Background Press Call by Senior Administration Officials on Presidential Action to Establish the Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse -…
Via Teleconference
5:05 P.M. EDT
MODERATOR: Okay. Hello, everyone. Thank you so much for joining us this evening. Really appreciate you tuning in.
I just want to start this call with a quick reminder that this call is on background, embargoed until tomorrow morning at 5:00 a.m. Eastern. You may attribute the context of the call to a senior administration official. Today, you will hear from [senior administration officials].
And with that, Ill kick it over to [senior administration official].
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay, I was muted. Am I unmuted?
MODERATOR: Yes, youre back.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: So sorry. Did you hear anything, because it seemed to do that and
MODERATOR: Nope.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay.
MODERATOR: Nope, were just starting.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Okay, Im going to start again then, with apologies. And good evening.
The President made a campaign promise to convene a national task force to prevent and address online harassment and abuse. And this task force is charged with developing recommendations for federal and state governments, for technology platforms, schools, and other public and private entities.
Tomorrow, the Vice President is going to host an event launching the task force, and she will be joined by Cabinet officials, advocates, and, most importantly, survivors.
The task force is aims to address the growing problem of online harassment and abuse, which disproportionately targets women, girls, and LGBTQI+ people.
It will be co-chaired the task force will be co-chaired by the Gender Policy Council and the National Security Council. And it includes the Attorney General, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and other heads of federal agencies and White House policy councils.
You know, just to take a step back about the why here, the President made this commitment because in the United States, one in three women under the age of 35 report being sexually harassed online, and over half of LGBTQI+ individuals report being the target of severe online abuse.
So what are we going to do? Within 180 days of launching, the task force is going to provide a blueprint for recommended steps the federal government can take to counter this issue, as well as suggestions for actions in partnership with the private sector and with civil society. And these recommendations will focus on increasing support for survivors of online harassment and abuse, as well as expanding research to better understand the impact and the scope of the problem, improve prevention efforts, and strengthen accountability for offenders and for platforms.
As you all well know, its imperative that we commit to better understanding and addressing the nexus between online misogyny and radicalization to violence.
You know, sadly, the the recent mass shootings in Buffalo and Uvalde highlight these links between online harassment and abuse, hate, and extremist acts. The Buffalo shooter, for example, was very explicitly radicalized online. And his manifesto espoused the great replacement theory, which is, of course, rooted in racism, misogyny, and xenophobia.
And thats just one example. We see this over and over again when we see issues of extremism and how they turn into violence.
The task force is just one element of the President and Vice Presidents strong commitment to unify communities and to tackle hate and violent extremism in all its forms.
Im going to turn this over now to [senior administration official]. [Senior administration official], over to you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Thanks, [senior administration official].
So, as [senior administration official] just said, tomorrow, Vice President Harris will launch the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which the Gender Policy Council and the National Security Council will co-chair. We also note that the Attorney General, Merrick Garland, will be present, along with Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and Sloane Stephens, the U.S. Open Tennis Champion survivor and mental health advocate.
As [senior administration official] had noted, the task force, within 180 days, will provide a series of recommendations for how the federal government, in partnership with the private sector and civil society, can better combat online harassment and abuse.
And just to take a step back, the Vice President has had a long record, as many of you know, of standing up to hate and exploitation. From her days as Attorney General of California to her tenure in the U.S. Senate, and even starting out her career as a district attorney focused on sexual assault and child exploitation cases, shes led the fight against bad actors and has pioneered innovative ways to secure safety and privacy rights in the digital world.
Ill just focus on her attorney general record for a second. She successfully prosecuted one of the first-ever cases against tan operator of a cyber exploitation website. She also launched the Privacy Enforcement and Protection Unit to prosecute individuals who infringe on the privacy rights of others. This unit was the first of its kind for the California Department of Justice at the time.
Furthermore, as Attorney General, she secured an agreement with the leading operators of tech companies that have mobile application platforms to enhance privacy protections basically, privacy agreements for millions of users on their smartphones, tablets, and other devices.
Her longstanding work in this area takes on an additional significance as the potential overruling of Roe may jeopardize data privacy.
As a senator, she introduced legislation that would have made these acts that we were just talking about a federal crime. So, she has led and will continue to lead the effort, along with the President, to dismantle cruelty, bullying, violence, and hate wherever it exists.
Back to you.
MODERATOR: Thank you so much, [senior administration officials]. With that, we will take your questions.
Great. First question, well turn it over to Chris with The AP.
Q Hi, everybody. I just want to make sure I understand whats happening tomorrow, specifically. It seems like whats going to be happening tomorrow is the announcement of a task force that will eventually issue recommendations, not were not going to get the recommendations tomorrow, if I understand that correctly.
And lastly, I just want to make sure I understand: What is the role of the National Security Council in this effort? And will we see Xavier Becerra there tomorrow, given HHSs role?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Thanks, Chris. So the answer your first question is: Yes, this is the launch of a task force. Its actually its also its first meeting. So what we will be doing is also hearing testimony from experts and survivors. And the meeting will be attended by a number of the different agencies and White House offices that are part of the task force.
We will not see Secretary Becerra because hes not able to be there. But Surgeon General Murthy will attend in his place, as will Attorney General Garland.
The other question about the role of the National Security Council is: Yes, they will be co-chairing the council with us. And you know, the the reason for that is the obvious connections. Two things one is the obvious connection between online harassment and abuse and extremism, hate, and violent acts, and the threat that has caused.
One of the things that actually we will also be touching on tomorrow and announcing tomorrow is some research from the U.S. Secret Services National Threat Assessment Center under the Department of Homeland Security, which shows the nexus between online misogyny and domestic terrorism. So that just is one example of some additional things we will be announcing tomorrow.
And I feel like there was one more part of your question.
Q No, you got it. Just beyond that misogyny is connected to the Uvalde shooter that thats the connection there, right?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes. Yes.
Q Okay. Thats it. Thank you.
MODERATOR: Thank you, Chris and [senior administration official].
Next, well turn it over to Kellen with the New York Times.
Q Hi, thanks very much. I was just wondering, and I know this is going to be the first meeting, but is there any sense of whether there are particular online platforms or social media sites, anything like that, that you expect to be the focus of this task force? Is there any any area in particular that youre going to be focusing on?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We are not focused on particular platforms. We are absolutely focused on the role of platforms and social media more generally, and the connections and their role. And as I said at the at the outset, there will be recommendations for the private sector and for civil society, but were not focused on any particular platform.
Q Got it. Thank you.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Next, well go over to Cat with the Washington Post.
Q Hey, thanks so much for taking the time to do this. I had two questions. Kind of following up on that, what role will major social media companies play in the task force and in the development of these recommendations?
And I also just wanted to ask you if you see any connection between the work the task force is doing and the work of the January 6th Committee on social media and extremism.
Thank you.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Sorry. So, you know, as I noted, preventing and addressing all forms of GBV gender-based violence including online requires engagement and, really, partnership between the public and the private sectors. And, you know, many technology companies have expressed a commitment to improving user safety and addressing abuse on their platforms.
And so, we will be looking for opportunities to engage with industry experts and leaders who share that commitment to supporting survivors and preventing abuse, including by improving the safety and the design of their products and platforms.
And I hadnt, quite frankly, thought about the connection to January 6th. This was really has been pretty laser-focused on online harassment and abuse and the connection to gender-based violence.
MODERATOR: Thanks, [senior administration official].
Next, well turn it over to Alexandra with Reuters.
Alexandra, I dont know if we cant hear you.
Okay, in the meantime, well turn it over to Ashley with Axios.
Q Hi, there. Thanks for having the call. You talked about ultimately developing best practices with civil society and the private sector, but will you will the task force be making any policy recommendations for Congress with the federal agencies?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: We do anticipate making policy recommendations, as well as recommendations on additional research on the role of, as I said, private sector and civil society and programs.
And again, there will be a couple of additional announcements tomorrow. And so, that sort of forecasts, because, honestly, weve already started this work. And this task force is really the next thing in the line of working on all facets of this of this problem and the solutions to it. So, yes, I would say, in all of those categories.
