Justice Department will not prosecute officers in Bijan Ghaisar shooting – Fairfaxtimes.com
Federal prosecutors will not pursue charges against the U.S. Park Police officers involved in the fatal shooting of Bijan Ghaisar, the U.S. Department of Justice announced on Nov. 14.
The decision came almost two years after Officers Alejandro Amaya and Lucas Vinyard shot Ghaisar five times at the conclusion of a car chase on George Washington Memorial Parkway prompted by a reported hit-and-run crash in Alexandria.
Based on the information available at this time, the Department cannot prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the two USPP officers committed willful violations of the applicable federal criminal civil rights statue when they shot Mr. Ghaisar, the Justice Department said in a press release.
The investigation conducted by the departments civil rights division, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Columbia, and the FBI confirmed that Amaya and Vinyard engaged Ghaisar in a vehicular pursuit starting at approximately 7:30 p.m. on Nov. 17, 2017.
The pursuit stopped at the intersection of Fort Hunt Road and Alexandria Avenue in Alexandria, where the two Park Police officers shot Ghaisar multiple times while he was in the drivers seat of his vehicle.
The 25-year-old McLean resident spent 10 days in a coma at Inova Fairfax Hospital before he was taken off life support on Nov. 28, 2017.
Details of the incident beyond those basic circumstances did not start to emerge until Jan. 24, 2018 when the Fairfax County Police Department released video footage captured by the in-car camera of a county police officer who joined in the pursuit to provide back-up if needed.
The four-and-a-half minute-long recording showed that U.S. Park Police officers fired nine shots after cornering Ghaisars SUV. A subsequent Fairfax County police investigation determined that none of the departments officers discharged their weapons.
According to the Justice Department, FBI investigators interviewed more than 150 individuals, including law enforcement officers from both the Park Police and Fairfax County, to determine whether the park police officers actions that night violated any federal laws.
When deciding whether to file charges, prosecutors looked at possible violations of a federal criminal civil rights statue that prohibits the willful deprivation of a persons rights, privileges, or immunities protected by the U.S. Constitution, in this case the Fourth Amendment right to not be subjected to unreasonable search and seizure.
To establish a violation of the statute, the Justice Department says it would be required to prove the officers involved in the shooting had used constitutionally unreasonable force with intent to disregard the law.
An officer acting out of fear, mistake, panic, misperception, negligence, or poor judgment would not meet the level of intent that courts require in their interpretation of the statue, according to the department.
The Department is unable to disprove a claim of self-defense or defense of others by the officers, the DOJ said. Accordingly, the Department has closed its investigation into this matter.
The decision to not prosecute the officers involved in Ghaisars death was the latest frustrating development for the accountants family and friends, who have criticized the U.S. Park Police and federal investigators for failing to provide transparency and accountability.
Ghaisars family called the Department of Justices decision to not prosecute Amaya and Vinyard cowardly.
The Justice Department has given us no answers to why Bijan was killed, Ghaisars family said in a statement. Instead they have broken every promise made to us from keeping us informed about the investigation to personally sharing the results before broadcasting it to the world to, most importantly, protecting Bijan.
The Park Police placed Amaya and Vinyard on administrative leave with pay after the shooting pending the conclusion of the FBIs investigation, but the federal government did not publicly release their names until this past March after Ghaisars family filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the 10 officers they identified as being responsible for the McLean residents death.
Amaya and Vinyard were named as the officers who apparently fired shots, but the remaining seven officers listed in the lawsuit remain unidentified.
The lawsuit is still underway in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia in Alexandria, and with the Justice Department not pressing charges, the Park Police will now move forward with its own internal investigation of Amaya and Vinyard, according to The Washington Post.
Ghaisars family and friends marked the two-year anniversary of his death on Nov. 17 with an emotional rally and candlelight vigil outside the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.
In addition to acquaintances of Ghaisar, the gathering drew local, state, and federal politicians and representatives from civil rights organizations, including the NAACP, Mothers against Police Brutality, and Amnesty International.
