Minneapolis Will Consider Facial Recognition Ban – VICE
A Minneapolis City Council member filed a motion that could result in a citywide ban on law enforcement use of facial recognition technology.
If successful, the motion, which was filed on October 2 and will be officially introduced Friday, could signal a wave of reforms over the use of military and surveillance equipment following the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police.
As calls to defund and disband police forces reverberate across the United States, a coalition has formed in Minnesota to reign in intrusive surveillance technology and establish democratic controls over policing. The POSTME coalition, which stands for Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology and Military Equipment, lobbied for a ban on the use of facial recognition by police in Minneapolis, among other reforms. In regular meetings with stakeholders including elected officials, organizers from around the nation and administrative staff within the city, the group has drafted legislation and educated those in government why these changes are vital. Their first target is a ban on the use of facial recognition by the Minneapolis Police Department which is seen as a strong first step towards restoring the Fourth Amendment protections that have lapsed in recent years.
Munira Mohamed, an organizer with the coalition explained, one of the most insidious aspects of facial recognition technologies is how widespread and indiscriminate it can be, which is made even more horrifying when you learn how absolutely unreliable and inaccurate it can be. The amount of racial bias shown in this technology is stunning and it has incredibly painful consequences for those falsely identified.
Numerousreports and studies have shown just how wildly inaccurate facial recognition systems can be. The Detroit Chief of Police said that the forces software misidentifies 96 percent of the time, and public records from the force showed that it was almost exclusively used on Black people in 2019. The use of facial recognition has been linked to at least two false arrests in Detroit, and the lawyers of one falsely arrested man believe there are many more victims.
In Minnesota, alarming investigative reports have raised concerns that law enforcement was rapidly adopting facial recognition and deliberately hiding their actions from the public. Law enforcement emails obtained by public records request stated, this is not an application that I want advertised to anyone other than sheriff's office employees." This tendency to keep technology secret and deploy it against the public without any public oversight is the norm not the exception in Minnesota. This undemocratic process has been the case with the vast majority if not all surveillance technologies being used in the state.
Emun Solomon is also an organizer with the coalition who said, the goals of POSTME are really divided into two buckets for me. The first is to establish a future proofing. The second is to build a friction-less or near frictionless system to maintain community engagement in holding police accountable. This also extends to other cities as well as the state of Minnesota.
The coalition includes members of the American Civil Liberties Union, Council on American Islamic Relations, Restore the Fourth, Communities United Against Police Brutality among other organizations. They met earlier this year for the first time, prior to the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police, and have decided for the time being to focus their efforts on Minneapolis City Council and expand from there. From the coalitions website, Police are increasingly using surveillance technology and military equipment to further entrench racial bias into the criminal justice system, secretly invade civilian privacy, and wrongfully arrest innocent people.
POSTME is all about bringing the values of democracy to the sphere of police powers. Not only do ordinary citizens not have a say, the police are often systematically shielded from any kind of public regulation or control and largely operate in the dark. The POSTME coalition is determined to bring oversight and accountability to surveillance and military technologies, Mohamed explained.
She notes that these reforms also expand democracy itself, Not only do we want laws and structures in place that create greater transparency but we want community control of that process. Surveillance technology is oftentimes implemented in complete secrecy and only after it has been in use for some time does its existence in a local community become apparent. The POSTME coalition wants to change that dynamic by plugging the community into conversations before new technology or military equipment is acquired by police.
Now that the facial recognition ban is beginning to advance at city hall, the POSTME coalition aims to increase community involvement in these discussions and grow the political capital to further these goals. The group is planning a virtual town hall with Minneapolis Councilmember Steve Fletcher to discuss this potential ban and their next steps on October 22nd.
Continued here:
Minneapolis Will Consider Facial Recognition Ban - VICE
- Former ICE instructor will testify as whistleblower that agents taught to violate Fourth Amendment - The Daily Gazette - February 24th, 2026 [February 24th, 2026]
- ICE Administrative Warrants and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to the DHS General Counsel - Just Security - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Administrative Warrants, Immigration Arrests, and the Fourth Amendment - Cato Institute - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Federal judge in WV rules that masked ICE agents violate the Fourth Amendment - The Real WV - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Op-Ed | The Trump administration has turned the Fourth Amendment on its head - amNewYork - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Do Construction Workers Have Fourth Amendment Rights? A Federal Court Will Decide. - Reason Magazine - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- DHS makes a mockery of the Fourth Amendment | Guest Column - Iowa City Press-Citizen - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- Democrats want ICE to comply with the Fourth Amendment. Right-wing media are trying to muddy the waters. - Media Matters for America - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment questions we should all be asking - WyomingNews.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Feds Are Stealthily Violating Millions of Americans Fourth Amendment Rights - New Civil Liberties Alliance - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Half the Answer #63: SCOTUS, the Fourth Amendment, and the Resistance - liberalcurrents.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Have we kissed the Fourth Amendment goodbye? - The Hill - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment - Courthouse News - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear a Fourth Amendment case regarding geofence warrants - Brookings - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICEs Actions Are Gutting the Fourth Amendment - Bloomberg.com - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICE and CBP are slicing the Fourth Amendment - Washington Examiner - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Sean Hannity argues with radio caller concerned ICE may be delving into some things that could be against the Fourth Amendment - Media Matters for... - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Howey: Putting on a show, at the expense of the Fourth Amendment - The Herald-Times - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Case v. Montana and the General Law Approach to the Fourth Amendment - Divided Argument | Substack - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Op-Ed | Abducting a despot: When U.S. justice leaves the Fourth Amendment behind amNewYork - amNewYork - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment Tested As ICE Plans Door-To-Door Enforcement - International Business Times UK - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Opinion | Flock data collection violates the Fourth Amendment - The Durango Herald - December 31st, 2025 [December 31st, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment's Erratic Year at the Supreme Court - Reason Magazine - December 27th, 2025 [December 27th, 2025]
- JoCo supervisors hear from public about Fourth Amendment protections - The Daily Iowan - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment rights should not depend on your proximity to the border - Pacific Legal Foundation - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Duke students and faculty push the university to become a fourth amendment campus as ICE presence grows - Times of India - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- FPUA OKs fourth amendment for island-to-mainland wastewater shift - Hometown News Treasure Coast - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Biometric Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - November 28th, 2025 [November 28th, 2025]
- Collateral Damage, Episode Five: What Fourth Amendment? - The Intercept - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Does the Fourth Amendment Really Protect People of Color? - EBONY Magazine - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Too poor for privacy? People v. Maki and the tent as a Fourth Amendment frontier - Daily Journal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Traffic Stops, Terry Stops, Policing, the Fourth Amendment, and Your Rights - Legal Talk Network - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- There goes the fourth amendment - The Tartan - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Hoover Webinar with Orin Kerr on His "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - Live 5 News - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WLBT - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WIS News 10 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WDTV 5 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - localnewslive.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WCTV - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox10tv.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WABI - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox8live.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WSAZ - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAVE News - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAFB - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - KY3 - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Opinion | To the Fourth Amendment: You Were Great While We Knew You - Common Dreams - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- Treasury Department surveillance at the southern border faces Fourth Amendment challenges - Reason Magazine - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Commentary: The Fourth Amendment will no longer protect you - The Daily Gazette - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. Enters into Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC - MarketScreener - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Immigration Raids: Whats the Law After The Supreme Courts Shadow Docket Ruling? - Stanford Law School - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years - Yahoo - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years -... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The Supreme Court erased the Fourth Amendment by OKing Trumps immigration sweeps - MSNBC News - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Listen: Ali Velshi Explains How The Supreme Court Punched a Hole in The Fourth Amendment - The Philadelphia Citizen - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Port: We do not have Fourth Amendment rights if the government can punish us for exercising them - InForum - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- North Carolina city declares itself a Fourth Amendment Workplace amid immigrant fears - Greensboro News and Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Prof Brandon Garrett reviews Orin Kerrs The Digital Fourth Amendment Lawfire - Sites@Duke Express - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Short Circuit 389 | On Walden Fourth Amendment - The Institute for Justice - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Trump's Immigration Crackdown Imperils the Fourth Amendment Rights of U.S. Citizens - Reason Magazine - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- 'The Fourth Amendment is nothing new': Judge torches Trump admin for using 'apparent race or ethnicity' to conduct immigration raids in California,... - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- ICE detainee to appear in Missoula court arguing about violation of Fourth Amendment and racial profiling - FOX 28 Spokane - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Sport: Holding, Offsides, and Illegal Contact Dont Always Happen on the Field of Play - The National Law Review - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Listen for Free to the First Hour of "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Yahoo - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Reason Magazine - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]
- Revised Version of "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment lawsuit: Michigan man claims officials tricked him into waiving rights - MLive.com - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with the Fourth Amendment - Stocktonia - April 16th, 2025 [April 16th, 2025]
- Two women sue police officer, City of Reno for alleged Fourth Amendment violations - This Is Reno - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- New Draft Article: "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- Examining the Fourth Amendment in a digital world - FOX 5 DC - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch on the Fourth Amendment and Misdemeanor Arrests - Reason - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- The Why Behind the Fourth Amendment Makes One Appreciate the Need, by Matthew Mangino - Creators Syndicate - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- City of La Crosse settles lawsuit involving three police officers over alleged Fourth Amendment violation - News8000.com - WKBT - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- Loopholes, DNA Collection and Tech: Does Your Consent as a User of a Genealogy Website Override Another Persons Fourth Amendment Right? - Law.com - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Daytona Beachs AI surveillance threatens Fourth Amendment rights - The West Volusia Beacon - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Oswego Village Board approves fourth amendment to Reserve at Hudson Crossing redevelopment agreement, second building set for construction in the... - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]