Iran, Israel, China, NATO: High-speed foreign policy; or, manning the phones in interesting times – Liberty Unyielding
This week we learned that Vice President Kamala Harris spoke with French President Emmanuel Macron by phone on 15 February, an unusual move for foreign policy execution in the modern era. When personal contact between national leaders is a matter of merely picking up the phone, it is not the drama it was in centuries past of envoys and surrogates especially in the case of close allies and great power club members.
According to the readout of the phone call, it was certainly a foreign policy communication:
Vice President Kamala Harris spoke today with President Emmanuel Macron of France, and expressed her commitment to strengthening bilateral ties between the United States and France and to revitalizing the transatlantic alliance. Vice President Harris and President Macron agreed on the need for close bilateral and multilateral cooperation to address COVID-19, climate change, and support democracy at home and around the world.They also discussed numerous regional challenges, including those in the Middle East and Africa, and the need to confront them together. The Vice President thanked President Macron for his leadership on the issue of gender equality and for Frances contribution to NASAs Mars 2020 Perseverance rover.
The National Pulse suggests its bizarre for Harris to make such calls this early in the administration. She also spoke to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada on 1 February.
Trending: How long will the Left put up with Bidens candid observations (aka bigoted comments)?
At the Daily Wire, Amanda Prestigiacomo confirmed that Mike Pence had occasionally, but rarely, made calls for foreign heads of government, and had not done so at all in Trumps final year in office.
On Friday, President Biden himself spoke by online videoconference to the other members of the G7, as they held a virtual summit.
The progress of foreign policy continues to be rapidly away from the normal bounds of expectation in more substantial ways. Theres little point in trying to make these thought transitions gracefully; they arent graceful to begin with, so any such attempt would be mischaracterizing them anyway. We live in interesting times.
In the intertwined matters of Iran, Iraq, the GCC nations, and Israel, the following things have happened in the last week.
Iran gets a boon
On Thursday, the U.S. announced a rescission of the 2020 judgment by Trump that we have the authority to invoke a snapback of Iran sanctions due to Irans non-compliance with the terms of the 2015 JCPOA, or Iran deal.
That Trump decision was based on UN Security Council Resolution 2231, which implemented the JCPOA. UNSCR 2231 has been in force and the U.S. is still a party to it, although Trump pulled us out of the JCPOA in order to reimpose U.S. sanctions on Iran. UNSCR 2231 constituted the authority the Trump administration was using to invoke a snapback.
The import of the snapback, per se, was for nations that did business with Iran, in violation of the UN sanctions. The Trump decision meant that those nations entities companies, banks, individuals could be subject to U.S. sanctions along with Iran.
So the Biden administration has rescinded that decision. The third-party nations no longer face U.S. sanctions if they violate the UN sanctions still invoke-able for breaches of Irans requirements under UNSCR 2231.
This was done so quietly you probably heard nothing about it. It means, of course, that there can be a free-for-all of economic reengagement with Iran by other nations.
At the same time (literally; these reports came out within moments of each other on Thursday), the Biden administration signaled its willingness to hold talks with Iran if the European Union extended an invitation.
And darned if the EU isnt eyeing just such an invitation:
We are ready to show up if such a meeting were to take place, the [U.S.] official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity, after talks among the U.S., British, French and German foreign ministers. Earlier, a senior EU official said he was prepared to convene such a meeting among the parties to the deal: Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States.
Go figure. To summarize, Iran has received the major concession of sanctions being lifted on third parties without having to do anything. This concession was obviously worked out among the U.S. and the EU-3.
Here its worth a reminder that one of the first things Iran did after Biden took office was test-launch a rocket with the potential to propel an ICBM, one that could reach not only Western Europe but North America. So maybe Iran did have to do something to win the sanctions concession from the new U.S. administration. Depends on how you look at it.
U.S. reengages with Iran
Good times, good times. But theres more. Iran proxy-engaged the U.S. a few days ago, with a rocket attack on a U.S. compound in Erbil on Monday, 15 February. The attack was claimed by an Iran-backed militia, Saraya Awliya al-Dam, linked to Kataib Hezbollah, a creature of the Iranian Qods Force under Qasem Soleimani. Fourteen rockets reportedly made impact on the compounds facilities, killing a U.S.-employed individual (not a U.S. citizen) and injuring several Americans, including one in uniform.
