Mediaboss Marketing

Senate Democrats are planning to use their legislative authority to roll back just a handful of Trump-era regulations, disappointing someactivistswho hoped they would be more aggressive in usingmaneuverstotopplethe former president's legacy.

Senate Majority LeaderCharles Shumer (D-N.Y.) announced Thursday that Democrats would use the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to overturn two different Trump-era regulations, one that weakened regulations on methane and another that limited workplace discrimination protections.

But by committing to attempt to nix just a few rules, Democrats are taking a sharp turn from the strategy employed by Republicans, who after Trump was elected used the act on 16 different regulations.

I think it's a powerful tool, said Alison Kamhi, an attorney with the Immigrant Legal Resource Center who helped analyze which of the many Trump immigration regulations could be good CRA targets.

It's not the only tool, but its a tool, and you want to see the Democrats using every tool in the toolbox," Kamhi added. "So I would have hoped for more rules to be introduced for potential CRA disapproval.

Its possible more will be coming.

Democrats have introduced resolutions that would unwind two different Trump financial regulations, including one that significantly weakens predatory lending regulations. But so far Schumer hasnt committed to a vote on either.

Democrats have some reason to be hesitant to use the CRA. Scrapping a rule reverts policy back to whatever was in place before it was adopted which can leave weaker regulations in place.

There is also concern over statutory language in the CRA that then blocks the relevant agency from crafting another rule thats substantially similar, a feature some fear could hinder future necessary regulation.

The CRA is a blunt tool, so you have to be careful when you're using it that youre not going to tie the hands of the administration going forward, said Aaron Weiss, deputy director of the Center for Western Priorities, which tracked Trumps environmental rollbacks.

So its not surprising that Congress is going to use it judiciously this year considering how quickly the Biden administration is moving toroll backTrumps environmental legacy the right way, he said.

The CRA process also eats up about 10 hours of floor time, something in short supply in the Senate after Trumps second impeachment trial and various 30-hour holds placed on several of Bidens nominees.

Still, Democrats could be giving up a significant number of opportunities if they just use the CRA twice.

A coalition of various advocacy groups identified 28 different Trump rules ripe for CRA use that they hoped the Senate would prioritize.

On the list: changes to the asylum process, a rule opening up logging in Alaskas Tongass National Forest, a rule weakening unfair and deceptive practices regulations for airlines, and a rule that would have sunset all Department of Health and Human Services rulesmore than 10 years old if they werent reviewed within the next few years.

Its an extremely powerful tool because the alternative is typically to repeal through notice and comment rulemaking, and notice and comment rulemaking could take years and then thats followed by one year of judicial review, said Richard Revesz, a professor at New York University School of Law, who warned of legal challenges.

The CRA allows for the definitive undoing of a bad policy very quickly.

The two rules that will get a vote are ones Democrats view as particularly dangerous.

The methane rule short circuited existing regulations for the oil and gas industry, allowing them to spew heat-trapping methane a gas several times more potent that carbon into the atmosphere.

The other was an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulation that critics say tilted the scales in favor of employers fielding challenges from employees claiming they faced discrimination.

To be successful, Democrats will have to wrangle votes from each of their 50 senators or secure Republican backing a potentially heavy lift with such tight margins.

But advocates are also hopeful Schumer will see fit to bring additional CRA resolutions to the floor, regulations they argue wont trip up any future rulemaking.

That includes an Office of the Comptroller of the Currency rule targeted by Sens. Chris Van HollenChristopher (Chris) Van HollenDemocrats disappoint by not going after more Trump regs with CRA Senators to unveil bill banning permanent Capitol fence SEC adopts measure aimed at cracking down on Chinese firms from US exchanges MORE (D-Md.) and Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownDemocrats disappoint by not going after more Trump regs with CRA American Rescue Plan: Ending child poverty let's make it permanent Meeting between Trump, Ohio Senate candidates turns tense: report MORE (D-Ohio).

This is a terrible rule, said Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center, who said the federal government has no right to help payday lenders skirt state laws that cap interest rates.

So the simplest thing to do is to just get rid of the rule.

The bills came just in the nick of time.Public Citizenestimates lawmakers have until April 4 to file resolutions that comply with the law, leaving little time to file additional measures. Schumer has until mid-May to bring them to the floor before the CRA clock runs out.

Immigration advocates have yet to secure a CRA resolution for one of their top priorities a regulation that barred asylum to those from any number of countries who passed through Mexico to arrive at the Southern border. Its since been enjoined by the courts, but it has not yet been struck down.

The reason that was our top priority is because its a rule that could bar asylum eligibility for vast numbers of people, if it were to go into effect, and were not concerned about the potential effects of CRA disapproval because thats a place where we don't want there to be rules issued, Kamhi said.We don't think there should be rules barring people from applying for relief based on where they transited through.

Democrats may also not be eager to let Republicans set a precedent. The CRA had only been used once since it was first adopted in 1996 until the GOP heavily used it in 2017.

The Biden administration has already opted to use a number of more traditional tactics, using a freeze memo to block regulations that had not yet taken effect, while striking some internal memos and directives. Theyve also flipped positions on a number of existing challenges to Trump era regulations, leaving the courts as another viable path for striking many of them down.

Thats part of the reason Weiss doesnt think Democrats should rely too heavily on the CRA.

Theyre moving so quickly on everything else, he said, and when there are bad regulations the courts generally step in and do the right thing anyway. And when a court throws out a rule it tends to not tie the hand of the agency going forward. It just means they go back and do it right the next time.

But Revesz worries that Democrats are too cautious about the CRA language blocking any future regulation that is substantially similar.

I understand that argument floats around, but for this administration it shouldn't be considered a bar even in cases where they actually want to replace a regulation, he said. Strengthening something not substantially the same as weakening something.

Read more:
Democrats disappoint by not going after more Trump regs with CRA | TheHill - The Hill