1st Amendment – Revolutionary War and Beyond!
We are considering offers for the sale of this website. Use the contact form in the left column to contact us for more information.
The 1st Amendment is the most well known to Americans of all the amendments in the Bill of Rights. It contains some of the most familiar phrases in political discussion, such as freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The 1st Amendment reads like this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The 1st Amendment protects your right to believe and practice whatever religious principles you choose and your right to say what you believe, even if it is unpopular or against the will of elected officials.
It also protects your right to publish any information you want, join together with whomever you want and ask the government to correct its own errors.
What exactly does the 1st Amendment mean and how does it apply to people today? Does it have relevance to you today? It sure does. In fact, it affects just about everything you do.
The 1st Amendment has seven clauses. This page has a brief description of each clause with links to more detailed information about the history and purpose of each section.
The Opening Phrase of the 1st Amendment says "Congress shall make no law." This opening phrase immediately tells exactly who this amendment is aimed at... and that entity is Congress. So the 1st Amendment specifically prohibits Congress from making laws interfering with the rights mentioned in the amendment.
It does not however, prohibit the states from making such laws, nor does it prohibit individuals from restricting these rights to those who may be under their authority, such as a parent and child or an employer and an employee.
For one hundred years the 1st Amendment was understood to only apply to the federal government, but after the Civil War and the 14th Amendment was added to the Constitution, courts began to forbid the states to interfere with these rights as well due to an idea called "due process of law."
Learn more about the Opening Phrase of the 1st Amendment here.
The Establishment Clause is the part of the 1st Amendment that says Congress shall make no law "respecting an establishment of religion." This is a very crucial part of the American Constitution. It prohibits the government from establishing a state religion or denomination and from directing people in what they must believe.
Without the Establishment Clause, the government could choose a state religion and force everyone to participate in it. It could also punish anyone who didn't adhere to its chosen faith.
This clause has been the focus of much debate in the last half century. Some Americans believe that whenever the government is involved, absolutely all religious expression must be forbidden in order to comply with the Establishment Clause.
For example, they might say a public school football team should not pray at a football game because the school is a government funded school.
Other Americans believe the government must make certain allowances for religious expressions in public events and buildings because Americans are a very religious people. They belive a high school football team prayer or a government employee displaying a cross at work does not violate the Establishment Clause because it is simply a personal expression and not an expression endorsed by the state.
Indeed, in the minds of some, banning expressions of religious faith like this is a violation of another clause of the 1st Amendment - the Free Exercise Clause, because it seeks to control the religious expressions of citizens.
Learn more about the history and purpose of the Establishment Clause here.
The Free Exercise Clause is the part of the 1st Amendment that says Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or "the free exercise thereof." This phrase deals with the restriction on Congress to regulate anyone's religious practices.
In general, Congress cannot tell people how they can or cannot express their religious beliefs. Such things as telling people when or how to pray, when they should go to church or to whom they should pray, are off limits to lawmakers.
In general, this is the case, but sometimes, minority religious groups may want to practice something that is not generally accepted or that the state has a very strong interest in regulating. For example, polygamy, ritual sacrifice and drug usage have been banned at times, because there is a compelling public interest in eliminating these behaviors.
In such cases, the Supreme Court has often ruled that the Free Exercise Clause does not apply. In other words, the Free Exercise Clause does not give free license to any behavior that someone says is their religious belief.
You can learn all about the Free Exercise Clause here.
The Freedom of Speech Clause is the part of the 1st Amendment that says, "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech."
British history contained a long string of suppression by those in authority of those with whom they disagreed. Many British subjects had been thrown in prison for voicing their religious and political beliefs. The Americans intended to prevent this from ever happening in their newly formed republic.
This is one of the protections in the Constitution that Americans hold most dear. They value it because it allows them to speak out against government policies they don't like. It also allows them to express the religious beliefs of their choosing.
