Mediaboss Marketing

Threats, sanctions and even troop deployments have accompanied the intensifying migrant crisis unfolding along the Poland-Belarus border. For this, Belarus is to blame, which is cynically instrumentalizing migrants against the EU. Yet Poland and the Baltic states are not helping either. They, too, have ramped up tensions by flexing their muscles and calling for NATO to step in.

Some fear armed conflict could erupt. Indeed, Belarus strongman Alexander Lukashenko recently claimed migrants were receiving arms from eastern Ukraine.

With tensions escalating, it makes you wonder why on earthnobody is engaging in talks.Is it not,after all, standard protocol to first exhaust all diplomatic means possible to resolve a crisis, and only then resort to military threats?

Of course, efforts have been made to talk sense into Lukashenko through various different channels. German Chancellor Angela Merkel has, for instance, spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin to no avail. Then on Monday, in a bit of a U-turn, she spoke to Lukashenko, who remainsisolated in the West,on the phone, thus enhancing his position somewhat. Whether those talks have made any inroads to defusethe crisis is anyone's guess.

DW's Roman Goncharenko

But more can and must be done. It's high time for the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to step up, which has been conspicuously silent of late, even though it was created specifically for resolving crises like these.

Belarus was never a fully-fledged member of the Council of Europe. It is, however, a member of the OSCE, along with all other states currently tied up inthe migrant conflict. This makes it the only international organization suited to mediate in this situation.

With every day that the crisis drags on, the more deafening the OSCE's silence has become. It makes you wonderwhat the organization is even good for. Granted, the OSCE is limited in its remit to what its member states deem appropriate. Still, it should try and get involved. With the body's Ministerial Council convening in early December, conditions look promising.

The Vienna-based organization is tailor-madefor handling the Belarus crisis. It has been led bySecretary-General Helga Schmid, a veteran diplomat, since late 2020. Schmid previously served as chief of staff under former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer, and until recently held a leading position within the European External Action Service (EEAS). In 2015, she met Lukaschenko in Belarus. The OSCE has maintained a close relationship with Minsk. In 2014, OSCE talks were held there aiming to pacify the conflict in eastern Ukraine. In addition, the OSCE has a dedicated special representative to help tackle people trafficking the very crime the West accuses Lukashenko of perpetrating.

Which steps could the OSCE take, specifically? Initially, the body should appoint a highly-respected diplomat as chief Belarus envoy. This person would then approach Lukashenko and pave the way for talks. The OSCE could then stage an international conference to discuss potential ways out of this crisis. In the medium-term, observers could be dispatched to Belarus, provided Lukashenko agrees. Indeed, the OSCE may succeed in brokering observer missions to both Poland, which is reluctant to accept outsiders monitoring the situation, and Belarus.

Germany should play a bigger role in OSCE negotiations, too. Olaf Scholz ofGermany's Social Democratic Party, which is set to lead the country's next government, promised during the election campaignto engage in a "new eastern policy in the spirit of the [Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe] CSCE and OSCE."

What better time to make good on his pledge,now that the migrant crisisisworsening by the day.

This article was adapted from German by Benjamin Restle.

Go here to read the rest:
Opinion: OSCE must step in to solve Belarus migrant crisis - DW (English)