Mediaboss Marketing

WASHINGTON Triumphant over the signing of their far-reaching $1.9 trillion stimulus package, Democrats are now starting to angle for a major political payoff that would defy history: Picking up House and Senate seats in the 2022 midterm elections, even though the party in power usually loses in the midterms.

Democratic leaders are making one of the biggest electoral bets in years that the stimulus will be so transformational for Americans across party lines and demographic groups that Democrats will be able to wield it as a political weapon next year in elections against Republicans, who voted en masse against the package.

Republicans need to gain only one seat in the Senate and just five in the House in 2022 to take back control, a likely result in a normal midterm election, but perhaps a trickier one if voters credit their rivals for a strong American rebound.

Yet as Democrats prepare to start selling voters on the package, they remain haunted by what happened in 2010, the last time they were in control of the White House and both chambers of Congress and pursued an ambitious agenda: They lost 63 House seats, and the majority, and were unable to fulfill President Barack Obamas goals on issues ranging from gun control to immigration.

It has become an article of faith in the party that Mr. Obamas presidency was diminished because his two signature accomplishments, the stimulus bill and the Affordable Care Act, were not expansive enough and their pitch to the public on the benefits of both measures was lacking. By this logic, Democrats began losing elections and the full control of the government, until now, because of their initial compromises with Republicans and insufficient salesmanship.

We didnt adequately explain what we had done, President Biden told House Democrats this month about the 2009 Recovery Act. Barack was so modest, he didnt want to take, as he said, a victory lap.

Now they are determined to exorcise those old ghosts by aggressively promoting a measure they believe meets the moment and has broader appeal than the $787 billion bill they trimmed and laced with tax cuts to win a handful of Republican votes in Mr. Obamas first months in office.

Republicans say the Democratic bet is a foolhardy one, both because of how little of the spending is directly related to the coronavirus pandemic and because of fleeting voter attention spans. But Democrats say they intend to run on the bill and press Republicans over their opposition to it.

This is absolutely something I will campaign on next year, said Senator Raphael Warnock of Georgia, who may be the most vulnerable incumbent Senate Democrat in the country on the ballot in 2022. Senator Gary Peters of Michigan, who heads the Democratic Senate campaign arm, said he would go on offense against Republicans who opposed the bill and sketched out their attack: Every Republican said no in a time of need.

Party lawmakers point out that the measure Mr. Biden signed on Thursday is more popular than the 2009 bill, according to polling; contains more tangible benefits, like the $1,400 direct payments and unemployment benefits; and comes at a time when the pandemic and former President Donald Trumps continued appetite for big spending have blunted Republican attacks.

People are going to feel it right away, to me thats the biggest thing, said Representative Conor Lamb, a Pennsylvania Democrat whose 2018 special election victory presaged the partys revival. Politics is confusing, its image-based, everyone calls everyone else a liar but people are going to get the money in their bank accounts.

And, Representative Sara Jacobs of California said, Democrats have learned the lessons from 2009, we made sure we went back to our districts this weekend to tell people how much help they were going to get from this bill.

Mr. Obamas aides are quick to note that they did promote their stimulus and the health care law but ran into much more fervent, and unified, opposition on the right as the Tea Party blossomed and portrayed the measures as wasteful and ill-conceived.

At the end of last week, with the Houses first extended recess looming at months end, Speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed House Democrats to seize the moment.

Ms. Pelosis office sent an email to colleagues, forwarded to The Times, brimming with talking points the speaker hopes theyll use in town halls and news conferences. During the upcoming district work period, members are encouraged to give visibility to how the American Rescue Plan meets the needs of their communities: putting vaccines in arms, money in pockets, workers back on the job and children back in the classroom safely, it said.

For their part, White House officials said they would deploy the whole of government, as one aide put it, to market the plan, send cabinet officers on the road and focus on different components of the bill each day to highlight its expanse.

Democrats hopes for avoiding the losses typical in a presidents first midterm election will depend largely on whether Americans feel life is back to normal next year and whether they credit the party in power for thwarting the disease, despair and dysfunction that characterized the end of Mr. Trumps term.

If voters are to believe the Democrats are delivering on an American rebound, of course, its essential the country is roaring back to prepandemic strength in a way it was not at the end of 2009, when unemployment reached 10 percent.

You could be looking at an extraordinary growth spurt in the third and fourth quarters, and that takes you into the year when candidates make their way, said Representative Richard E. Neal of Massachusetts, chairman of the Ways & Means Committee, where much of the bill was crafted.

The politics of the legislation, in other words, will be clear enough by this time next year. If all the sudden you got high inflation and things are hitting the fan, Republicans are going to run on it, said Representative Filemon Vela, a Texas Democrat. If things are going well theyre going to run on something else.

For now, Republicans are expressing little appetite to contest a measure that has the support of 70 percent of voters, according to a Pew survey released last week.

Part of their challenge stems from Mr. Trumps aggressive advocacy for $2,000 direct payments in the previous stimulus package late last year, a drumbeat hes kept up in his political afterlife as he argues Republicans lost the two Georgia Senate runoffs because they did not embrace the proposal.

