Opinion: The foreign interference inquiry features a parade of senior Liberals protesting too much – The Globe and Mail
Open this photo in gallery:
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appears as a witness at the Public Inquiry Into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions in Ottawa, on April 3.Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press
We are partway through the mandate of the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions, a.k.a. the Foreign Interference Commission, which is to say we are all the way through the only part that matters.
The commission is supposed to report by May 3 two weeks from now on the first part of its mandate: to examine and assess interference by China, Russia and other foreign states in the 2019 and 2021 elections, and the flow of information to senior decision-makers, including elected officials and actions taken in response. In other words: what went wrong, who knew and what did they do about it?
The commissions final report, due by the end of the year, is supposed to assess more systemic issues surrounding how government agencies should best detect, deter and counter foreign interference. But these are not questions for which a public inquiry is the necessary, or even appropriate forum. They are the sorts of broad policy questions we elect governments, with the support of the civil service, to tackle.
The point of a public inquiry, and the formidable powers of investigation that go with it, is to delve into the sorts of things that governments would rather were not delved into: the critical failures, mistakes and omissions, including by current elected officials, that might have given rise to the situation being investigated.
That was never likely under the pseudo-inquiry conducted by special rapporteur and Trudeau family friend David Johnston, which was why it was established and why it failed. It remains to be seen how much further the current inquiry gets, given the limits placed on even its access to sensitive documents.
What can be said, however, after three weeks of hearings, is how much it has succeeded in establishing already. Recall the state of play before the inquiry.
In spite of a series of reports in The Globe and Mail and other media, drawing on scores of leaked intelligence documents and interviews with confidential intelligence sources, detailing how China, in particular, had attempted to interfere in the past two elections how it had run misinformation campaigns against certain candidates, particularly Conservatives, it considered unfriendly; how it had channelled funding to others, mostly Liberals, it considered friendly; how it had conspired to secure a nomination for at least one candidate in a safe Liberal riding, Han Dong, who went on to be elected; how it had attempted to intimidate a senior Conservative MP, Michael Chong; and how, despite the Canadian Security Intelligence Services repeated attempts to raise the alarm with senior government officials, up to and including the Prime Minister, nothing had been done about it, not even so much as informing the purported victims of the interference campaign it was still possible to pretend, if you tried very hard, that this was all a lot of fuss over nothing.
Who were these confidential sources, anyway? Were those documents accurately quoted, and in context? Besides, intelligence is not evidence: the documents could have been based, all of them, on hearsay and rumour. Maybe the leakers had political motives. Maybe there was other intelligence, not yet disclosed, that was exculpatory.
It is rather more difficult to play this sort of game now. We shall have to see, of course, what the commissioner, Justice Marie-Jose Hogue, says in her report. But nothing that has come out of the inquiry to date has materially challenged any of what was contained in the CSIS documents, or how it was reported.
Mr. Dongs appearance, in particular, did nothing to advance his case that he was an innocent victim of circumstance. There was his surprising admission, in testimony before the inquiry, that he had met with and solicited the votes of a group of Chinese foreign students who were later bused into the nomination meeting, a fact he had neglected to mention until then. He said a conversation with his wife had jogged his memory.
There was, too, his response to evidence that he had advised Chinese officials, in a conversation taped by CSIS, that an immediate release of the two Michaels would be seen as an affirmation of the effectiveness of a hardline Canadian approach as advocated by the Conservative opposition. It was not, as you might expect, I never said that, but I dont remember saying that.
Mr. Dongs memory failings perhaps explain why he has yet to be admitted back into the Liberal caucus, from which he exiled himself last year while he pursued his efforts to clear his name. But as efforts in self-incrimination they pale in comparison with the testimony of a parade of Liberal officials and cabinet ministers, including the Prime Minister.
It has always been a mystery how, in the face of this hail of memos from intelligence officials, some at the very highest levels, warning of Chinas attempts to interfere, senior Liberals, inside government and out, could have remained so oblivious or having been alerted, could have failed to act.
