Mediaboss Marketing

Hope and change? Photo: Leah Millis/Reuters

During her brief run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2019, Kamala Harris was widely believed to be emulating Barack Obamas 2008 campaign strategy. She treated South Carolina, the first primary state with a substantial Black electorate, as the site of her potential breakthrough. But she front-loaded resources into Iowa to prepare for that breakthrough by reassuring Black voters that she could win in the largely white jurisdiction. She had the added advantage of being from the large state of California, where the primary had just been moved up to Super Tuesday (March 3). For a thrilling moment, after her commanding performance in a June 2019 debate, Harris seemed on track to pull off this feat, threatening Joe Bidens hold on South Carolina in the polls and surging in Iowa. But neither she nor Cory Booker, who also relied on the Obama precedent, could displace Biden as the favorite of Black voters or strike gold in the crowded Iowa field. Out of money and luck, Harris dropped out before voters voted.

Now Kamala Harris is the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee for 2024 without having to navigate any primaries. But she still faces some key strategic decisions. Joe Biden was consistently trailing Donald Trump in the polls in no small part because he was underperforming among young and non-white voters, the very heart of the much-discussed Obama coalition. Can Harris recoup some of these potential losses without sacrificing support elsewhere in the electorate? That is a question she must address at the very beginning of her general-election campaign.

Theres a chance that Harris can inject a bit of the Obama hope and change magic into a Democratic ticket that had previously felt like a desperate effort to defend an unpopular administration led by a low-energy incumbent, as Ron Brownstein suggests in The Atlantic:

Polls have shown that a significant share of Americansdoubt the mental capacity of Trump, who has stumbled through his own procession of verbal flubs, memory lapses, and incomprehensible tangents during stump speeches and interviews to relatively little attention in the shadow of Bidens difficulties. Particularly if Harris picks a younger running mate, she could top a ticket that embodies the generational change that many voters indicated they were yearning for when facing a Trump-Biden rematch

In the best-case scenario for this line of thinking, Harris could regain ground among the younger voters and Black and Hispanic voterswho have drifted away from Biden since 2020. At the same time, she could further expand Democrats already solid margins among college-educated women who support abortion rights.

Team Trump seems to believe it can offset these potential gains by depicting Harris as a California radical and a symbol of diversity who might alienate the older white voters with whom Biden had some residual strength. Obama overcame similar race-saturated appeals in 2008, but he had a lot of help from a financial collapse and an unpopular war presided over by the party of his opponent.

Harriss likely effort to follow Obamas path has major strategic implications in terms of the battleground map. Any significant improvement over Bidens performance among Black, Latino, and under-30 voters might put Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, and North Carolina very nearly conceded to Trump in recent weeks back into play. But erosion of Bidens support among older and/or non-college-educated white voters could create potholes in his narrow Rust Belt path to victory in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

These strategic choices could definitely affect Harriss choice of a running-mate, not just in terms of potentially picking a veep from a battleground state, but as a way of amplifying the shift produced by Bidens withdrawal. Brownstein even thinks Harris might consider following Bill Clintons 1992 example of doubling down on her own strengths:

The other option that energizes many Democrats would be for Harris to take the bold, historic option of selecting another woman: Whitmer. That would be a greater gamble, but a possible model would be 1992, when Bill Clinton chose Al Gore as his running mate; Gore was, like him, a centrist Baby Boomer southernerrather than an older D.C. hand. I love Josh Shapiro and I think he would be a great VP candidate, but I would double down with Whitmer, [Democratci consultant Mike] Mikus told me. I dont think you have to go with a moderate white guy. I think you can be bold [with a pick] that electrifies your base. I heard similar views from several consultants.

Whitmers expressed disinterest in the veepstakes may take that particular option off the table, but the broader point remains: Harris does not have to and may not be able to simply adopt Bidens strategy and tweak it slightly. She may be able to contemplate gains in the electorate that were unimaginable for an 81-year-old white male incumbent. But the strategic opportunity to follow Obamas path to the White House will first depend on Harriss ability to refocus persuadable voters on Trumps shaky record, bad character, and extremist agenda. Biden could not do that after the debate debacle of June 27. His successor must begin taking the battle to the former president right now.

Daily news about the politics, business, and technology shaping our world.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

See the rest here:
Harris May Follow Obamas Path to the White House After All - New York Magazine