Its difficult for congressional Republicans to portray one of the main elements of the Democrats bill as socialism when the de facto leader of their party is an enthusiastic supporter of wealth redistribution. Moreover, right-wing media outlets have been more focused on culture war issues that are more animating to many conservatives than size-of-government questions.

Asked if they would run against the bill next year, the House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, said, Theres going to be a lot of things we run against.

At the weekly news conference of House Republican leaders, Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming spoke about the stimulus for 45 seconds before changing the subject to the rising number of migrants at the Southern border.

Thestimuluspayments would be $1,400 for most recipients. Those who are eligible would also receive an identical payment for each of their children. To qualify for the full $1,400, a single person would need an adjusted gross income of $75,000 or below. For heads of household, adjusted gross income would need to be $112,500 or below, and for married couples filing jointly that number would need to be $150,000 or below. To be eligible for a payment, a person must have a Social Security number. Read more.

Buying insurance through the government program known as COBRA would temporarily become a lot cheaper. COBRA, for the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, generally lets someone who loses a job buy coverage via the former employer. But its expensive: Under normal circumstances, a person may have to pay at least 102 percent of the cost of the premium. Under the relief bill, the government would pay the entire COBRA premium from April 1 through Sept. 30. A person who qualified for new, employer-based health insurance someplace else before Sept. 30 would lose eligibility for the no-cost coverage. And someone who left a job voluntarily would not be eligible, either. Read more

This credit, which helps working families offset the cost of care for children under 13 and other dependents, would be significantly expanded for a single year. More people would be eligible, and many recipients would get a bigger break. The bill would also make the credit fully refundable, which means you could collect the money as a refund even if your tax bill was zero. That will be helpful to people at the lower end of the income scale, said Mark Luscombe, principal federal tax analyst at Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting. Read more.

There would be a big one for people who already have debt. You wouldnt have to pay income taxes on forgiven debt if you qualify for loan forgiveness or cancellation for example, if youve been in an income-driven repayment plan for the requisite number of years, if your school defrauded you or if Congress or the president wipes away $10,000 of debt for large numbers of people. This would be the case for debt forgiven between Jan. 1, 2021, and the end of 2025. Read more.

The bill would provide billions of dollars in rental and utility assistance to people who are struggling and in danger of being evicted from their homes. About $27 billion would go toward emergency rental assistance. The vast majority of it would replenish the so-called Coronavirus Relief Fund, created by the CARES Act and distributed through state, local and tribal governments,accordingto the National Low Income Housing Coalition. Thats on top of the $25 billion in assistance provided by the relief package passed in December. To receive financial assistance which could be used for rent, utilities and other housing expenses households would have to meet severalconditions. Household income could not exceed 80 percent of the area median income, at least one household member must be at risk of homelessness or housing instability, and individuals would have to qualify for unemployment benefits or have experienced financial hardship (directly or indirectly) because of the pandemic. Assistance could be provided for up to 18 months,accordingto the National Low Income Housing Coalition. Lower-income families that have been unemployed for three months or more would be given priority for assistance. Read more.

And by the end of the week, Mr. McCarthy announced he and a group of House Republicans would travel to the border on Monday in a bid to highlight the problem there and change the subject.

After spending the campaign vowing to find common ground with Republicans and make Washington work again, Mr. Biden, in his first major act as president, prioritized speed and scale over bipartisanship.

He and his top aides believe in legislative momentum, that success begets success and that theyll be able to push through another pricey bill this one to build roads, bridges and broadband because of their early win on Covid-19 relief.

The fact that we could do it without Republicans forces them to the table, said a senior White House official, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the nitty-gritty of lawmaking.

Yet to the G.O.P. lawmakers who have signaled a willingness to work with the new administration, Mr. Bidens determination to push through the stimulus without G.O.P. votes will imperil the rest of his agenda.

What I would be worried about if I were them is what does this do to jeopardize bipartisan cooperation on other things you want to do you cant do everything by reconciliation, said Senator John Cornyn of Texas, alluding to the parliamentary procedure by which the Senate can approve legislation by a simple majority. Ive heard some of our members say that, If youre going to waste all this money on unrelated matters, Im really not interested in spending a bunch more money on infrastructure.

To Senator Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, who was one of the Senate Republicans who went to the White House last month pitching a slimmed-down stimulus, its downright bizarre to hear Democrats claiming their 2010 difficulties stemmed from not going big.

I would argue it was too big, it was unfocused, it was wasted money, Ms. Capito said.

To Democrats, though, they are avoiding, not repeating, their past mistakes.

The public didnt know about the Affordable Care Act and the administration was not exactly advertising, Ms. Pelosi told reporters last week.

Senator Chuck Schumer, the majority leader, was just as blunt, singling out the Maine moderate who was wooed by Mr. Obama to ensure bipartisan support for the 2009 Recovery Act but whose appeals for a far-smaller compromise bill were ignored last month.

We made a big mistake in 2009 and 10, Susan Collins was part of that mistake, Mr. Schumer said on CNN. We cut back on the stimulus dramatically and we stayed in recession for five years.

And, he could have noted, his party would not have full control of both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue for another decade.

Read the rest here:
Stimulus Bill as a Political Weapon? Democrats Are Counting on It. - The New York Times