The Ghaisar family has experienced so much pain over the last two years, not just in coping with the loss of their beloved son and brother Bijan, but also in trying to understand what led to his death, Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said in a joint statement. Todays announcement by the Department of Justicewill only add to this familys heartbreak.
Warner and Grassley said they would be formally requesting a briefing on the decision to not pursue charges in Ghaisars case from the Justice Department within the next 30 days.
Warner joined Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) in sending a letter to the FBI in January 2018 asking for an update on the status of the bureaus investigation. The FBI responded that April that it would not discuss an active investigation.
After joining the Ghaisar familys Lincoln Memorial vigil, Beyer, fellow Rep. Jennifer Wexton (D-Va.) and D.C. Rep. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) sent a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray on Nov. 18 calling for him to authorize local authorities to release 9-1-1 recordings connected to the fatal shooting.
Beyer previously made the same request in a letter on Mar. 26, 2018.
We found the two-year period it took to resolve the case unacceptable and remain concerned with the result, the trio wrote in their new letter. Releasing these recordings would be an important element of rebuilding trust. The people of the National Capital Region demand high transparency and accountability standards from their local government and law enforcement entities.
When contacted by the Fairfax County Times for more information on its investigation and concluding decision, a Department of Justice public information officer directed media inquiries to the U.S. Attorneys Office in D.C.
Thank you for your inquiry, District of Columbia U.S. Attorneys Office public information officer Kadia Koroma said. However, we have no comment outside of what was issued in the press release.
Read this article:
Justice Department will not prosecute officers in Bijan Ghaisar shooting - Fairfaxtimes.com
- Editorial: A bipartisan defense of the Fourth Amendment - Orange County Register - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- A bipartisan defense of the Fourth Amendment - Olean Times Herald - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Civil Society Coalition Condemns EARN IT Act for Failing to Protect Children While Threatening Encryption and First and Fourth Amendment - New America - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Pegasus spyware and Section 702 surveillance place the Fourth Amendment under siege - Washington Times - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Students head to Ohio Mock Trial state finals to argue Fourth Amendment rights - News and Sentinel - March 9th, 2026 [March 9th, 2026]
- Cell Tower Dump and Geofence Warrants: The NJ Supreme Courts Next Fourth Amendment and Privacy Issue? - Law.com - March 7th, 2026 [March 7th, 2026]
- NCLA Asks Supreme Court to Rule that Geofencing Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment - myvillager.com - March 7th, 2026 [March 7th, 2026]
- Former ICE instructor will testify as whistleblower that agents taught to violate Fourth Amendment - The Daily Gazette - February 24th, 2026 [February 24th, 2026]
- ICE Administrative Warrants and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to the DHS General Counsel - Just Security - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Administrative Warrants, Immigration Arrests, and the Fourth Amendment - Cato Institute - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Federal judge in WV rules that masked ICE agents violate the Fourth Amendment - The Real WV - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Op-Ed | The Trump administration has turned the Fourth Amendment on its head - amNewYork - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Do Construction Workers Have Fourth Amendment Rights? A Federal Court Will Decide. - Reason Magazine - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- DHS makes a mockery of the Fourth Amendment | Guest Column - Iowa City Press-Citizen - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- Democrats want ICE to comply with the Fourth Amendment. Right-wing media are trying to muddy the waters. - Media Matters for America - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment questions we should all be asking - WyomingNews.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Feds Are Stealthily Violating Millions of Americans Fourth Amendment Rights - New Civil Liberties Alliance - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Half the Answer #63: SCOTUS, the Fourth Amendment, and the Resistance - liberalcurrents.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Have we kissed the Fourth Amendment goodbye? - The Hill - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment - Courthouse News - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear a Fourth Amendment case regarding geofence warrants - Brookings - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICEs Actions Are Gutting the Fourth Amendment - Bloomberg.com - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICE and CBP are slicing the Fourth Amendment - Washington Examiner - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Sean Hannity argues with radio caller concerned ICE may be delving into some things that could be against the Fourth Amendment - Media Matters for... - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Howey: Putting on a show, at the expense of the Fourth Amendment - The Herald-Times - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Case v. Montana and the General Law Approach to the Fourth Amendment - Divided Argument | Substack - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Op-Ed | Abducting a despot: When U.S. justice leaves the Fourth Amendment behind amNewYork - amNewYork - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment Tested As ICE Plans Door-To-Door Enforcement - International Business Times UK - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Opinion | Flock data collection violates the Fourth Amendment - The Durango Herald - December 31st, 2025 [December 31st, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment's Erratic Year at the Supreme Court - Reason Magazine - December 27th, 2025 [December 27th, 2025]
