Mediaboss Marketing

Hussein, it turned out, did not have an active WMD program, but was hoping to keep Iran, his regimes longtime foe, guessing as to whether he did have one as a deterrent.

During questioning, Biden mocked Ritter as ol Scotty boy and suggested that his demands that the international community compel Iraq to cooperate with inspectors if met, would give Ritter the unilateral authority to start a war in Iraq. Biden argued that such decisions belonged to higher-level officials. I respectfully suggest they have a responsibility slightly above your pay grade, to decide whether or not to take the nation to war, Biden said. Thats a real tough decision. Thats why they get paid the big bucks. Thats why they get the limos and you dont. I mean this sincerely, Im not trying to be flip.

He ended by redeploying his unusual idiom in thanking Ritter. The reason why Im glad you did what you did: We should come to our milk. We should make a decision, Biden said.

Bidens earlier suggestion that taking Saddam down was the only way to guarantee an end to the WMD program left little doubt where Biden would later come down on the issue.

Bidens grilling of Ritter is important because it gives context to claims Biden later made: First, that when he voted in favor of the invasion of Iraq as a senator, he did not mean to vote for war, but hoped the resolution would empower inspectors to get back into Iraq and monitor the program. And second, that he never believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

On the first claim, Biden told NPR last year that former President George W. Bush looked me in the eye in the Oval Office. He said he needed the vote to be able to get inspectors into Iraq to determine whether or not Saddam Hussein was engaged in dealing with a nuclear program. He got them in and before you know it, we had shock and awe.

But according to Bidens own statements in 1998, he believed that Hussein could never be trusted to eliminate his program, no matter how many inspectors were admitted.

In October 2004, by which time it had become clear there were no WMDs, Biden told an audience at the Council on Foreign Relations, I never believed they had weapons of mass destruction.

In fact, as Biden had said in 1998, he believed not only that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, but no amount of inspections or diplomacy could guarantee their removal. That, he told Ritter, could only be done by guys like you in uniform to be back on foot in the desert taking this son of a taking Saddam down.

Bidens thought process puts critical hearings he held in 2002 as chair of the Foreign Relations Committee in sharper context. That summer, as the world was focused on the war in Afghanistan, from where the attacks of September 11, 2001, had been launched, Biden sought to begin a national dialogue on Iraq. During a series of high-profile hearings, he feigned neutrality, but his earlier questioning of Ritter leaves no doubt where he stood: Iraq had WMDs, and the only way to disarm Iraq with confidence was to depose Saddam Hussein. Biden, given his chairmanship, was a leading voice on foreign policy within the party. He had voted against the first Gulf War, waged by Bushs father, and wasnt considered a knee-jerk hawk. His support for the 2003 war made Democratic opposition ultimately untenable even as Ritter, in the run up to it, loudly made the case against war, arguing that the WMD claims were overhyped.

Biden had reason to disbelieve the WMD claims. In a classified hearing on September 24, 2002, at the urging of a staff member, Biden asked then-CIA Director George Tenet what evidence of WMDs the U.S. had technically collected.

None, Senator, Tenet said, according to an account in the book Hubris, by Michael Isikoff and David Corn. Biden, wondering if there was some highly classified evidence, asked Tenet, George, do you want me to clear the staff out of the room? Tenet told him no. Theres no reason to, Senator.

None, Senator that answer will ring in my ears as long as I live, the staffer later told the authors. Later in that same hearing, Biden heard from two government witnesses who rejected the aluminum tubes claim that had been circulating, and would later become a centerpiece of Secretary of State Colin Powells presentation to the United Nations.

Biden, to be sure, was not a full-throated advocate for the war on Bushs terms, and throughout the fall, worked with Republican Sens. Richard Lugar and Chuck Hagel to try to build support for a narrower authorization, that would only allow Bush to attack Iraq for the purpose of dismantling a WMD program. But the effort was undercut by House Democratic leaders, and particularly Rep. Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., who pushed ahead with Bushs broader resolution. I was angry, Biden later said, according to Hubris. I was frustrated. But I never second-guess another mans political judgment.

Biden was also aware of the difficulty of invading and occupying Iraq, unlike some of his Republican colleagues. In February 1998, the News Journal of Wilmington reported that Biden saw invasion as unlikely.

Though some Republicans have urged the military to remove Saddam from power entirely, Biden said there was little will for that in Congress. Such a move would require a bloody ground war, the use of 300,000 to 500,000 ground troops, and some kind of continuing presence in Iraq while a new government is installed, he said.

Yet during the summer 2002 hearings, Biden claimed that one thing is clear, these weapons must be dislodged from Saddam Hussein, or Saddam Hussein must be dislodged from power. Given that he was already on record believing that the weapons could never effectively be dislodged from Saddam Hussein, that left only one option: war. Biden voted for the Iraq war resolution on October 11, 2002, three weeks after hearing from Tenet in the classified session.

See original here:
Joe Biden Was Talking Up War With Iraq Years Before Invasion - The Intercept