Mediaboss Marketing

For the second day in a row, President Trump slammed Attorney General Jeff Sessions, and threw in old foe Hillary Clinton. Nathan Rousseau Smith (@fantasticmrnate) reports. Buzz60

Donald Trump and Jeff Sessions at a presidential campaign rally in 2016 in Madison, Ala.(Photo: John Bazemore, AP)

WASHINGTON If President Trump was listening to the broadcast of Jeff Sessions's contentious Senate confirmation hearing backin January, he would know why his demands this week for his attorney general to investigate Hillary Clintoncrossed a bright ethical line.

This country does not punish its political enemies,'' Sessions told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He went on to acknowledge that his own critical remarks of Clinton during the 2016 presidential election disqualified him from launching such an inquiry.

I believe the proper thing for me to dowould be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton,'' Sessions said.

Since Trump first publicly expressed frustration with his attorney generallast week specifically over his March decision to recuse himself from overseeing the widening Russia investigation Sessions has said very little.

Yet the attorney general's own remarksnearly eight months ago underscoretheminefield of potential conflicts of interest inherentin Trump's request to investigate a political opponent and the president's apparent disregard for the traditional independence of the Justice Department.

Trump's continued insistence that Sessions reopen the Clinton inquiry into her use of a private email server,lawmakers and former federal prosecutors said Tuesday, represents atroubling and undisguised attempt to manipulate the criminal justice system.

"Prosecutorial decisions should be based on applying facts to the law without hint of political motivation,'' said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. "To do otherwise is to run away from the long-standing American tradition of separating the law from politics regardless of party.''

Others, however, saw even more serious implications in the recent series of Trump's disparaging comments about Sessions, coupled with the calls for a renewed Clinton investigation.

"To make a demand like this in public, while implying that the attorney general's job is in jeopardy, almost feels like an attempt at blackmail,'' said Patrick Cotter, who has prosecutedhigh-profile organized crime figures."It reeks of a crude mob deal that even most mobsters wouldn't stoop to.

"I'm no fan of Attorney General Sessions, but I believe the president is threatening his own attorney general,'' Cotter continued. "He's essentially telling Sessions, 'If you want to keep your job, you better start an investigation of Hillary Clinton.' "

One day after describing his own attorney general as "beleaguered," Trump fired off a series of tweets Tuesday morning criticizing Sessions for taking "a VERY weak position on Hillary Clinton crimes." He also publicly questioned why Sessions was not pursuing reportsfrom early this yearthat officials in Ukraine also sought to interfere in the election.

Later that day, at a White House press conference, Trump reassertedhis "disappointment'' with Sessions' recusal from the current Justice Department inquiry into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russians who sought to influence the election. The decision was "unfair" to the presidency, he said.

Trump refused to answer questions, however, about whether he intended to dismiss the attorney general. "Time will tell,'' Trump said.

Related:

After President Trump's public attacks, can Jeff Sessions survive as attorney general?

President Trump again knocks Attorney General Jeff Sessions, calling him 'beleaguered'

After attacking AG Jeff Sessions for failing to investigate Hillary Clinton, Trump won't say if he will fire him

Trump: If I'd known Sessions would recuse himself on Russia I wouldn't have picked him

Yet Trump's renewed focus on prosecuting Clinton after spending a half-year in office is notable also because it represents a departure from his own post-election statements in which he expressed little interest in pursuing further inquiries into his defeated campaign foe.

Less than two weeks after the election, Trump told the New York Times that he did not want to hurt the Clintons. Then-FBI Director James Comey, who wasabruptly dismissed by Trump in May, formally closed the Clinton investigation just days before the November election without recommending criminal charges.

"I really don't,'' Trump said then. "She went through a lot and suffered greatly in many different ways.''

What's more, Kellyanne Conway, now a White House adviser, was more definitive when she told MSNBC last year that Trump also hoped that Congress would forego further investigation into the former secretary of State's activities.

"I think when the president-elect, who's also the head of your party, tells youbefore he's even inaugurated that he doesn't wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong message, tone and content to members'' of Congress,'' Conway said then.

Now,Trump is sending a very different message by appearing to turnthe case into a make-or-break issue for the continued tenure of his attorney general, analysts said.

William "Bill'' Barr, who served as attorney general in the administration of George H.W. Bush, said there is nothing inherently illegal or unethical for a president to recommend an investigation.

"But in the current context,'' Barr said, "it would be viewed as political.''

During the campaign, Trump and his surrogates used the Clinton case as a rallying cry all along the trail, often leading chants of "Lock her up!"

Now that he's president, however, Trump's continued pursuit of Clinton could easily be viewed not only as an attempt to punish a political rival or exert undue influence on investigators.

Regardless of whether Trumpconvinces the Justice Department to take up an inquiry, Trump's latest push on this front is "unprecedented," said former federal prosecutorScott Fredericksen.

"The suggestion that he wants to prosecute and imprison a political rival crosses a very bold and historical line that establishes the independence of the Justice Department,'' Fredericksen said. "That line is what separates our American democracy from a third-world dictatorship. A very important line may have been crossed here.''

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2v5R8B2

The rest is here:
Analysis: Trump's demand for AG Jeff Sessions to investigate Hillary Clinton is an ethical minefield - USA TODAY