Background Press Call by Senior Administration Officials on Presidential Action to Establish the Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse -…
Via Teleconference
5:05 P.M. EDT
MODERATOR: Okay. Hello, everyone. Thank you so much for joining us this evening. Really appreciate you tuning in.
I just want to start this call with a quick reminder that this call is on background, embargoed until tomorrow morning at 5:00 a.m. Eastern. You may attribute the context of the call to a senior administration official. Today, you will hear from [senior administration officials].
And with that, Ill kick it over to [senior administration official].
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay, I was muted. Am I unmuted?
MODERATOR: Yes, youre back.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: So sorry. Did you hear anything, because it seemed to do that and
MODERATOR: Nope.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay.
MODERATOR: Nope, were just starting.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay, Im going to start again then, with apologies. And good evening.
The President made a campaign promise to convene a national task force to prevent and address online harassment and abuse. And this task force is charged with developing recommendations for federal and state governments, for technology platforms, schools, and other public and private entities.
Tomorrow, the Vice President is going to host an event launching the task force, and she will be joined by Cabinet officials, advocates, and, most importantly, survivors.
The task force is aims to address the growing problem of online harassment and abuse, which disproportionately targets women, girls, and LGBTQI+ people.
It will be co-chaired the task force will be co-chaired by the Gender Policy Council and the National Security Council. And it includes the Attorney General, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and other heads of federal agencies and White House policy councils.
You know, just to take a step back about the why here, the President made this commitment because in the United States, one in three women under the age of 35 report being sexually harassed online, and over half of LGBTQI+ individuals report being the target of severe online abuse.
So what are we going to do? Within 180 days of launching, the task force is going to provide a blueprint for recommended steps the federal government can take to counter this issue, as well as suggestions for actions in partnership with the private sector and with civil society. And these recommendations will focus on increasing support for survivors of online harassment and abuse, as well as expanding research to better understand the impact and the scope of the problem, improve prevention efforts, and strengthen accountability for offenders and for platforms.
As you all well know, its imperative that we commit to better understanding and addressing the nexus between online misogyny and radicalization to violence.
You know, sadly, the the recent mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde highlight these links between online harassment and abuse, hate, and extremist acts. The Buffalo shooter, for example, was very explicitly radicalized online. And his manifesto espoused the great replacement theory, which is, of course, rooted in racism, misogyny, and xenophobia.
And thats just one example. We see this over and over again when we see issues of extremism and how they turn into violence.
The task force is just one element of the President and Vice Presidents strong commitment to unify communities and to tackle hate and violent extremism in all its forms.
Im going to turn this over now to [senior administration official]. [Senior administration official], over to you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Thanks, [senior administration official].
So, as [senior administration official] just said, tomorrow, Vice President Harris will launch the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which the Gender Policy Council and the National Security Council will co-chair. We also note that the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, will be present, along with Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and Sloane Stephens, the U.S. Open Tennis Champion survivor and mental health advocate.
As [senior administration official] had noted, the task force, within 180 days, will provide a series of recommendations for how the federal government, in partnership with the private sector and civil society, can better combat online harassment and abuse.
And just to take a step back, the Vice President has had a long record, as many of you know, of standing up to hate and exploitation. From her days as Attorney General of California to her tenure in the U.S. Senate, and even starting out her career as a district attorney focused on sexual assault and child exploitation cases, shes led the fight against bad actors and has pioneered innovative ways to secure safety and privacy rights in the digital world.
Ill just focus on her attorney general record for a second. She successfully prosecuted one of the first-ever cases against tan operator of a cyber exploitation website. She also launched the Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit to prosecute individuals who infringe on the privacy rights of others. This unit was the first of its kind for the California Department of Justice at the time.
Furthermore, as Attorney General, she secured an agreement with the leading operators of tech companies that have mobile application platforms to enhance privacy protections basically, privacy agreements for millions of users on their smartphones, tablets, and other devices.
Her longstanding work in this area takes on an additional significance as the potential overruling of Roe may jeopardize data privacy.
As a senator, she introduced legislation that would have made these acts that we were just talking about a federal crime. So, she has led and will continue to lead the effort, along with the President, to dismantle cruelty, bullying, violence, and hate wherever it exists.
