Archive for the ‘Wikipedia’ Category

Elvis Is a Wikipedia Entry Directed by Baz Luhrmann – The New Yorker

A good-enough story can withstand more or less any direction, and thats the extent of the artistic success that Baz Luhrmann achieves with Elvis. The rise of a Memphis truck driver to a generational hero and a world icon, under the thumb of his Mephistophelian manager, and his fall to the status of a mere self-destructive celebrity who became an object of nostalgia while still young is amazing enough, in its arc and its details, to hold attention even in the course of a garish and simplistic two hours and thirty-nine minutes. Elvis is a gaudily decorated Wikipedia article that owes little to its sense of style; its a film of substance, but of bare substance, a mere photographic replica of a script that both conveys and squanders the power of Presleys authentic tragedy.

Luhrmann squeezes his name into the credits more times and more quickly than any other director Ive seen, aided by the idiosyncrasies of contractual punctuation: its a Baz Luhrmann film, from a story by Baz Luhrmann and Jeremy Doner and a screenplay by Baz Luhrmann & Sam Bromell and Baz Luhrmann & Craig Pearce and Jeremy Doner, and its directed by Baz Luhrmann. His style does more than leave smudgy fingerprints all over the material; its calculatedly obtrusive, as if to give viewers a thumb in the eye. But the key to Luhrmanns act of cinematic aggression is less its vain embellishment than its weird, misguided, yet deeply revealing premise: it thrusts Presleys predatory manager, Colonel Tom Parker, front and center.

The character of Colonel Tom is embodied by the movies one above-the-title-sized star, Tom Hanks, who plays the role with a slimy, serpentine monotony under transformative costumes and makeup (Parker was fat and bald) and a chewy, indistinct accent (Parker was born and raised in the Netherlands). Hanks is the films narrator as well as a main onscreen presence alongside Presley, whose life and art are related from Colonel Toms perspective. Indeed, the drama of Elvis is the musicians effort to become, in effect, the protagonist of his own life, to fulfill his own plans and dreams rather than the requirements of Elvis Presley the business, which was run by Parker. The movie is even framed as a flashback from Parkers collapse, just before his death in 1997; its drama is launched by a self-justifying and self-unaware monologue in which Colonel Tom denies any responsibility for Presleys death in 1977.

Colonel Tom takes credit for Elviss career (I made him), and adds that he and Elvis were partners, as the snowman and the showman. Parkers own career as an impresario started at travelling carnivals; he calls himself a snowman because hes capable of delivering a snow job on anyone for anything. Though he recognizes the originality of Elviss fusion of blues and country music, he sees Elvis not as an artist but as a showman, indeed as the greatest show on Eartha circus slogan, and the antithesis of earnest musicianship. But who was this miraculous hybrid? In come flashbacks to the backstory, of Elviss father, Vernon (Richard Roxburgh), incarcerated for passing a fraudulent check, and of the familys move to a Black neighborhood in Tupelo, Mississippi. There, in 1947, young Elvis (Chaydon Jay) makes Black friends and accompanies them to the areas two musical attractions: a roadhouse where Arthur (Big Boy) Crudup (Gary Clark, Jr.) plays electric blues, and a Pentecostal church where the revival service is filled with ecstatic gospel music and where Elvis, the only white person there, does more than listenhe plunges into the center of the service, dancing and flinging himself into the throng. Cut to Sun Records, where Elvis performs a cover of Crudups Thats All Right and the companys owner, Sam Phillips (Josh McConville), declares that the nineteen-year-old Elvis is playing Black music.

