A guide to the statewide constitutional amendments on the ballot in November 2020 – Yellowhammer News
In this Novembers general election, voters will get to decide the fate of six statewide amendments to the Constitution of Alabama.
Yellowhammer News has prepared a guide to each statewide amendment and its impact on Alabama if enacted.
The six amendments mentioned will be on every ballot handed to an Alabamian on Election Day. Other local amendments may appear on the ballot in certain counties.
How the first amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to amend Article VIII of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, now appearing as Section 177 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended, to provide that only a citizen of the United States has the right to vote.
More directly, the Alabama constitution would be changed to say only a citizen of the United States who meets certain qualifications has the right to vote
It currently says every citizen of the United States who meets certain qualifications has the right to vote.
The change that would occur if Amendment 1 passes is primarily technical; legal scholars agree current Alabama law permits only citizens to vote. Proponents of the amendment say the change is a needed clarification.
Alabama Senate Pro Tem. Del Marsh (R-Anniston) sponsored Amendment 1, and it passed the upper chamber unanimously. Marsh told Yellowhammer News at the time that his goal was to affirm that only citizens can vote in Alabamas elections.
How the second amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to increase the membership of the Judicial Inquiry Commission and further provide for the appointment of the additional members; further provide for the membership of the Court of the Judiciary and further provide for the appointment of the additional members; further provide for the process of disqualifying an active judge; repeal provisions providing for the impeachment of Supreme Court Justices and appellate judges and the removal for cause of the judges of the district and circuit courts, judges of the probate courts, and judges of certain other courts by the Supreme Court; delete the authority of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to appoint an Administrative Director Courts; provide the Supreme Court of Alabama with authority to appoint an Administrative Director of Courts; require the Legislature to establish procedures for the appointment of the Administrative Director of Courts; delete the requirement that a district court hold court in each incorporated municipality with a population of 1,000 or more where there is no municipal court; provide that the procedure for the filling of vacancies in the office of a judge may be changed by local constitutional amendment; delete certain language relating to the position of constable holding more than one state office; delete a provision providing for the temporary maintenance of the prior judicial system; repeal the office of circuit solicitor; and make certain nonsubstantive stylistic changes.
The Fair Ballot Commission summarized in plain language the six primary changes that would be made by Amendment 2:
1. It provides that county district courts do not have to hold city court in a city with a population of less than 1,000.
2. It allows the Alabama Supreme Court, rather than the chief justice, to appoint the administrative director of courts.
3. It increases from nine to 11 the total membership of the Judicial Inquiry Commission and determines who appoints each member (the Judicial Inquiry Commission evaluates ethics complaints filed against judges).
4. It allows the governor, rather than the lieutenant governor, to appoint a member of the Court of the Judiciary (the Court of the Judiciary hears complaints filed by the Judicial Inquiry Commission).
5. It prevents a judge from being automatically disqualified from holding office simply because a complaint was filed with the Judiciary Inquiry Commission.
6. It provides that a judge can be removed from office only by the Court of the Judiciary.
Amendment 2 also changes the statutes governing Alabamas constables; these changes are opposed by the Alabama Constables Association.
The amendment was sponsored by State Senators Arthur Orr (R-Decatur) and Cam Ward (R-Alabaster).
Amendment 2 is the result of work done by a task force comprised of legislators and members of the judicial branch of government.
Advocates for the amendment say it simplifies several administrative procedures that govern Alabamas judicial system, which they argue is needed since many of the current procedures were written several decades ago and are no longer relevant.
Opponents of the measure argue that removing municipal courts from small towns with less than 1,000 residents will inconvenience the people who live there.
They also say that removing the legislatures ability to impeach judges the amendment makes the Judicial Inquiry Commission the only institution that can do so takes away the ability of the peoples representatives to get rid of bad judges.
More information on what the Judicial Inquiry Commission is and what it does can be found here.
How the third amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to provide that a judge, other than a judge of probate, appointed to fill a vacancy would serve an initial term until the first Monday after the second Tuesday in January following the next general election after the judge has completed two years in office.
Most simply, the amendment would extend the time that judges who are appointed to fill an empty seat may serve.
If Amendment 3 is approved, appointed judges would run for reelection in the first general election after they have served two years in their appointed job.
Currently, appointed judges run in the first general election to occur after they have served for one year.
Tom Spencer of the Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama (PARCA)authored a report on the proposed amendments.
He noted with regards to Amendment 3, This change might make it more attractive for nominees to accept a judicial appointment. At the same time, this change gives the appointee longer to build up the advantage of incumbency before running for a full term.
Judgeships come open when a sitting judge dies, resigns, retires or is removed. The amendment would not apply to probate judges.
Amendment 3 was sponsored by State Representative David Faulkner (R-Mountain Brook) and co-sponsored by State Representative Matt Fridy (R-Montevallo).
How the fourth amendment will appear on the ballot:
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to authorize the Legislature to recompile the Alabama Constitution and submit it during the 2022 Regular Session, and provide a process for its ratification by the voters of this state.
If Amendment 4 is passed, state legislators would have permission to rearrange the state constitution to do four things, per the Fair Ballot Commission:
1. Remove racist language.2. Remove language that is repeated or no longer applies.3. Combine language related to economic development.4. Combine language that relates to the same county.
Only changes in those four categories could be made.
The proposed changes would be submitted during the 2022 legislative session for approval by both chambers of the legislature.
If the updated constitution is approved by the legislature, it would then be voted on by the people of Alabama in the 2022 general election.
Only if the legislature and the people of Alabama give the updated constitution their approval in 2022 would the changes become permanent. Amendment 4 could be thought of as permission for lawmakers and legislative staff to get started on the process.
As such, Amendment 4 will not affect how the state is governed; it only permits cosmetic changes and even those have to be approved by the public in two years.
Proponents say removing racist and redundant language is a worthy change to the states primary governing document.
Amendment 4 comes from a bipartisan place; it was sponsored by State Representative Merika Coleman (D-Birmingham) and co-sponsored by State House Speaker Mac McCutcheon (R-Monrovia), among others.
How the fifth and sixth amendments will appear on the ballot:
Relating to Franklin County, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to provide that a person is not liable for using deadly physical force in self-defense or in the defense of another person on the premises of a church under certain conditions.
Statewide Amendment 6 reads in full:
Relating to Lauderdale County, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, to provide that a person is not liable for using deadly physical force in self-defense or in the defense of another person on the premises of a church under certain conditions.
Both amendments would create special stand your ground laws for the churches in their respective counties.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall already interprets Alabamas statewide stand your ground law as applicable to churches.
Local legislators in both Franklin and Lauderdale counties believe an additional measure stating the stand your ground law applies to churches in their counties is needed as a form of clarification.
The passage of Amendment 5 and Amendment 6 requires a majority of Alabama voters and a majority of the voters in the relevant counties.
The Fair Ballot Commissions breakdown, in plain language, of all six amendments is available here, and the full analysis from PARCA is available here.
The Fair Ballot Commission is an independent state entity that receives technical assistance from several agencies, but primarily the secretary of states office.
Sample ballots for each of Alabamas 67 counties can be found here.
Yellowhammer received guidance from Jason Isbell, a lawyer in Montgomery and a member of the Fair Ballot Commission, in putting this guide together.
Henry Thornton is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can contact him by email: henry@yellowhammernews.comor on Twitter@HenryThornton95
- Former ICE instructor will testify as whistleblower that agents taught to violate Fourth Amendment - The Daily Gazette - February 24th, 2026 [February 24th, 2026]
- ICE Administrative Warrants and the Fourth Amendment: A Response to the DHS General Counsel - Just Security - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Administrative Warrants, Immigration Arrests, and the Fourth Amendment - Cato Institute - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Federal judge in WV rules that masked ICE agents violate the Fourth Amendment - The Real WV - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Op-Ed | The Trump administration has turned the Fourth Amendment on its head - amNewYork - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Do Construction Workers Have Fourth Amendment Rights? A Federal Court Will Decide. - Reason Magazine - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- DHS makes a mockery of the Fourth Amendment | Guest Column - Iowa City Press-Citizen - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- Democrats want ICE to comply with the Fourth Amendment. Right-wing media are trying to muddy the waters. - Media Matters for America - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment questions we should all be asking - WyomingNews.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Feds Are Stealthily Violating Millions of Americans Fourth Amendment Rights - New Civil Liberties Alliance - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Half the Answer #63: SCOTUS, the Fourth Amendment, and the Resistance - liberalcurrents.com - February 9th, 2026 [February 9th, 2026]
- Have we kissed the Fourth Amendment goodbye? - The Hill - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Maryland man argues arrest using cellphone tracking device violates the Fourth Amendment - Courthouse News - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Supreme Court agrees to hear a Fourth Amendment case regarding geofence warrants - Brookings - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICEs Actions Are Gutting the Fourth Amendment - Bloomberg.com - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- ICE and CBP are slicing the Fourth Amendment - Washington Examiner - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Sean Hannity argues with radio caller concerned ICE may be delving into some things that could be against the Fourth Amendment - Media Matters for... - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Howey: Putting on a show, at the expense of the Fourth Amendment - The Herald-Times - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Case v. Montana and the General Law Approach to the Fourth Amendment - Divided Argument | Substack - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Op-Ed | Abducting a despot: When U.S. justice leaves the Fourth Amendment behind amNewYork - amNewYork - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Fourth Amendment Tested As ICE Plans Door-To-Door Enforcement - International Business Times UK - January 11th, 2026 [January 11th, 2026]
- Opinion | Flock data collection violates the Fourth Amendment - The Durango Herald - December 31st, 2025 [December 31st, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment's Erratic Year at the Supreme Court - Reason Magazine - December 27th, 2025 [December 27th, 2025]
- JoCo supervisors hear from public about Fourth Amendment protections - The Daily Iowan - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment rights should not depend on your proximity to the border - Pacific Legal Foundation - December 14th, 2025 [December 14th, 2025]
- Duke students and faculty push the university to become a fourth amendment campus as ICE presence grows - Times of India - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- FPUA OKs fourth amendment for island-to-mainland wastewater shift - Hometown News Treasure Coast - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Biometric Surveillance and the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - November 28th, 2025 [November 28th, 2025]
- Collateral Damage, Episode Five: What Fourth Amendment? - The Intercept - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Does the Fourth Amendment Really Protect People of Color? - EBONY Magazine - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Too poor for privacy? People v. Maki and the tent as a Fourth Amendment frontier - Daily Journal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Traffic Stops, Terry Stops, Policing, the Fourth Amendment, and Your Rights - Legal Talk Network - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- There goes the fourth amendment - The Tartan - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Hoover Webinar with Orin Kerr on His "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - Live 5 News - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WLBT - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WIS News 10 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WDTV 5 - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - localnewslive.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WCTV - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox10tv.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WABI - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - fox8live.com - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WSAZ - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAVE News - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - WAFB - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear arguments in case tied to Fourth Amendment - KY3 - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Opinion | To the Fourth Amendment: You Were Great While We Knew You - Common Dreams - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- Treasury Department surveillance at the southern border faces Fourth Amendment challenges - Reason Magazine - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Commentary: The Fourth Amendment will no longer protect you - The Daily Gazette - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. Enters into Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Guaranty with Oaktree Fund Administration, LLC - MarketScreener - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Immigration Raids: Whats the Law After The Supreme Courts Shadow Docket Ruling? - Stanford Law School - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years - Yahoo - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- 'Against The Principles Of The Fourth Amendment' 80,000 AI Cameras Track Americans Daily As CEO Claims He Can Eliminate All Crime In 10 Years -... - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- The Supreme Court erased the Fourth Amendment by OKing Trumps immigration sweeps - MSNBC News - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Listen: Ali Velshi Explains How The Supreme Court Punched a Hole in The Fourth Amendment - The Philadelphia Citizen - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Port: We do not have Fourth Amendment rights if the government can punish us for exercising them - InForum - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- North Carolina city declares itself a Fourth Amendment Workplace amid immigrant fears - Greensboro News and Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Prof Brandon Garrett reviews Orin Kerrs The Digital Fourth Amendment Lawfire - Sites@Duke Express - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Short Circuit 389 | On Walden Fourth Amendment - The Institute for Justice - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Trump's Immigration Crackdown Imperils the Fourth Amendment Rights of U.S. Citizens - Reason Magazine - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- 'The Fourth Amendment is nothing new': Judge torches Trump admin for using 'apparent race or ethnicity' to conduct immigration raids in California,... - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- ICE detainee to appear in Missoula court arguing about violation of Fourth Amendment and racial profiling - FOX 28 Spokane - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Fourth Amendment and Sport: Holding, Offsides, and Illegal Contact Dont Always Happen on the Field of Play - The National Law Review - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Listen for Free to the First Hour of "The Digital Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Yahoo - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- New Montana Law Blocks the State From Buying Private Data To Skirt the Fourth Amendment - Reason Magazine - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]
- Revised Version of "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason Magazine - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Fourth Amendment lawsuit: Michigan man claims officials tricked him into waiving rights - MLive.com - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Border Patrol to retrain hundreds of California agents on how to comply with the Fourth Amendment - Stocktonia - April 16th, 2025 [April 16th, 2025]
- Two women sue police officer, City of Reno for alleged Fourth Amendment violations - This Is Reno - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- New Draft Article: "Data Scanning and the Fourth Amendment" - Reason - March 15th, 2025 [March 15th, 2025]
- Examining the Fourth Amendment in a digital world - FOX 5 DC - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Geofencing, High Tech Surveillance and the Future of the Fourth Amendment - Law.com - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Justices Sotomayor and Gorsuch on the Fourth Amendment and Misdemeanor Arrests - Reason - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- The Why Behind the Fourth Amendment Makes One Appreciate the Need, by Matthew Mangino - Creators Syndicate - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- City of La Crosse settles lawsuit involving three police officers over alleged Fourth Amendment violation - News8000.com - WKBT - February 25th, 2025 [February 25th, 2025]
- Loopholes, DNA Collection and Tech: Does Your Consent as a User of a Genealogy Website Override Another Persons Fourth Amendment Right? - Law.com - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Daytona Beachs AI surveillance threatens Fourth Amendment rights - The West Volusia Beacon - February 1st, 2025 [February 1st, 2025]
- Oswego Village Board approves fourth amendment to Reserve at Hudson Crossing redevelopment agreement, second building set for construction in the... - January 27th, 2025 [January 27th, 2025]