Back to you.
MODERATOR: Thank you so much, [senior administration officials]. With that, we will take your questions.
Great. First question, well turn it over to Chris with The AP.
Q Hi, everybody. I just want to make sure I understand whats happening tomorrow, specifically. It seems like whats going to be happening tomorrow is the announcement of a task force that will eventually issue recommendations, not were not going to get the recommendations tomorrow, if I understand that correctly.
And lastly, I just want to make sure I understand: What is the role of the National Security Council in this effort? And will we see Xavier Becerra there tomorrow, given HHSs role?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Thanks, Chris. So the answer your first question is: Yes, this is the launch of a task force. Its actually its also its first meeting. So what we will be doing is also hearing testimony from experts and survivors. And the meeting will be attended by a number of the different agencies and White House offices that are part of the task force.
We will not see Secretary Becerra because hes not able to be there. But Surgeon General Murthy will attend in his place, as will Attorney General Garland.
The other question about the role of the National Security Council is: Yes, they will be co-chairing the council with us. And you know, the the reason for that is the obvious connections. Two things one is the obvious connection between online harassment and abuse and extremism, hate, and violent acts, and the threat that has caused.
One of the things that actually we will also be touching on tomorrow and announcing tomorrow is some research from the U.S. Secret Services National Threat Assessment Center under the Department of Homeland Security, which shows the nexus between online misogyny and domestic terrorism. So that just is one example of some additional things we will be announcing tomorrow.
And I feel like there was one more part of your question.
Q No, you got it. Just beyond that misogyny is connected to the Uvalde shooter that thats the connection there, right?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes. Yes.
Q Okay. Thats it. Thank you.
MODERATOR: Thank you, Chris and [senior administration official].
Next, well turn it over to Kellen with the New York Times.
Q Hi, thanks very much. I was just wondering, and I know this is going to be the first meeting, but is there any sense of whether there are particular online platforms or social media sites, anything like that, that you expect to be the focus of this task force? Is there any any area in particular that youre going to be focusing on?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We are not focused on particular platforms. We are absolutely focused on the role of platforms and social media more generally, and the connections and their role. And as I said at the at the outset, there will be recommendations for the private sector and for civil society, but were not focused on any particular platform.
Q Got it. Thank you.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Next, well go over to Cat with the Washington Post.
Q Hey, thanks so much for taking the time to do this. I had two questions. Kind of following up on that, what role will major social media companies play in the task force and in the development of these recommendations?
And I also just wanted to ask you if you see any connection between the work the task force is doing and the work of the January 6th Committee on social media and extremism.
Thank you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Sorry. So, you know, as I noted, preventing and addressing all forms of GBV gender-based violence including online requires engagement and, really, partnership between the public and the private sectors. And, you know, many technology companies have expressed a commitment to improving user safety and addressing abuse on their platforms.
And so, we will be looking for opportunities to engage with industry experts and leaders who share that commitment to supporting survivors and preventing abuse, including by improving the safety and the design of their products and platforms.
And I hadnt, quite frankly, thought about the connection to January 6th. This was really has been pretty laser-focused on online harassment and abuse and the connection to gender-based violence.
MODERATOR: Thanks, [senior administration official].
Next, well turn it over to Alexandra with Reuters.
Alexandra, I dont know if we cant hear you.
Okay, in the meantime, well turn it over to Ashley with Axios.
Q Hi, there. Thanks for having the call. You talked about ultimately developing best practices with civil society and the private sector, but will you will the task force be making any policy recommendations for Congress with the federal agencies?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We do anticipate making policy recommendations, as well as recommendations on additional research on the role of, as I said, private sector and civil society and programs.
And again, there will be a couple of additional announcements tomorrow. And so, that sort of forecasts, because, honestly, weve already started this work. And this task force is really the next thing in the line of working on all facets of this of this problem and the solutions to it. So, yes, I would say, in all of those categories.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Next question, well turn it over to Brendan at Politico.