- JoCo supervisors hear from public about Fourth Amendment protections - The Daily Iowan - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment rights should not depend on your proximity to the border - Pacific Legal Foundation - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Duke students and faculty push the university to become a fourth amendment campus as ICE presence grows - Times of India - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- FPUA OKs fourth amendment for island-to-mainland wastewater shift - Hometown News Treasure Coast - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Biometric Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - November 28th, 2025 [November 28th, 2025]
- Collateral Damage, Episode Five: What Fourth Amendment? - The Intercept - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Does the Fourth Amendment Really Protect People of Color? - EBONY Magazine - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Too poor for privacy? People v. Maki and the tent as a Fourth Amendment frontier - Daily Journal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Traffic Stops, Terry Stops, Policing, the Fourth Amendment, and Your Rights - Legal Talk Network - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- There goes the fourth amendment - The Tartan - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Hoover Webinar with Orin Kerr on His "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - Live 5 News - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WLBT - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WIS News 10 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WDTV 5 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - localnewslive.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WCTV - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox10tv.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WABI - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox8live.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WSAZ - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAVE News - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAFB - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - KY3 - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Opinion | To the Fourth Amendment: You Were Great While We Knew You - Common Dreams - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- Treasury Department surveillance at the southern border faces Fourth Amendment challenges - Reason Magazine - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Commentary: The Fourth Amendment will no longer protect you - The Daily Gazette - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. Enters into Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC - MarketScreener - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Immigration Raids: Whats the Law After The Supreme Courts Shadow Docket Ruling? - Stanford Law School - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years - Yahoo - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years -... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The Supreme Court erased the Fourth Amendment by OKing Trumps immigration sweeps - MSNBC News - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Listen: Ali Velshi Explains How The Supreme Court Punched a Hole in The Fourth Amendment - The Philadelphia Citizen - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Port: We do not have Fourth Amendment rights if the government can punish us for exercising them - InForum - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- North Carolina city declares itself a Fourth Amendment Workplace amid immigrant fears - Greensboro News and Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Prof Brandon Garrett reviews Orin Kerrs The Digital Fourth Amendment Lawfire - Sites@Duke Express - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Short Circuit 389 | On Walden Fourth Amendment - The Institute for Justice - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Trump's Immigration Crackdown Imperils the Fourth Amendment Rights of U.S. Citizens - Reason Magazine - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- 'The Fourth Amendment is nothing new': Judge torches Trump admin for using 'apparent race or ethnicity' to conduct immigration raids in California,... - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- ICE detainee to appear in Missoula court arguing about violation of Fourth Amendment and racial profiling - FOX 28 Spokane - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Sport: Holding, Offsides, and Illegal Contact Dont Always Happen on the Field of Play - The National Law Review - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Listen for Free to the First Hour of "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Yahoo - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Reason Magazine - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]
- Revised Version of "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment lawsuit: Michigan man claims officials tricked him into waiving rights - MLive.com - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with the Fourth Amendment - Stocktonia - April 16th, 2025 [April 16th, 2025]
- Two women sue police officer, City of Reno for alleged Fourth Amendment violations - This Is Reno - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- New Draft Article: "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- Examining the Fourth Amendment in a digital world - FOX 5 DC - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]