In Call Before Jan. 6 Riot, a Plea to Descend on the Capitol – The New York Times
One week before an angry mob stormed the Capitol, a communications expert named Jason Sullivan, a onetime aide to Roger J. Stone Jr., joined a conference call with a group of President Donald J. Trumps supporters and made an urgent plea.
After assuring his listeners that the 2020 election had been stolen, Mr. Sullivan told them that they had to go to Washington on Jan. 6, 2021 the day that Congress was to meet to finalize the electoral count and descend on the Capitol, according to a recording of the call obtained by The New York Times.
While Mr. Sullivan claimed that he was not inciting violence or any kind of riots, he urged those on the call to make their presence felt at the Capitol in a way that would intimidate members of Congress, telling the group that they had to ensure that lawmakers inside the building understand that people are breathing down their necks.
He also pledged that Mr. Trump was going to take action on his own; the president, he said, was going to impose a form of martial law on Jan. 6 and would not be leaving office.
Biden will never be in that White House, Mr. Sullivan declared. Thats my promise to each and every one of you.
The recording of the call, which took place on Dec. 30, 2020, emerged as the Justice Department has expanded its criminal investigation of the Capitol attack. It offers a glimpse of the planning that went on in the run-up to the storming of the Capitol and the mind-set of some of those who zeroed in on Jan. 6 as a kind of last stand for keeping Mr. Trump in office.
It also reflects the complexities that federal prosecutors are likely to face as they begin the task of figuring out how much or even whether people involved in the political rallies that preceded the assault can be held accountable for the violence that erupted.
After more than a year of focusing exclusively on rioters who took part in the storming of the Capitol, prosecutors have widened their gaze in recent weeks and have started to question whether those involved in encouraging protests like the one that Mr. Sullivan was describing can be held culpable for disrupting the work of Congress.
Mr. Sullivans remarks during the call appeared to be an effort to motivate a group of people aggrieved by the election to take direct action against members of Congress on Jan. 6, presaging what Mr. Trump himself would say in a speech that day. While it remains unclear whether anyone on Mr. Sullivans call went on to join the mob that breached the Capitol, he seemed to be exhorting his listeners to apply unusual pressure on lawmakers just as they were overseeing the final count of Electoral College votes.
In a statement provided by his lawyer, Mr. Sullivan played down the nature of the call, saying he had merely shared some encouragement with what he described as people who all felt their votes had been disenfranchised in the 2020 elections. Mr. Sullivan said he had been asked to participate in the call by a group of anti-vaccine activists or what he called health freedom advocate moms who were hosting a small, permitted event at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
I only promoted peaceful solutions where Americans could raise their voices and be heard as expressed in our First Amendment, Mr. Sullivan said in the statement. I in no way condone the violence of any protesters.
Still, in the recording of the call, Mr. Sullivan can be heard telling his listeners that the lawmakers inside the Capitol need to feel pressure.
If we make the people inside that building sweat and they understand that they may not be able to walk in the streets any longer if they do the wrong thing, then maybe theyll do the right thing, he said. We have to put that pressure there.
As the Justice Department widens its inquiry, federal prosecutors are using a grand jury in Washington to gather information on political organizers, speakers and so-called V.I.P.s connected to a series of pro-Trump rallies after the 2020 election. One prominent planner of those rallies, Ali Alexander, received a subpoena from the grand jury and said last week that he intended to comply with its requests.
In the run-up to Jan. 6, Mr. Alexander publicly discussed a pressure campaign against lawmakers that was meant to stop the final electoral count, saying he was working with Representative Mo Brooks of Alabama and Representatives Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar of Arizona, all Republicans.
We four schemed up of putting maximum pressure on Congress while they were voting, Mr. Alexander said in a since-deleted video on Periscope. The plan, he said, was to change the hearts and the minds of Republicans who were in that body, hearing our loud roar from outside.
It is unclear if the Justice Department is aware of Mr. Sullivans conference call; the department declined to comment. The House committee investigating the events of Jan. 6 was provided with a copy of the recording some months ago by the woman who made it, Staci Burk, a law student and Republican activist from Arizona.
Shortly after the election, Ms. Burk became convinced that phony ballots had been flown in bulk into Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. She eventually submitted an anonymous affidavit concerning the ballots in an election fraud case filed in Federal District Court in Phoenix by the pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell.
Debating a criminal referral. The Jan. 6 House committee has grown divided over whether to make a criminal referralto the Justice Department of former President Donald J. Trump, even though it has concluded that it has enough evidence to do so. The debate centers on whether a referral would backfire by politically tainting the expanding federal investigation.
A Trump ally agrees to cooperate. Ali Alexander, a prominent organizer of pro-Trump events after the 2020 election, has agreed to cooperatewith the Justice Departments newly expanded investigation of the attack on the Capitol last year.
The effort to disqualify insurrectionists. New lawsuitswere filed against three Arizona officials, including Representatives Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs, to bar them from office under the 14th Amendment. This is part of a larger legal effort to disqualify G.O.P. lawmakers from re-election if they participated in events surrounding the Jan. 6 attack.
Contempt charges. The House voted to recommend criminal contempt of Congress chargesagainst Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino Jr., two close allies of Mr. Trump, after the pair defied subpoenas from the special committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack.
After becoming involved with Ms. Powell, Ms. Burk said she had been approached by several members of a right-wing paramilitary group, the 1st Amendment Praetorian, which was associated with a former legal client of Ms. Powells, Michael T. Flynn, Mr. Trumps first national security adviser.
Ms. Burk said that members of the group then placed her under unwanted surveillance, insisting on moving into her home in what they described as an effort to protect her from people who might want to retaliate against her for coming forward about voter fraud.
It was a member of the 1st Amendment Praetorian, Ms. Burk said, who had joined the conference call that featured Mr. Sullivan. Ms. Burk said she recorded the call, much like she recorded other activities by the 1st Amendment Praetorian, because she felt threatened and unsafe by the groups presence in her home.
At one point during the call, Mr. Sullivan was asked by an unknown questioner whether Mr. Trump intended to impose martial law on Jan. 6. That explosive notion had been raised publicly two weeks earlier by Mr. Flynn during an appearance on the right-wing television network Newsmax.
Mr. Sullivan answered the question by telling the man that he foresaw Mr. Trump putting in place a limited form of martial law on Jan. 6.
I dont see any other way around it, because hes not going to allow an election fraud to take place, Mr. Sullivan said. Its not going to happen.
A social media consultant who calls himself the Wizard of Twitter, Mr. Sullivan worked for a political action committee run by Mr. Stone, a longtime confidant of Mr. Trumps, during the 2016 presidential campaign. According to Reuters, one of the projects he did for Mr. Stone was a strategy document describing how to use Twitter swarms to amplify political messages.
More recently, Mr. Sullivan has taken an active role in promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory, which holds that prominent liberals belong to a cult of Satan-worshipping pedophiles. At a public appearance last year with Ms. Powell and Mr. Flynn, Mr. Sullivan called Hillary Clinton a godawful woman and then made a gesture suggesting she should be hanged.
On the conference call ahead of Jan. 6, Mr. Sullivan told his listeners that he was an expert at making things go viral online, but that it was not enough to simply spread the message that the election had been stolen.
There has to be a multiple-front strategy, and that multiple-front strategy, I do think, is descend on the Capitol, without question, he said. Make those people feel it inside.
Luke Broadwater contributed reporting.
Excerpt from:
In Call Before Jan. 6 Riot, a Plea to Descend on the Capitol - The New York Times
- What are the limits of free speech? Online controversies spark First Amendment debate - WKRC - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Are teachers' social media posts on Charlie Kirk protected by the First Amendment? - CBS News - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Federal Court Blocks Trump Administrations Freeze of Grants to Harvard University: Implications for First Amendment and Title VI Enforcement -... - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Dunleavy: A tribute to Charlie Kirk and the First Amendment - Juneau Empire - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- This Just In: The Very First Amendment - Chapelboro.com - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- FWC is limiting social media comments, raising First Amendment concerns - Creative Loafing Tampa - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- On the First Amendment and the Fourth Estate - Boca Beacon - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- WATCH: The first amendment vs. fascism - The.Ink | Anand Giridharadas - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Opinion | Vivek Ramaswamy: An Ohio County vs. the First Amendment - The Wall Street Journal - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Former Backpage CEO Gets Three Years of Probation After Testifying at Trial About Sites Sex Ads - First Amendment Watch - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk Died Protecting the First Amendment Says Grant County GOP Chair - Source ONE News - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- This school year, attacks on the First Amendment extend to our schoolhouse doors | Opinion - Bergen Record - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- A Decades-Long Peace Vigil Outside the White House Is Dismantled After Trumps Order - First Amendment Watch - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Woman sues Madison County attorney, former Madison city clerk over alleged violation of First Amendment rights - norfolkneradio.com - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Talkative Defendant Is Told He Misunderstands First Amendment By Harvey Weinstein Judge - Inner City Press - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- 'South Park' keeps tying Trump to Satan. What to know about satire and the First Amendment - USA Today - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Man told to take down Trump flag says it's a First Amendment issue. Mayor says it has to be on a flag pole - News 12 - Westchester - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- First Amendment Rights and Protesting in Tennessee - Nashville Banner - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Northwestern University President Says He Will Resign Following Tenure Marked by White House Tension - First Amendment Watch - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Surprise resident's First Amendment fight against city far from over one year later - yourvalley.net - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Letter: Trump crushes the First Amendment - InForum - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- From Kozminski to Cherwitz: The TVPA's Transformation from Anti-Trafficking Tool to First Amendment Weapon - The National Law Review - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Graham Linehans arrest shows we need a UK First Amendment - Spiked - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- First Amendment battles loom over another religious law in Texas - yahoo.com - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Agrees To Restore Health Websites and Data - First Amendment Watch - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- MFIA Clinic Urges FTC to Withdraw Proposed Consent Order on First Amendment Grounds - Yale Law School - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Judge Reverses Trump Administrations Cuts of Billions of Dollars to Harvard University - First Amendment Watch - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Harvard Wins Legal Battle over Research Funding, Citing First Amendment Rights - Davis Vanguard - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- We have the First Amendment and we have to protect it: GOP lawmaker - Fox Business - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Jay Bhattacharya: the First Amendment is unenforceable - UnHerd - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Judge rules Trump administration violated First Amendment in Harvard funding dispute - Washington Times - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- LAWSUIT: Texas bans the First Amendment at public universities after dark - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - September 3rd, 2025 [September 3rd, 2025]
- Organization Defends UTCs First Amendment Rights As Greek Life Paused In Hazing Probe - Black Enterprise - September 1st, 2025 [September 1st, 2025]
- Thank Goodness For The First Amendment: SALT In Review - Law360 - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- Meet the First Amendment reporters protecting your freedoms | Opinion - The Tennessean - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- Florida Cities Race To Save Rainbow Crosswalks as the States Deadlines for Removal Loom - First Amendment Watch - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- The First Amendment Does Not Protect Media Matters From Breaking The Law - News Radio 1200 WOAI - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- A Burning First Amendment Issue: President Trumps Executive Order On Flag Desecration - Hoover Institution - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Trumps war on the First Amendment is likely to plant a burning flag back on the Supreme Court steps - the-independent.com - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Opening convocation: Signing the Honor scroll and learning first amendment rights - The Cavalier Daily - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Trumps Order on Flag Burning Could Return the Question to the Supreme Court - First Amendment Watch - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Few can name the freedoms the First Amendment protects. We must change that | Opinion - azcentral.com and The Arizona Republic - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- First Amendment violations? Maine town reviews ordinance barring homeschoolers from school board - Read Lion - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Editorial: The point of the First Amendment - The Christian Chronicle - August 27th, 2025 [August 27th, 2025]
- Trump flag burning executive order could flip First Amendment on its head with new court - Fox News - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- Trumps war on the First Amendment is likely to plant a burning flag back on the Supreme Court steps - The Independent - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- Trump says flag burning is a crime, First Amendment be damned - Daily Kos - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- Trumps war on the First Amendment is likely to plant a burning flag back on the Supreme Court steps - Yahoo News Canada - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- Trump Bans Flag Burning in Direct Threat to First Amendment - The New Republic - August 26th, 2025 [August 26th, 2025]
- 'Vindicating the First Amendment': Law professors win injunction against Trump admin over proposed sanctions for their work with International... - August 24th, 2025 [August 24th, 2025]
- Notice of Public Hearing: Warhorse Ranch Development Agreement First Amendment Request - City of Draper (.gov) - August 24th, 2025 [August 24th, 2025]
- Can my child's teacher hang a pride flag in the classroom? The First Amendment and schools - IndyStar - August 22nd, 2025 [August 22nd, 2025]
- A Matter of Fact: Origin of the First Amendment - KUSA.com - August 22nd, 2025 [August 22nd, 2025]
- Police Blotter: Chores stink, that First Amendment right - thepostathens.com - August 22nd, 2025 [August 22nd, 2025]
- UK professor reassigned over views shared on website claims his First Amendment rights have been violated - WKYT - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- A federal court took 2 years to figure out that gay people have First Amendment rights - vox.com - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- MFIA Clinic Presses Court to Affirm First Amendment Protection for Filming in Public - Yale Law School - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Judge blocks mandatory Ten Commandments display in schools, citing First Amendment - KEYE - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Texas judge blocks Ten Commandments schools bill on First Amendment grounds - Amarillo Globe-News - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Franklin, Tennessee, Is Violating the First Amendment Over Yard Signs and Flags - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Immigrants Seeking Lawful Work and Citizenship Are Now Subject to Anti-Americanism Screening - First Amendment Watch - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- FIRE Attorney Zach Silver on the First Amendment Right to Record Police in Pennsylvania - First Amendment Watch - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- Hulk Hogans Lasting Effect on Publishing and Privacy Isnt What You Think - First Amendment Watch - August 20th, 2025 [August 20th, 2025]
- 9/11 and the First Amendment: Five years on - Free Speech Center - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Video Lesson: Introduction to the First Amendment - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Conservative Network Newsmax Agrees To Pay $67M in Defamation Case Over Bogus 2020 Election Claims - First Amendment Watch - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Video Lesson: How the First Amendment Limits Public Colleges and Administrators - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- First Amendment Claim Over Firing Of Firefighter For Supposedly Racially Offensive Anti-Abortion Post Can Go Forward - Hoover Institution - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Video Lesson: First Amendment on Campus for Faculty - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Legislative Apportionment and the First Amendment - Free Speech Center - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Judge Strikes Down Trump Administration Guidance Against Diversity Programs at Schools and Colleges - First Amendment Watch - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Ordered To Restore Some Withheld Grant Funding to UCLA - First Amendment Watch - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- 9 People Plead Not Guilty in a Texas Elections Probe Involving Vote Harvesting - First Amendment Watch - August 18th, 2025 [August 18th, 2025]
- First Amendment Claim Over Firing of Firefighter for Supposedly Racially Offensive Anti-Abortion Post Can Go Forward - Reason Magazine - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- The First Amendment is under attack as never before, book on separation of church and state argues - MSNBC News - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- Trump can't accept bad news. Here's how that hurts the First Amendment | Opinion - yahoo.com - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- LA banned the N and C words from council meetings. Does the First Amendment allow that? - USA Today - August 14th, 2025 [August 14th, 2025]
- A new Supreme Court case asks whether children still have First Amendment rights - yahoo.com - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- For the love of Pete (Seeger), stand up for the First Amendment - PEN America - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- A new Supreme Court case asks whether children still have First Amendment rights - vox.com - August 7th, 2025 [August 7th, 2025]