Settlement reached in suit against former deputy charged with beating Waskom man; criminal case pending – Marshall News Messenger
A civil suit filed by a Waskom man against former Harrison County Sheriffs deputy Charles Chase Dotson and two bystander officers in connection with an aggravated assault by a public servant incident has been dismissed after reaching a settlement in the amount of $325,000.
Attorneys for all parties announced that a settlement had been reached, three days after a jury trial kicked off in the matter before U.S. Magistrate Judge Roy Payne.
We picked the jury on March 29. We tried the case for three days and the case was probably going to take about a week, but the morning of day-three all parties were able to find a resolution that everyone could live with, said Waskom-based attorney Josh B. Maness, who represents the reported victim, 64-year-old Charles Edward Collins, in the case.
Mr. Collins is glad this part is over and behind him, and hopes this never happens again, Maness told the News Messenger Tuesday.
This civil case shouldve been resolved a year-and-a-half ago because the evidence was so compelling, he added, but nonetheless were glad its behind us.
Federal law allows a citizen to sue a member of law enforcement when they reportedly violate the persons protective rights. Maness explained before that the lawsuit was all about accountability.
Law enforcement, like everybody else, is not above the law, he said previously.
Per the settlement agreement, the Texas Association of Counties, which provides liability insurance for county jails, will pay a total of $325,000 to resolve the claim against Dotson.
In the case, Collins, an oilfield consultant, alleged that then-Harrison County Sheriffs deputy Dotson unconstitutionally arrested him and used excessive force during the arrest and that Ryan Roop and Caleb Oden, who were among the other officers present at the scene, did not intervene and thus were liable under a theory of bystander liability.
The Waskom resident initially filed an official oppression complaint in November 2018 against Dotson and subsequently followed it up with the civil lawsuit in January 2019 to compensate for his pain and suffering. He later amended the complaint, suing the additional officers individually for allegedly acting as bystanders, watching a restrained Collins get brutally attacked by Dotson for no reasonable cause.
The bystander officers, Roop and Oden have now, however, been granted immunity through the settlement agreement.
Per court documents, Collins and defendants Roop and Oden, through their counsel, jointly filed an agreed take nothing judgment, relieving them from owing anything.
We agreed that they didnt do anything wrong, Maness said of the agreement concerning the bystander officers, Roop and Oden.
Maness thanked his co-counsel, Brendan Roth, for his assistance in the case.
I certainly appreciate his help, said Maness.
He noted that the civil case has not interfered with the criminal case thats currently pending against Dotson in the same matter.
In the criminal matter, Dotson was initially indicted May 2019 on a misdemeanor official oppression charge arising out of the same facts as the civil suit, filed by Collins. During a re-indictment in December 2019, the charges were then upgraded to a felony of aggravated assault by a public servant and a third-degree felony of tampering with physical evidence with intent to impair.
The criminal case against Dotson will still proceed, said Maness.
Regarding the civil suit, Maness said he had the chance to visit with jurors, following the dismissal of the civil case. After viewing the video of the incident, which was made public in 2019, all agreed there needed to be some accountability.
The video evidence has obviously been out for a while and I did speak with half the jurors before they left the courthouse and all of them agreed that what Dotson did was unreasonable and unjustified, Maness told the News Messenger.
According to the lawsuit, under no threat to himself, Dotson violated Collins Fourth and 15th amendment right to be free from excessive force. The lawsuit notes that the alleged misconduct occurred while Dotson was acting in his capacity as a law enforcement officer with the Harrison County Sheriffs Office.
The reported misconduct took place on Nov. 22, 2018, in the wee hours of Thanksgiving Day, after a complainant called authorities and asked for assistance at Collins residence that he shared with his fianc, near Waskom.
On or about November 22, 2018, Charles Collins was at his residence. Mr. Collins had become irritated and broke a rear sliding door and some small belongings in the residence, the lawsuit said.
Collins then went to sleep. Sometime after that, his girlfriends daughter arrived and became alarmed by the damage she saw to the living room area, the lawsuit said.
Unsure of what had occurred, she called law enforcement for assistance, the lawsuit states. She then made contact with her mother, Mr. Collins girlfriend, who told her that law enforcement assistance was not necessary.
Several deputies arrived to the scene. The lawsuit goes on to say that after getting Collins out of bed and interviewing him about what had occurred, Collins told deputies that he would stay at home and handle the damage the next day. Collins girlfriend, who talked with deputies separately, said she would stay with her daughter the remainder of the night and return to the residence the next morning.
The deputies stayed for well over an hour. At no point in time has there ever been any allegation of any type of domestic abuse between Mr. Collins and his girlfriend, the lawsuit said.
Despite that fact, the lawsuit claims that the defendant, Dotson, ultimately told Collins and his girlfriend that he was going to arrest Collins so Collins could sleep it off and that she could bond him out the next day and pay a small fine.
