Mediaboss Marketing

Ive been thinking about Frank Meyer lately. Among other things, Meyer was one of the founding editors ofNational Reviewand played an outsized role in the mid-century conservative disputes, arguing forand winninga synthesis, or fusion, between the traditionalist and libertarian camps. Meyer himself was more of a libertarian, but he argued that while traditionalists emphasized certain aspects of conservatism and libertarians emphasized others, no contradiction or repudiation was required. Its a fascinating history, and I recommend George H. NashsThe Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945to learn more.

Fusionism won at the time, but we know that a non-insignificant number of contemporary conservatives, perhaps especially the young, view it as defunct. Maybe, maybe not, and Im not here pursuing that problem. However, I would suggest a read of his 1956essay, Freedom, Tradition, Conservatism, not only for his take on fusionism, but for his description of the great tension facing conservatives in his timenamely, when we live in a time of Revolution, the conservative tendency to preserve, continue in tradition, and maintainpious modesty about our cultural accomplishments is largely defunct. In Revolutionary times, when institutions are corrupt and custom and habit off-kilter, we cannot, he suggests, rest in natural conservatism but must give rise to new attempts to preserve ordered liberty, even though these attempts differ from what we are used to seeing.

No one doubts that conservative thought has fragmented, and we are seeing an explosion of new schools of thought. This is to be expected, and is perfectly normal response to our age of Revolution. Some efforts will be more profitable than others, some will fail, some are unwise, but in many ways these efforts are to welcomed. We are thinking again. We are attempting to respond. We are attempting a struggle against a dehumanizing revolutionbut we really are all pushing or attempting to overcome the same common threat. Civilization saving isnt easy.

AtPublic Discourse, we intend to play the role of moderation and calm. We know our society is in the middle of a Revolutionand not a good oneand we know conservatives are experimenting and fracturing in their responses. We try to read and understand all the trends, all the possibilities, and stay calm and reasonable as we host debate and conversation about the best way forward.

Support Our Work

Public Discourseis completely free of charge to readers, which means we rely on the generosity of our donors. Please consider supporting our work.

Recent Highlights

This past month we continued this work. A great example was Kelly Hanlonsinterviewwith Samuel Gregg on Americas Commercial Republic, and Its Detractors. A good many contemporary conservatives arent so sure about free markets and free trade, and Gregg is someone to take seriously as he considers the issues.

OurLong Readwas from Baylors Thomas Hibbs, tackling the evident problem of contempt in online exchange and suggesting much of this anger stems from the sadness, isolation, and fear experienced by so many Americans. This is not an internet problem so much as a human problem, and the wisdom of the past, including from Thomas Aquinas, offers us sound advice.

If you cant keep up with the publishing houses output of excellent books, you might enjoy Matthew J. Francksreviewabout a book on a giant of constitutional law, James Bradley Thayer, or Richard Garnettsreviewof Philip HamburgersPurchasing Submission, orTerence Sweeneyon Michael Lamb and Augustines political thought. Joshua Katz provides an excellentcommentaryonJohn Agrestos new book on liberal education. Of course, its always worth the time to read Matt Francks column, The Bookshelf. This month on the idea and challenge ofinclusion, a word much in the news.

And be sure to read some of my favorites of this month:

From Our Archives

Since Ive been reflecting on Meyer, I also took some time to re-read Toward a New Consensus, an invitation from thePublic Discourseeditorial team to thinkers from the various conservative schools to lock themselves into argument. Argument is not cheap tricks, online scores, or owning anyone. Argument is fundamentally a sign of respect and equality, a commitment to the view that you and I both are capable of the common good of truth and knowledge. We atPDhavent changed our view on that, and I dont think we ever will.

What Were Reading around the Web

Miscellaneous

We have two announcements. First, to our readers in Washington, DC: on Monday, April 24 at 6:00pm we are hosting a panel with the Catholic Information Center featuring Mary Harrington on her new book,Feminism Against Progress.Alexandra DeSanctis,Christine Emba, andLeah Libresco Sargeantwill offer responses. Registration will open shortly, and we will send out a link once its available. For readers not in DC, we will publish everyones remarks as a symposium shortly following the event.

Second, weve put together a reader survey, which is quick and easy to complete.Wed be extremely grateful if youd click here to share your views.Because we value your input and your time, readers who complete the survey will be offered the opportunity to win two books, along with aPublic Discourse bookmark and mug. We will select ten readers who will each receive these items.

Sincerely,

R. J. SnellEditor-in-Chief,Public Discourse

Read more here:
From the Editors Desk - Public Discourse