Negatively speaking, many people abuse this right by slandering people they disagree with, or using ugly and offensive language, racial epithets or hateful language about people who are different than they are.
Generally, freedom of speech is considered to be not only the words people speak, but any type of expression that is used to convey an idea. Such things as picketing, wearing symbols or burning the flag are considered protected forms of speech because they are expressing the ideas of the people participating in them.
You can learn more about the Freedom of Speech Clause by clicking here.
The Freedom of the Press Clause states that "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom... of the press."
This was a very important principle to the Founding Fathers of America because of the importance the press played during the Revolutionary War.
Without the press, the Founding Fathers would have found it very difficult to distribute their views to people in other parts of the country. The press turned out to be a very important instigation in getting Americans to consolidate their views against England and in spreading the concepts that would justify a break with England.
English history contained no freedoms for the press whatsoever. All publications were subject to governmental review before publication. Criticisms of the government were strictly prosecuted as sedition. All Americans wanted the right to criticize their government freely as well as to discuss other topics whenever they chose.
If you would like to learn more about the Freedom of the Press Clause, please click here.
The Freedom of Assembly Clause is the part of the First Amendment that reads like this: "Congress shall make no law... abridging... the right of the people peaceably to assemble..." This clause is also sometimes referred to as the Freedom of Association Clause. This clause protects the right to assemble in peace to all Americans.
The Freedom of Assembly was very important to early Americans because without the right to assemble, they could not coordinate their opposition to the British government. The Freedom of Assembly was recognized to be of utmost importance if the Americans were to be successful in establishing a government of the people.
The Freedom of Assembly Clause has been relied upon by many groups in American history, such as civil rights groups, women's suffrage groups and labor unions. Government officials in each case tried to restrict the speech of these groups and prevent them from meeting, organizing and getting their message out. The Freedom of Assembly proved to be an important factor that allowed these groups to prosper and see their visions fulfilled.
You can learn more about the history and importance of the Freedom of Assembly Clause here.
Click to enlarge
King George III
by Allan Ramsay
The Freedom of Petition Clause of the 1st Amendment reads like this:
"Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom... of the people... to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The freedom to petition the government was very important to early Americans because of their experience with trying to get King George III and Parliament to respond to their grievances. The colonists were so angry about the Monarchy's refusal to acknowledge their grievances that they mentioned this fact in the Declaration of Independence.
The freedom to petition the government for redress of grievances has come to include the right to do such things as picketing, protesting, conducting peaceful sitins or boycotts and addressing government officials through any media available.
You can read more about the history and meaning of the Freedom of Petition Clause here.
Preamble to the Bill of Rights Learn about the 1st Amendment here. Learn about the 2nd Amendment here. Learn about the 3rd Amendment here. Learn about the 4th Amendment here. Learn about the 5th Amendment here. Learn about the 6th Amendment here. Learn about the 7th Amendment here. Learn about the 8th Amendment here. Learn about the 9th Amendment here. Learn about the 10th Amendment here.
Read the Bill of Rights here.
Learn more about the Bill of Rights with the following articles:
Last updated 8/7/12
Return to top of 1st Amendment
Revolutionary War and Beyond Home
Follow this link:
1st Amendment - Revolutionary War and Beyond!
