Elon Musk Overstates Partisan Impact of Illegal Immigration on House Apportionment – FactCheck.org
In claiming that illegal immigration benefits Democrats, entrepreneur Elon Musk vastly overstated its impact on the apportionment of House seats and Electoral College votes.
The math, as I understand it, you can research this obviously very easily on the internet, its pretty straightforward to research this, but my understanding is that the Democrats would lose approximately 20 seats in the House if illegals were not counted in the census and thats also 20 less electoral votes for president, Musk said in an interview with journalist Don Lemon on March 19. So illegals absolutely do affect who controls the House and who controls the presidency. It does not affect the Senate.
Thats inaccurate.
In December 2019, the Center for Immigration Studies, a think tank that advocates lower immigration, released an analysis of the impact of legal and illegal immigration on the apportionment of seats in the U.S. House in 2020.
Looking only at immigrants in the country illegally the yardstick Musk employed CIS estimated they were responsible for the redistribution of three seats in 2020. Looking at it in partisan terms, two states with a Republican-controlled legislature and a Republican governor (Alabama and Ohio) and one state with a divided legislature and a Democratic governor (Minnesota) each had one fewer House seat in 2020 due to the inclusion of immigrants living in the country illegally in population counts. Gaining one extra seat were two blue states (New York and California) and one red state (Texas). In other words, the estimated net impact was that one Democratic state picked up a seat from a Republican state.
And, since electoral votes are apportioned based on the number of House and Senate members from each state, in that scenario, one Republican electoral vote was swung to a Democratic vote.
CIS also analyzed the impact of all immigration, both legal and illegal, and concluded it was responsible for a shift of 26 House seats. But that includes immigrants who became U.S. citizens, the U.S.-born children of immigrants living in the U.S. legally or illegally, as well as other immigrants living legally in the country.
A July 2020 analysis by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center, based on government data, similarly found: If unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. were removed from the 2020 census apportionment count three states could each lose a seat they otherwise would have had and three others each could gain one. Its analysis concurred with CIS on five of the six states affected, but instead of New York gaining a seat because of the impact of illegal immigration, Pew found that Florida gained a seat.
In other words, in 2020, if immigrants lacking permanent legal status hadnt been included in population counts,two red states and one blue state would have gained a seat, and two red states and one blue state would have lost a seat. A wash, politically speaking, when it comes to balance in the House or electoral votes.
To add some perspective, over the last 10 elections, presidents have won by an average of about 176 electoral votes over the runner-up though in 2000, Republican George W. Bush beat Democrat Al Gore by just five Electoral College votes. In the 2020 election, Joe Biden beat Donald Trump by 74 electoral votes. In other words, there is no evidence that the inclusion of immigrants living in the country illegally in census counts and apportionment calculations has swung a presidential election to one party or another. And in 2020, it did not affect the partisan majority in the House.
Reapportionment for the House of Representatives is done every 10 years based on the decennial census. A states electoral votes are determined by the number of senators and representatives it has. So if a state gains or loses a House seat, it also gains or loses an electoral vote.
As required by the 14th Amendment, the apportionment of seats in Congress for each state is calculated according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State. There is no indication in the Constitution that immigrants without permanent legal status should not be included in reapportionment.
Numerous efforts have been made over the years to challenge the legality of including those immigrants in the apportionment process, but none has been successful. In March 2018, the Commerce Department under President Donald Trump attempted to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. (The mandatory decennial census doesnt ask whether someone is a citizen.)
But Trumps efforts were quickly challenged in the courts, and in July 2019, Trump abandoned his effort to include the question, though he tried to use other government sources to obtain a count of immigrants living in the country illegally.
Trump later attempted via a memorandum in July 2020 to exclude from the apportionment base aliens who are not in a lawful immigration status.
Excluding these illegal aliens from the apportionment base is more consonant with the principles of representative democracy underpinning our system of Government, the memo said. Affording congressional representation, and therefore formal political influence, to States on account of the presence within their borders of aliens who have not followed the steps to secure a lawful immigration status under our laws undermines those principles.