Throughout the film, Elviss bona fides in the Black community are emphasized, especially in his early and crucial friendship with B. B. King (Kelvin Harrison, Jr.) and with other important characters in Elviss musical rise, including Big Mama Thornton, Sister Rosetta Tharpe, and Little Richard (played by Shonka Dukureh, Yola, and Alton Mason, respectively). When Elvis passes through Black crowds in Memphiss Beale Street, they lovingly swarm him for autographs. But what makes Elvis an original, in the movies view, is more than his fusion of Black and white traditions; its the sexual frenzy that he whips up when he gets onstage, at an outdoor concert, with long hair and makeup that prompts a young white man (at a segregated show) to call him by a homophobic slur. At first hesitant at the mike, Elvis launches into a song, and his sinuous, thrusting moves conspicuously excite the young women in the crowd. His bassist, Bill Black (Adam Dunn), leans over and advises him to wiggle much more; when Elvis does, women scream in ecstasy and men are scandalized. Parker apostrophizes in voice-over, as he watches an excited woman, that shes having feelings she wasnt sure she should enjoythis unleashed Elvis is her forbidden fruit. He adds, It was the greatest carnival attraction Id ever seen.

Whatever pleasure Elvis manifestly feels in making music, his core motives are to make enough money for his parents to live in comfort; he promises his mother, Gladys (Helen Thomson), a pink Cadillac when he makes it big. But Gladys sees the dangeror, rather, telegraphs the rest of the movie when she warns him about the dangers of pursuing wealth, and adds that she saw something in the reaction of his audience that could come between them. That thing, of course, is fame, the bond with the public that makes him a commander of hearts and minds but also the victim of his devotees. He is mobbed in the street; the Presley family property is invaded by fans; police have to hold the crowds back from the stage at his concerts. Elvis is a cautionary tale about the predatory power of modern media and the uncontrollable force of fandomthe cult of personality that neglects and devours the person concealed in the plain sight of the public image. (Elvis is one of two new releases that dramatize the toxicity of fandom and sudden celebrity, the other being Marcel the Shell With Shoes On.)

The overt sexuality that Elvis displays is a source of scandal, denunciation, and legal threats, and, for Colonel Tom, a possible financial liability. From trying to sanitize Elviss public image and create a new Elvis (the public responds the way it responded, three decades later, to New Coke) to turning him all-American when hes drafted into the Army, Colonel Tom interferes with Elviss art and life alike, putting showmanship, celebrity, and publicity ahead of the musicians imperatives. Colonel Tom has a criminal past in the Netherlands and deserted from the U.S. Army; he is, unbeknownst to Elvis, undocumented and imperilled. He maneuvers and manipulates Elvis with secret deals that keep him virtually entombed in Las Vegas, exhausting himself emotionally and musically to feed his audiences nightly frenzies, jolted onstage each night through the medical depredations of a doctor for hire (Tom Nixon). Unsurprisingly, Colonel Tom exonerates himself from Elviss death at the age of forty-two. He says that Elvis was indeed addictedto the love that he got from you, the audience. He sums up: Ill tell you what killed him: it was lovehis love for you. The onus is on the members of the audience and their deadly effect on their superstar.

Luhrmann depicts Elvis as a pre-modern figure, an artist whose public image is somewhere between a phenomenon independent of his artistry and a means of advertising created by his business team. Elviss movie career proves to be mostly a disaster, despite some commercial success: its inescapable uncoolness impinges on his musical career and is an artistic failure in Elviss own eyes. (He dreamed of following in the footsteps of James Dean as a dramatic actor.) Elvis places great emphasis on his return to musical purity in his 1968 television special, and sets it against the political turmoil of the time, including the assassinations of Martin Luther King, Jr., and Robert F. Kennedy. The movie aims to show that Elvis strove to keep up with his moment, including politically, and only Colonel Toms blanding-out, old-fashioned handling of him got in the way. When Elviss star is falling, his manager riffs on how its not the Colonels fault that the world has changed. Yet one of the key things that changed was media consciousness itself and its relation to the new rock mainstreammost obvious in the Beatless self-aware media politics, their recognition of the inseparability of their art from their image, their image from their life, and their postmodern deployment of their fame in A Hard Days Night.

