood in Brussels: Now we are letting in the eight candidate countries currently in the waiting room, we run the risk of eight more leaders saying no to our liberal agenda, and we cant have that, can we?

Therefore, to keep the EU operational, its leaders would take away the one thing designed to protect member states sovereignty and the democratic choices of their people: the veto. Dont worry, says Baerbock, its fair because the change would affect each country equally.

This includes reaching decisions more often with a large majority as opposed to achieving unanimity. Even if this means that Germanylike any other member statecan also be outvoted, the minister wrote.

Well, the fact is that Germany is not like any other member state. It is by far the largest EU member and therefore, its voice carries a much larger weight already,not to mention in a future Council deprived of the unanimity principle.

In a system based on qualified majority (QMV) voting, one needs only half of member states who represent roughly two-thirds, or 65%, of the EUs total population to pass any law. This means that while the current system gives one votea more or less equal voiceto each EU member in the European Council, under QMV, the larger a state, the more powerful it is relative to others.

Germany alone represents nearly 19% of the total EU populationmore than the smallest 17 member states combined. In fact, the five biggest member states alone (Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and Poland) together already account for 66% of the total population, meaning that they are far less likely to find themselves on the wrong end of any vote in a QMV system.

In other words, what Baerbock is advocating in the name of freedom and democracy would be the single biggest shift away from true democratic principles in the history of EU reforms.

The problem is that shes not alone. The left-leaning majority of the European Parliament already endorsed several treaty change proposals that include scrapping veto rightsaiming to strengthen Brussels and weaken member states to eliminate any meaningful political oppositionwhile justifying it with the mostly undebated need for enlargement.

As Polish MEP Jacek Saryusz-Wolski explained, the people of Europe are being deliberately kept in the dark about what it truly entails:

The public is not supposed to notice that a putsch is about to take place, that the European Union as a community of sovereign states is being abolished and a superstate is being created without any consent of the people, and that the member states are being reduced to the role of German states.

This is a kind of group of political ideologues, some of whom I would even call fanatics, who want to build a superstate on the ruins of nation-states, where a political oligarchy will rule unaccountably and escape the democratic control of citizens.

Recently, even former Commission chief Jos Manuel Barroso spoke out against the idea of a systematic treaty change, warning that it would be a huge mistake if now Europeans would start a fundamental revision of the [EU] institutions because of enlargement, lest we run the risk of neither becoming a reality.

Instead, the bloc should avoid too ambitious reforms and only make those strictly necessary for enlargement, the ex-Commission president said.

Read the original here:
German Foreign Minister Aims To Abolish Veto in EU Council Ahead of Enlargement - The European Conservative

President of the French far-right Rassemblement National parliamentary group Marine Le Pen delivers a speech during a campaign rally for the forthcoming European Union parliamentary elections, in Perpignan, southern France, on May 1, 2024. ED JONES / AFP

Former far-right French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen on Wednesday, May 1, urged voters to inflict "the most crushing electoral sanction" possible on President Emmanuel Macron's party in European elections next month. The parliamentary leader of the Rassemblement National (RN) spoke at a party congress in the run-up to the European Parliament contest on June 9.

"We must counter them, we must sanction them, we must dismiss them," she told followers in the southern city of Perpignan. "We must inflict on those in power the most crushing electoral sanction that we can," she said.

The RN's list for the elections is not led by Le Pen but by her youthful protg Jordan Bardella, just 28, who has already succeeded the veteran campaigner as party leader. The far-right party has been leading in the polls, well ahead of Macron's centrist alliance.

Seeking to counter youth with youth, Macron has deployed the until now little-known European parliament member Valrie Hayer, 38, to lead the ruling coalition's list for the vote.

"This sanction will be measured by the gap between the list led by Jordan Bardella" and the Renaissance list, Le Pen added.

Second place in the European polls would be a major embarrassment for Macron, who throughout his almost seven years in office has presented himself as a bulwark against the far right as more radical forces gained ground elsewhere in Europe. A recent Le Monde poll found that Hayer's list is increasingly threatened of being caught by the Socialists, who tail her by just three points.

Le Pen urged followers to vote for Bardella's list to ensure that June 9 was the first stage of a great change in Europe, "but also because there are presidential elections in 2027 in France."

Le Monde with AFP

Original post:
Le Pen urges 'crushing' defeat of Macron in speech ahead of European elections - Le Monde