How to Hate Each Other Peacefully in a Democracy – The Atlantic
It is difficult to imagine it now, but continental Europe struggled with foundational divideswith periodic warnings of civil waras recently as the 1950s. Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, and the Netherlands were divided into ideologically opposed subcultures, sometimes called spiritual families or pillars. These countries became models of consensual democracy, where the subcultures agreed to share power through creative political arrangements.
If we have learned anything, though, it is that lessons learned in Europe are not easily applied to the Middle East. Consensual democracy works best when there are multiple centers of power in society, none of which is strong enough to dominate on its own. While this more or less holds true in Lebanon, and even then precariously, it is not applicable in much of the region. In countries like Egypt, Turkey, and to a lesser extent Tunisia, the perception that Islamists are too strong and secularists too weak makes polarization significantly worse than it might otherwise be.
Is Islam Exceptional?
In continental Europe, the lines were also drawn more clearly. In Belgium, for instance, there were distinct groups of Flemish and Walloon that could be plainly identified. Egypt, Turkey, and Tunisia, however, relatively homogenous. More homogeneity is almost always viewed as a positive factor in forging national identity, but it can also have its drawbacks. Islamists and non-Islamists are different, but not different enough. They live in the same cities, go to the same schools, visit each other on holidays, and sit together at family dinners. This can make it better. It can also make it worse.
Despite this surface-level homogeneity, the underlying principles of consensual democracythat power should be shared, dispersed, and restrainedcan still be useful. A pure parliamentary system with only a ceremonial president could have helped alter Egypts course. But this is not what Egypt had. From independence onwards, the Egyptian president had always been a towering figure in the countrys politics, casting a shadow on everything else. As the first elected, civilian president in 2012, Morsi was, in fact, weaker than all of his predecessors, yet he still enjoyed disproportionate powers in Egypts centralized, top-heavy system. Not surprisingly, then, he became a lightning rod for the opposition. The fact that presidential contests are all or nothingonly one person, after all, can win heightened the existential tenor of political competition. These dynamics allowed the military to capitalize on the anger that had coalesced around the person of President Morsi.
A parliamentary system, on the other hand, would have put power in the hands of a strong prime minister, who could have more easily been replaced, without necessitating a rejection of the democratic process Egyptians had agreed to less than a year prior. Early elections and no-confidence votes are regular features of parliamentary democracy. Presidents, on the other hand, are generally difficult to impeach, requiring voters to wait four years or longer to express their buyers remorse. Despite their claims to the contrary, presidents invariably represent one partytheir own. A prime minister is more likely to govern in coalition with other parties, making him accountable to a larger number of stakeholders. All other things being equal, parliamentary systems also make coups against elected leaders less likely. Of course, coups can and will still happen, but here, too, parliamentarism is the better option. Ousted parties can more easily reconstitute themselves in parliamentary systems, as Turkeys recurring cycle of military intervention followed by Islamist success suggests.
Designing better political systems can only take you so far, however. At some point, parties and politicians must work in good faith to lower the political stakes. There are any number of creative possibilities. Parties, for example, can agree to postpone debates on the divisive issues that are likely to fracture the unsteady, diverse coalitions that toppled the authoritarian regimes in the first place. This, though, is anathema to how we like to think about democracys development. After 30 years of Hosni Mubaraks rule, it was only natural to expect Egyptians to want to debate anything and everything among themselves; discussions over the role of religion had been suppressed for far too long.
But by instituting an interim period before contending with the most divisive issues, democratic competition can be regularizedboth sides could, potentially, gain enough trust in each other. Of course, the ideological polarizationover perennial touchstones like alcohol consumption, sex segregation, womens rights, and educational curriculawould still inevitably come. At least then, though, Egyptians would have had a fighting chance.
* * *
One way to address foundational divides is to build liberal vetoes into the political system from the beginning. The most effective way to do this is through permanent guarantees in the constitution. The U.S. Bill of Rights is, in this respect, a towering achievement, imposing clear limits on the desires of the majority. If members of Congress wanted to issue legislation prohibiting Muslims from holding cabinet positions, for instance, they wouldnt be able to, however large their majority. The constitution wouldnt allow it. But this raises its own set of difficult questions. After a revolution, who gets to write the constitution?
