Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution – Wikipedia
The Twenty-fifth Amendment (Amendment XXV) to the United States Constitution deals with succession to the Presidency and establishes procedures both for filling a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, as well as responding to Presidential disabilities. It supersedes the ambiguous wording of Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution, which does not expressly state whether the Vice President becomes the President or Acting President if the President dies, resigns, is removed from office or is otherwise unable to discharge the powers of the presidency.[1] The Twenty-fifth Amendment was adopted on February 10, 1967.[2]
Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.
Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.
Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.[3]
Article II, Section 1, Clause 6 of the Constitution states:
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
That clause was unclear regarding Presidential succession and inability; it did not state who had the power to declare a President incapacitated.[1] Also, it did not provide a mechanism for filling a Vice Presidential vacancy prior to the next Presidential election. The vagueness of this clause caused difficulties many times before the Twenty-fifth Amendment's adoption:
President Dwight D. Eisenhower attempted to clarify procedures through a signed agreement with Vice President Richard Nixon, drafted by Attorney General Herbert Brownell Jr.. However, this agreement did not have the authority of a constitutional amendment.[9]
All of these incidents made it evident that clearer guidelines were needed.[1] There were two proposals for providing those guidelines.
In 1963, Senator Kenneth Keating of New York proposed a Constitutional amendment which would have enabled Congress to enact legislation providing for how to determine when a President is "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", rather than, as the Twenty-fifth Amendment does, having the Constitution so provide.[10] This proposal was based upon a recommendation of the American Bar Association in 1960.[11]
The text of the proposal read:[12]
In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the said office shall devolve on the Vice President. In case of the inability of the President to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the said powers and duties shall devolve on the Vice President, until the inability be removed. The Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then be President, or, in case of inability, act as President, and such officer shall be or act as President accordingly, until a President shall be elected or, in case of inability, until the inability shall be earlier removed. The commencement and termination of any inability shall be determined by such method as Congress shall by law provide.
Senators raised concerns that the Congress could either abuse such authority[13] or neglect to enact any such legislation after the adoption of this proposal.[14]Tennessee Senator Estes Kefauver, the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, a long-time advocate for addressing the disability question, spearheaded the effort until he died of a heart attack on August 10, 1963.[15][16] Senator Keating was defeated in the 1964 election, but Senator Roman Hruska of Nebraska took up Keating's cause as a new member of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments.[9]
The assassination of John F. Kennedy showed the need for a clear way for determining presidential disability in the context of the Cold War.[17] The new President, Lyndon B. Johnson, had once suffered a heart attack,[18] and the next two people in line for the presidency were the 71-year-old Speaker of the House John McCormack,[17][19] and the 86-year-old Senate President pro tempore Carl Hayden.[17][19] Senator Birch Bayh succeeded Kefauver as Chairman of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments and set about advocating for a detailed amendment dealing with presidential disability.[17]
On January 6, 1965, Senator Birch Bayh proposed S. J. Res. 1 in the Senate and Representative Emanuel Celler (Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee) proposed H. J. Res. 1 in the House of Representatives. Their proposal specified the process by which a President could be declared "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", thereby making the Vice President an Acting President, and how the President could regain the powers of his office. Also, their proposal provided a way to fill a vacancy in the office of Vice President before the next presidential election. This was as opposed to the KeatingKefauver proposal, which neither provided for filling a vacancy in the office of Vice President prior to the next presidential election nor provided a process for determining presidential disability. In 1964, the American Bar Association endorsed the type of proposal which Bayh and Celler advocated.[20] On January 28, 1965, President Johnson endorsed S. J. Res. 1 in a statement to Congress.[9] Their proposal received bipartisan support.[21]
On February 19, the Senate passed the amendment, but the House passed a different version of the amendment on April 13. On April 22, it was returned to the Senate with revisions.[9] There were four areas of disagreement between the House and Senate versions:
On July 6, after a conference committee ironed out differences between the versions,[22] the final version of the amendment was passed by both Houses of the Congress and presented to the states for ratification.[23]
The Congress proposed the Twenty-fifth Amendment on July 6, 1965, and the amendment was ratified by the following states:[2]
The following states have not ratified the amendment:
Just six days after its submission, Nebraska and Wisconsin were the first states to ratify the amendment. On February 10, 1967, Minnesota and Nevada were the 37th and 38th states to ratify, respectively. On February 23, 1967, in a ceremony in the East Room of the White House, General Services Administrator Lawson Knott certified the amendment's adoption.