As Defense One notes, Erbil has been quiet for a number of years now. This was an unusual attack.
In what must be the alliances fastest reaction ever, NATO promptly decided to deploy a force of some 4,000 troops to Iraq. In the context of NATOs recent profile in Iraq, thats a lot of troops.
The 30-member alliance will increase its personnel in Iraq from 500 to around 4,000, The Hill reports, a move to prevent the war-torn country from becoming a breeding ground for terrorists, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg announced Thursday.
But NATOs not blaming the deployment on Iran. Combatting ISIS, in the wake of an attack claimed by an Iran-sponsored militia, is the justification for putting up to 4,000 NATO troops in Iraq again, after a long hiatus in which European NATO had very little footprint there.
Heres the sequence in The Hill report, stating the justifying event and NATOs rationale for sending troops:
Justification: NATO willexpand its security training mission in Iraqby thousands of troops following adeadly rocket attack on a military air baseearlier this week.
NATO statement: ISIS still operates in Iraq and we need to make sure theyre not able to return, [Jens] Stoltenberg told reporters at the end of a two-day virtual NATO defense ministers meeting.
Without suggesting ISIS is not a problem, this frankly doesnt compute. Rocket attacks of the kind seen in Erbil are very much the pattern of the Iran-backed militias, whereas they are not characteristic of ISIS. Theres nothing in the attack on Erbil to suggest its imperative to mount a preemptive response to ISIS, per se.
But heres what a force of up to 4,000 would do. It would put NATO in a position to perform the service Obama had U.S. troops doing in the period from late 2013 to 2016: providing fire support and air cover for Iran-backed militias in Iraq. As long as those militias were purporting to battle ISIS, the Obama administration actually used U.S. assets to support their seizure and occupation of territory in Iraq. The pattern was marked in the recapture of Tikrit (2015) and Mosul (2016-17), and along the Euphrates Corridor west of Baghdad, especially in Fallujah and Ramadi.
European NATOs alacrity in stepping to the plate on this is inspiring. The Europeans offering to do it relieves the Biden administration of having to employ a large footprint of U.S. troops to accomplish it.
Of course, helping Iran gain territory in Iraq again by proxy does put the Iranian land-bridge vision back in play. Presumably this is considered a feature, not a bug.
Jens Stoltenberg avers that NATOs efforts will now include more Iraqi security institutions and areas beyond Baghdad, though their presence is conditions-based and increases in troop numbers will be incremental.
Yes. Given the relative dearth of ISIS presence in Iraq, the conditions in question are likely to be how thoroughly the pro-Iranian elements in the Iraqi government are able to enforce cooperation with an enterprise to hand Iraqi territory over to Irans effective control.
There are more forms of engagement than are dreamt of in our philosophy. With the out-of-profile NATO move in Iraq, the Biden administration is engaging Iran, as surely as if Kamala Harris had picked up the phone and called Hassan Rouhani. The signal: well give you Iraq, so come talk to us, at the EU-3s table, about what else youd like.
Last to the starting line
It need hardly be added, but shoot-all, Im going to add it anyway: Joe Bidens long-awaited phone call with Benjamin Netanyahu finally took place this past week. The EU-3/NATO gambit with Iran was clearly already lined up. The Biden-Netanyahu call was held on Wednesday 17 February, about 24 hours before the spate of news about U.S. sanctions policy and the NATO reaction to the rocket barrage on Erbil.
An attack of decorum may have put that sequence in the right order, at least. Another one didnt come off so well. Reports on 15 February, based on a disclosure from China, suggested that Bidens Iran envoy, Rob Malley (whom we know as the Hamas Whisperer), had spoken to the Chinese already about U.S. policy on Iran and the Iranian nuclear program. Afterward, when China announced this had happened (in a formal statement from the foreign ministry), the Biden administration declined to discuss it with the media.
