Mediaboss Marketing

Polands ruling Law & Justice party contested the mandate of the countrys top judge after she criticized the government for undermining the judiciary, deepening a rule-of-law dispute that has set the nation on a collision course with the European Union.

Fifty Law & Justice lawmakers asked the Constitutional Tribunal to assess whether the 2014 appointment of Malgorzata Gersdorf as Supreme Court first president was constitutional, party member Arkadiusz Mularczyk said Thursday. The request follows comments from Gersdorf last week in which she accused the party of seeking to take over the courts by naming judges dependent on the justice minister.

The motion is a further step by the party to reshape Polands institutional framework in a political push that has prompted the first ever probe into an EU country overrule of law. Since winning a 2015 election, Law & Justice has overhauled the constitutional court in moves that the tribunal has ruled illegal, ignored those rulings, and stacked the court with its allies despite criticism from the European Commission.

At the heart of the dispute is the judiciary, which Law & Justice describes as a privileged caste and plans to revamp by giving politicians a dominant role in deciding judicial issues, including which judges get promoted.

Our motion is not revenge or a vendetta, Mularczyk told a news briefing Thursday. Since the first president of the Supreme Court is wearing the costume of a defender of the rule of law in Poland, we have to make sure that the rules that allowed for her appointment are constitutional.

S&P Global Ratings handed Poland its first ever downgrade last year, citing concern over the independence of key democratic institutions. Polish markets were bogged down by political risk last year, but have recovered some losses in 2017, with Warsaws WIG20 stock index showing the biggest returns among EU peers.

The most important business stories of the day.

Get Bloomberg's daily newsletter.

Mularczyk said he expected her appointment to be ruled unconstitutional. The lawmakers complaint is about how Gersdorf was nominated. While the constitution states the president may appoint a candidate that is presented by a general assembly of Supreme Court judges, Law & Justice says that the process, guided by internal supreme court rules in linewith a 2002 law, should be more transparent in how candidates are picked.

Click here to read more about Polands turn toward populism

The law on supreme court has been in place since 2002 and two other presidents have been appointed based on the same procedure, theres no grounds to question Malgorzata Gersdorfs appointment," Supreme Court spokesman, Justice Michal Laskowski, told reporters Thursday. I cant explain why doubts are emerging after 15 years, everybody should find their own answer."

A Warsaw appeals court last month asked the Supreme Court to assess if Decembers appointment of a new chief justice to the Constitutional court was legal. Law & Justice legislators gave President Andrzej Duda, who won the 2015 election as the partys candidate, new powers to pick the panels leader, instead of allowing the judges to decide themselves.

According to Gersdorf, the ruling party is trying to dismantle check-and-balance safeguards without having a mandate to the change constitution. In a speech to a gathering of judges in January, she said the epoch of rule of law in Poland had ended and judges had to be ready to fight for judicial independence, including by risking disciplinary measures and removal from their posts.

The government has brushed off the EUs concerns that its backsliding on democracy, and says that the disputed changes that its made have strengthened the rule of law. The Polish zloty weakened 0.4 percent against the euro, its main currency pair, as of 4:24 p.m. in Warsaw, curbing its 2017 appreciation to 2.5 percent.

Read the rest here:
Polish Ruling Party Attacks Top Judge in New Democracy Row - Bloomberg