Their testimony before the inquiry only accentuates the implausibility of the story. At every turn, Liberal officials responses were either we didnt see the memo, or it was not reflected in oral briefings, or in the face of evidence they received both, well, what does CSIS know anyway?
The Prime Ministers chief of staff, Katie Telford, testified that on a previous occasion she had ordered that a particularly incriminating CSIS memo be rewritten, based on her own intuition that it must be mistaken. Much to her delight, the agency obliged the very next day.
Intelligence agencies can of course get things wrong. And governments are not automatically obliged to accept their assessment. But can it really be acceptable that a government official can not just disregard an intelligence memo, but order its findings adjusted to her liking, without any checks or safeguards?
More worrying still was the aftermath of CSISs briefing of party officials on the Han Dong matter. The briefing, carried out during the 2019 election campaign, was classified, restricted to a small number of officials with security clearance. Yet, as a senior national-security official told The Globe last week, a party member tipped off Mr. Dong days later that CSIS had their eye on him.
Then there was the testimony of the Prime Minister. Much attention has been paid to Justin Trudeaus peculiarly vehement insistence that he seldom reads the briefing materials put in front of him. While he reads them when he can, as a summary of Mr. Trudeaus prehearing interview put it, in other cases he trusts that someone else will tell him if there is something he needs to know. Or as he said in his public appearance, the only way to guarantee, to make sure, that I receive the necessary information is to give me an in-person briefing.
This appears to conflict with testimony offered by Ms. Telford before a parliamentary committee a year ago, that of course the Prime Minister reads any documents he receives. But it is far from the only contradiction or anomaly in his testimony.
Mr. Trudeau testified that, while he was briefed by the partys national campaign manager, Jeremy Broadhurst (now a senior adviser in the Prime Ministers Office) on the Han Dong affair, he did not feel there was sufficient or sufficiently credible information that would justify this very significant step as to remove a candidate in these circumstances. Mr. Broadhurst, for his part, testified that he recommended that no action should be taken, because I thought the bar for overturning that that bar should be extremely high.
Oh please. This very significant step? If only. Political parties drop candidates all the time, and with far less justification because they posted something untoward on their Facebook page when they were 12, let alone because they are suspected of being the protgs of a hostile foreign power. This sudden respect for the sanctity of the local nomination process would be a lot easier to credit if there were any if the races were not often rigged by party HQ to favour one candidate or another, when they are not pre-empted altogether.
Indeed, Mr. Trudeau at another point smirked at CSISs naivet about the Canadian political process: nomination meetings, he said in a prehearing interview, are stacked with busloads of supporters for one candidate or another all the time. That may be true, but they are not usually under the direction of a foreign power told, as the inquiry also heard, that their families back home would face consequences if they did not show up.
So the Liberals, and Mr. Trudeau in particular, are left with many more questions to answer after their testimony than before. Their insistence, in particular, that briefing notes prepared by CSIS for the Prime Ministers Office, stating that Beijing had clandestinely and deceptively interfered in both the 2019 and 2021 general elections, that state actors are able to conduct [foreign interference] successfully in Canada because there are no consequences, either legal or political, and that until [foreign interference] is viewed as an existential threat to Canadian democracy and governments forcefully and actively respond, these threats will persist, was not reflected in what CSIS director David Vigneault personally briefed them, hangs by the slenderest of threads.
Recalled to the witness stand, Mr. Vigneault testified he might not have used those exact words in his oral briefings, but only because he had been telling them much the same thing for years. I can say with confidence that this is something that has been conveyed to the government, to ministers, the Prime Minister, using these words and other types of words, he said.
The question is why no one was listening. Or why, if they were, they stopped up their ears.