There are two main possibilities. Historically, elite commissions and committees often drafted constitutions, the most notable example being the United States in 1787. The post-war Japanese constitution, meanwhile, was commissioned by General Douglas MacArthur and drafted by approximately two dozen Americans during Japans postwar occupation, with relatively minor revisions made by Japanese government officials and virtually no public consultation, writes the legal scholar Alicia Bannon. When Corazon Aquino, Asias first female president, led the Philippines democratic transition in the 1980s, she appointed a fifty-member commission which drafted a constitution that continues to govern the Philippines to this day. Such top-down approaches have generally fallen out of favor.
Today, the most common approach, adopted by both Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, is to do it democratically. Tunisia directly elected a parliament which doubled as a constituent assembly, while in Egypt, the elected parliament selected the 100 men and women whose sole job was to draft a new constitution. This is the most obviousand I would argue fairapproach. To the extent that societies should be able to chart their own course, why shouldnt the population have a say on the basic framework of their political system-to-be? To shut ordinary citizens out is to undermine the legitimacy of any constitutional document, particularly in polarized societies where one group is likely to dominate any appointed body to the exclusion of others. There is simply no way to achieve fair representation except through some kind of democratic selection process (which is precisely why we have democracy in the first place). To appoint, rather than elect, a committee also raises the question of who exactly is doing the appointing.
Tunisia and Egypts constitution-drafting processes were reflective of the international consensus around the need for popular participation and buy-in. The democratic approach to constitution-drafting, however, is problematic for the same reasons that democracy is problematicit can lead to illiberal outcomes in societies where a large portion, perhaps even a majority, of the population espouse illiberal beliefs and attitudes. If Egypt had directly elected its constituent assembly, close to 75 percent of the members would have been Islamist. As it turned out, 50 percent werenearly 25 percent less than their actual electoral weight would have suggested. But while Islamists may have seen this as a concession, liberals, rightly, saw the constituent assembly as what it still was: an Islamist-dominated body.
In her study of Kenyas early-2000s constitution drafting process, Alicia Bannon labels the presumed need for broad participation the participation myth. Certain conditions, she argues, can make broad participation either helpful or undesirable in light of an individual countrys circumstances. While also citing negative experiences in Nicaragua and Chad, Bannon notes that the broadly participatory process in Kenya was not only expensive, in terms of expense, time, and opportunity cost, but also divisive, leading to ethnic pandering and polarization.
Lastly, instituting a democratic selection process while, at the same time, agreeing on a limited number of supraconstitutional principles is a third, alternative path. Islamists and secularists, however, are unlikely to agree on nonnegotiables. (If they could, then the ideological divide wouldnt be nearly as large as it is.) In the end, somethingor someonehas to give. Either Islamists voluntarily concede some of their preferences, agreeing for example to include only mildly Islamic language, or a supreme body, perhaps one where Islamists are underrepresented, formulates something resembling a bill of rights binding on all participants.
This third way would loosely mirror the constitution-drafting process in post-apartheid South Africa. Nelson Mandelas African National Congress initially wanted to elect a constituent assembly to draft the constitution but gave in to the objections of F.W. de Klerks National Party, which feared a new constitution would not adequately protect the white population. In 1993, 26 parties negotiated a set of supra-constitutional principles, similar to the United States Bill of Rights, before directly electing a constituent assembly. Mandela and de Klerk soon shared the Nobel Peace Prize.
Practicality aside, the South African modelin part because we know, after the fact, that it was successfulsounds appealing. I should include a major caveat here, however. As a small-d democrat, I am deeply uncomfortable with non-democratic solutions that circumscribe self-determination. Democracy is about representing and reflecting the popular will, and to limit or subvert that on something as fundamental as a constitution sets a troubling precedent. Why shouldnt Egyptians, Jordanians, or Turks have the right to try out an alternative ideological project outside the confines of liberal democracy, however much we might disagree with it? That should be their choice, not anyone elses. That conversation, however, is moot if democracy fails to take hold in the first place. A democratic approach to constitution drafting in Egypt ended up fueling polarization and pushed liberals to considerand then supportextra-legal regime change. If we wish to prioritize the survival of democracy in hostile conditions, then some things, at least in the short run, will need to be prioritized over others. These are necessary evils.
This article has been adapted from Shadi Hamids book, Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam Is Reshaping the World, which has just been released in paperback.
