Attorneys for Theresa Bentaas look to suppress DNA evidence in Baby Andrew case – Argus Leader
Attorneys for a woman charged with murder in a 1981 former cold case involving the death of a babywant to suppress DNA evidence police obtained from her trash, saying doing so violated her rights.
Theresa Rose Bentaas, 58,was chargedwith first- and second-degreemurder in March 2019 after DNA evidence matched her to a baby who in 1981 was foundwrapped in blankets.
Baby John Doe, named Baby Andrew by the anonymous donor who paid for his funeral, was found in what is now 33rd Street and Sycamore Avenue, with the umbilical cord still attached.
Bentaas' privately retainedattorney, Clint Sargent, on Friday filed a motion to suppress DNA extraction, testing, sequencing and profile evidence. He also filed more than 30 pages in briefs supporting the motion.
Theresa Bentaas(Photo: Minnehaha County jail)
Sargent and co-counsel Raleigh Hansman requested the following evidence be excluded from trial, saying it violated her Fourth Amendment rights:
Laboratory reports, interviews of Theresa and her husband Dirk Bentaas andbuccal swabs of Theresa and Dirk Bentaas.
"As a free member of the general public, law enforcement's extraction of Bentaas' DNA from the items pulled from the trash and the subsequent creation of her DNA profile for the testing of Baby Doe case constitutes an unreasonable search under the Fourth Amendment," Bentaas' attorneys wrote in the brief.
More: Theresa Bentaas posts bond, released from jail
Pulling the trash was lawful under both South Dakota and federal law, but extracting the DNA from the items from that trash pull is a "separate invasion of privacy...that must be considered a separate search under the Fourth Amendment,"the brief states.
If a Fourth Amendment violation is brought up in a case, the defendant must establish a factual connection between the alleged constitutional violation and the challenged evidence.
If Bentaas were to prove the evidence is "fruit of the poisonous tree,"the burden would shift back to the government to show that evidence is untainted.
The brief also states if there wouldn't have been an "illegal search and seizure of Bentaas' DNA," a warrant allowing law enforcement to get swabs from Bentaas or her husband wouldn't have been issued.
The brief goes on to say thatan affidavit in support of a search warrant for Bentaas' buccal swabs didn't showa "fair probability" that evidence of a crime would have been found from Bentaas' buccal swab.
"The decision to seek a search warrant for Bentaas' DNA only after receiving the DNA results from the trash pull items speaks for itself," Sargent writes.
The grave of Baby Andrew John Doe, an infant who was found dead in a ditch in 1981, is shown. Police arrested Theresa Rose Bentaas decades later on Friday, March 8, 2019 after determining through DNA that she was the mother.(Photo: Loren Townsley / Argus Leader)
The brief accuses law enforcement of exaggerating lab results. In January 2019, when Parabon Labs got a DNA match that was possibly "up to a third cousin" in the family tree for Baby Andrew, a detective took the information to put together a basic family tree, according to the brief. The family tree was shared with a Parabon genealogist, who recommended getting follow-up DNA.
Baby Andrew: Theresa Bentaas appears in court, trial date set
"Under the guise of the trash pull, Detective Mertes circumvented the search warrant requirement for DNA and deprived Bentaas of her Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure," Bentaas' attorneys wrote in the brief.
The state's "failure to obtain a search warrant to extract, test and sequence the DNA on the items submitted to the SD Forensic Lab violated Bentaas' Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure," the brief states.
The state had not filed a response as of Friday.
Up until March 8, 2019, Bentaas was a member of the general public, the brief goes on to say, which gives her greater privacy interest in her DNA.
Baby Andrew's body was exhumed in 2009and sent via FedEx to the University of North Texas, were DNA was extracted. The body was returned to Sioux Falls, where it was buried at St. Michael's Cemetery on Cliff Avenue.
From 2010 to 2018, the DNA profile of Baby Andrew was run through the South Dakota DNA database once per year. No matches were found.
On Jan. 24, 2019,Parabon NanoLabs, Inc. a Virginia company to which Sioux Falls police had sent Baby Andrew's DNA completed a "Genetic Genealogy Report," a lead-generation tool to identify remains by making connections through DNA and genealogy.
A DNA profile found possible family trees, include "what they had found so far was approximately a third cousin which was fairly far out from the direct DNA of this baby," according to the brief.