MODERATOR: Thank you. Next question, well turn it over to Brendan at Politico.
Q Yeah. Hi, guys. Thanks so much for doing the call. You know, I think particularly given, you know, it sounds like the involvement of the DOJ and the National Security Council and folks like that, I wanted to ask whether the White House has given any thought to privacy or, you know, like free speech concerns around this?
You know, Im thinking specifically of sort of the backlash that occurred around DHSs disinformation board, and I can imagine some of the same voices might raise concerns with this effort, you know, regarding the White House or the governments attempt to sort of, like, control speech online that some people might see as obviously hate speech or harassment or threatening violence and others might not see that way.
Are you guys thinking about those issues at all? And is that something that has crossed the White Houses radar so far? And do you guys plan to sort of dig into those issues at all, as you as you weigh a lot of these other questions?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes, we are particularly focused on online activities that are illegal conduct, such as cyber stalking or non-consensual distribution of intimate images or targeted harassment, as well as, you know, the overlap with intimate partner and sexual violence online, and online abuse linked to the distribution of child sex abuse material and trafficking.
And these are obviously harmful and illegal acts that occur online. And there has been a strong bipartisan consensus that more has to be done to hold perpetrators and platforms accountable to prevent these harms.
We are very mindful of the of the First Amendment issues. But, you know, violent and threatening speech is not protected by the First Amendment. So, while we are going to carefully navigate those issues, were also going to remain laser-focused on the non-speech aspects. So, yes, that will be part of our work.
And I realized I actually forgot to mention you raised the National Security Council again, and I did realize there was one other piece I wanted to respond to in Chriss question, which is: Why is the National Security Council involved? For all the reasons weve already discussed. And also, I should just note that another thing we are doing is that the the National Security Council and we launched a Global Partnership for Action on Gender-Based Online Harassment and Abuse at the Summit for Democracy back in December, and sort of officially asked for partners at the U.N. Commission on the Status of Women in March.
And so, the State Department is continuing to expand that global partnership because, obviously, this work is important in a number of different countries around the world. So, that partnership the Global Partnership brings together countries and international organizations and civil society and the private sector to understand technology-facilitated gender-based violence around the world and to prevent and address it.
MODERATOR: Thank you, [senior administration official].
And our last question, well go to Tal at the SF Chronicle.
Q Hi, I have a quick procedural question and then an actual question. The procedural question is: Will you all be distributing a copy of the report you mentioned, tying misogyny to violence?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: Yes. Our goal is to have a factsheet under a 5:00 a.m. embargo tonight. So well make sure everyone on this call gets that.
Q Okay, great. Thanks. And then my question you know, and I mean this with all due respect, but if this is a campaign promise, you know, were 18 months into the administration, I believe, you know, its youre announcing a task force that in six months will give recommendations that, of course, will then need to be enacted.
Im just wondering, you know: What took so long to stand up the task force? And, you know, should we take away a sense of urgency from, you know, this coming together, kind of, over such a long time?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: What I would say about that is that this is, you know, sort of a midpoint in the work on online harassment and abuse. And I think, you know, [senior administration official] laid out the Vice Presidents long commitment to this.
You know, Im sure you know the Presidents long commitment to gender-based violence wherever it occurs. And, you know, between passing the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and taking on military sexual assault and, you know, other issues that are related, this is just part of our overall work to combat gender-based violence wherever it occurs.
And, you know, what has the way that this task force has developed and Im sort of quite proud of the fact that its, I think, a very thoughtful group of people who are involved and the issues are sort of well-defined at this point is because it grows out of interagency work, which has been ongoing.
So, as I said, this is a public acknowledgement of the work that we are doing and, sort of, you know, the moment to say, Okay, weve been doing all of this interagency work. This brings it together, and that were asking for this report back within 180 days.
MODERATOR: Thank you so much. And thanks, everyone, for joining.
Just a friendly reminder that this is under embargo until 5:00 a.m. tomorrow morning. Well be sure to share the factsheet, hopefully in the next few hours here. And please reach out with any questions.
5:25 P.M. EDT
See the original post:
Background Press Call by Senior Administration Officials on Presidential Action to Establish the Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse -...