Read the original:
Opinion: The foreign interference inquiry features a parade of senior Liberals protesting too much - The Globe and Mail
- Columbia crisis: Another massive failure of liberalism - Salon - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- MAGA is obsessed with Viktor Orban; liberals should be, too - - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Opinion | Justin Trudeau May Be No Match for the New World of Polarization - The New York Times - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Liberals accuse Poilievre of planning to override charter rights with notwithstanding clause - CBC.ca - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Even if the Liberals win in 2026, dont count on a new deal for cities - TVO Today - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Howie Carr: Lets toll all smug liberals - Boston Herald - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Only 6% of vaccine injury claimants have been paid as Liberals earmark $36 million for program - True North - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- PC opposition blasts Liberals over handling of mental health and drug crisis - Yahoo News Canada - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- As Michael Cohen testifies against Trump, many liberals are still wary of him - The Washington Post - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Letters: Seven ways to kill the Canadian dream (courtesy of the Trudeau Liberals) - National Post - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- How a former Edmonton cop became the hand behind the Liberals' proposed hate-crime law - The Logic - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Tories dismiss fishing harbour repairs by federal Liberals as 'electioneering' - CBC.ca - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Globe editorial: The Liberals' capital-gains tax hike punishes prosperity - The Globe and Mail - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Opinion: For the good of the Liberal party, Trudeau needs to think about his future - The Globe and Mail - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Freeland pushes back against suggestion Liberals are bending to NDP on disability benefit - iPolitics.ca - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- 'Hell freezing over': Liberals shocked to agree with Jeanine Pirro on dead dog take - Raw Story - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- 'Sopranos' Actress Says People In Hollywood Are Too 'Petrified' To Cross Liberals On Social Issues - The Daily Wire - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Liberals' plan to destroy super will drive up house prices - The New Daily - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- How liberals killed Earth Day - Washington Times - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- The Weekly Wrap: The Liberals lean all the way into class warfare - The Hub - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Liberals Are Trying to Make Trump's Age an Issue. It Won't Work. - The New Republic - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Israel Attacks, Trump Trial Rights, and Liberals Taking The Country Down - WBT - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Letter | Liberal tribalism led to downfall of phonics - The Capital Times - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Quebec Liberals will choose new leader during convention in June 2025 - Yahoo News Canada - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Globe editorial: The Liberals move from borrow and spend, to tax and spend - The Globe and Mail - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Other voices: Liberal bias at NPR, old-school journalism and the reluctance to admit a mistake - St. Paul Pioneer Press - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- S&Ds contest harmful deal on the new EU retail investment law, brokered by liberals in cooperation with the far right - Socialists & Democrats - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Unpacking the Liberals Housing First Federal Budget - Move Smartly - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Budget 2024 sets up a hard year for the Liberals. Heres what to expect - Global News - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Jagmeet Singh says the Liberals and Conservatives are 'controlled' by corporate lobbyists. How true is that? - Toronto Star - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Liberals force banks to identify carbon rebates by name in direct deposits - True North - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Outspoken Liberal cabinet minister Iona Campagnolo earned a reputation for getting things done - The Globe and Mail - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Here's what the Liberals have already promised will be in today's federal budget - CP24 - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Quebec Liberals will choose new leader during convention in June 2025 - larongeNOW - April 20th, 2024 [April 20th, 2024]
- Did Macron and Tusk Just Chart a Path for Liberals Elsewhere on Immigration? - Just Security - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Freedom from Fear and the Specter of Perfection - Liberal Currents - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Trump praises 'very nice' Katie Britt SOTU response in Ohio rally - 1819 News - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Memo To Britain: Tories Have Acted Like A Light Version Of Liberals And Could Be In For A Wipeout - Forbes - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Liberal Media Loses It Over Trump's 'Bloodbath' Comments - WIBC - Indianapolis News & Politics - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- The Case for Trump: Bullet Points to share with Liberals and RINO's by Joyce Kaufman 850 WFTL - 850 WFTL - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Liberals drop more hints that an $18B Honda expansion in Ontario is possible - Automotive News Canada - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Polls