Mediaboss Marketing

Donald Trump and Sarah Palin. Photo: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images

During the Republican presidential primary, the traditional conservative Republican counterattack on Donald Trump defined him as an ideologically alien figure. Trump, conservatives insisted, was a liberal Republican, or sounds like a liberal Democrat, or was a rich, New York liberal, or possibly even a Democratic Party double agent.

This was not merely a matter of campaign messaging. Anti-Trump conservatives genuinely wanted to believe that his authoritarian demagoguery was inimical to standard Republicanism or, at the very least, that the two had little relation to one another. That distinction has grown harder to sustain as Trump has governed as a doctrinaire conservative movement ideologue. But not all anti-Trump conservatives have given it up entirely. Matt Latimer, a former George W. Bush speechwriter, supplies a lurid example of the persistence of the fantasy. In a Politico essay, Latimer suggests that Trump could well have won the presidency running as a Democrat.

It is true that Trump has advocated an incoherent and frequently shifting mix of public positions that, at times, could have identified him in the Democratic Party as comfortably as the Republican Party. Latimer argues that the qualities that failed to disqualify Trump as a Republican nominee would also have failed to disqualify him as a Democratic one. His comments on women and minorities would have exposed him to withering scrutiny among the lefts army of advocacy groups, he argues. Liberal donors would likely have banded together to strangle his candidacy in its cradle if they werent laughing him off. But Republican elites tried both of these strategies in 2015, as well, and it manifestly didnt work.

Except the Democratic Party, unlike the Republican Party, is a multiracial coalition. The Democratic Party might not be free of racism, but it has a fairly low tolerance for it. The GOP elite failed to make Trumps racism a disqualification because it endeared Trump to the most racially resentful portions of the nearly all-white party. Indeed, Trump became a Republican because he identified growing racial resentment as the most powerful impulse in conservative grassroots politics and capitalized on it. Conservative elites failed to counteract his appeal because they had been fooling themselves into believing that tea party protesters cared about balanced budgets and low marginal tax rates.

Latimer likewise argues that Trumps buffoonish reality-television persona might have played just as well in blue America as red America. Think the Democrats wouldnt tolerate misogynist rhetoric and boorish behavior from their leaders? he writes. Well, then youve forgotten about Woodrow Wilson and John F. Kennedy and LBJ and Bill Clinton.

It is true that Democrats were willing to accept Bill Clintons adultery. (Though they didnt extend the same forgiveness to John Edwards.) But it is a far cry from the long tradition of male politicians sleeping around to Trumps gross public misogyny. If Latimer has an example of a modern Democratic politician who won an election after being accused of assault by multiple women and then being recorded boasting of grabbing women by their genitals, it has slipped my mind.

Of course boorishness hardly encompasses Trumps disqualifying characteristics. Democrats tolerated Clintons adultery because he was a competent public servant who could cogently discuss public policy like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Al Gore, Michael Dukakis, and Walter Mondale. Trump is a flamboyantly ignorant demagogue who delighted Republicans by swatting away all opposition with crude insults that dont even pretend to address substantive objections.

The closest I can come to imagining a Democratic version of Trump is two recent figures. Alan Grayson, a bloviating populist from Florida, was crushed (by a deeply underwhelming opponent) in a primary last year. In 1998, Geoffrey Fieger, a demagogic trial attorney with a vague resemblance to Bob Odenkirks character on Better Call Saul, captured the Democratic nomination for governor of Michigan. Fieger had certain Trumplike qualities. He gobbled up press coverage with a constant stream of attention-grabbing insults. He called the Republican governor dumber than Dan Quayle and twice as ugly and the result of miscegenation between humans and barnyard animals, and accused him of stealing billions of dollars from the state budget because he failed to grasp basic facts of how the budget works. Fieger embarrassed state Democratic officials, who treated him like a leper, and he wound up pulling less than 38 percent of the vote in a Democratic-leaning state.

Trump is a product of a decades-long evolution in the Republican Party. What Richard Hofstadter accurately diagnosed as the paranoid style in American politics angry, conspiratorial, distrustful of expertise has over time assumed the dominant place in the GOP. One can draw a straight line from George W. Bushs good ol boy anti-intellectualism to Sarah Palins curdled resentment to Trump. Republican leaders tiptoed around birther conspiracy theories because they couldnt risk alienating the large segment of their base that thrilled to them.

The same process has not taken hold in the Democratic Party. A recent poll finds that 54 percent of Democrats, but only 13 percent of Republicans, have a lot of trust that what scientists say is accurate and reliable. That is an indication of two party bases that now have very different relationships with empiricism and expertise. Whatever the shortcomings of the New York Times editorial page, it has no equivalent to The Wall Street Journal editorial pages lurid trafficking in bizarre accusations of murder against the Clintons during the 1990s.

Trump is an historical outlier. But he is also the product of the political culture of a Republican Party that is fertile soil for his brand of authoritarian ethno-nationalism. The desire to regard him as a fluke who could just as easily have wound up in the other party is the kind of evasion that has prevented many Republican elites from squaring up to the forces that enabled Trumps rise.

He could tap McConnells favorite Luther Strange or Hannitys favorite Mo Brooks. Theocrat Roy Moores in the mix, too.

Alan Futerfas is a criminal attorney whos worked with some high-profile defendants.

The rookie right-fielder doesnt just hit a lot of home runs, he hits them a long way.

Go ahead and put this on loop.

After that deal fell through, the presidents son-in-law pushed for the U.S. to support the Saudis blockade of Qatar.

Maybe its not a coincidence that he was chosen by the party that almost put Sarah Palin in the White House.

Were going to have to do something that we probably never dreamed wed do.

The brutal, months-long offensive has finally liberated Iraqs second-largest city after three years of ISIS control.

Before going into public health, Brenda Fitzgerald sold (scientifically dubious) anti-aging hormone treatments to patients.

Lots of crowds and some new routes for regional commuters but things have been worse.

So long as CBO gives the revised bill a better score, one last chance to repeal Obamacare could be appealing to all of the GOPs factions.

In his morning tweetstorm, the president also suggested that the media would never be as hard on Chelsea Clinton as it is on Ivanka.

Hes been holding dinners for donors and other influential GOP figures at his home on the grounds of the Naval Observatory.

The president reversed himself after the idea was panned by both Democrats and Republicans.

The presidents son says he was lured into the June 2016 meeting with a Kremlin-linked lawyer under false pretenses.

Plague, famine, heat no human can survive. This is not science fiction but what scientists, when theyre not being cautious, fear could be our future.

Why does the president double-down every time it seems like he should retreat? Because Bannon is still his chief tactician.

There is no sign that the power-plant control systems were affected by the breaches.

Go here to read the rest:
Could Donald Trump Have Been Elected As a Democrat? - New York Magazine