Mr. Collins girlfriend pressed one of the other deputies as to what the charges were and he was unable to answer her, the lawsuit states. Rather, he stated he would have to go ask Deputy Dotson.
The lawsuit goes on to say that Collins was cuffed behind his back and placed in to the back of Dotsons patrol vehicle.
Deputy Dotson drove at a high rate of speed, in excess of 100 mph, to the Harrison County jail annex, the lawsuit states.
It was at the jail annex where the alleged excessive force took place.
Upon arrival at the annex, the assisting deputies as well as a jailer were waiting for Collins arrival at the sally port with a wheelchair, the lawsuit states.
Cooperating with their commands, Collins exited the vehicle and sat in the awaiting wheelchair where his legs where strapped to the leg braces.
At this point, Deputy Dotson began to repeatedly and violently strike Mr. Collins about the face and upper body, the lawsuit said. This was done without any threat to the safety or welfare of any of the attending law enforcement personnel.
The lawsuit points out that this was all done with Collins legs strapped to the wheelchair but also with his hands still restrained by handcuffs behind his back.
Blood immediately began to pour down Mr. Collins face, the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit goes on to say that once booked into the jail, Collins asked to be transported to the local hospital, as he feared he might succumb to his injuries especially considering the fact he was taking prescription blood thinners.
Finally, after repeated requests, jail staff transported him to Christus GSMC Marshall for evaluation, the lawsuit said.
After receiving medical attention at the hospital, Collins was then taken to the downtown jail facility inside of the Harrison County courthouse, where his girlfriend was able to bond him out the following morning after he pleaded not guilty to all charges during his arraignment, the lawsuit said.
About two weeks later, Deputy Dotson resigned his position from the department amid an investigation that was launched to look into whether Dotson had committed the crime of official oppression against the rights of Collins.
According to the lawsuit, Dotsons exercise of the established policies and customs of the Harrison County Sheriffs Office violated the plaintiffs clearly established constitutional rights, including the right to due process by law; freedom from unreasonable seizure of his person; freedom from the use of unreasonable, unnecessary, and excessive force; and the right to medical care without delay for injuries received while in custody.
Defendant Dotson willfully, deliberately, maliciously, or acted with reckless disregard for Plaintiffs constitutional rights, the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit goes on to say that Dotson deprived Collins of his Fourth Amendment rights and those rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution incorporated and applied to the states through the 14th Amendment by the reasons stated before and by using excessive force in the course of attempted custody of the plaintiff.
Plaintiff therefore pleads he was unlawfully beaten and harmed, the lawsuit said. Such actions resulted directly and only from the use of force clearly excessive to the need, and the excessiveness of which was objectively reasonable.
In light of the fact Charles Collins was already restrained prior to being brutally beaten and not resisting arrest by defendant, it is initially absurd the defendant would deem force was warranted and/or required, the lawsuit said.
Furthermore, Mr. Collins was not armed with any kind of weapon, the lawsuit said. For these other reasons, it was objectively unreasonable for Charles Dotson to beat savagely and brutally assault Charles Collins on the occasion described.
The savage beating of a defenseless detainee restrained in handcuffs and confined to a wheelchair is never reasonable, the lawsuit said.
In the civil case, Collins asked for actual and compensatory damages as determined at a trial on the merits; mental anguish damages; punitive damages in an amount to punish and/or deter, and to make an example of the defendant, in order to prevent similar future conduct.
Dotson was represented by David Iglesias and Stephanie Ernst in the case. Robert Davis and Lee Correa represented Roop and Oden.
