DOJ Takes a Stance on Section 230 Reform that Could Place Additional Burdens on Online Platforms – JD Supra
The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently outlined proposed reforms to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996.[1] Section 230 has been in place since the early days of the Internet and protects online platforms from liability for certain third-party posts. It has recently become a point of contention between Big Tech and the Trump Administration. Recently, a presidential tweet was labeled with a fact-checking message that described the content as unsubstantiated.[2] The President claimed the label was intended to chill his rights under the First Amendment and subsequently signed the Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship, calling for review and clarification of the scope of Section 230. The Executive Order also calls on the Secretary of Commerce and the Attorney General to engage in rule-making with the Federal Communications Commission to clarify when a tech company could be deemed to be taking part in not taken in good faith.[3] Additionally, the Order encouraged the Federal Trade Commission to investigate unfair or deceptive acts or practices committed by online platforms.
How did this relatively small piece of legislation become the center of a heated debate?
By way of background, Section 230 shields websites from legal liability for posts, including comments, images, and videos, of third-party users. At the time this legislation was passed, the Internet was vastly different from what it is today. In the 90s, as the tech world was beginning to grow, Congress sought to encourage that growth through statutory protections. Section 230 provides websites with immunity for posts left by users, and allows for Good Samaritan protection from civil lawsuits if websites remove or moderate posts that they consider to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable.[4] This way, websites can still clean up posted content without having to worry about being targeted via lawsuits for choosing to police and self-regulate their own domains, so long as they do so in good faith.
Section 230 allows platforms to be available to all users to share, gather, and disseminate information. Websites, especially those with enormous platforms, host millions upon millions of individual posts every single day. Even with dedicated moderators and advanced algorithms in place, it is a huge undertaking to examine every single post to determine whether it is illegal or inappropriate; and even with a robust procedure in place, it is hardly fail-safe. But there is growing concern about who gets the final say about what is considered inappropriate and when it should be revised, removed, or labeled. Section 230 has become a flashpoint and raises complex First Amendment, online safety, and competition considerations.
The Executive Order alone might not seem like it has teeth, unless Congress agrees with the President and passes legislation that repeals or amends Section 230. But the rule-making prompted by the Executive Order could shift interpretation of the law, calling into doubt the wide protections enjoyed by tech companies. Moreover, Attorney General William Barr has been vocal about his concerns regarding Section 230 and its protections, prompting the DOJ to seriously examine the law to propose a way forward.
In February, the DOJ hosted a one-day workshop called Section 230 Nurturing Innovation or Fostering Unaccountability? inviting both public and private stakeholders to confer about the laws transformation since its enactment to the present day and whether it needs to be modified to account for this new era of Big Tech. The DOJ states that it also met with companies that attended or indicated interest in talking about Section 230, although it is unclear which companies that included.
Last month, following its 10-month review of the law, the DOJ released its recommendations for Section 230 reform.[5] Rather than seek a complete repeal of the legislation, the DOJ identified four key categories where reform should take place in order to realign the scope of Section 230 with the realities of the modern internet.[6] These four areas are (1) Incentivizing Online Platforms to Address Illicit Content, (2) Clarifying Federal Government Enforcement Capabilities to Address Unlawful Content, (3) Promoting Competition, and (4) Promoting Open Discourse and Greater Transparency.[7]
The first category seeks to strip away protection from those who purposely facilitate or solicit unlawful content and allows for civil lawsuits involving child abuse, terrorism, and cyber-stalking to proceed, thus incentivizing websites to be proactive about tracking and removing illegal content. The second category proposes more government intervention through civil enforcement actions. The third category seeks to clarify that companies cannot use Section 230 to protect themselves from antitrust actions where liability is based on harm to competition, not on third-party speech.[8] Finally, the fourth category is aimed at refining the language of Section 230, including an addition of good faith.
Some argue that Section 230 should be updated to address some of the potential dangers of the growing Internet that were not present in 1996. If this effort gains more traction, many view it as imperative that tech representatives be involved in the conversation because they are the experts in devising the algorithms and training the moderators to track down illegal and harmful content. A companys role and responsibility to police, remove, and/or label content may implicate complex First Amendment concerns. There may not be a one-size-fits-all approach to updating Section 230 to address all posted content in all types of forums. Many will be watching to see whether there will be changes to this law that has helped fuel online growth.