We should not kid ourselves. It matters very much that Team Biden discussed and in some ways significantly rearranged policy on Iran with the EU-3 and China before Biden spoke to the prime minister of Israel. Realistic appraisals are essential here. Whats happening is a reset.
In more than passing, we should also note that this is of a piece with the Biden administrations decision to freeze the F-35 sale to UAE, and end U.S. support to Saudi Arabias efforts against the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen. Both of those decisions portend undermining the defensive capabilities of long-time partners in the region against an aggressive, radical Iran.
China, as predicted
There are too many things going on with China to catalogue all of them here. I will focus on just one.
A short while ago, we noted that China was adopting a new law permitting her maritime patrol ships a fleet with the status of a coast guard to fire on foreign vessels in the waters of disputed islands (i.e., the islands China has a claims dispute over), and to attack foreign infrastructure on those islands.
China passed that law, and the Biden administration publicly affirmed U.S. support for Japans claims on the disputed Senkaku Islands, near Taiwan, just before the coup took place in Burma/Myanmar. In the mix at the time, Chinese bomber aircraft ostentatiously communicated about targeting USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) as the carrier entered the South China Sea on 23 January 2021.
China has since wasted no time in beginning to probe the firmness of the Biden administrations intentions on the Senkakus.
On 6 February, Chinese maritime patrol ships entered the waters off the Senkaku Islands in pursuit of Japanese fishing vessels operating there. Nikkei Asia carried a Kyodo report that this was the eighth day in a row on which such Chinese ships had entered Senkaku waters, but this interaction appeared to be noteworthy because of the engagement with fishing vessels.
On 16 February, another report indicated that Chinese ships harassed Japanese vessels in the Senkakus, and this time one of the Chinese ships had an autocannon on the deck. I take that to mean a large-caliber machine gun not permanently mounted, which would be in keeping with the profile of Chinas gray-zone maritime patrol fleet. (Ships of several types function in this role, and they are all civilian-type hulls.)
China means to probe and harass Japan, of course. But as this escalates, it is clearly a test for the Biden administration as well.
Speaking of China
A final note. Emmanuel Macron has spoken to others besides Kamala Harris recently. In an interview with Financial Times, published on 18 February just before the G7 summit, Macron had this to say about NATO, and in particular its relevance and purpose:
I am a defender of European sovereignty, of strategic autonomy, not because Im against Nato or because I doubt our American friends, but because I am lucid on the state of the world, because I think we need a fair sharing of the burden and Europe cannot delegate its protection and the protection of its neighbourhood to the USA and so we have to do it together.
Nato still needed to be reinvented, he added. Nobody can tell me that todays Nato is a structure that, in its foundations, is still pertinent. It was founded to face down the Warsaw Pact. There is no more a Warsaw Pact.
Steven Erlanger, international affairs reporter for the New York Times, thought this odd.
NATO, Erlanger points out, was built to face down Moscow. And Moscow remains ambitious and nuclear.
NATO was formed six years before the Warsaw Pact, for those keeping track. So Macron was a bit poorly briefed in that exchange,
But on the larger point, I find Erlangers instincts good. Macrons assertion raises the question: if a nuclear-armed Russia is not an adversary worthy of being countered with a prepared alliance what is a nuclear-armed Russia? How do we define that entity as a geopolitical presence?
And that raises the possibly more urgent question: what is a nuclear-armed China?
On the Russia question theres at least a legacy framework to deviate from. The second question, we have yet to truly pursue in a systematic and corporate way. There is no bedrock alliance with a common view on it, save the treaty-bound U.S. and Japan, which largely agree on the matter.
China has been exploiting the heck out of that, from the Americas to Europe and back to the Middle East and South Asia. Xi Jinping doesnt look like slacking off any time soon.
And that thought-experiment brings us to the third obvious question the one that, surprisingly, may matter the most. If France is not an enthusiastic, committed member of NATO, what, then, is a nuclear-armed France?
Oh, Im well aware of the history of France as a nuclear power, with her force de frappe and her carefully preserved national prerogatives within NATO. But that thinking is from 50-60 years ago, when there was no question what we thought the USSR was, and no question that NATO was the essential project of a Europe with a common purpose.