Allowing immigrants in the country to be included in the counts used for apportionment would also create perverse incentives encouraging violations of Federal law, the memo stated. States adopting policies that encourage illegal aliens to enter this country and that hobble Federal efforts to enforce the immigration laws passed by the Congress should not be rewarded with greater representation in the House of Representatives.
Late in 2020, the Supreme Court delayeda ruling on a court challenge to Trumps memo, and on his first day in office, President Joe Biden issued an executive orderrevoking Trumps memo and stating thatcensus counts in each state are donewithout regard to whether its residents are in lawful immigration status.
While it is true that Census includes this population and that they are counted in Congressional districts, it is important to note that this population is routinely undercounted for multiple reasons and therefore the effect is likely minimal on district appropriations, Ariel Ruiz Soto, a senior policy analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, told us via email. But also, many of these immigrants are part of mixed-status households that include many US citizens who have critical needs and must be counted to receive funding and services (for example, in schools). And yes many red states also have notable unauthorized immigrant populations.
The U.S. Census is used in many federal funding formulas. In fiscal year 2021, it informed the distribution of more than $2.8 trillion in federal funding.
Although the next reapportionment wont happen until 2030, a surge in illegal immigration during the Biden presidency has brought the issue back to the legislative forefront.
On Jan. 25, 21 senators introduced the Equal Representation Act, which seeks to require a citizenship question on the decennial census, and prohibit the inclusion of noncitizens in counts used for apportionment of representatives. Four days later, a companion bill was introduced in the House. To date, the bill has 89 Republican co-sponsors.
A press release from Sen. Katie Britt of Alabama said, The current census method of counting illegal aliens for purposes of representation incentivizes open borders by boosting the relative political power of the respective states and voters that court mass illegal migration. For example, at least two million illegal aliens reside in California, currently resulting in this sanctuary state being apportioned several more congressional seats and Electoral College votes than the states population of citizens would justify.
As we noted earlier, CIS and Pew Research Center both concluded that California would have had one less representative, and one less electoral vote, if immigrants living in the country illegally were excluded from the census apportionment count.
In press releases, other Republicans also portrayed illegal immigration as a boost only to Democratic states, though that is not the case.
What were seeing is the Democrats abusing the system by creating sanctuary cities in blue states that are literally losing citizens every day to states like mine, Sen. Bill Hagerty of Tennessee said in a press conference at the Capitol on Jan. 25. Whats happening is cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, are acting as magnets to attract illegal immigrants. Those immigrants are then being counted in the populations of California, Illinois, New York, and other cities for the purposes of allocating congressional districts and electoral votes.
Blue states may be losing citizens over their liberal policies, but theyre making up for it by welcoming illegal immigrants, Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee said in a press release.
But immigrants dont just settle in blue states, and there is some evidence that immigrants without permanent legal status have been settling more often in red states in recent years. While California (2.2 million) had more immigrants living in the U.S. illegally than any other state in 2022, the No. 2 and 3 states were the red states of Texas (1.85 million) and Florida (935,000), the Center for Migration Studies estimates.
When it comes to apportionment power, however, its not whether they have any unauthorized immigrants in their state, its whether they have a higher than average share, Jeffrey Passel, senior demographer for the Pew Research Center, explained in a phone interview.
Its not simply Democratic states, Passel said. Theres a mix of states with higher than average shares.
The apportionment formula allocates sequentially, so it also matters how close a state is to the population threshold needed to get another representative, Passel said. The average number of people per congressional district is 761,169, although some states such as Delaware (990,837) and Idaho (920,689) have far more than the average, while others have far less, including Montana (542,704) and Rhode Island (549,082).
Republicans also claimed that a surge in illegal immigration since Biden took office will cause an increase in partisan disparity in apportionment.
Hagerty misleadingly talked aboutthe 8 to 10 million people that have entered America just since Joe Biden took office. As weve written, government statistics show that in the initial processing of millions of encounters at the southern border during the Biden administration, 2.5 million people have been released into the U.S. with notices to appear in immigration court or other classifications, as of October. There also could have been about 1.6 million gotaways, or people crossing the border illegally who evaded apprehension.