- 7 Former FCC Commissioners Want 'News Distortion Policy' Rescinded for Threatening First Amendment - TheWrap - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Crystal River and the First Amendment - chronicleonline.com - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- AG Sulzberger Honored with The James C. Goodale First Amendment Award - The New York Times Company - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Kansas county pays $3M for forgetting the First Amendment - Freedom of the Press Foundation - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Teachers and social media: A First Amendment fight - WGCU - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- What To Know About How Florida Will Teach McCarthyism and the Cold War - First Amendment Watch - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Texas A&M University Professors Now Need Approval for Some Race and Gender Topics - First Amendment Watch - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Santa Ana cops need a refresher on the First Amendment - Orange County Register - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Was Mississippi State student arrested over 'free speech'? See what the First Amendment says - The Clarion-Ledger - November 16th, 2025 [November 16th, 2025]
- Social media restrictions and First Amendment rights for children | 'Law of the Land' on the Sound of Ideas - Ideastream - November 10th, 2025 [November 10th, 2025]
- Test your Constitutional knowledge: When can free exercise of religion be limited under the First Amendment? - AL.com - November 10th, 2025 [November 10th, 2025]
- Editing federal employees emails to blame Democrats for shutdown violated their First Amendment rights, judge says - CNN - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I am in love with the First Amendment | Opinion - PennLive.com - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- EXCLUSIVE: Texas Good Ol Boys Club vs. First Amendment Krottinger Arrested Over Meme - Yahoo - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Speeds up New Rules That Would Make It Easier To Charge Some Protesters - First Amendment Watch - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- America struggles to balance First Amendment free speech with gun rights amid political violence - Milwaukee Independent - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Man Who Threw Sandwich at Federal Agent in Washington Is Found Not Guilty of Assault Charge - First Amendment Watch - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Judge Will Order Federal Agents in Chicago To Restrict Using Force Against Protesters and Media - First Amendment Watch - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- EXCLUSIVE: Texas Good Ol Boys Club vs. First Amendment - Krottinger Arrested Over Meme - Dallas Express - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Inside the 'harsh terrain' of Columbia University's First Amendment predicament - USA Today - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Biden Warns of Dark Days for the Country as He Urges Americans To Stay Optimistic - First Amendment Watch - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Victory! Court Rules that Minnesota Horse Teacher is Able to Continue Teaching in Important First Amendment Win - The Institute for Justice - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Anti-Abortion Pregnancy Centers Are Looking To Offer Much More Than Ultrasounds and Diapers - First Amendment Watch - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- May the First Amendment be with you: Protester sues after Imperial March performance sparks arrest - Fast Company - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- Mitchell and Mayes ask judge to toss out law against prosecutions targeting First Amendment rights - KJZZ - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- Creator of app that tracked ICE talks about its removal and the First Amendment - NPR - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- How Trump's Threats Against the NFL Could Violate the First Amendment - American Civil Liberties Union - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- 'He played The Imperial March as he walked': Man arrested for playing Darth Vader's theme at National Guard troops sues over alleged First Amendment... - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Arizona law protects First Amendment rights. Maricopa County wants to overturn it - azcentral.com and The Arizona Republic - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- John Foster: First Amendment rights and whether you really should say that - dailyjournal.net - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Creator of app that tracked ICE talks about its removal and the First Amendment - Boise State Public Radio - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Author Michael Wolff Sues Melania Trump, Saying She Threatened $1B Suit Over Epstein-Related Claims - First Amendment Watch - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Creator of app that tracked ICE talks about its removal and the First Amendment - WVIA Public Media - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel Clash Was "Never About The First Amendment", Sinclair Exec Insists; FCC "Overreach" & Nexstar-Tegna Mega-Deal... - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Sinclair COO Rob Weisbord insisted that the local TV giant's recent clash with late-night host Jimmy Kimmel was "never about the First... - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Historys Lessons for the Second Committee for the First Amendment - The Nation - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Why did the city turn off social media comments? Does that violate the First Amendment? - WQOW - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Euphemisms, Political Speech, and the First Amendment - The Dispatch - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Indiana University Fires Student Newspaper Adviser Who Refused To Block News Stories - First Amendment Watch - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Mike Johnson Accuses No Kings Protesters of Blatantly Exercising First Amendment Rights - The Borowitz Report - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Florida chooses harassment and intimidation, over