- California wants to make platforms pay for offensive user posts. The First Amendment and Section 230 say otherwise. - FIRE | Foundation for Individual... - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- 'Retaliation For Protected First Amendment Activity' - NASA Workers Union Sues Trump Over 'Unlawful' Effort To Strip Collective Bargaining Rights -... - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- We took the freedom of speech away: On First Amendment, Trump says quiet part out loud - MSNBC News - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Opinion: Why NPRs dispute with CPB really is about the First Amendment - current.org - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Jane Fonda Helps Revive Committee For The First Amendment - Honolulu Civil Beat - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Pastor shot in the head by ICE agents sues Trump administration over First Amendment threats in Chicago - the-independent.com - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Are KY mans Halloween decorations protected by First Amendment? What experts say - Lexington Herald Leader - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- National Review : The First Amendment Applies to the Doctors Office, Too - Pacific Legal Foundation - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Are College GameDay Signs Protected by the First Amendment? - Freedom Forum - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Kirk, Kimmel and the First Amendment | Letter to the editor - Mercer Island Reporter - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmels First Amendment right to be annoying | Andrew D. Hayes - MassLive - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Muslim activists cite First Amendment as defense for vandalizing Texas church with anti-Israel graffiti - Christian Post - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- When Conversion Therapy Meets the First Amendment: A Landmark Case Before the U.S. Supreme Court - ZENIT - English - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Your right to know: What the First Amendment really says about freedom of the press - The Laconia Daily Sun - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- A Matter of Fact: The gift of the First Amendment - 9News - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Rutherford Co. teacher fired for comments about Kirk files First Amendment lawsuit - The Daily News Journal - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Why free speech rights got left out of the Constitution and added in later via the First Amendment - The Conversation - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Mary Rose Papandrea Installed as Burchfield Professor of First Amendment and Free Speech Law - GW Today - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Supreme Court Weighs First Amendment Challenge to Colorados Ban on Conversion Therapy for Minors - Law Commentary - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- 'We took the freedom of speech away:' Trump on flag burning protection, First Amendment - USA Today - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Jane Fonda heads celebrity-organized Committee for the First Amendment - The Tufts Daily - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Pastor shot in the head by ICE agents sues Trump administration over First Amendment threats in Chicago - The Independent - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- CAC Release: Colorado Banned Conversion Therapy Because It Is Harmful. That Conversion Therapy is Accomplished Through Speech Does Not Make Colorados... - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Board of Health gets updates in wake of First Amendment audit controversy - Hopkinton Independent - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- A new lawsuit claims the federal government is infringing on first amendment rights | First Listen - NPR Illinois - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Letter to the editor: Beware of abridgement of the First Amendment - The Independent Record - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- NPPA raises First Amendment concerns over largest drone flight ban ever issued in US - Editor and Publisher - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Why free speech rights got left out of the Constitution and added in later via the First Amendment - EL OBRERO | Periodismo Transversal - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Cancel culture is undermining the First Amendment and the press is helping | Column - Tampa Bay Times - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirks Death Has Created New Debates Around The First Amendment - Religion Unplugged - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- FBI Cuts Ties With Southern Poverty Law Center, Anti-Defamation League After Conservative Complaints - First Amendment Watch - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- How Unique is the First Amendment? featuring Floyd Abrams Harrington School of Communication and Media - The University of Rhode Island - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Apple and Google Block Apps That Crowdsource ICE Sightings. Some Warn of Chilling Effects - First Amendment Watch - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Iconic First Amendment Attorney To Offer Forecast 2026 Keynote - Radio & Television Business Report - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Opinion: Local journalism is too important to give up on, and the First Amendment is too important to surrender - Anchorage Daily News - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- The Trump administration is waging a systematic assault on First Amendment - The Durango Herald - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Press, protesters sue Trump administration over First Amendment violations at ICE facility in Broadview - Yahoo - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- SCOTUS To Consider Whether Conversion Therapy Bans Violate First Amendment - GO Magazine - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- California educators First Amendment rights face test in wake of Charlie Kirks killing - EdSource - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Reagan-Appointed