Q Yeah. Hi, guys. Thanks so much for doing the call. You know, I think particularly given, you know, it sounds like the involvement of the DOJ and the National Security Council and folks like that, I wanted to ask whether the White House has given any thought to privacy or, you know, like free speech concerns around this?
You know, Im thinking specifically of sort of the backlash that occurred around DHSs disinformation board, and I can imagine some of the same voices might raise concerns with this effort, you know, regarding the White House or the governments attempt to sort of, like, control speech online that some people might see as obviously hate speech or harassment or threatening violence and others might not see that way.
Are you guys thinking about those issues at all? And is that something that has crossed the White Houses radar so far? And do you guys plan to sort of dig into those issues at all, as you as you weigh a lot of these other questions?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes, we are particularly focused on online activities that are illegal conduct, such as cyber stalking or non-consensual distribution of intimate images or targeted harassment, as well as, you know, the overlap with intimate partner and sexual violence online, and online abuse linked to the distribution of child sex abuse material and trafficking.
And these are obviously harmful and illegal acts that occur online. And there has been a strong bipartisan consensus that more has to be done to hold perpetrators and platforms accountable to prevent these harms.
We are very mindful of the of the First Amendment issues. But, you know, violent and threatening speech is not protected by the First Amendment. So, while we are going to carefully navigate those issues, were also going to remain laser-focused on the non-speech aspects. So, yes, that will be part of our work.
And I realized I actually forgot to mention you raised the National Security Council again, and I did realize there was one other piece I wanted to respond to in Chriss question, which is: Why is the National Security Council involved? For all the reasons weve already discussed. And also, I should just note that another thing we are doing is that the the National Security Council and we launched a Global Partnership for Action on Gender-Based Online Harassment and Abuse at the Summit for Democracy back in December, and sort of officially asked for partners at the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women in March.
And so, the State Department is continuing to expand that global partnership because, obviously, this work is important in a number of different countries around the world. So, that partnership the Global Partnership brings together countries and international organizations and civil society and the private sector to understand technology-facilitated gender-based violence around the world and to prevent and address it.
MODERATOR: Thank you, [senior administration official].
And our last question, well go to Tal at the SF Chronicle.
Q Hi, I have a quick procedural question and then an actual question. The procedural question is: Will you all be distributing a copy of the report you mentioned, tying misogyny to violence?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes. Our goal is to have a factsheet under a 5:00 a.m. embargo tonight. So well make sure everyone on this call gets that.
Q Okay, great. Thanks. And then my question you know, and I mean this with all due respect, but if this is a campaign promise, you know, were 18 months into the administration, I believe, you know, its youre announcing a task force that in six months will give recommendations that, of course, will then need to be enacted.
Im just wondering, you know: What took so long to stand up the task force? And, you know, should we take away a sense of urgency from, you know, this coming together, kind of, over such a long time?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: What I would say about that is that this is, you know, sort of a midpoint in the work on online harassment and abuse. And I think, you know, [senior administration official] laid out the Vice Presidents long commitment to this.
You know, Im sure you know the Presidents long commitment to gender-based violence wherever it occurs. And, you know, between passing the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and taking on military sexual assault and, you know, other issues that are related, this is just part of our overall work to combat gender-based violence wherever it occurs.
And, you know, what has the way that this task force has developed and Im sort of quite proud of the fact that its, I think, a very thoughtful group of people who are involved and the issues are sort of well-defined at this point is because it grows out of interagency work, which has been ongoing.
So, as I said, this is a public acknowledgement of the work that we are doing and, sort of, you know, the moment to say, Okay, weve been doing all of this interagency work. This brings it together, and that were asking for this report back within 180 days.
MODERATOR: Thank you so much. And thanks, everyone, for joining.
Just a friendly reminder that this is under embargo until 5:00 a.m. tomorrow morning. Well be sure to share the factsheet, hopefully in the next few hours here. And please reach out with any questions.
5:25 P.M. EDT
See the original post:
Background Press Call by Senior Administration Officials on Presidential Action to Establish the Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse -...