[1] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-issues-recommendations-section-230-reform.%5B2%5D Twitter Safety (Twitter Safety). We added a label to two @realDonaldTrump Tweets about Californias vote-by-mail plans as part of our efforts to enforce our civic integrity policy. We believe those Tweets could confuse voters about what they need to do to receive a ballot and participate in the election process. May 27, 2020, 10:54 p.m. tweet.[3] Exec. Order on Preventing Online Censorship (May 28, 2020), available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-preventing-online-censorship/.%5B4%5D 47 U.S.C. 230(c)(2)(A).[5] https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-issues-recommendations-section-230-reform.%5B6%5D https://www.justice.gov/ag/department-justice-s-review-section-230-communications-decency-act-1996.%5B7%5D https://www.justice.gov/file/1286331/download.%5B8%5D Id. at p. 4.
The rest is here:
DOJ Takes a Stance on Section 230 Reform that Could Place Additional Burdens on Online Platforms - JD Supra
- Trumps aggressive actions against free speech speak a lot louder than his words defending it - The Conversation - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Bowen Yang Rants About SNL Censors: This Is the Real World - The Daily Beast - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Government censorship comes to Bluesky, but not its third-party apps yet - TechCrunch - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Time to re-read The Masses, the 1910s literary magazine crushed by government censorship. - Literary Hub - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Operation Caged Bird Seeks to Unban Books from Naval Academy: Book Censorship News, April 25, 2025 - Book Riot - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- 12 Moments Of Anime Censorship That Became Bizarrely Hilarious - SlashFilm - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- I faced censorship and attacks at MIT for trying to teach about Palestine. This reflects the rising fascism in higher education. - Mondoweiss - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Opinion | The Naval Academy Canceled My Lecture on Wisdom - The New York Times - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- University suspects big tech Google and Meta censoring ads just because its Catholic - The College Fix - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Netflix Co-CEO Says Theyre Not in China Because Not a Single Episode Cleared the Censorship Board - IndieWire - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Republicans, beware: Censorship by the right is no better than by the left | Opinion - USA Today - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- DITV: YAF Brings in CEO of Babylon Bee to Speak About Censorship - The Daily Iowan - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- There are medieval roots to modern attempts to censor controversial literature - KJZZ - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Barbra Streisand can tell you: Censorship is not the answer - The Frederick News-Post - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Meta Oversight Board Fumes As Facebook Ends Censorship Initiatives - The Daily Wire - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Bluesky Just Bowed to Censorship Demands in Turkey, but Theres a Loophole - Gizmodo - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Censorship is getting louder: Metas fine is just the echo - Pearls and Irritations - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Trump Administration Blasts Biden, Fauci for Outright Censorship on Revamped Covid-19 Website - Yahoo - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Book censorship: Why its not going to stop with the books, no matter how you spin it - DMNews - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Wall Streets silent protest: censorship in the age of Trump - The Irish Times - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Digital Blasphemy: Netflixs Controverial Censorship of Mel Gibsons The Passion for Easter - Bleeding Fool - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Censorship in STEM: A Recap of the Heterodox Academy STEM Community Meeting at USC April 24 - University of Nevada, Las Vegas | UNLV - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Top Ultra-processed Foods Researcher at NIH Resigns, Citing Censorship - Civil Eats - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Trump-style book censorship is spreading just ask British librarians | Alison Hicks - The Guardian - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Why would he take such a risk? How a famous Chinese author befriended his censor - The Guardian - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Grandpas advice for the new wave of American censors - FIRE | Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Trump admin accused of censoring NIHs top expert on ultra-processed foods - Ars Technica - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- 100 mph speeders, 4/20 sales, RI lobbyist expenses, RISD censorship: Top stories this week - The Providence Journal - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- 'Wuthering Waves' Developer Responds to Backlash Over Censorship - The Gooner Rage is Real - VICE - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- State Department shuts down agency that pushed censorship of conservative news sites - Must Read Alaska - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- DrainMore Than FightAuthoritarianism and Censorship - The Fulcrum - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Theyre Coming For Us: Media Censorship in the Age of Palestinian Genocide - Counterpunch - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Censorship or Caution? The ACSA's Gaza Journal Controversy Exposes a Field at War With Itself - Architect Magazine - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Why deregulating online platforms is actually bad for free speech - The Conversation - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- We Took on Book Bans in Our Small Conservative Community and Won - Teen Vogue - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- MAJOR VICTORY Trump Administration Declassifies the Biden Administrations Secret Domestic Surveillance and Censorship Strategy, Following AFLs... - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Banned Books and Censorship: Who Gets to Decide What We Read? - The Teen Magazine - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Nina Jankowiczs censorship bull, onshoring risks are