View post:
Elvis Is a Wikipedia Entry Directed by Baz Luhrmann - The New Yorker

Raju Narisetti on Wikipedia & the Mission To Take Free Knowledge to Every Person – The Quint

All our campaigns are time based, depending on the country. For example, in the west, the Thanksgiving to Christmas period tends to be the giving period. So we'll put some campaigns then. So it depends on the country and is always time bound.

The easy answer to your question is no, this is not a fundraising campaign related to any shortfall or crisis, but I would say that since our mission is to provide free knowledge and information to every person on this planet, we will always need money to do that.

I think it's easy to look at a number like $120 million, that is our annual budget and say, "Wow, that's a big number. Why do they need money?"

Let me give you a couple of examples. Depending on the month, we are probably the fifth or sixth or seventh largest site in the world in terms of the number of visits. If you look at the top five or top six in front of us, it'll be Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Baidu.

Baidu said in their annual report that they have spent $4 billion just on research and development. Facebook said that they will spend between $29 and $34 billion just on Capital expenditure in 2022.

So here are organisations that are roughly in the same ballpark as we are, having to spend significant amounts to keep up with the infrastructure. And here is Wikimedia, completely nonprofit, doesn't take any money, no advertising.

We do some of the same big infrastructure work, to support 1.5 billion devices with data centers around the world, making sure that whenever you want information, it's available. I think those things cost a fair amount of money.

See the original post:
Raju Narisetti on Wikipedia & the Mission To Take Free Knowledge to Every Person - The Quint

English Wikipedia – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The English Wikipedia is the English language edition of the Wikipedia online encyclopedia. English is the first language in which Wikipedia was written. It was started on 15 January 2001. It is the largest encyclopedia in the world, and the largest version of Wikipedia since April 2019.[1] It has 6,513,124 articles as of 14 June 2022.[2] In October 2015, the total volume of the compressed texts of the English Wikipedia's articles added up to 11.5 gigabytes.

Logo

Screenshot

Homepage in June 2020

Type of site

Content license

The Simple English Wikipedia is a variation in which most of the articles use only basic English vocabulary (simplewiki). There is also the Old English (nglisc/Anglo-Saxon) Wikipedia (angwiki). It has a newsletter called The Signpost.

Wikipedias in other languages have imitated some of its technical and organizational features.

As the English Wikipedia is very popular, there can be many people editing the wiki in one minute. This made recent changes less effective for understanding changes. Instead, editors can select and watch for changes in particular articles, using the "watchlist" feature of MediaWiki. Both watchlist and recent changes can be filtered to show particular kinds of edits, such as edits from IP addresses or edits that may possibly be vandalism. Some editors use special software to detect and fix vandalism.[3][4]

Some people think that the English Language Wikipedia shows bias and unfairness.[5] Editors of reference works such as the Encyclopdia Britannica have questioned Wikipedia's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[6] An example of bias is that around 90% of Wikipedia editors are male.[7] Other people think that Wikipedia is more useful than other encyclopedias because it is large and can be updated quickly.

In 2012, the logo of the English Wikipedia like most Wikipedias was slightly changed. However, some Wikipedias, like the Simple English Wikipedia, still kept the old logo.

Read the original here:
English Wikipedia - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I fed an AI Hideo Kojima’s Wikipedia page and interviewed it – For The Win

Interviewer: How do you feel about Konami?

Hideo Kojima: I dont really have any strong feelings about them. We parted ways amicably, and I wish them the best.

Interviewer: Why exactly did you split from Konami?

Hideo Kojima: I wanted to create my own studio so that I would have more creative freedom.

Interviewer: Why did Konami scrub your name from Metal Gear Solid: Ground Zeroes if the split was amicable?

Hideo Kojima: Im not sure. I guess they were just trying to distance themselves from me.

Interviewer: Why would they want to distance themselves from you?

Hideo Kojima: I dont know. I guess they just dont like my games.

Interviewer: How does that make you feel?