See the original post here:
Settlement reached in suit against former deputy charged with beating Waskom man; criminal case pending - Marshall News Messenger
- Civil Society Coalition Condemns EARN IT Act for Failing to Protect Children While Threatening Encryption and First and Fourth Amendment - New America - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Pegasus spyware and Section 702 surveillance place the Fourth Amendment under siege - Washington Times - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Students head to Ohio Mock Trial state finals to argue Fourth Amendment rights - News and Sentinel - March 9th, 2026 [March 9th, 2026]
- Cell Tower Dump and Geofence Warrants: The NJ Supreme Courts Next Fourth Amendment and Privacy Issue? - Law.com - March 7th, 2026 [March 7th, 2026]
- NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Rule that Geofencing Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment - myvillager.com - March 7th, 2026 [March 7th, 2026]
- Former ICE instructor will testify as whistleblower that agents taught to violate Fourth Amendment - The Daily Gazette - February 24th, 2026 [February 24th, 2026]
- ICE Administrative Warrants and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to the DHS General Counsel - Just Security - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Administrative Warrants, Immigration Arrests, and the Fourth Amendment - Cato Institute - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Federal judge in WV rules that masked ICE agents violate the Fourth Amendment - The Real WV - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Op-Ed | The Trump administration has turned the Fourth Amendment on its head - amNewYork - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Do Construction Workers Have Fourth Amendment Rights? A Federal Court Will Decide. - Reason Magazine - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- DHS makes a mockery of the Fourth Amendment | Guest Column - Iowa City Press-Citizen - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- Democrats want ICE to comply with the Fourth Amendment. Right-wing media are trying to muddy the waters. - Media Matters for America - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment questions we should all be asking - WyomingNews.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Feds Are Stealthily Violating Millions of Americans Fourth Amendment Rights - New Civil Liberties Alliance - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Half the Answer #63: SCOTUS, the Fourth Amendment, and the Resistance - liberalcurrents.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Have we kissed the Fourth Amendment goodbye? - The Hill - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment - Courthouse News - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear a Fourth Amendment case regarding geofence warrants - Brookings - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICEs Actions Are Gutting the Fourth Amendment - Bloomberg.com - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICE and CBP are slicing the Fourth Amendment - Washington Examiner - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Sean Hannity argues with radio caller concerned ICE may be delving into some things that could be against the Fourth Amendment - Media Matters for... - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Howey: Putting on a show, at the expense of the Fourth Amendment - The Herald-Times - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Case v. Montana and the General Law Approach to the Fourth Amendment - Divided Argument | Substack - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Op-Ed | Abducting a despot: When U.S. justice leaves the Fourth Amendment behind amNewYork - amNewYork - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment Tested As ICE Plans Door-To-Door Enforcement - International Business Times UK - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Opinion | Flock data collection violates the Fourth Amendment - The Durango Herald - December 31st, 2025 [December 31st, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment's Erratic Year at the Supreme Court - Reason Magazine - December 27th, 2025 [December 27th, 2025]
- JoCo supervisors hear from public about Fourth Amendment protections - The Daily Iowan - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment rights should not depend on your proximity to the border - Pacific Legal Foundation - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Duke students and faculty push the university to become a fourth amendment campus as ICE presence grows - Times of India - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- FPUA OKs fourth amendment for island-to-mainland wastewater shift - Hometown News Treasure Coast - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Biometric Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - November 28th, 2025 [November 28th, 2025]
- Collateral Damage, Episode Five: What Fourth Amendment? - The Intercept - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Does the Fourth Amendment Really Protect People of Color? - EBONY Magazine - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Too poor for privacy? People v. Maki and the tent as a Fourth Amendment frontier - Daily Journal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Traffic Stops, Terry Stops, Policing, the Fourth Amendment, and Your Rights - Legal Talk Network - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- There goes the fourth amendment - The Tartan - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Hoover Webinar with Orin Kerr on His "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - Live 5 News - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WLBT - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WIS News 10 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WDTV 5 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - localnewslive.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WCTV - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox10tv.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WABI - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox8live.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WSAZ - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAVE News - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAFB - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - KY3 - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Opinion | To the Fourth Amendment: You Were Great While We Knew You - Common Dreams - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- Treasury Department surveillance at the southern border faces Fourth Amendment challenges - Reason Magazine - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Commentary: The Fourth Amendment will no longer protect you - The Daily Gazette - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. Enters into Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC - MarketScreener - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Immigration Raids: Whats the Law After The Supreme Courts Shadow Docket Ruling? - Stanford Law School - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years - Yahoo - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years -... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The Supreme Court erased the Fourth Amendment by OKing Trumps immigration sweeps - MSNBC News - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Listen: Ali Velshi Explains How The Supreme Court Punched a Hole in The Fourth Amendment - The Philadelphia Citizen - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Port: We do not have Fourth Amendment rights if the government can punish us for exercising them - InForum - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- North Carolina city declares itself a Fourth Amendment Workplace amid immigrant fears - Greensboro News and Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Prof Brandon Garrett reviews Orin Kerrs The Digital Fourth Amendment Lawfire - Sites@Duke Express - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Short Circuit 389 | On Walden Fourth Amendment - The Institute for Justice - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Trump's Immigration Crackdown Imperils the Fourth Amendment Rights of U.S. Citizens - Reason Magazine - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- 'The Fourth Amendment is nothing new': Judge torches Trump admin for using 'apparent race or ethnicity' to conduct immigration raids in California,... - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- ICE detainee to appear in Missoula court arguing about violation of Fourth Amendment and racial profiling - FOX 28 Spokane - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Sport: Holding, Offsides, and Illegal Contact Dont Always Happen on the Field of Play - The National Law Review - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Listen for Free to the First Hour of "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Yahoo - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Reason Magazine - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]
- Revised Version of "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment lawsuit: Michigan man claims officials tricked him into waiving rights - MLive.com - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with the Fourth Amendment - Stocktonia - April 16th, 2025 [April 16th, 2025]
- Two women sue police officer, City of Reno for alleged Fourth Amendment violations - This Is Reno - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- New Draft Article: "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- Examining the Fourth Amendment in a digital world - FOX 5 DC - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch on the Fourth Amendment and Misdemeanor Arrests - Reason - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]