- Analysis: What Disney is thinking as it faces a First Amendment fight with Trump - CNN - April 29th, 2026 [April 29th, 2026]
- First Amendment advocates blast the FCC's early review of ABC broadcast licenses - NBC News - April 29th, 2026 [April 29th, 2026]
- Kimmel, the First Amendment and a brewing battle with the FCC - USA Today - April 29th, 2026 [April 29th, 2026]
- Former Spokane mayor Woodward wants $10 million from the city, alleges First Amendment violations - KXLY.com - April 29th, 2026 [April 29th, 2026]
- The Taricani Visiting Journalist Series on First Amendment Rights Harrington School of Communication and Media - The University of Rhode Island - April 29th, 2026 [April 29th, 2026]
- In rare interviews, Bush hails the First Amendment and Obama says America doesn't have 'kings' - NBC News - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- CBS Hosting Dinner Praising Trump And His Love Of The First Amendment - Techdirt. - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- BREAKING: Street preacher threatens to sue SIUE on grounds of First Amendment rights violation - alestlelive.com - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- First Amendment to Arkansas: You Cannot Sentence Speech on the Internet to Death by a Thousand Cuts in NetChoice Court Victory - NetChoice - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- The GUARD Act dis-GUARDs the First Amendment and competition - Competitive Enterprise Institute - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- Supreme Court Denies Hearing in First Amendment Cases Related to Occupational Speech - The Institute for Justice - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- Code is functional free speech under the First Amendment: Coin Center - TradingView - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- Texas public schools can now have Ten Commandments displays, Appeals Court ruled, but Supreme Court can still save this First Amendment disaster -... - April 23rd, 2026 [April 23rd, 2026]
- Trump admin violated First Amendment by forcing Facebook and Apple to remove ICE-trackers - Law and Crime News - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Judge sides with creators of banned ICE trackers who allege DHS and DOJ violated their First Amendment rights - Engadget - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- How Originalism Broke the First Amendment - Balls and Strikes - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Trump says CNN may have committed a crime. The First Amendment says otherwise - Poynter - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Jon Prosser's last-ditch effort against Apple's lawsuit is the First Amendment - AppleInsider - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- California Attorney Who Tried To Help Overturn 2020 Election Loses Law License - First Amendment Watch - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: First amendment lynchpin of American experiment - The Facts - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- White House Correspondents Dilemma: Toasting the First Amendment as Trump Tramples Over It | Analysis - TheWrap - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Mitali Bags speech on The Constitution (One Hundred and Thirty-First Amendment) Bill, 2026 and The Delimitation Bill, 2026 - All India Trinamool... - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Occupational licensing has a First Amendment problem - The Hill - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- Paterno: Dangerous Times for the First Right of the First Amendment - StateCollege.com - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- When ICE enforcement and the First Amendment collide - News From The States - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- Briefing Room: Advice on dealing with First Amendment auditors - Seal Beach News - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- On Books, Book Reviews, and Bezos - First Amendment Watch - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- Escambia County sheriff responds after heated argument between First Amendment auditor and deputy: did not reflect our core values - Yahoo - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- Diddy Appeal: Lawyers Seek Release, Argue Freak-Offs Are Protected By First Amendment - HOT 97 - April 10th, 2026 [April 10th, 2026]
- Future of First Amendment: FIU to host 'Free Speech: A Florida Dialogue' with Georgetown University - WLRN - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Hollywood Stars Join Together to Defend the First Amendment - The Progressive - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Federal judge rules Trump violated First Amendment by ordering defunding of NPR and PBS - KUOW - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Lemon Pound Cake and the First Amendment - jdsupra.com - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Citing First Amendment, federal judge blocks Trump order to end funding for NPR and PBS - nbcmiami.com - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Getting to Know You: Imprisoned for Exercising her First Amendment Rights She Now Speaks Truth to Power - morningsentinel.com - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Federal judge rules Trump's public media order violated First Amendment. Here's what that means for KOSU - KOSU - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Aspen Public Radio and co-plaintiffs win federal case against Trump Administration, proclaiming a win for the First Amendment - KHOL 89.1 FM - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Federal judge cites First Amendment in blocking Trump order to end funding to NPR and PBS - Colorado Public Radio - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Opinion | The Supreme Court repels an egregious assault on the First Amendment - washingtonpost.com - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- In Counseling Case, the Supreme Court Sides with the First Amendment - nationalreview.com - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- REACTION: Supreme Court Affirms Therapy as SpeechA Major First Amendment Victory - Minding The Campus - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- BIZARRE: The First Amendment should be banned - northernstar.info - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- EDITORIAL: A victory for the First Amendment at the high court - Las Vegas Review-Journal - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- TV station megamerger is a threat to First Amendment freedoms (Editorial) - Daily Camera - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Monroe County woman sues sheriff, claiming arrest over Facebook post violated First Amendment rights - WBIR - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Supreme Court overturns ban on so-called 'conversion therapy' on First Amendment grounds - Fox News - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- Donald Trump Violated First Amendment With This Action, Says US Judge - Yahoo - April 5th, 2026 [April 5th, 2026]
- No First Amendment for some immigrant journalists or sources, govt says - Freedom of the Press Foundation - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Protesting in Tennessee, what are your First Amendment rights? - The Tennessean - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- First Amendment lawsuit seeks to end Nashuas policy of requiring name and address during public comment - New Hampshire Public Radio - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- First Amendment Balancing, or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Become a Breyerian - | Knight First Amendment Institute - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Does a Public Actor Have the Right to Anonymity? Animal Research and Wider First Amendment Implications - Harvard Law School - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Halo zone around police, ICE nears final passage as Dems voice First Amendment concerns - News From The States - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Bravo to students who use the First Amendment - The Campanile - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Supreme Court revives First Amendment lawsuit from street preacher who called concertgoers whores, Jezebels and sissies - CNN - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- The next AI fight: Do the chatbots have First Amendment rights? - qz.com - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Judge strikes down restrictive Pentagon press policy, finding it violates First Amendment - CBS News - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Gianforte Administration Reverses Permit Guidelines, Allows Weekend Events at the State Capitol - First Amendment Watch - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- A call for US companies to follow the First Amendment: Ross Kerber - TradingView - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Students sue University of Alabama over suspension of campus magazines, claim First Amendment breach - rocketcitynow.com - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- Students raise concerns over Kansas Senate bill that limits First Amendment right to protest - Kansas Reflector - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- Jane Fonda's Committee For The First Amendment On Brendan Carr Threats - Deadline - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- This is the issue with doing counterterrorism in a 'First Amendment society': Paul Mauro - Fox News - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- A Media-Rating Company Says a Trump Agency Is Threatening Its Livelihood - First Amendment Watch - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- Feds Move To Dismiss Charges Against Army Veteran Who Burned American Flag Near White House - First Amendment Watch - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- Jane Fonda's Committee for the First Amendment issued a response to FCC Chair Brendan Carr's threats against broadcasters' coverage of Iran. Read more... - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- On MSNOW, Angelo Carusone discusses grave First Amendment consequences of the Trump administration trying to control major media organizations - Media... - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- Diddy Appeals Conviction Claiming Freak-Offs Protected by First Amendment - That Grape Juice.net - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- Raja Ramaswamy Column: We should protect the First Amendment like we do the Second - reporter.net - March 17th, 2026 [March 17th, 2026]
- The Recap: Trump squashes First Amendment, and another state could flip blue - Daily Kos - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- In Fox News Op-Ed, Mahmoud Khalil Urges Americans To Defend The First Amendment - Yahoo - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Sheriff Grady Judd says troll crossed lines of First Amendment in threats made to Kaitlin Bennett - Yahoo - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- The Fate of the First Amendment - Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Attacking the First Amendment on Repeat - Civil Discourse with Joyce Vance - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Humanities Hub leads a week of celebrating First Amendment rights and history - Clemson News - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Free Expression and the Rights of Non-Citizens - | Knight First Amendment Institute - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- Former ACLU president speaks with Trojans about intricacies of the First Amendment and free speech - USC Today - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- AU holds 2026 Future of the First Amendment Lecture on Tuesday - WJBF - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS5th Cir.: Principal not immune from teachers First Amendment claims over pre-attendance prayer ban - VitalLaw.com - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]
- First amendment quote - Pea Ridge Times - March 15th, 2026 [March 15th, 2026]