Section 1 codified the "Tyler Precedent" regarding when a President is removed from office, dies, or resigns. In any of these situations, the Vice President immediately becomes President.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment's adoption, a Vice Presidential vacancy remained until the start of the next presidential term. The Vice Presidency has been vacant several times due to death, resignation, or succession to the Presidency. Often these vacancies lasted for several years.
Under Section 2, whenever there is a vacancy in the office of Vice President, the President nominates a successor who becomes Vice President if confirmed by a majority vote of both Houses of the Congress.
Section 3 provides that when the President transmits a written declaration to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, stating that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of the Presidency, and until the President sends another written declaration to the aforementioned officers declaring himself able to resume discharging those powers and duties, the Vice President discharges those powers and duties as Acting President.
Section 4 is the only part of the amendment that has never been invoked.[25] It allows the Vice President, together with a "majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide", to declare the President "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office" by submitting a written declaration to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. As with Section 3, the Vice President would become Acting President.
Section 4 is meant to be invoked should the President's incapacitation prevent him from discharging his duties, but he is unable or unwilling to provide the written declaration called for by Section 3. The President may resume exercising the Presidential duties by sending a written declaration to the President pro tempore and the Speaker of the House.
Should the Vice President and Cabinet believe the President is still "unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office", they may within four days of the President's declaration submit another declaration that the President is incapacitated. If not already in session, the Congress must then assemble within 48 hours. The Congress has 21 days to decide the issue. If within the 21 days two-thirds of each house of Congress vote that the President is incapacitated, the Vice President would "continue" to be Acting President. Should the Congress resolve the issue in favor of the President, or make no decision within the 21 days allotted, then the President would "resume" discharging the powers and duties of his office. The use of the words "continue" and "resume" imply that the Vice President remains Acting President while Congress deliberates.
However, the President may again submit a written declaration of recovery to the President pro tempore and the Speaker of the House. That declaration could be responded to by the Acting President and the Cabinet in the same way as stated earlier. The specified 21-day Congressional procedure would start again.
The Twenty-fifth Amendment has been invoked six times since its ratification. The first three times were applications of Sections 1 and 2 in the context of scandals surrounding the Nixon Administration. The latter three were applications of Section 3 in connection to the President's undergoing a medical procedure requiring general anesthesia.
On October 12, 1973, following Vice President Spiro Agnew's resignation two days earlier, President Richard Nixon nominated Representative Gerald Ford of Michigan to succeed Agnew as Vice President.
The United States Senate voted 923 to confirm Ford on November 27 and, on December 6, the House of Representatives did the same by a vote of 38735. Ford was sworn in later that day before a joint session of the United States Congress.[26]
President Richard Nixon resigned on August 9, 1974, resulting in Vice President Gerald Ford succeeding to the office of President.[27] Gerald Ford is the only person ever to be Vice President, and later President, without being elected to either office.[28]
When Gerald Ford became President, the office of Vice President became vacant. On August 20, 1974, after considering Melvin Laird and George H. W. Bush, President Ford nominated former New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller to be the new vice president.
On December 10, 1974, Rockefeller was confirmed 907 by the Senate. On December 19, 1974, Rockefeller was confirmed 287128 by the House and sworn into office later that day in the Senate chamber.[26]
On July 12, 1985, President Ronald Reagan underwent a colonoscopy, during which a pre-cancerous lesion called a villous adenoma was discovered. Upon being told by his physician (Dr. Edward Cattow) that he could undergo surgery immediately or in two to three weeks, Reagan elected to have it removed immediately.
That afternoon, Reagan consulted with White House counsel Fred Fielding by telephone, debating whether to invoke the amendment and, if so, whether such a transfer would set an undesirable precedent. Fielding and White House Chief of Staff Donald Regan recommended that Reagan transfer power and two letters doing so were drafted: the first letter specifically invoked Section 3 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment; the second only mentioned that Reagan was mindful of this provision. At 10:32a.m. on July 13, Reagan signed the second letter and ordered its delivery to the appropriate officers as required under the amendment.[29]
Books such as The President Has Been Shot: Confusion, Disability and the 25th Amendment, by Herbert Abrams, and Reagan's autobiography, An American Life, argue President Reagan's intent to transfer power to Vice President Bush was clear. Fielding himself adds:
I personally know he did intend to invoke the amendment, and he conveyed that to all of his staff and it was conveyed to the VP as well as the President of the Senate. He was also very firm in his wish not to create a precedent binding his successor.
On June 29, 2002, President George W. Bush underwent a colonoscopy and chose to invoke Section 3 of the amendment, temporarily transferring his powers to Vice President Dick Cheney. The medical procedure began at 7:09a.m. EDT and ended at 7:29a.m. EDT. Bush woke up twenty minutes later, but did not resume his presidential powers and duties until 9:24a.m. EDT after the president's doctor, Richard Tubb, conducted an overall examination. Tubb said he recommended the additional time to make sure the sedative had no aftereffects. Unlike Reagan's 1985 letter, Bush's 2002 letter specifically cited Section 3 as the authority for the transfer of power.[29]
On July 21, 2007, President Bush again invoked Section 3 in response to having to undergo a colonoscopy, temporarily transferring his powers to Vice President Cheney. President Bush invoked Section 3 at 7:16a.m. EDT. He reclaimed his powers at 9:21a.m. EDT. As happened in 2002, Bush specifically cited Section 3 when he transferred the Presidential powers to the Vice President and when he reclaimed those powers.[29]
There are two documented instances in which invocation of Section 4 of the Twenty-fifth Amendment was considered, both of which involved the 40th President of the United States, Ronald Reagan.
Following the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan on March 30, 1981, Vice President George H. W. Bush did not assume the presidential powers and duties as Acting President. Reagan was unable to invoke Section 3, because he was in surgery. Bush did not invoke Section 4, because he was on a plane returning from Texas. Reagan was out of surgery by the time Bush arrived in Washington.[30] In 1995, Birch Bayh, the primary sponsor of the amendment in the Senate, wrote that Section 4 should have been invoked.[31]
Upon becoming the White House Chief of Staff in 1987, Howard Baker was advised by his predecessor's staff to be prepared for a possible invocation of the Twenty-fifth Amendment[32] due to Reagan's perceived laziness and ineptitude.[33][34]
According to the PBS program American Experience,
What Baker's transition team was told by Donald Regan's staff that weekend shocked them. Reagan was "inattentive, inept", and "lazy", and Baker should be prepared to invoke the 25th Amendment to relieve him of his duties.
Reagan biographer Edmund Morris stated in an interview aired on the program,
The incoming Baker people all decided to have a meeting with him on Monday, their first official meeting with the President, and to cluster around the table in the Cabinet room and watch him very, very closely to see how he behaved, to see if he was indeed losing his mental grip.