That report led police to a Sioux Falls couple, Theresa Rose (Josten) Bentaas and Dirk Bentaas.
Police on Feb. 11, 2019, did a trash pull at Bentaas' home. They seized cigarettes and cigarette butts, cotton swabs, Kleenex with hair, hair with yellow cardboard, ear plugs, water bottles, glass bottles, beer cans, beer bottles and dental floss.
Theresa Rose Bentaas, 57, was arrested Friday morning after police determined through DNA that she was the mother of Baby Andrew. Argus Leader
Police obtained a search warrant for buccal swabs from Theresa and Dirk Bentaas.
Female DNAfound on a water bottle, Coors Light can and cigarette butts from the trash pull "could not be excluded as being from the biological mother of Baby (Andrew) Doe." DNA from two different men was also linked to Baby Andrew.
Police interviewed Dirk and Theresa Bentaas later in February 2019. Police did a cheek swab on both. In that interview, Theresa Bentaas said she was "young and stupid" and admitted to being pregnant in 1980-1981.
Test results from the cheek swabs showed "extremely strong evidence" to support the biological relationship between Theresa Bentaas, Dirk Bentaas and Baby Andrew.
Theresa Bentaas was arrested in March 2019. She posted bond and has been out of custody sinceMay 2019. Bond conditions included that she be required to wear a GPS ankle monitor, hand over her passport, check in at her attorney's office once a week and live with a family member.
Bentaas' trial is scheduled for April. Her next court appearance is scheduled in March.
Email reporter Danielle Ferguson at dbferguson@argusleader.com, or follow on Twitter at @DaniFergs.
Read or Share this story: https://www.argusleader.com/story/news/crime/2020/02/14/attorneys-theresa-bentaas-look-suppress-dna-evidence-baby-andrew-case/4765639002/
See the original post here:
Attorneys for Theresa Bentaas look to suppress DNA evidence in Baby Andrew case - Argus Leader
- Collateral Damage, Episode Five: What Fourth Amendment? - The Intercept - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Does the Fourth Amendment Really Protect People of Color? - EBONY Magazine - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Too poor for privacy? People v. Maki and the tent as a Fourth Amendment frontier - Daily Journal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Traffic Stops, Terry Stops, Policing, the Fourth Amendment, and Your Rights - Legal Talk Network - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- There goes the fourth amendment - The Tartan - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Hoover Webinar with Orin Kerr on His "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - Live 5 News - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WLBT - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WIS News 10 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WDTV 5 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - localnewslive.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WCTV - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox10tv.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WABI - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox8live.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WSAZ - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAVE News - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAFB - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - KY3 - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Opinion | To the Fourth Amendment: You Were Great While We Knew You - Common Dreams - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- Treasury Department surveillance at the southern border faces Fourth Amendment challenges - Reason Magazine - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Commentary: The Fourth Amendment will no longer protect you - The Daily Gazette - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. Enters into Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC - MarketScreener - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Immigration Raids: Whats the Law After The Supreme Courts Shadow Docket Ruling? - Stanford Law School - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years - Yahoo - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years -... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The Supreme Court erased the Fourth Amendment by OKing Trumps immigration sweeps - MSNBC News - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Listen: Ali Velshi Explains How The Supreme Court Punched a Hole in The Fourth Amendment - The Philadelphia Citizen - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Port: We do not have Fourth Amendment rights if the government can punish us for exercising them - InForum - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- North Carolina city declares itself a Fourth Amendment Workplace amid immigrant fears - Greensboro News and Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Prof Brandon Garrett reviews Orin Kerrs The Digital Fourth Amendment Lawfire - Sites@Duke Express - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Short Circuit 389 | On Walden Fourth Amendment - The Institute for Justice - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Trump's Immigration Crackdown Imperils the Fourth Amendment Rights of U.S. Citizens - Reason Magazine - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- 'The Fourth Amendment is nothing new': Judge torches Trump admin for using 'apparent race or ethnicity' to conduct immigration raids in California,... - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- ICE detainee to appear in Missoula court arguing about violation of Fourth Amendment and racial profiling - FOX 28 Spokane - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Sport: Holding, Offsides, and Illegal Contact Dont Always Happen on the Field of Play - The National Law Review - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Listen for Free to the First Hour of "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Yahoo - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Reason Magazine - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]
- Revised Version of "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment lawsuit: Michigan man claims officials tricked him into waiving rights - MLive.com - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with the Fourth Amendment - Stocktonia - April 16th, 2025 [April 16th, 2025]
- Two women sue police officer, City of Reno for alleged Fourth Amendment violations - This Is Reno - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- New Draft Article: "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- Examining the Fourth Amendment in a digital world - FOX 5 DC - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch on the Fourth Amendment and Misdemeanor Arrests - Reason - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- The Why Behind the Fourth Amendment Makes One Appreciate the Need, by Matthew Mangino - Creators Syndicate - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- City of La Crosse settles lawsuit involving three police officers over alleged Fourth Amendment violation - News8000.com - WKBT - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- Loopholes, DNA Collection and Tech: Does Your Consent as a User of a Genealogy Website Override Another Persons Fourth Amendment Right? - Law.com - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Daytona Beachs AI surveillance threatens Fourth Amendment rights - The West Volusia Beacon - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Oswego Village Board approves fourth amendment to Reserve at Hudson Crossing redevelopment agreement, second building set for construction in the... - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]
- US DOJ Report on Mt. Vernon Police Department Finds highly intrusive strip searches were a gross violation of the Fourth Amendment on an enormous... - December 25th, 2024 [December 25th, 2024]
- Permissibility of Cross-Border Share Swap: Understanding the Fourth Amendment of the NDI Rules and its Implications - SCC Online - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Does the Fourth Amendment protect smartphone users? - Lewiston Morning Tribune - October 12th, 2024 [October 12th, 2024]
- The Fourth Amendment shouldn't stop once you get up to drone level: Albert Fox Cahn - Fox Business - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence -... - September 21st, 2024 [September 21st, 2024]
- Gujarat's Proposes Fourth Amendment To Net Metering Regulations For Rooftop Solar Systems Up To 100 KW - SolarQuarter - July 26th, 2024 [July 26th, 2024]
- Nearly 96% of Private Property Is Open to Warrantless Searches, New Study Estimates - Reason - March 15th, 2024 [March 15th, 2024]
- Heres what to do (and not do) if you get pulled over in California. What are my rights? - Yahoo Movies Canada - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- FBI Seized $86 Million From People Not Suspected Crimes. A Federal Court Will Decide if That's Legal. - Reason - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- Digital justice: Supreme Court increasingly confronts law and the internet - Washington Times - December 12th, 2023 [December 12th, 2023]
- MCHS goes on lockout after weapons found on campus - Mineral County Independent-News - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Cops Stormed Into a Seattle Woman's Home. It Was the Wrong ... - Reason - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Ron Wyden, U.S. Senator from Oregon The Presidential Prayer ... - The Presidential Prayer Team - November 19th, 2023 [November 19th, 2023]
- Bill Maher Slams Critics of the West Amid Israel Conflict: Marginalized People Live Better Today Because of Western Ideals (Video) - Yahoo... - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Surveillance authority change could harm ability to stop attacks, FBI ... - Roll Call - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- New York's progressive chief judge joins with conservatives to ... - City & State - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Should domestic abusers have gun rights? | On Point - WBUR News - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- The Biden administrations latest executive order calls for a ... - R Street - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- DPS Presents Purple Hearts, Medal of Valor and Other Prestigious ... - the Texas Department of Public Safety - November 5th, 2023 [November 5th, 2023]
- Senators Katie Britt and John Kennedy Call for Investigation into ... - Calhoun County Journal - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Trump and Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment: An Exploration ... - JURIST - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Expert Q&A with David Aaron on FISA Section 702 Reauthorization ... - Just Security - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- A Constitution the Government Evades - Tenth Amendment Center - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Imagine If Feds Hunted More Real Terrorists, Not Conservatives - The Federalist - October 15th, 2023 [October 15th, 2023]
- Lake Orion Voters Could Decide Removing TIF Funding for ... - Oakland County Times - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- A marriage of convenience: Why the pushback against a key spy program could cave in on progressives - Yahoo News - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- Iowa Public Information Board accepts one complaint against ... - KMAland - August 24th, 2023 [August 24th, 2023]
- Burleigh County weighs OHV ordinance to crack down on reckless ... - Bismarck Tribune - August 8th, 2023 [August 8th, 2023]