Mediaboss Marketing

Jordan Peterson is many things. First and foremost, people will tell you that hes a clinical psychologist who has studied and researched for many years in Canada and the US.

Hes an author, YouTuber, public speaker, personality figure, and is oftentimes used by right-wing political pundits as a resource to wreck the libs.

But above all Jordan Peterson is divisive.

If reactions to hisrecent appearance on "The Joe Rogan Experience" proves anything, it's that Peterson knows how to appeal to one audience while irking another.

But, what exactly are the things hes said, and why do people love to hate him, hate to love him, have a lot of respect for, and downright despise this Canadian ex-professor?

Perhaps the very thing that made him wildly famous, Peterson is known for openly criticizing the Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (Bill C-16), an act that would introduce "gender identity and expression" as a prohibited grounds of discrimination.

RELATED:Inside Matthew McConaughey's Friendship With Controversial Male Rights Activist Jordan Peterson

During an interview with Channel 4 News, a British public broadcasting service, he elaborated on his point of view and spoke with Cathy Newman about the situation that brought him into the spotlight.

What I said, at the beginning, was that I was not going to cede the linguistic territory to radical leftists regardless of whether or not it was put in law, he told Newman.

Moments later, he mentions that he believes radical leftist ideologues are authoritarian, and that passing a law like that would be an attack on the freedom of someones speech because they are being controlled to say something or otherwise face consequences.

Peterson did notexplainwhether he thinks discrimination against people based onrace, national or ethnic origin or any of the other identities protected by the same Canadian law counts as "freedom of speech." Or why he thinks trans people don't deserve to be protected in the same way.

While many labeled him transphobicfor saying this and compared him to alt-right personalities, he has claimed in this same interview that he respects trans rights to their own pronouns and their gender identity, but simply disagrees with the identity politics that inscribes these rights into law.

RELATED:7 Questionable Things Everyone Ignores About Jimmy Fallon

For a clinical psychologist who claims he isnt a politician, he sure loves to talk about political ideologies and philosophies quite often maybe its because thats what everyone wants him to talk about.

Well, on November 3rd, 2017, the University of British Columbia Free Speech Club was hosting an event where Peterson talked about Identity politics and the Marxist lie of white privilege, two things he seems to be very against.

He claims that white privilege, is simply majority privilege. That, since America was founded by white people white people who stole this land from people of colorand that mostly white people inhabit the society, it is built to benefit them merely by necessity.

RELATED:How Ron DeSantis Is Far More Dangerous Than Trump & Might Be Our Next President

He compares this to howbecause China is full of mostly Chinese people, it is built to benefit them.

This view has emblazoned many who argue against the existence of white privilege and disagree with the notion that non-white people are at an inherent disadvantage because of their race.

However, Peterson's view can be criticized for its erasure of hundreds of years of oppression and the establishment of racial and systemic hierarchies that currently exist to this day.

Equally, his explanation for why white privilege exists doesn't negate the need for us to interrogate this system.

White people do make up the majority of the US population but even this is complicated as these number erase the experience of Latino and Hispanic people who are white but do not benefit from white privilege.

RELATED:Joe Rogan Admits He's A 'F-ing Moron' So Why Do His Millions Of Listeners Trust Him?

In a conversation with National Post columnist Christie Blatchford, Peterson talks about the #MeToo movement that saw women shining a light on and pushing back against a culture ofsexual abuse and harassment.

You dont want to confuse the action of some of the men with all of the men, he said. Its really important to get that distinction right, and were not getting that distinction right at all.

This brings to mind the popular hashtag that was turned into a meme by those who wanted to mock opposition to the #MeToo movement, #NotAllMen.

RELATED:Why "Not All Men" Is The Wrong Response When Women Talk About Their Oppression And Abuse

He suggests that, similarly to crime, the only people who are really committing these abuses are a significantly small handful of men, and that because of this movement that seemingly inflates the issue to include all men into the group.

He claims that bills are being signed into law that now prosecutes people based on the consequences of their actions and not the intent of those actions.

Were moving from a legal system where intent matters to a legal system where consequences matter which is really the eradication of the legal system, he explains.

Similar to the issue from before about the pronouns/discrimination bill, Peterson is terrified of a society where his beliefs and everything he does could be scrutinized and actually place him in trouble with the legal system and he has a right to be.

RELATED:9Things Milo Yiannopoulos Said That Prove He's A Terrible Human

A totalitarian society is not a free society, and he believes that walking along the path of a Marxist ideology will inevitably lead to a society that controls everything a situation where communism goes wrong.

However, unfortunately for Peterson, these kinds of statements can label him as being sexist and insensitive towards the real struggles and suffering that women go through every day.

Equally, there are already plenty of laws in place that prosecute people for the consequences of their actions rather than their intent manslaughter,criminally negligent homicide, we could go on.

Holding sexual abusers accountable regardless of whether their "intended" to sexually abuse someone is not an entirely new concept.

RELATED:11 Strict Rules That Elon Musk Allegedly Makes His Girlfriends & Wives Follow

Peterson has gone on record several times to talk about his beliefs on climate change, but most recently, he was on the Joe Rogan Experience and talked about how scientists seemingly skew data to make it seem like a much larger problem than it actually is.

During the podcast episode, Peterson equates climate change to everything, claiming that when scientists refer to climate, they mean everything, without ever actually specifying what everything means.

RELATED:People Think These 7 Videos Prove Donald Trump Has Dementia, Alzheimer's Or Mental Issues

Thats what bothers me about the climate change types, he starts. Climate is about everything. So okay, but your models arent based on everything. Your models are based on a set number of variables.

He claims that scientists are taking out certain variables from the model that increase the margin for error but also increase the potential for panic and climate apocalypse, as he calls it.

In fact, its already the case that even if the climate models are right, the error bars are so wide by a hundred years out, that well never be able to measure the effects of the changes were making now.

Sticking to the normal guns of never openly taking a real side on any socio-political issue, he doesnt mention whether or not he believes in climate change or how much climate change has been affected by humans.

When asked about whether or not he believed the collective issue of global warming would finally be able to unite the world against one common evil during a college seminar in England, he laughed.

RELATED:11 Awkward Details About Donald And Melania Trumps Relationship

Instead, he suggests that the issues of climate change have become all too politicized and that the actual data behind climate change is hard to differentiate from anti-capitalistic data that might arise from certain political agendas, therefore it could never unite humans.

Dr. Peterson is nothing if not a good public speaker. He has a very soft-spoken voice and speaks very clearly and eloquently about the subject matter.

The confidence at which he speaks makes it clear to a lot of people that he truly believes that what hes saying is correct, despite a lot of the controversies he deals with are subject to opinion and theory.

Many people agree with the things he says because he says them so well, hes a doctor, and hes widely considered to be an intellectual and respected as someone whos very knowledgeable and says a lot of big words.

Right-wingers love him because they believe he owns the libs, and left-wingers dont like him because of some of the harmful ideologies he teeters on the edge of far-right ideologies despite his many claims of not being this crazy alt-right personality.

RELATED:Why IncelTerms Like Beta, Chad, And Thot Are More Dangerous Than You Think

Isaac Serna-Diez is a writer who focuses on entertainment and news, social justice, and politics. Follow him on Twitterhere.

Continue reading here:
4 Most Controversial Views Jordan Peterson Has - YourTango