And that context is no longer what were talking about. Even the most committed proponents of NATO know that.
One of Erlangers Twitter correspondents posted an interesting map depicting his concept of a sort of rump NATO, comprising the European nations that still see a threat from Moscow.
Without, as always, meaning to pick on him, the immediate thought in my mind is that if Im China looking at that map or Russia, for that matter defining what a nuclear-armed, free-radical France is would shoot to the very top of my to-do list, if the map got even close to becoming reality.
Might it? I recommend not dismissing what a French president says on the record, as if it doesnt matter.
Interesting times. Its a good thing we have Kamala Harris manning (womanning?) the phones.
For your convenience, you may leave commments below using Disqus. If Disqus is not appearing for you, please disable AdBlock to leave a comment.
The rest is here:
Iran, Israel, China, NATO: High-speed foreign policy; or, manning the phones in interesting times - Liberty Unyielding
- Trump brushes off Iran's assassination threat with a don't care attitude - Hindustan Times - Hindustan Times - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Son of couple held in Iran: 'They aren't spies, they're Mum and Dad' - BBC - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- China likely to strengthen backing for Iran as it looks to secure interests - South China Morning Post - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- How Turkey Views the Iran-Israel Confrontation - The Washington Institute - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- How the West Can Ensure Iran Never Gets the Bomb - The Atlantic - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Who Will Become the Next Supreme Leader of Iran? - NPR - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Israel Won the War It Fought. But Iran Emerged Victorious in the One That Mattered - Haaretz - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Russia vows to refill Iran's uranium stocks, as Netanyahu warns that enriched supply was unscathed during the war - New York Post - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Opinion | The Fallout From the Iran Strikes - WSJ - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Pakistans ability to thread the needle in relations with the US and Iran tested by the Israel-Iran war - Middle East Institute - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- How Israel tracked down and assassinated scientists involved in Iran's nuclear program - Le Monde.fr - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- The Limits of Russias Friendship: How Moscow Sees the Iran Crisis - CSIS | Center for Strategic and International Studies - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- After US strikes, Iran is seeking closer ties to Europes pariah states - The Hill - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- A win for Tehran: experts assess Carlson's Iran interview - - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Time for Iran to make a no-enrichment nuclear deal - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Israeli officials think Trump could give them green light to attack Iran again - Axios - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- We didnt wipe them out: Why Iran is still dangerous even after key strikes - The Times of Israel - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Iran's president says Tehran open to dialogue with US, accuses Israel of assassination attempt - Reuters - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Israel said to expect US backing for future strikes on Iran if it revives nuclear program - The Times of Israel - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Trump all for Iran peace talks, but ready, willing and able to strike again - The Hill - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Witkoff promises new nuclear talks with Iran within a week; Trump says not sure they have a purpose - The Times of Israel - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Iran demands accountability for Israel and US after war of aggression - Al Jazeera - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Iran gets significant diplomatic boost from BRICS bloc with Russia and China - Newsweek - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- After setback to Iran's nuclear program, Trump expected to leverage military support in Netanyahu meeting - Fox News - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- A timeline of the Iran-Israel war - Tehran Times - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Turkey is the new Iran - www.israelhayom.com - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- US, Iran de-escalate rhetoric, nudge to talks but Tehran wary of Israels influence - The Arab Weekly - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Sen. Steve Daines says regime change is the best long-term plan in Iran - Fox News - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Why Iran emerged victorious in its war with Israel - Tehran Times - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Why has Iran stepped up its deportation of Afghan refugees? - Al Jazeera - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Iran alone in crises: Where were Russia, China in their time of need? - Euronews.com - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- The 12-day conflict is over: What is next for Iran? | Daily Sabah - Daily Sabah - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Iran President Accuses Israel of Assassination Attempt in Interview with Tucker Carlson - Algemeiner.com - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- I will never regret coming: Amid Israels devastating strikes on Iran, a woman traveling solo had to find her way out - CNN - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- A text, a Telegram link, then an offer of money: how Iran sought to recruit spies in Israel - The Guardian - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Tucker Carlson says to air interview with president of Iran - Reuters - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- CNN in Iran: Behind the scenes with our team - CNN - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- A fragile ceasefire in the Israel-Iran war tests the harmony of Los Angeles' huge Iranian community - AP News - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Nuclear Inspectors Leave Iran After Cooperation Halted With U.N. Watchdog - The New York Times - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Israel concealed information about Iran's destruction of five military sites, satellite images show - Tehran Times - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Only diplomacy will stop the atomic bomb: Reflections following the war against Iran - EL PAS English - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Readers sound off on what Iran achieved, Diddys jurors and Sen. Lisa Murkowski - New York Daily News - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- American Solo Traveler Was in Iran When It Was Bombed. She Documents How She Fled the Country (Exclusive) - People.com - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Iran hit five Israeli military bases in 12-day war The Telegraph - - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Why Hamas can keep fighting without Iran, and what that means for Israel - opinion - The Jerusalem Post - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Iran's uranium supply chain must be thwarted as nuclear program grows - The Jerusalem Post - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Why Im banned from Iran, Israel and the US despite breaking no rules - The Telegraph - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Why Trump stopped calling on Iran to surrender - The Spectator World - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- A week into the fragile Israel-Iran peace agreement, heres what we still dont know - AP News - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Dont look away from whats happening in Iran - The Boston Globe - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Its offensive: voices from Iran as fans face 2026 World Cup travel ban - The Guardian - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Tucker Carlson interviews the president of IRAN - Daily Mail - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Divine justice: IAF is Gods army, striking Iran as prophesized in the Bible - The Times of Israel - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- New Cold War?: US faces long-term battle to contain Iran after Trump's strike on their nuclear facilities - Fox News - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- The Israel-Iran war has not yet transformed the Middle East - The Economist - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Opinion | Iran Is Terrorizing Its Own Citizens. The World Needs to Respond. - The New York Times - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Trump meets with Saudi defense minister at the White House and discusses situation in Iran - Axios - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- US issues first wave of Iran sanctions after ceasefire in 12-day war - Al Jazeera - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- France demands immediate release of French couple held in Iran for three years - Reuters - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- US-Iran nuclear talks to resume in Oslo next week for first time since war report - The Times of Israel - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Will Trumps Strikes on Iran Really Stop Its Nuclear Program? - The New York Times - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Between Gaza and Iran, Israel's Hidden War in the West Bank Is Flaring Up - Newsweek - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- After ceasefire, Iran is preparing for the long war with Israel - Middle East Eye - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Iran becomes the latest Russian ally to discover the limits of Kremlin support - Atlantic Council - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Trump says Iran wants to meet 'very badly' after US strikes - - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Iran can still build nuclear weapons without further enrichment. Only diplomacy will stop it - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Pentagon says US strikes set back Iran nuclear program one to two years - The Guardian - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Assessing the U.S. Article 51 Letter for the Attack on Iran: Legal Lipstick on the Use of Force Pig - Just Security - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Suspected Iran spies accused of plotting assassination of senior figure in Israel - The Times of Israel - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Will Iran conflicts aftermath drive Israel, Saudi Arabia towards normalization? - Breaking Defense - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Israel's economy can't survive a long war with Iran - and Trump knows it - Middle East Eye - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- US slams Iran for unacceptable suspension of ties with UN nuclear watchdog - The Times of Israel - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- U.S. Launches Eighth Round of Sanctions Targeting Iran's Oil and Tankers - The Maritime Executive - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Opinion | John Bolton: Trumps Work in Iran Has Only Begun - The New York Times - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Iran assesses the damage and lashes out after Israeli and US strikes damage its nuclear sites - AP News - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Iran Suspected of Scouting Jewish Targets in Europe - WSJ - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Opinion | War With Iran Exposes the Emptiness of the Axis of Autocracy - Politico - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Iran Pivots Toward China, But Is Beijing Ready To Play Ball? - Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- The global implications of the US strikes on Iran - Brookings - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Iran readied to mine Strait of Hormuz after Israel began strikes US sources - The Times of Israel - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]