the First Amendment | Letters - Tampa Bay Times - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Test your Constitutional knowledge: Are these protests protected by the First Amendment? - AL.com - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Know Your First Amendment Rights Before the Assignment - National Press Foundation - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Lawrence school board candidates share how they would apply the First Amendment while in office - Lawrence Journal-World - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Florida chooses harassment and intimidation, over the First Amendment | Letters - Yahoo - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- First Amendment rights and whether you really should say that - The Republic News - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- The Knight Institutes Ramya Krishnan on the Trump Administrations Unconstitutional Targeting of Noncitizen Speech - First Amendment Watch - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- A Brief Legal Analysis of the Department of Educations Proposed Compact for Higher Education - | Knight First Amendment Institute - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Attorney General Bonta Co-Leads Multistate Coalition in Defense of First Amendment Protections for Noncitizen Students and Faculty - State of... - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Brown University Rejects Trumps Offer for Priority Funding, Citing Concerns Over Academic Freedom - First Amendment Watch - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Prominent First Amendment lawyer Floyd Abrams to give annual Amanpour lecture Rhody Today - The University of Rhode Island - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Do Government Media Policies Like the Pentagons Violate the First Amendment? - Freedom Forum - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- COLUMN: Jimmy Kimmel cant hide behind the First Amendment | Mike Rosen - Denver Gazette - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Journalists Turn in Access Badges, Exit Pentagon Rather Than Agree to New Reporting Rules - First Amendment Watch - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- 5 days and the First Amendment's future: CSU reinstates free speech policy following weeklong protests - The Rocky Mountain Collegian - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Federal Judge Blocks Texas From Enforcing Law Giving the First Amendment a Bedtime by Banning Overnight Protest Encampments - The New York Sun - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Fox News rebuke shows Trumps attacks on First Amendment are hitting roadblocks - CNN - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Americans agree the First Amendment is important, but many are unsure why, survey says - AL.com - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Chiles v. Salazar : a Defining Test for the First Amendment - City Journal - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- State of the First Amendment Address to focus on algorithms, free expression, AI - University of Kentucky - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- New York Times, AP, Newsmax Among News Outlets Who Say They Wont Sign New Pentagon Rules - First Amendment Watch - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Editors notebook: The First Amendment under threat in Tennessee - Tennessee Lookout - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- U.S. news organizations reject Pentagon reporting rules, say they undermine First Amendment - The Globe and Mail - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Why free speech rights got left out of the Constitution and added in later via the First Amendment - The Fulcrum - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- California Wants To Punish Social Platforms for Aiding and Abetting the First Amendment - Reason Magazine - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Hegseths First Amendment war: The press is correct to walk away from ridiculous Pentagon pledge - New York Daily News - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- The First Amendment is fading and we are letting it happen - Talon Marks - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Friday Oct. 17 12:30pm-1:30pm Zoom event: Trump, the Media, and the First Amendment - Reason Magazine - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- California wants to make platforms pay for offensive user posts. The First Amendment and Section 230 say otherwise. - FIRE | Foundation for Individual... - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- 'Retaliation For Protected First Amendment Activity' - NASA Workers Union Sues Trump Over 'Unlawful' Effort To Strip Collective Bargaining Rights -... - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- We took the freedom of speech away: On First Amendment, Trump says quiet part out loud - MSNBC News - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Opinion: Why NPRs dispute with CPB really is about the First Amendment - current.org - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Jane Fonda Helps Revive Committee For The First Amendment - Honolulu Civil Beat - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Pastor shot in the head by ICE agents sues Trump administration over First Amendment threats in Chicago - the-independent.com - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Are KY mans Halloween decorations protected by First Amendment? What experts say - Lexington Herald Leader - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- National Review : The First Amendment Applies to the Doctors Office, Too - Pacific Legal Foundation - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Are College GameDay Signs Protected by the First Amendment? - Freedom Forum - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Kirk, Kimmel and the First Amendment | Letter to the editor - Mercer Island Reporter - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmels First Amendment right to be annoying | Andrew D. Hayes - MassLive - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Muslim activists cite First Amendment as defense for vandalizing Texas church with anti-Israel graffiti - Christian Post - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]