show 'across-the-board, generalized retreat' from Liberals, says Coletto - The Hill Times - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Ontario Liberals rule out carbon tax if they form government in 2026 - Global News - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Are EU liberals still progressive and pro-European? - EURACTIV - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Opinion: If the Trudeau Liberals are annihilated in an election, it will be over housing - The Globe and Mail - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Trump defended over bloodbath speech as conservatives claim liberals are twisting his words - MSN - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Liberals say Poilievre 'doesn't care' about the housing shortage and mock his record | RCI - Radio-Canada.ca - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- An expected defeat was unexpectedly painful for Justin Trudeau's Liberals. That should set off alarm bells - Toronto Star - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Liberals say Poilievre 'doesn't care' about the housing shortage and mock his record - MSN - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Even when it criticizes Israel, the liberal world is not against us - opinion - The Jerusalem Post - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Socialists ramp up attacks on conservatives and liberals in EU election manifesto - POLITICO Europe - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Howard Levitt: Young people are rejecting the woke status quo and that spells trouble for the Liberals - Financial Post - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Six liberal conspiracy theories clouding politics | Business - Colorado Springs Gazette - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Carson Jerema: Don't believe the Liberals, online harms act targets free speech - National Post - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Howard Levitt: Young people are rejecting the woke status quo and that spells trouble for the Liberals - Yahoo Canada Finance - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The history of Section 13, the controversial hate speech law the Liberals just revived - National Post - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The Liberals are set to unveil an online harms bill today. Here's what you need to know - CBC.ca - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- The Liberals and NDP say they have a pharmacare deal so what's left on their to-do list? - CBC.ca - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Liberals introduce online bill, Amanda Todds mother urges MPs to pass - Vancouver Sun - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Liberals accuse Poilievre of creating 'dysfunction' in bid to extend House hours - CTV News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- WA Liberals leader Libby Mettam tells Stateline how she plans to rebuild ahead of the state election - ABC News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Liberals take first step toward pharmacare with bill for birth control, diabetes meds - Sylvan Lake News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Best of the 'Media Buzz Meter': Liberal Pundits Increasingly Say Biden Can't Win, Should Bow Out at the Convention - FOX News Radio - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Georgian Dream is preparing a bill against ideology of pseudo-liberals and wilful propaganda of non-traditional ... - Democracy & Freedom Watch - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Dunkley by-election: First results show swing to Liberals - MSN - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Liberals vote against disclosure of ArriveCan costs as Opposition MPs accuse the government of filibustering - The Hill Times - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Liberals want to stop overnight voting with health breaks for MPs - Global News - March 2nd, 2024 [March 2nd, 2024]
- Far right, conservatives, liberals converging before EU elections, leading Left MEP says - EURACTIV - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Trump wants to fire thousands of government workers. Liberals are preparing to fight back if he wins - The Associated Press - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Conservatives and liberals invited to event on polarization, first in statewide series - ECM Publishers - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Liberal Pundits Increasingly Say Biden Can't Win, Should Bow Out at the Convention - FOX News Radio - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Opinion: The federal Liberals and Ontario Tories are fighting again and it won't end well for Trudeau - The Globe and Mail - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- John Ivison: Finally, signs that Liberals are waking from their sleepy approach to defence - National Post - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- What make-or-break confidence tests are the Liberals facing this sitting? - iPolitics.ca - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- The Supreme Court Could Permanently Break the Government. Liberals Have a Chance to Stop Them. - The New Republic - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Some thoughts on why the Liberals are sinking in popularity - Toronto Star - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Opinion: Liberals face political oblivion with Trudeau at the helm - The Globe and Mail - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- New poll finds Ontario Liberals are in a close race with the Conservative party Breakfast Television - Breakfast Television - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- Liberals rebrand carbon-tax rebates, amount to rise as much as 17% in April - Financial Post - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
- SuperFlashback: When abortion-defending liberals freaked out about ad featuring Tim Tebows proud mom - Washington Examiner - February 20th, 2024 [February 20th, 2024]
Tags: