For Some Arrested At Portland Protests, Release Is Conditional On Not Attending More – NPR
Protesters gather in front of the Mark O. Hatfield federal courthouse in downtown Portland, where some demonstrators have been arrested and others released from jail on the condition that they not attend any more protests. Spencer Platt/Getty Images hide caption
Protesters gather in front of the Mark O. Hatfield federal courthouse in downtown Portland, where some demonstrators have been arrested and others released from jail on the condition that they not attend any more protests.
A number of people arrested at demonstrations in Portland, Ore., say the terms of their release prevent them from attending protests going forward, a stipulation First Amendment experts have called cause for concern.
ProPublica reported on Tuesday that at least a dozen protesters arrested in recent weeks are prohibited from attending demonstrations within city or state limits, or in general, while they await trials on federal misdemeanor charges. Protesters say this was one of several conditions including abiding by a curfew, avoiding the area surrounding the federal courthouse and appearing for court dates that they had to agree to in order to leave jail.
Bailey Dreibelbis, 23, is one such protester. He told NPR's Vanessa Romo that he was arrested on the evening of July 22 and released the following afternoon on certain conditions, including that he would not attend any more protests in Portland.
Of the terms of his release, Dreibelbis said his public defender was "pretty clear that if I wanted to be out of there that day, that I would have to take them."
"She kind of chuckled with me, because I didn't do anything illegal upon arrest," he added. "I did not assault an officer, I did not set anything on fire."
Dreibelbis said he entered an open fence outside the federal courthouse, noting he did not see signs or hear announcements about that area being off limits. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office said Dreibelbis was charged with failing to comply with a lawful order, which is a class c misdemeanor.
Like Dreibelbis, other protesters are facing charges in connection with petty offenses that took place on federal grounds.
According to ProPublica, 18 of the 50 protesters charged in Portland are accused of only minor offenses under federal law that criminalizes certain actions when they happen on federal property or against people on that property. These behaviors include "failure to obey a lawful order" and "disorderly conduct."
Fourteen protesters were charged with "failing to obey a lawful order" between July 21 and July 24 alone, ProPublica found.
Orders setting conditions for release, reviewed by ProPublica, were signed by a federal magistrate in Portland. Kevin Sonoff of the U.S. Attorney's Office said in an email to NPR that the prosecutors didn't seek the "no protest" restriction, that it was added by the court. He said the office did ask for those released to be barred from a five-block limit around the federal courthouse.
"This morning, we joined the Federal Public Defender's Office in jointly recommending to the court that these additional release conditions be modified," Sonoff said.
Dreibelbis told NPR he hadn't initially planned to attend a protest that night he said he roller skates after work and ended up in that part of town and is now barred from attending any other protests.
Legal experts told NPR that such a stipulation almost certainly violates individuals' First Amendment rights to free assembly.
"These conditions are deeply troubling and likely unconstitutional," Ramya Krishnan, staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute, wrote in an email. "A blanket ban on attending future protests in the city seriously infringes on the First Amendment right to free assembly, and isn't reasonably related to any legitimate goal of pretrial release."
Enrique Armijo, a law professor at Elon University, explained that it is not uncommon for criminal defendants to give up certain rights as a condition of their release, but those conditions are typically very narrow, in the interest of public safety and tightly connected to the basis of prosecution.
The agreements in Portland, he said, are overly broad in that they do not show a clear public safety connection between the right the person is being asked to give up and the harm that person is alleged to have committed.
"There's no way you can say that because of something you may have done with respect to federal property, a federal court is going to say you cannot engage in First Amendment-protected activity in the entire city in which that federal property is located," Armijo said. "That's just the definition of what First Amendment law considers overbreadth: What you're being asked to give up is much, much greater from a constitutional perspective than that which you are alleged to have done."
Elizabeth Goitein, who codirects the Brennan Center for Justice's Liberty & National Security Program, said this kind of "blanket First Amendment restriction" violates one of the most core constitutional rights.
"The fact that these people may or may not have committed a misdemeanor is irrelevant, they certainly haven't been tried or convicted of any such offense and they are presumed innocent until proven guilty," she said. "Even after someone has been convicted of an offense, that does not mean that the government can require them to give up First Amendment freedoms going forward."
Goitein also noted that this practice raises red flags even beyond Portland because it could potentially happen in other cities.
"It's a problem if it happens once," she said. "And if it's happening systemically across a major city in this country, we need to be extremely concerned."
People have gathered for demonstrations against racism and police violence in Portland every night since the death of George Floyd in May, with tensions escalating after the Trump administration deployed federal agents to the city to protect the federal courthouse there earlier this month. Oregon Gov. Kate Brown said federal agents will begin a phased withdrawal on Thursday.
Read the original post:
For Some Arrested At Portland Protests, Release Is Conditional On Not Attending More - NPR
- Trump Administration Will Appeal Judges Order Reversing Federal Funding Cuts at Harvard - First Amendment Watch - December 25th, 2025 [December 25th, 2025]
- Housing, tourism and the First Amendment: Nevada editors reflect on the news year that was 2025 - KNPR - December 25th, 2025 [December 25th, 2025]
- FCC fights First Amendment and democracy itself - mronline.org - December 25th, 2025 [December 25th, 2025]
- First Amendment Stories of 2025: A Year in Review - Freedom Forum - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Trump tests the First Amendment: A timeline - CNN - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Professor Sanctioned by University for a Satirical Land Acknowledgment Wins First Amendment Case on Appeal - The New York Sun - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Trump Sues the BBC: First Amendment Analysis - Freedom Forum - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Madisons Lost First Amendment: The Mission Statement that Never Was - Jurist.org - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Let them sue: Iowa lawmakers scoffed at First Amendment in wake of Charlie Kirk shooting, records show - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and... - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Pastor alleges Tarrant County judge violated First Amendment by removing him from meeting - Fort Worth Report - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Yes, the First Amendment Applies to Non-Citizens Present in the United States - Reason Magazine - December 22nd, 2025 [December 22nd, 2025]
- Gingrich: Going After People Who Have Been Radicalized Requires Rethinking Parts Of The First Amendment - Real Clear Politics - December 16th, 2025 [December 16th, 2025]
- [VIDEO] Jane Fonda Revives the Committee for the First Amendment - ACLU of Southern California - December 16th, 2025 [December 16th, 2025]
- Does The First Amendment Protect Supposedly Addictive Algorithms? - Hoover Institution - December 16th, 2025 [December 16th, 2025]
- Stop the gatekeeping. The First Amendment is for all of us - Freedom of the Press Foundation - December 16th, 2025 [December 16th, 2025]
- Why 'online speech is messy' when it comes to the First Amendment - WUSF - December 16th, 2025 [December 16th, 2025]
- Puerto Rico Governor Signs Bill That Critics Say Will Restrict Access to Public Information - First Amendment Watch - December 16th, 2025 [December 16th, 2025]
- How a Gossip Blogger Became the Poster Child for First Amendment Rights | On the Media - WNYC Studios | Podcasts - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- JD Vance floats First Amendment 'exception' to ban '6-7' - Fox News - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Free speech advocates rally to support FIREs defense of First Amendment protections for drag shows - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and... - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Law's Andrew Geronimo discusses political websites and the first amendment - Case Western Reserve University - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Texas runs afoul of the First Amendment with new limits on faculty course materials - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- First Amendment expert weighs in on new University of Florida neutrality policy - WCJB - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Public libraries in TX, LA, and MS are no longer protected by the First Amendment. - Literary Hub - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Congressman Murphy introduces bills to fortify First Amendment rights on college campuses - WCTI - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Oregon lawsuit accuses Trump admin of chilling First Amendment rights during ICE protests - KOIN.com - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- The Man Accused of Killing Charlie Kirk Appears in Court for 1st Time as a Judge Weighs Media Access - First Amendment Watch - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- ICEBlock App Maker Sues Trump Administration Over Its Pressure on Apple To Remove App - First Amendment Watch - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Federal judge to hear arguments on motion in professor's First Amendment lawsuit against UT - WBIR - December 12th, 2025 [December 12th, 2025]
- Inside the First Amendment fight over how Los Angeles polices words - USA Today - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Brands, bands, trademarks and the First Amendment - The Global Legal Post - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- First Amendment in flux: When free-speech protections came up against the Red Scare - Free Speech Center - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- The Pentagon and the FBI are investigating 6 legislators for exercising their First Amendment rights - Reason Magazine - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Corporations Say Its Their First Amendment Right To Hide - The Lever - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Campus Crackdown on the First Amendment - Folio Weekly - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Lange: Annoying emails are not exempt from the First Amendment - WyomingNews.com - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- From burgers to the First Amendment: Cozy Inn wins mural lawsuit - KAKE - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Salina violated First Amendment rights of Cozy Inn on mural issue - The Hutchinson News - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- After Bobby George Threatened to Sue Online Critics, CWRU's First Amendment Clinic Stepped In - Cleveland Scene - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- First Amendment in flux: When free speech protections came up against the Red Scare - The Conversation - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- First Amendment litigator explains the dos and donts of student protest - The Dartmouth - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- We should protect the First Amendment like we do the Second - Indiana Capital Chronicle - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams and Berkshire Eagle President Fred Rutberg talk free speech, press freedom at the Triplex Cinema - The Berkshire... - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- E&C Democrats: The Trump Administration is Violating the Whistleblower Protection Act and First Amendment by Retaliating Against Bethesda Declaration... - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- First Amendment in flux: When free speech protections came up against the Red Scare - itemonline.com - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Judge rules Salina violated Cozy Inns First Amendment rights over burger mural - KSN-TV - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- 7 Former FCC Commissioners Want 'News Distortion Policy' Rescinded for Threatening First Amendment - TheWrap - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Crystal River and the First Amendment - chronicleonline.com - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- AG Sulzberger Honored with The James C. Goodale First Amendment Award - The New York Times Company - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Kansas county pays $3M for forgetting the First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Teachers and social media: A First Amendment fight - WGCU - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- What To Know About How Florida Will Teach McCarthyism and the Cold War - First Amendment Watch - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Texas A&M University Professors Now Need Approval for Some Race and Gender Topics - First Amendment Watch - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Santa Ana cops need a refresher on the First Amendment - Orange County Register - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Was Mississippi State student arrested over 'free speech'? See what the First Amendment says - The Clarion-Ledger - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Social media restrictions and First Amendment rights for children | 'Law of the Land' on the Sound of Ideas - Ideastream - November 10th, 2025 [November 10th, 2025]
- Test your Constitutional knowledge: When can free exercise of religion be limited under the First Amendment? - AL.com - November 10th, 2025 [November 10th, 2025]
- Editing federal employees emails to blame Democrats for shutdown violated their First Amendment rights, judge says - CNN - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I am in love with the First Amendment | Opinion - PennLive.com - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- EXCLUSIVE: Texas Good Ol Boys Club vs. First Amendment Krottinger Arrested Over Meme - Yahoo - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Speeds up New Rules That Would Make It Easier To Charge Some Protesters - First Amendment Watch - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- America struggles to balance First Amendment free speech with gun rights amid political violence - Milwaukee Independent - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Man Who Threw Sandwich at Federal Agent in Washington Is Found Not Guilty of Assault Charge - First Amendment Watch - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Judge Will Order Federal Agents in Chicago To Restrict Using Force Against Protesters and Media - First Amendment Watch - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- EXCLUSIVE: Texas Good Ol Boys Club vs. First Amendment - Krottinger Arrested Over Meme - Dallas Express - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Inside the 'harsh terrain' of Columbia University's First Amendment predicament - USA Today - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Biden Warns of Dark Days for the Country as He Urges Americans To Stay Optimistic - First Amendment Watch - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Victory! Court Rules that Minnesota Horse Teacher is Able to Continue Teaching in Important First Amendment Win - The Institute for Justice - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers Are Looking To Offer Much More Than Ultrasounds and Diapers - First Amendment Watch - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- May the First Amendment be with you: Protester sues after Imperial March performance sparks arrest - Fast Company - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- Mitchell and Mayes ask judge to toss out law against prosecutions targeting First Amendment rights - KJZZ - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- Creator of app that tracked ICE talks about its removal and the First Amendment - NPR - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- How Trump's Threats Against the NFL Could Violate the First Amendment - American Civil Liberties Union - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- 'He played The Imperial March as he walked': Man arrested for playing Darth Vader's theme at National Guard troops sues over alleged First Amendment... - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Arizona law protects First Amendment rights. Maricopa County wants to overturn it - azcentral.com and The Arizona Republic - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- John Foster: First Amendment rights and whether you really should say that - dailyjournal.net - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Creator of app that tracked ICE talks about its removal and the First Amendment - Boise State Public Radio - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Author Michael Wolff Sues Melania Trump, Saying She Threatened $1B Suit Over Epstein-Related Claims - First Amendment Watch - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Creator of app that tracked ICE talks about its removal and the First Amendment - WVIA Public Media - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel Clash Was "Never About The First Amendment", Sinclair Exec Insists; FCC "Overreach" & Nexstar-Tegna Mega-Deal... - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]