Ruiz Soto, of the Migration Policy Institute, noted that most of the immigrants released into the country are still being processed at immigration courts, and many of them may ultimately be issued removal orders if courts determine they do not to qualify for asylum protection.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, each House member represents an average of 761,169 people, based on the 2020 census. But immigrants disperse around the country, and while some states wind up with a disproportionate share, thats true of red and blue states.
In fact, there is reason to believe Republican states may be benefiting more from illegal immigration than Democratic ones in recent years, according to an analysis released in January by David J. Bier of the libertarian Cato Institute.
According to Bier, recent immigration trends are benefiting Republicans in states where they control the legislature and manage redistricting. About 62 percent of the threemillion increase in the total immigrant population from March 2019 to March 2023 has occurred in GOP states, according to the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement.
That includes all immigrants. Looking only at noncitizens, Bier wrote, an overwhelming 95 percent of the increase in the noncitizen population has been in GOP states from March 2019 to March 2023.
The noncitizen population includes noncitizens in the country both illegally and legally, though Bier told us, I dont believe that there would be a substantial difference in locational choice between the two groups.
The claim is that Democrats are right now letting more noncitizens come because these new entrants will increase their congressional representation, Bier told us via email. But while [that] may have been true for immigrants who entered decades ago, it hasnt been true for recent arrivals.
According to Biers analysis, seven of the top 10 states where noncitizens settled between 2019 and 2023 are states with Republican legislatures, with Texas topping the list.
It is certainly likely that these states are attracting immigrants because of their strong job growth, Bier wrote.
From 2021 to 2023, during the Biden administration, five of the top 10 states in which noncitizens settled were Republican-controlled, four were Democratic-controlled, and one has a divided legislature. However, California a blue state gained the most noncitizen arrivals, according to CPS Annual Social and Economic Supplements. The 2.7 million noncitizens estimated to have settled in the U.S. in that time period by the Census Bureau included those living in the U.S. legally and illegally.
Steven A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, looked at the monthly Current Population Survey a smaller survey but with up-to-date data over the three years of the Biden presidency, from January 2021to February 2024, and concluded that there were slightly more blue states than red where the immigrant population grew the most, suggesting that when the next Census happens that the recent surge will benefit Democratic states more than the Republican states somewhat.
All of these current analyses may ultimately be irrelevant. What really matters is where the noncitizens, specifically those in the country illegally, disproportionately reside at the time of the decennial census and which party controls those states legislatures (and can influence redistricting maps) at that time.
But overall, while illegal immigration affects apportionment at the margins, Passel said, immigrants in the country illegally disperse to many states and make up a fairly small percentage of people in the U.S. overall. The inclusion of unauthorized immigrants in apportionment counts is not a major factor in determining who controls the House of Representatives, he said.
If youre one of the states that loses a seat, it makes a big difference, Passel allowed.
That immigration redistributeshouseseatsis not in dispute, Camarota told us via email. In a country of 330 million people however, it is generally hard to move seats around because each seat now has about 760,000 people,though if a state is on the margin of getting or losing a seat, then it can lose or gain relatively easily.
However, Camarota said he has analyzed population surveys during the Trump presidency and found certain House districts, with a high density of noncitizens, are more likely to elect Democrats.
The key group that wins politically from the growth in illegal immigrants and non-citizens in general are those that live around them, Camarota said, pointing to a CIS reportthat looked at districts with relatively few voters because many of the people in the district are noncitizens who cant vote.
It takes so many fewer votes to win an election in a district with a lot of non-citizens, Camarota said.This means that voters in such places have significantly more political power. That is, their votes count much more.In general the low citizen districts are almost all represented by Democrats.
Camarota argues there are other long-term advantages to immigration both legal and illegal for Democrats.
There is goodevidence immigrants and their children [who ultimately become citizens] may vote Democratic 2 to 1 on average, Camarota said.So in the long run immigrationhas partisanimplications, which I think is part of the complaint.
Whether thats true, or remains true in 2030, is a matter for speculation, but regardless, thats not what Musk was arguing. He said theres currently an advantage to Democrats of 20 House seats and an equal number of electoral votes due to immigrants in the country illegally being included in apportionment calculations and thats not accurate.