Read this article:
How to Hate Each Other Peacefully in a Democracy - The Atlantic
- China 'clearly' trying to interfere in Taiwan's democracy, Taipei says before recall vote - Reuters - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Intervening coalitions request preliminary injunction in Arkansas direct democracy lawsuit - News From The States - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Trumps Attack on Immigrants Is the Tip of the Spear for His Attack on Democracy - American Immigration Council - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Benjamin Garcia-Holgado Receives the 2025 Edward S. Corwin Award for The Judicial Bulwark: Courts and the Populist Erosion of Democracy - Political... - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- The Homelessness Crisis Is a Crisis of Democracy - Jacobin - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- One Meal Every Three Days: Journalist & Aid Worker Back from Gaza on Stark Reality on the Ground - Democracy Now! - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Press Release: Senator Roger Marshall Discusses Obama Administration's Alleged Threat to Democracy on Newsmax - Quiver Quantitative - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Dont give up on democracy: Edgar Lins mission rooted in family and experience - Madison365 - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- 2025 Democracy Service Medal: Honoring the Legacy of Oswaldo Pay - National Endowment for Democracy - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Senator Marshall: The Obama White House Was the True Threat to Democracy - Senator Roger Marshall (.gov) - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- MEDIA ADVISORY: The 13th High-Level Dialogue on Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance: Trends, Challenges, and Prospects, under the theme Justice,... - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Letter to the Editor: Term limits will save democracy and cure cancer! - Main Street Media of Tennessee - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- In Brenda Wineapple's "Keeping the Faith: God, Democracy, and the Trial That Riveted a Nation" readers revisit The Scopes Trial - WAMC - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- With Maine voter ID referendum, democracy is in the details | Opinion - The Portland Press Herald - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- U.K. Police Arrest Another 100 for Supporting Banned Group Palestine Action - Democracy Now! - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Ricig joins Nestor and Dan Rodricks for coffee and democracy chatter at Zekes in Lauraville - baltimorepositive.com - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Editorial: Zelensky just betrayed Ukraine's democracy and everyone fighting for it - The Kyiv Independent - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- How Anti-Affirmative Action Crusaders Are Escalating Their War on Inclusive Democracy - Balls and Strikes - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- PBS and NPR are generally unbiased, independent of government propaganda and provide key benefits to US democracy - The Conversation - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- The Guardian view on votes at 16: democracy belongs to the young too | Editorial - The Guardian - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Terms of Engagement Democracy: The Worst Form of Government Except All the Rest? - Ash Center - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Democracy Vouchers are serving Chinatown-ID; lets renew them - International Examiner - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- New York Citys Ranked Choice Voting: Democracy Thats Accountable to Voters - The Fulcrum - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Opinion | In Georgia, the EUs commitment to democracy is being tested and it may be failing - OC Media - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Democrats Endorse Omar Fateh to Be Next Mayor of Minneapolis - Democracy Now! - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Former EPA Official on Trump Gutting Science Research Office: People Are Not Going to Be Protected - Democracy Now! - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Democracy is pissed and shes raining - Illinois Times - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- OPINION Assault on literacy: Banned books and the destruction of our democracy - Windy City Times - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- How Western democracy died Real change is an illusion - UnHerd - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- The EUs strategic compromises are blinding it to the ongoing fight for democracy in Serbia - ceps.eu - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Democracy in Crisis as Half of Young People Fail to Register to Vote - Byline Times - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Experts Issue Stark New Warning About Nuclear Weapons, 80 Years After Trinity Test - Democracy Now! - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Two Ultra-Orthodox Parties Leave Netanyahus Government Coalition - Democracy Now! - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- The Next Phase in Destroying Israeli Democracy Begins: Ousting the Attorney General - Haaretz - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- The Pollster Who Sensed Democracy Was Faltering - The Atlantic - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Whatever Evers decides, Wisconsin is heading into a high-stakes battle for democracy - Wisconsin Examiner - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Automatic voter registration: a huge step forward for democracy and a chance to bring missing millions into elections - The Conversation - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Opinion | We Need Human Connection to Heal Democracy and Build Shared Prosperity - Common Dreams - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- All the States Where DOJ is Demanding Voting Data - Democracy Docket - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- News - Updating the Arsenal of Democracy: Allies Embrace Co-Production Model - DVIDS - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- A half year of devastation: Trumps first six months shakes American democracy - New York Daily News - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Emerging right-wing politics a threat to democracy - New Age BD - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- This Week in Democracy Week 26: Soft on Child Abuse, Tough on Public Broadcasting - Zeteo - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Opinion | Defunding Public Media Makes Perfect Sense If Destroying Democracy Is the Goal - Common Dreams - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- From military coups to elections: where is African democracy heading? - africanews.com - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Democracy Is Dying But Hey Nice Fireworks Funny 4th Of July T Shirt - roarmag.org - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Noto Democracy and the slow work of civic change - The Japan Times - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- "Good Trouble Lives On" in Whittier California! Honoring the late US Representative John Lewis, the Community Rallied for Democracy and... - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Britain will lower its voting age to 16 in a bid to strengthen democracy - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Lowering the voting age: a boost for UK democracy or a shot in the dark? - The Guardian - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- From Voices to Visions: Reflections on Climate Democracy in Practice - International IDEA - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Imagining The Path Forward for The Healthy Democracy Ecosystem - The Fulcrum - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Republicans Advance Trump Judicial Nominee Said to Have Urged Court Defiance - Democracy Docket - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- An Urgent Warning from Texas: A Conversation on Defending Democracy and Fighting Authoritarianism in the States - Center for American Progress - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- How we Treat [Immigrants] will Shape the Future of Our Democracy and Our Moral Character - The Birmingham Times - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Britain will lower its voting age to 16 in a bid to strengthen democracy - AP News - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Democracy is not theirs to dismantle. More than 120 people turn out for 'Good Trouble' protest - GazetteXtra - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Dems to Fight Texas Illegal, Unconstitutional and Egregious Effort to Rig the Elections - Democracy Docket - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Senate Advances Bill to Claw Back $9 Billion in Funds for Foreign Aid and Public Broadcasting - Democracy Now! - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Video Britain to lower voting age to 16 in a bid to strengthen democracy - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Protecting democracy from big money: Why the UK's new elections strategy doesn't go far enough - Transparency International UK - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Election Officials Have Been Under Attack For Years. Now The DOJ Wants to Criminally Charge Them - Democracy Docket - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Pentagon to Withdraw Half of 4,000 National Guard Troops Deployed to Los Angeles - Democracy Now! - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Antithesis of democracy: Protesters gather for Good Trouble rally in Raleigh - Raleigh News & Observer - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- U.N. Rapporteur Urges Nations to Cut Ties to Israel to Stop Genocide in Gaza - Democracy Now! - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Texas Used DOJs Concerns to Justify Redistricting. Now It Says Theyre Off Base. - Democracy Docket - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Sudan, Remember Us Trailer: Watermelon Pictures Sets August Release For Doc Paying Tribute To Youthful Pro-Democracy Activism - Deadline - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Public Space Is the Infrastructure of Democracy. Its Time to Protect Our Right to Gather. - Next City - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- The U.S. Government Just Slapped The World's Largest Democracy With A Travel Advisory - TheTravel - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- History, Historians, and Democracy in the Age of Trump - Civil War Memory - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- UK to lower voting age to 16 a once-in a-generation opportunity to secure the future health of British democracy - The Conversation - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Britain will lower its voting age to 16 in a bid to strengthen democracy - MSN - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Equatorial Guinea: FAJ applauds journalists role in advancing democracy and justice at the Citizens Forum - International Federation of Journalists -... - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Britain will lower its voting age to 16 in a bid to strengthen democracy - Aurora Sentinel - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Book review: Christianity and Democracy Today: International perspectives, edited by David P. Gushee and Paul Silas Peterson - The Church Times - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- This Is the Most Inspiring Thing Ive Heard About Democracy at the Supreme Court in Ages - Slate Magazine - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Opinion | Trump Is Winning the Battle to Undermine Democracy - The New York Times - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Liberals claimed Trump would end democracy. They were wrong again. | Opinion - USA Today - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Daily Briefing July 15: Day 648 Dramatic day at Knesset leaves democracy intact for now - The Times of Israel - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Who is leading and lagging on democracy and reforms in the EUs Eastern Partnership? - New Eastern Europe - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]