Morris went on to explain,
Reagan who was, of course, completely unaware that they were launching a death watch on him, came in stimulated by the press of all these new people and performed splendidly. At the end of the meeting, they figuratively threw up their hands realizing he was in perfect command of himself.[33][34]
Read more:
Twenty-fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia
- Relax, We Cant Invoke the Twenty-Fifth Amendment Every Time a President Offers to Let an Enemy Bomb an American City - McSweeneys Internet Tendency - October 6th, 2026 [October 6th, 2026]
- Fauci's decision to invoke the Fifth Amendment tees up a legal debate and a contempt vote - Dayton Daily News - August 31st, 2026 [August 31st, 2026]
- Prichard police detectives bag of money, Fifth Amendment invocation form basis of new trial demand in homicide - fox10tv.com - August 22nd, 2026 [August 22nd, 2026]
- Fauci refuses Senate appearance after invoking Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in COVID probe - New York Post - August 22nd, 2026 [August 22nd, 2026]
- Letter to the Editor: Trump and the Fifth Amendment double standard - courierherald.com - August 22nd, 2026 [August 22nd, 2026]
- Fauci refuses Senate appearance after invoking Fifth Amendment more than 100 times in COVID probe - Fox News - August 16th, 2026 [August 16th, 2026]
- Trump sued on First and Fifth Amendment grounds over paid Truth Social access - Scripps News - August 16th, 2026 [August 16th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment over 100 times at Senate hearing - newuniversity.org - August 16th, 2026 [August 16th, 2026]
- Fauci walks away when pressed on Fifth Amendment, pandemic regrets - New York Post - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Pat McAfee pokes fun at Anthony Fauci pleading the Fifth Amendment live on ESPN - Fox News - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Here's how many times Trump invoked Fifth Amendment in civil fraud trial, according to a judge - Snopes - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes the Fifth Amendment at Senate hearing on COVID-19 pandemic origins - Scripps News - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- What It Means to Plead the Fifth Amendment - Time Magazine - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Aaron Rodgers calls Fauci coward, criminal for invoking the Fifth Amendment - WJTV - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci Invokes Fifth Amendment More Than 100 Times in Bitter Senate Hearing - The New York Times - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- In the News: Mark Osler on Anthony Faucis Fifth Amendment Claim - Newsroom | University of St. Thomas - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Dr. Fauci invokes his Fifth Amendment right not to testify at Senate hearing - NBC News - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment and declines to testify in Republican-led COVID-19 Senate hearing - Oregon Public Broadcasting - OPB - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - Live 5 News - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- CBS News | Legal Analysis on Whether Dr. Anthony Fauci Can Be Punished for Invoking Fifth Amendment - Loyola Marymount University - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- The scope of Faucis Fifth Amendment invocation may have to be settled in court - MS NOW - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Hawley trolls Fauci's blanket Fifth Amendment claims exposing 'contempt for this body' - Fox News - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WDAM-TV - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes fifth amendment and declines to testify in Senate Covid hearing - The Guardian - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WTVM.com - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Dr. Anthony Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in heated COVID-19 hearing - WTAE - August 4th, 2026 [August 4th, 2026]
- Faucis legal protection from pardon, Fifth Amendment is an open question - The Hill - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Anthony Fauci Invokes Fifth Amendment in Rand Paul Senate Hearing NPR - Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WBKO - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Washington Post. . Anthony Fauci repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during a Senate hearing Wednesday where Republicans pressed the retired... - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Dr. Fauci invokes the Fifth Amendment at Senate hearing on COVID pandemic - CBS News - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - fox8live.com - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WCTV - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - KEYC News Now - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WEEK | 25 News Now - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci Threatened With Contempt Of Congress After Invoking Fifth Amendment - Forbes - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - Cleveland 19 News - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - ABC7 WWSB - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WSAW - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WCAX - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WSFA - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Anthony Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment at fiery Senate hearing on Covid-19 - Financial Times - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WTHI-TV - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - KOLN | Nebraska Local News, Weather, Sports | Lincoln, NE - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes the Fifth Amendment over 100 times - CNN - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WPTA | 21Alive | Fort Wayne, IN - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - WVLT - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - wflx.com - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Fauci invokes Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing about COVID-19 pandemic - KOLD - July 30th, 2026 [July 30th, 2026]