Editors note:FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made throughour Donate page. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Read the rest here:
Elon Musk Overstates Partisan Impact of Illegal Immigration on House Apportionment - FactCheck.org
- Elon Musk's Neuralink filed as 'disadvantaged business' before being valued at $9 billion - CNBC - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Royal Society suggested to Elon Musk he consider resigning science fellowship - The Guardian - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk leaps to Donald Trumps defense following WSJ hit piece - The Independent - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Is Cashing In on the AI Romance Boom - Bloomberg - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Video Elon Musk posts on X criticizing Trumps handling of the Epstein files - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk says hell launch the America Party. Can he get candidates on the ballot? - Stateline - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk keeps adding fuel to Trumps Epstein scandal. It might be his most effective launch - San Francisco Chronicle - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Gov. Greg Abbott says emails with Elon Musk are too intimate and embarrassing to make public - KUT - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk mocks Trump over Epstein files Where is the client list? - The Times - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Someone Made a Giant Elon Musk Head and Drove It Around Arches National Park - Outside Magazine - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- As Elon Musk Opts for Politics Instead of Humanoids Jim Cramer Says Its Hard to Pull the Trigger on TSLA Stock - Yahoo Finance - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- What's the meaning of giant Elon Musk sculpture spotted in Arches National Park? - Deseret News - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk says a male Grok companion is coming, with a personality inspired by 'Twilight' and '50 Shades of Grey' - Business Insider - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Blows Major Hole in Trumps Epstein Hoax Theory - The Daily Beast - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk says Tesla is going to have the most epic demo ever, but we heard that before - Electrek - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk teases Teslas most epic demo by end of year - Teslarati - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's xAI is willing to pay up to $440k if you're an engineer who can make anime girl avatars - Business Insider - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Texas Governors Office Says Its Emails With Elon Musk May Be, in Part, Too Embarrassing to Release to the Public - ProPublica - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk changed his phone number after spat with Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson reveals on Pod Force One - New York Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's North Star is becoming increasingly clear - Business Insider - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Texas governor admits his emails with Elon Musk are too intimate and embarrassing to publish - Fortune - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Turns to Tesla and SpaceX to Fuel His AI Ambitions - Bloomberg.com - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Mark Cuban says Elon Musk's new political party is 'really smart' in a key way - Business Insider - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Governor of Texas Says He Can't Release His Emails With Elon Musk Because They Are "Intimate and Embarrassing" - Yahoo - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Texas Governor Greg Abbott will not release intimate Elon Musk emails - The Independent - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Said Empathy is the Wests Weakness. He is Half Right. - inkstickmedia.com - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Tesla enters India! Elon Musk-led EV maker to open first showroom in Mumbai today; heres how much the ca - Times of India - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- A giant Elon Musk bust was spotted at a Utah national park with a sign calling out DOGE cuts - Business Insider - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk said a year ago that AI has no use at SpaceX. Now he's willing to pay $170k a head for AI engineers. - Business Insider - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Inside Linda Yaccarinos rocky two-year stint as X CEO under Elon Musk and the deal that forced their breaking point - New York Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wont release intimate and embarrassing emails with Elon Musk - New York Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- xAI gives first public explanation for why Grok called itself 'MechaHitler' and cited Elon Musk's opinions - Business Insider - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk promises Tesla shareholders a vote over buying equity in his Grok startup: If it was up to me, Tesla would have invested in xAI long ago -... - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Said Grok 4 Was the "Smartest AI in the World," But Its Leaderboard Scores Just Came Out and They Tell a Different Story -... - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk praises retro-futuristic Tesla diner as one of the coolest spots in LA - New York Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- An Elon Musk ally gave away the keys to Groks AI brain - Quartz - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's Starlink Faces A New Alphabet Rival: This Google-Backed Startup Wants Federal Billions To Beam Internet Through Air - Yahoo Finance - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Texas governor says his emails with Elon Musk are too intimate or embarrassing to release - The Verge - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- What on earth are Elon Musk and Greg Abbott emailing about? - Daily Kos - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Tesla finally enters India nine years after Elon Musk first teased its debut - TechCrunch - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- US Defense Department awards $200 million contract to Elon Musk's Grok aka 'MechaHitler' and is looking forward to deploying it 'in our warfighting... - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- The Tesla leaks: what its really like to work for Elon Musk - The Times - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Is Back at Work and Burning Through Executives - The Wall Street Journal - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Gave Apple 72 Hours to Accept His $5 Billion DealTim Cook Said No, and Paid the Price for His Decision - The Daily Galaxy - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Elon Musk is gone from government, but DOGE impact lingers and is being 'hijacked': Congresswoman - MSNBC News - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Is Back at Work and Burning Through Executives - MSN - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Here are the biggest companies that have followed Elon Musk out of Delaware - Business Insider - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Elon Musk says Tesla Robotaxi is coming to California, but no one other than shareholders believe him - Electrek - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Katie Millers beach photo with family sparks buzz day after Elon Musk unfollows her on XIs she still with Team Musk? - Mint - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Updated Grok. Guess What It Said? - The Atlantic - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- I've run a political party. Elon Musk is not someone you want in that job. - MSNBC News - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- An underground loop could come to Orlando; Elon Musk company behind the plan - WESH - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Advice for Elon Musk from the Most Successful Third-Party Campaign in Modern History - Politico - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk plans to bring Tesla robotaxis to San Francisco this year - San Francisco Chronicle - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- We asked Grok 4 about immigration and conflict in the Middle East. Unprompted, it turned to Elon Musk for answers. - Business Insider - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- A bit like AI, Elon Musk seems custom-built to undermine everything good and true in the world | Zoe Williams - The Guardian - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk says AI Grok is coming to Tesla vehicles, days after it unleashed antisemitic rant - CBS News - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- After Linda Yaccarinos Departure As X CEO, Will Elon Musk Once Again Flip Off Advertisers In Favor Of AI? - Deadline - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Teslas feckless board needs to rein in Elon Musk before its too late - New York Post - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Is Running Out of Road in China - The Wall Street Journal - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk hit by mass resignations: Why his CEO Linda Yaccarino and 14 other executives may have just qui - Times of India - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk tells Tesla bull Dan Ives to 'shut up' after analyst calls for company oversight of the CEO - Business Insider - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's Grok 4 was asked to predict the World Series. After 4.5 minutes, it chose the Dodgers. - Business Insider - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Luca Guadagninos OpenAI Movie Will Depict Elon Musk: Hes Not So Bad, as Far as Dictators Go, Says the Script Report - IndieWire - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Says Hes Forming America Party - WSJ - The Wall Street Journal - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- 'Fiat Is Hopeless': Elon Musk Says His 'America Party' Will Embrace Bitcoin - Yahoo Finance - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's feud with Trump and 'America Party' gambit hit Tesla shares and wiped up to $15 billion off his net worth - Fortune - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, started calling itself 'MechaHitler' - NPR - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to launch a competitive third party. It likely wouldn't be easy - NPR - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- X CEO Linda Yaccarino couldn't turn things around for Elon Musk because of Elon Musk - Business Insider - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- X CEO Linda Yaccarino resigns after two years at the helm of Elon Musk's social media platform - AP News - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- How X CEO Linda Yaccarino went from Elon Musk's fixer to out of a job in 2 years - Business Insider - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- What would it take for Elon Musk to create a new political party in America? - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Exclusive | Trump, Elon Musk had 'very troublesome ending,' Susie Wiles tells 'Pod Force One' - New York Post - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Consulted Curtis Yarvin, Right-Wing Thinker, on Third Party - The New York Times - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- X CEO Linda Yaccarino quits just two years after Elon Musk hired her - New York Post - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Elon Musk narrowly wins fight against neighbors over Austin-area home - KUT - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Opinion | What Elon Musk Gets Wrong About Our Broken Political System - Politico - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Andreessen Horowitz is the latest company to follow Elon Musk out of Delaware - Business Insider - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Elon Musk: Steve Bannon is in the Epstein files - Yahoo - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]