Judge Calls Out Trumps Full-Throated Assault on the First Amendment - Democracy Docket - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Federal judge overturns part of Fla. book-ban law, drawing on nearly 100 years of precedent protecting First Amendment access to ideas - Middle... - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Senators Blumenthal and Warren on First Amendment and the FCC - C-SPAN - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- A Word From Legal: Social Media, the First Amendment, and You - Maryland State Education Association - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- League of Women Voters spotlights First Amendment - Midland Daily News - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- A grave dancing teacher tests the First Amendment in San Jacinto public schools - Orange County Register - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Clemson University being sued, claiming the school violated First Amendment - WLTX - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- First Amendment invoked in bid to demolish Holy Cross Catholic Church. Here's what historic board decided - IndyStar - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Is counseling entitled to protection under the First Amendment? - American Psychological Association (APA) - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Jane Fonda Relaunches Committee for the First Amendment With Support of 550 Celebrities Including Pedro Pascal, Viola Davis and More - Variety - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- US stars back relaunched Committee for the First Amendment - Music Ally - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Jane Fonda reboots Committee for the First Amendment: Artists must speak out before its too late - The Hill - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Nearly 80 years after McCarthyism, Jane Fonda relaunches Committee for the First Amendment: The stakes are too high - CNN - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Full-throated assault on the First Amendment: Judge rips into Trump over attempts to deport pro-Palestinian academics - CNN - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Your right to know: What the First Amendment really says about freedom of the press - The Montpelier Bridge - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Rhode Island Latino Arts vs. the Trump administration: Inside a First Amendment court battle - Rhode Island PBS - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: School district doesnt believe in First Amendment - Rogue Valley Times - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Judge Finds the Trump Administration Unconstitutionally Targeted Noncitizens Over Gaza War Protests - First Amendment Watch - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Jane Fonda Relaunches the Committee for the First Amendment with 550+ Signatories (Including Me) - The Ankler. - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Jane Fonda Relaunches McCarthy-Era Committee For The First Amendment With Support Of 550 Celebrities Including Barbra Streisand, Pedro Pascal, Ben... - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Committee to Protect Journalists calls on FCC chair to respect First Amendment rights, press freedom - Editor and Publisher - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Trump is targeting the First Amendment rights of all Americans - The Contrarian - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Sens. Blumenthal and Warren Hold Forum on First Amendment and FCC - C-SPAN - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- The First Amendment Applies to the Doctors Office, Too - National Review - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- Readers respond: Stand strong for First Amendment - OregonLive.com - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- The First Amendment as a racist weapon - People's World - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- Judge Rules MyPillow Guy Mike Lindell Defamed Smartmatic With False Claims on Voting Machines - First Amendment Watch - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- Someone remind Florida universities that you either have a First Amendment, or you dont - Creative Loafing Tampa - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- A Big Win for the First Amendment in Retaliatory Case Filed Against Journalist Timothy Burke - freepress.net - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- Guest Post: Your favorite college team is likely to be violating the First Amendment at its stadium - Extra Points - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- Where America stands on the First Amendment: key takeaways - Free Speech Center - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- The Trump administrations relationship with the First Amendment - 1A | Speak Freely - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- Voices of the Newsroom: Is comedy a First Amendment right? - Los Angeles Loyolan - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- New York Times columnist discusses the state of free speech and the First Amendment at WashU - studlife.com - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- Does the First Amendment Apply to Hate Speech?: News Article - Independent Institute - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- In 'Crucial Victory for the First Amendment,' Charges Against Journalist Timothy Burke Dismissed - Common Dreams - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- The First Amendment: 7 things you need to know - baldwin-bulletin.com - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel Thanks Trump for Record Ratings After Suspension; Julia Louis-Dreyfus Brings Host a Puppy Whos a Big Fan of the First Amendment - Variety - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel May Be Back. Trumps Attacks on the First Amendment Arent Over - Rolling Stone - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- How the First Amendment protects Americans speech and how it does not - The Conversation - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- First Amendment lawyer on Jimmy Kimmel, the FCC and free speech - CBS News - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]