- Opinion | Why I will use my Fifth Amendment rights before Congress today - The Washington Post - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- ActBlue C.E.O. Invokes Fifth Amendment Repeatedly in Testimony to Congress - The New York Times - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- ActBlue CEO invokes Fifth Amendment repeatedly in testimony to Congress - The Seattle Times - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- ActBlue CEO Will Invoke Fifth Amendment At Congressional Hearing - Campaigns & Elections - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- ActBlue CEO invokes Fifth Amendment in House hearing over illegal foreign donations - Fox Business - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- 'Okay, wow, didn't expect that one': Rep. Loudermilk stunned by ActBlue CEO's Fifth Amendment answer - The Economic Times - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- Urban Outfitters Inc Enters Into Fifth Amendment To Credit Agreement On May 19, 2026 - TradingView - May 27th, 2026 [May 27th, 2026]
- Principals who invoked their Fifth Amendment rights during CRCT investigation identified - Albany Herald - May 22nd, 2026 [May 22nd, 2026]
- User Clip: Clip: Use of the Fifth Amendment - C-SPAN - May 22nd, 2026 [May 22nd, 2026]
- Is the Twenty-fifth Amendment Really an Option? - The New Yorker - May 7th, 2026 [May 7th, 2026]
- Does the Fifth Amendment Protect You From Turning Over Documents (with Tiffany H. Eggers) - Dykema - May 1st, 2026 [May 1st, 2026]
- We have the Twenty-Fifth Amendment. Now is the time to use it. - lawdork.com - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Herald Tribune Events - The Fifth Amendment - Sarasota Herald-Tribune - March 26th, 2026 [March 26th, 2026]
- A full and perfect equivalent : Just Compensation and the Fifth Amendment - Pacific Legal Foundation - February 22nd, 2026 [February 22nd, 2026]
- Jeffrey Epstein's accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, pleaded the Fifth Amendment during the House Oversight Committee's deposition. - Facebook - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- Elie Honig Explains How Maxwell May Have Inadvertently Waived Her Fifth Amendment Protection - AOL.com - February 14th, 2026 [February 14th, 2026]
- Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment for nearly every question during his depositions. If he had nothing to hide, why stay silent? He used the same... - February 11th, 2026 [February 11th, 2026]
- Jeffrey Epstein Associate: Why is Ghislaine Maxwell Invoking the Fifth Amendment in a Congressional Probe? - The Sunday Guardian - February 11th, 2026 [February 11th, 2026]
- Maxwell invokes the Fifth Amendment at closed virtual House Oversight deposition - Rural Radio Network - February 11th, 2026 [February 11th, 2026]
- Ghislaine Maxwell expected to invoke Fifth Amendment in congressional deposition - Washington Examiner - February 11th, 2026 [February 11th, 2026]
- Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell cowardly pleads the Fifth Amendment during deposition - Sky News Australia - February 11th, 2026 [February 11th, 2026]
- Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Browns Mills Shopping Center Redevelopment OKd, Enabling Parties to Pursue Closing of Tract - Pine Barrens Tribune - February 7th, 2026 [February 7th, 2026]
- More Historical Evidence Showing that the Public Use Clause of the Fifth Amendment Does Not Allow Takings that Transfer Property to Private Parties -... - January 30th, 2026 [January 30th, 2026]
- Government Notifies CGST (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2025; Inserts Rule 31D on Retail Sale PriceBased Valuation and Adds New Clause (f) in Rule 86B,... - January 6th, 2026 [January 6th, 2026]
- The fifth amendment: A path back to the people? - The Jakarta Post - December 7th, 2025 [December 7th, 2025]
- Evertec Inc - On Nov 25, Enters Into Fifth Amendment To Credit Agreement - SEC Filing - TradingView - December 7th, 2025 [December 7th, 2025]
- Brooklyn mom of missing 11-year-old autistic boy invokes Fifth Amendment in Family Court - New York Daily News - December 7th, 2025 [December 7th, 2025]
- Stepmother Cites Fifth Amendment, Says FBI Probe Could Target Minor in Teen Cruise Ship Mystery Death - LAmag - November 24th, 2025 [November 24th, 2025]
- Officer invokes Fifth Amendment in trial of former SAPD officers - WOAI - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- BREAKING: Appellate Court finds one of Patrick Tate Adamiaks convictions violated Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment - Second Amendment... - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Ligado and the Fifth Amendment Fight Over Spectrum Rights - The National Interest - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]