Hideo Kojima: Its fine. Im just focused on making the best games I can.

Interviewer: Who do you think is the best character youve created?

Hideo Kojima: I think its Solid Snake. Hes a great character, and I think people can relate to him.

Interviewer: Why do you think hes relatable?

Hideo Kojima: I think its because hes a very human character. Hes not perfect, and he makes mistakes. But hes always trying to do the right thing, and I think people can respect that.

Interviewer: Would you consider kidnapping child soldiers as one of Snakes mistakes?

Hideo Kojima: Im not really sure. I just try to be cool about everything.

Interviewer: You were criticized for the character design of Quiet, a character who wears no clothes because she breathes through her skin. Do you think those criticisms were justified?

Hideo Kojima: I dont really have an opinion on that. I just wanted to create a character that I thought was cool.

Interviewer: What do you think is cool about a character whos nude and breathes through her skin?

Hideo Kojima: I just think its a cool concept.

Interviewer: Why are there so many jokes about poop in your games?

Hideo Kojima: Im not sure. I guess I just like poop jokes.

Interviewer: What can poop jokes tell us about the human condition?

Hideo Kojima: They just make people laugh.

They sure do, AI Kojima. They sure do.

Written by Kirk McKeand on behalf of GLHF.

See the rest here:
I fed an AI Hideo Kojima's Wikipedia page and interviewed it - For The Win

Iyabo Ojo makes shocking revelation about her ex-husband, cries for help – Kemi Filani News

Nollywood actress, Iyabo Ojo has raised her concerns over her profile and biography on Wikipedia.

The divorced mother of two seeks help to edit and clarify the fact that her ex husband Mr. Ojo was never a Movie Marketer but a Clearing Agent, as wronglystated on her Wikipedia page.

It is no longer news that Iyabos marriage to Mr. Ademidun Ojo packed up a long time ago, shortly after the birth of their two children.

Abeg who handles this Wikipedia. Bloggers my Ex husband, the father of my children Mr Ademidun Ojo was never a Movie Marketer ooooooooo, he was a CLEARING AGENT ., She cried out on her verified Instagram page.

Kemi Filani News had earlier reported when Iyabo Ojo called out her colleague Caroline Danjuma.

Ojo and Danjuma now known as Caroline Hutchings both featured on the Real Housewives of Lagos (RHOL), the reality TV show.

But it appears all is not well between the two film stars.

Caroline had posted to whom it may concern subtle shade on her Instagram page: Out of trenches , but the trenches is yet to leave you .. love and light to your fav .. inferiority complex is a mental disorder. QueenC.

Unfortunately, many had thought the shade was for Laura Ikeji who is also part of Real Housewives of Lagos (RHOL), the reality TV show.

However, with Iyabo Ojos response, one could tell who owns Carolines message.

Iyabo Ojo wrote: Caro! Caro!! Caro!! Your rudeness & disrespect that night was on a different level, you said I was insensitive towards your boyfriends bracelet lol its a pity the camera cant play out everything & the most happened off camera but deep down in your heart you know that I was one of the reasons you remained on the show.. even when you snitched on Toyin showing me her WhatsApp messages to you about me, I still kept my cool and encouraged you to remain on the show..Off camera youre so rude & disrespectful even to the crew but I have always made excuses for you, and I can see in your diary sessions, you are such an angel in Disguise.

Why didnt you mention I returned your gift the next day, you said I was insensitive about your boyfriends bracelet bcos I asked if it was from your billionaire ex husband or current billionaire boyfriend lol thats a girls talk no big deal darling & you know that, weve had worse talks than that.. the only issue was I asked on camera which I apologized immediately and we even laughed about it even tho the camera didnt show that part, abi you forgot you told us that you wish you had stolen it for yourself & lied it went missing anyways lets leave the gbasgbos for reunion

See original here:
Iyabo Ojo makes shocking revelation about her ex-husband, cries for help - Kemi Filani News