Mediaboss Marketing

Good morning. Im Paul Thornton, and it is Saturday, Nov. 7, 2020. Before we take a look back at the week in Opinion, lets talk about ...

Newsletter

A cure for the common opinion

Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.

Enter Email Address

Sign Me Up

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

Oh, to hell with the pithy introduction President Trump appears likely to have lost! Thats a big deal! Arguably the most authoritarian American leader ever ran for reelection, and enough voters seem to have told him no. We passed an important stress test that other liberal societies failed when they acquiesced to a strongmans wish to stay in power. That the president wants to overturn the election only exposes the lethality of the bullet our democracy looks like it just dodged.

This isnt to say were in the clear. As op-ed columnist Nicholas Goldberg explained, given everything we know about Trump his mismanagement of the pandemic, his refusal to accept the emotional burden of the deaths of 236,000 people, his dehumanization of immigrants, his persistent maladaptiveness the fact that he was able to draw tens of millions of votes is just mind-boggling and does not bode well for the months and years ahead. The Times Editorial Board expressed similar discomfort with Trumps less-than-demoralizing defeat and contemplated the implications of his enduring support.

Look, I wanted to see Trump and his sycophantic enablers buried in a landslide as much as the next guy, but after the Obama years we have to learn to accept something less satisfying than a 2008-type realigning election. Globally, authoritarian leaders in seemingly healthy democracies have managed to retain power in free and fair elections, only to go on to make the next election a little less free and a little less fair. For all its faults, the United States appears to have bucked this trend and selected as its next leader someone whose defining characteristics were empathy and competence. This is a wonderful development.

Why arent Democrats dancing in the streets? My thinking aligns more with that of op-ed columnist Virginia Heffernan, who urges liberals to mute their inner self-critics and celebrate the achievement of their biggest goal: the likely election of Biden and Kamala Harris. The problem, according to Heffernan, is that liberals are natural movement joiners, eternally focused on lofty principles but blind to the realities on the ground. She repeats the advice of journalist Windsor Mann, a Republican who voted for Biden: Spike the football. Gloat. L.A. Times

Enjoying this newsletter? Consider subscribing to the Los Angeles Times

Your support helps us deliver the news that matters most. Become a subscriber.

There is no Latino voting bloc. Get used to it. About of quarter of voters who identify as Latino supported Trump, according to exit polls, leading to howls of dismay among liberals over ... what exactly? That the presidents inhumane border policies should have pushed every Latino voter into the arms of Joe Biden? That assumption isnt just offensively reductive; its not a winning strategy, says Mariel Garza. She writes: Really, we have to go through this again, explaining that Latinos are a racially, culturally, socioeconomically diverse group of people with a wide range of hopes and dreams and political leanings and not a uniform voting bloc? L.A. Times

Newsletter

The Latinx experience chronicled

Get the Latinx Files newsletter for stories that capture the multitudes within our communities.

Enter Email Address

Sign Me Up

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.

On that note, we have a new newsletter dedicated to the complexity of the Latinx experience. Its called the Latinx Files, its free, its weekly, and I encourage you to sign up for it. Nearly half of Los Angeles County and a fifth of all Americans identify as Latino, and the experiences of this diverse group will play an important role in Californias future. The newsletters author is L.A. Times audience engagement editor Fidel Martinez, who each week will send to your inbox his original reporting combined with the best of the papers coverage of Latinx culture, politics, art and much more. L.A. Times

This was the worst week ever for COVID-19 in the United States, and its only getting worse. While you were compulsively refreshing your Twitter feeds for ballot updates, new coronavirus infections set a daily record on Wednesday, then a new one on Thursday, then a new one on Friday. With a president who refuses to take meaningful action and much of the country momentarily distracted by the nontrivial task of rescuing American democracy, the pandemic is bound to get worse in the U.S., writes Mariel Garza: Sorry to be the bearer of bad news at the end of a difficult week, but its good not to lose sight of the fact that theres something more dangerous than partisan politics lurking out there. L.A. Times

If I told you that anticompetitive businesses successfully bought a law, where would you think this happened? In a post-Soviet oligarchy? It actually happened here in California, where voters probably just thought they were helping out their favorite Uber drivers by passing Proposition 22. What they were really doing was allowing money-losing, billionaire-backed companies rewrite a state employment law they didnt like and permanently etching it into the books by making it amendable only by a seven-eighths legislative majority. As the New York Times Shira Ovide charitably put it, Uber and Lyft Go Legit. New York Times

Read the rest here:
Opinion: Trump's losing, and liberals are upset? - Los Angeles Times