Mediaboss Marketing

The families and CEOs behind Canadas largest grocery retailers have donated more than $150,000 to the Liberal and Conservative Party over the last two decades, data from Elections Canada shows.

That puts the owners of Loblaw and Empire among the top political donors in the country, according to a political financing expert.

Corporations have been banned from giving to federal parties since 2004, but that hasnt stopped billionaire families like the Westons (owners of Loblaw) and Sobeys (owners of Empire) from frequently giving the maximum annual amount allowed.

These families split the spoils fairly evenly between the Conservative and Liberals, indicating they think of donations as a down payment to ensure corporate-friendly policies from both parties.

Donations buy influence with politicians, Duff Connacher of Ottawa-based Democracy Watch said. Psychologists have shown the best way to influence people is to give them a gift or do them a favour. Even small gifts create an unconscious sense of obligation.

In the midst of a cost-of-living crisiswith historic visits to food banks and one in four children suffering from food insecuritythe practices of the grocery giants have come under intensified public scrutiny, sparking a boycott movement against Loblaw this month.

Loblaw, Empire, and Metro control nearly two thirds of the entire retail food market in Canada and pulled in record profits topping $6 billion in 2023, aided by widespread price-gouging.

While Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and opposition leader Pierre Poilievre have taken turns accusing each other of cozying up to the corporate elite, Conservatives and Liberals have both consistently obliged their grocery donors.

The Liberal government forked over $26 million to Loblaw and Costco for new fridges and appliances. Under the former Conservative government of Stephen Harper, grocery retailers started pocketing tens of millions of dollars in subsidies intended to make food more affordable in Canadas north.

Neither party has advocated for stricter rules to ensure Loblaw cant repeat its tax evasion scheme of the 2000s, when it deprived the federal government of nearly $400 million in revenue by stashing money in Barbados.

For the past few years, the New Democrats have pushed for a windfall tax on the record profits of grocery giants. Justin Trudeau initially rejected the idea, calling it simplistic, then shifted to vaguely threatening to implement it, without following through. Meanwhile, the Conservatives have expressed constant opposition.

Alongside their history of donations, the corporate grocers have recently turned to a PR blitz, claiming they are innocent of the accusations of profiteering and putting the blame instead on higher costs of supplies.

But a study last year by economist Jim Stanford found clear evidence that they have used the cover of inflation to raise food prices well beyond their costs.

According to StatsCan data, grocery retail profits in 2023 doubled from what they were pre-pandemic, and their profit margins massively increased too. And it wasnt because Canadians were buying more food. Canadians are actually buying fewer groceries than before the pandemic, Stanford concluded, but paying much more for them.

Yet neither the Liberals or Conservatives have advocated for restraining the ability of corporate retailers to squeeze huge profits from the most basic essentials of life. Committed to a shared neoliberal political consensus, both parties pretend the state cant use its enormous power to intervene in the marketplace to alter profiteering behaviour.

According to Conacher, donations often buy inaction from governments, but it can be harder to track that.

Most of the battle is over whether these companies will be strongly regulated, he said. If voters or citizen groups are clamouring for reforms, what big business is looking for is inactionand politicians can do them a favour by simply not doing anything.

That may be one reason why weve seen the Liberal government resort exclusively to coaxing and cajoling.

They gathered grocery CEOs for a gabfest in Ottawa where they elicited a promise to stabilize prices. Theyve made tweaks to the countrys competition law that lawyers have described as window dressing. Theyve pushed for a toothless, voluntary, industry-developed grocery code. And theyre courting foreign multinational companies to enter the Canadian market to bring down prices (though Walmarts entry in the 1990s didnt particularly help do that).

I have faith that they will come to the table with solutions, Industry Minister Franois-Philippe Champagne said of the grocery giants in the fall without any plausible reason. As of the first quarter of 2024, Champagne has his definite answer: their record profits have only kept rising.

Poilievre has released no details about what his grocery reforms would look like. Instead, hes claimed incorrectly that higher prices and food bank use are entirely a result of the governments carbon tax. (Economist Trevor Tombe has estimated that the tax is responsible for a fraction of an one per cent increase).

Meanwhile, the PR firm of Poilievres chief advisor, Jenni Byrne, has been exposed for lobbying on behalf of Loblaw in Ontario.

Neither party has ever suggested the kind of policies that would make a genuine impact: price controls to prevent companies from jacking up prices, regulations that would bar them oligopolistic price-fixing and vertical domination, or a publicly-run, non-profit grocer that could provide affordable alternatives and genuine competition.

Records on federal political donors have only been kept since 2004, when Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien brought in a ban on corporate donations in the wake of the sponsorship scandal.

Since then, members of the Weston family have given $34,036, the Sobey family $110,262, and Metros CEOs Eric La Flche $6,179.08, relatively evenly split between the two main parties.

Instead of stopping big money from flowing to the main political parties, the ban on corporate donations has only obscured it, according to Conacher.

The pattern has been clear, he said. When business donations have been banned, suddenly executives, their spouses, and sometimes their kids are giving, substituting for what the business used to give. The only way to stop that is to dramatically lower the donation limit to what an ordinary voter can afford, no more than 100 dollars.

Individuals are currently allowed to give a maximum of $1,700 yearly to a federal party, along with another $1,700 to local riding associations, nomination contestants, and leadership candidates.

Giving to both Liberals and Conservatives isnt just a feature of these family food empirestypically all of Canadas wealthiest have given to both political parties.

The last time Canadian Business published its list of the top 100 richest families, 56 donated to the Liberal Party and 61 donated to the Conservative Party (with many giving to both).

Its a long-standing corporate insurance policy that appears to be continuing: a way to guarantee pro-corporate government regardless of which party is in power.

The kind of journalism you appreciate

The Breach's coverage reaches hundreds of thousands of readers and viewersno paywall, no ads. That's because our sustaining members contribute an hour of their wages per month to help us create independent, bold, transformative journalism. Join us today!

Original post:
Grocery giants paid for friendly Liberal, Tory policy with decades of donations The Breach - The Breach