What the Keystone XL pipeline means for Obamas legacy

Washington The Senate is scheduled to vote on the controversial Keystone XL pipeline project Tuesday. If it passes and thats still in doubt the bill will go to President Obamas desk. He has signaled he is likely to veto it.

That pushes the whole issue into next year and the new Congress, where Republicans will control both chambers. The political reality of Mr. Obamas final two years in office will be in place. And the most important numbers will be 67 and 290 the number of votes needed in the Senate and House, respectively, to overturn a presidential veto.

But lets take a step back and look at just how important or not Keystone is to Obamas legacy. Big picture, the economy and health care reform are his most important legacy issues. Immigration probably comes next, especially if he takes executive action to defer deportations, as promised. Then theres climate change.

The pipeline project, partially completed and awaiting US approval of the final leg for six years, would carry tar-sands oil from Canada to the Texas Gulf Coast. Even to environmentalists, a key part of the Democratic base, the project has taken on symbolic importance perhaps going beyond its actual impact on greenhouse gas emissions.

The Keystone XL pipeline has become a symbol of how misguided the energy debate is in Congress, and how desperate oil companies are to go after resources that are dirtier, more dangerous, and more expensive to extract, says Michelle Robinson, director of the Clean Vehicles Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists, in a statement Monday.

Environmentalists will see Obamas final decision on Keystone as a signal of how serious he is about climate change. His agreement with China last week on reducing carbon emissions, seen as a historic first step for the worlds top two polluters, would lose some of its shine if he turned around and approved Keystone.

The Democratic donor base is also looking at how the party goes on Keystone, first among them billionaire anti-Keystone activist Tom Steyer. Obama may be a lame duck, but hes still the leader of the Democratic Party.

Weighing in favor of approving the pipeline is the labor movement, which has its own divisions over Keystone, but is another important element of the Democratic base. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka has called on Congress to approve the pipeline, citing jobs and the economy.

Weighing against is top adviser John Podesta, the architect of the US-China climate agreement. When Mr. Podesta joined the White House at the beginning of the year, he said he would steer clear of the Keystone issue. But its hard to imagine his presence and his views havent had an impact. Podestas one-year appointment ends soon, at which point he is expected to play a top role in Hillary Rodham Clintons presidential bid. The DNA of Obamas climate and energy policy will head straight into the campaign of the Democrats top prospect for 2016.

For now, Obama can avoid a public decision by saying hes waiting for the State Department to issue its final recommendation and for the Nebraska Supreme Court to rule on a case involving the pipelines route. That ruling is expected in January.

Read the original here:
What the Keystone XL pipeline means for Obamas legacy

Related Posts

Comments are closed.