manageable and other commentary - New York Post - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Opinion: If US schools are censored, students will struggle to form their own opinions - The Asheville Citizen Times - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Lonely Island surprised 'Jizz in My Pants' wasn't censored on SNL : 'There's still potentially kids watching' - Entertainment Weekly - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Censoring Santosh and the grim truth of police torture - Hindustan Times - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- The Antitrust Division Hosts a Big-Tech Censorship Forum - Department of Justice (.gov) - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Is the future of censorship-resistant VPNs, no VPNs? - TechRadar - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- The VPN industry must change or face losing the battle against censorship - Tom's Guide - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- DOJ, FTC listen to Big Tech censorship concerns - Global Competition Review - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- CIF Becomes the Official Sponsor of Dirty Mouths, turning censorship into sponsorship. - Marketing Communication News - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- India quietly censored a White Lotus Season 3 scene; even HBO didnt see this coming - The Indian Express - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- Journalists in Haiti defy bullets and censorship to cover unprecedented violence - The Independent - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- CEO of Babylon Bee visits campus, gives talk about dangers of censorship - The Crimson White - April 5th, 2025 [April 5th, 2025]
- One White Lotus Scene Was Conspicuously Missing in India, and Its Part of a Bigger Censorship Issue - IndieWire - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Australian tribunal to rule on whether using biologically accurate pronouns online is grounds for censorship - Alliance Defending Freedom... - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Its About Censorship, Erasure, and Control: the GOPs Push for Parental Rights - The Texas Observer - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Mastercard agrees to eschew pressure to engage in censorship of ads - adfmedia.org - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- 'Stories About Overthrowing the Government Are No Longer Allowed': Anime Censorship Overseas Adding to Broadcast Woes - Comic Book Resources - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Media apathy makes Schmitts hearing on government censorship all the more vital - Read Lion - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Mastercard, Facing Pressure Over Role In Global Censorship Effort, Agrees To Major Change - The Daily Wire - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Launch: New OONI Explorer thematic censorship pages - Open Observatory of Network Interference | OONI - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Jersey City Library Set to Welcome 'The Hammer' to Talk on Censorship, Book Bans - TAPinto - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Anime Is Booming, But New Censorship Rules Are About to Threaten Some of Its Top Shows - Screen Rant - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Twitter Files journalist Matt Taibbi spars with Bidens disinfo czar in censorship hearing: We dont need a truth squad - New York Post - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- From censorship to curiosity: Pope Francis appreciation for the power of history and books - The Conversation - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Oppenheimer Now Streaming Uncensored on Netflix in India After Theatrical Censorship - IGN India - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- What is Sahyog, which Elon Musk-owned X called a censorship portal? - The Indian Express - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerberg-Led Meta Set To Face 'Truth' At Senate Hearing Over China Operations And Communist Party Censorship Efforts - Meta Platforms... - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Sharyn Rothstein looks at censorship through the eyes of a badass librarian - DC Theater Arts - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- The dangers of censorship: The harm of book banning - Collegiate Times - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Can Controversy and Censorship Ever Be Good for Artists and Their Art? - observer.com - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Why is X suing the Indian govt over censorship? Musks heft within US administration could play a part - The Straits Times - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Explained: What is the Sahyog Portal that X has called out for censorship? - MediaNama - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Censorship and the question of artistic freedom - Times of India - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Art Censorship: Between Restriction and Sharpening Idea of Freedom of Expression - Universitas Gadjah Mada - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- Mass surveillance and censorship/ What is DPI, intended for use by the government? - cna.al - April 1st, 2025 [April 1st, 2025]
- The Freckled Face of Censorship or How Book Bans Are Restricting Our Freedoms - U.S. News & World Report - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Spice Girls latest victims of woke censorship as iconic '90s song has 'offensive' lyric removed by BBC and other stations - GB News - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- MEDIA ADVISORY: HFAC Subcommittee Hearing on the Censorship-Industrial Complex - House Foreign Affairs Committee - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Durbin Questions Witnesses In Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing On Censorship - RiverBender.com - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Hawley Exposes Big Tech as Willing Collaborators in Censorship: They Own It - Josh Hawley - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Scientists Respond to FTC Inquiry into Tech Censorship - R Street - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- Venice Title Pooja, Sir: Rajagunj Released in Nepal After Extensive Censorship Battle: An Attack on the Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech... - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]
- 'Assault on the 1st Amendment': Expert buries Trumps 'censorship' argument in 60 seconds - AlterNet - March 26th, 2025 [March 26th, 2025]