Mediaboss Marketing

Somebody with a House of Representatives IP web address decided to put President Trump on Wikipedias online list of people who faced prominent investigations for obstruction of justice.

@Congressedits is a Twitter bot that automatically posts a notice whenever Wikipedia gets anonymously updated by someone using a congressional Internet connection. On Thursday morning, the bot announced a new update:

The only change was that the presidents name was added underneath Wikipedias list of notable examples of obstruction. The addition has since been erased.

Trumps name was mostly likely added to preempt the major news that was bound to come out of James Comeys testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee. The former FBI director spoke about his interactions with Trump, though the question of whether Trump tried to interfere with an active investigation is still being debated.

The Daily Caller picked up on several deleted tweets from The Federalists Gabriel Malor, who initially said that the update come from the office of Rep. Mike Coffman (R-CO). Coffmans office and House security specialists have insisted that this was not the case, and Malor has put up an update:

[Image via screengrab]

>> Follow Ken Meyer (@KenMeyer91) on Twitter

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

See the original post here:
Someone in Congress Put Trump's Name on Wikipedia's 'Obstruction of Justice' Webpage - Mediaite

An unknown person operating from within Congress made edits to the Wikipedia entry on important cases relating to Obstruction of Justice, listing President Donald Trump among the notable examples.

Other notable examples already posted on the Wikipedia page include President Richard Nixon, Scooter Libby and baseball legend Barry Bonds.

Donald Trump was added to the list, along with a link back to his Wikipedia page, on Thursday afternoon, the same time former FBI Director James Comey testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

While its common for Wikipedia pages to be changed, what makes this instance particularly interesting is that it was made byan anonymous posterin a congressional building. Media were alerted to the change by a Twitter account, @Congressedits, which automatically posts a tweet whenever someone using a congressional IP address makes changes on Wikipedia.

Initially, it was believed the change came from Rep. Mike Coffmans (R-Colo.) office, but Gabriel Malor, a writer for the Federalist, said this claim was shot down by a House Security Specialist.

UPDATE: Via Rep. Coffmans office, a House Security Specialist has told them this is an IP address open to the public for wifi use, Malor wrote on Twitter.

Why does this matter? Because speculation has since been flying over whether the change was made as part of some larger media strategy by a congressional office preparing to go on the attack against Trump. This is precisely the theory right-leaning Mediaite promoted on Saturday evening.

Trumps name was mostly likely added to preempt the major news that was bound to come out of James Comeys testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Ken Meyer wrote for Mediaite. The former FBI director spoke about his interactions with Trump, though the question of whether Trump tried to interfere with an active investigation is still being debated.

The change also raises additional questions about the trustworthiness of Wikipedia. If Wikipedia is being actively edited by politicians and their staffs, how reliable could it possibly be?

Originally posted here:
Mysterious person in Congress made Wikipedia edits involving Trump and 'obstruction of justice' - TheBlaze.com

Metro

DUP Wikipedia page locked to stop people pointing out the party doesn't believe in dinosaurs Metro The DUP's Wikipedia page has been locked down after people edited it to point out that the party doesn't believe in dinosaurs. Theresa May just announced that she is forming a minority government supported by the Democratic Unionist Party, an extremely ... and more »

More:
DUP Wikipedia page locked to stop people pointing out the party doesn't believe in dinosaurs - Metro

Google searches for the DUP will have gone through the roof today after speculation that Theresa May will form a coalition government with the party - but some people were probably shocked by what they discovered.

The Tories lost control of the Commons in yesterday's general election when they failed to win the 326 seats needed to form a majority.

It is thought they will now look to enter a coalition with the Democratic Unionist Party ( DUP ) to push them over the threshold and allow them to form a government.

But some people aren't a fan of the DUP, who oppose abortion and support Brexit .

This dislike has resulted in their Wikipedia page being hacked by a prankster - and replaced with information about the Nazi party.

A screengrab of their Wikipedia page shows Adolf Hitler listed as leader and the name changed from Democratic Union Party to 'Nationalist Socialist German Workers Party' - the official name of the Nazis.

It also lists the deputy leader as Nigel Farage, the former UKIP leader who campaigned for Brexit.

The headquarters are down as an address in Berlin, 'ethnic cleanse county' and under 'ideologies' somebody added "Nazisism".

Anyone who googled the DUP earlier on would have got a bit of a shock.

But the page seems to have returned to normal now and lists Arlene Foster as leader, along with accurate information.

Video Unavailable

Click to play Tap to play

Play now

On the Wikipedia tab showing the history of the page, there is a long list of edits made today as pranksters try to change the information published for the party.

Anyone can edit Wikipedia pages.

The Democratic Unionist Party are based in Northern Ireland and are the fifth largest party in Westminster, with 10 seats.

The party, led by Arlene Foster, is famously anti-abortion and pro-Brexit, deny climate change and don't believe in LGBT rights.

Read more about the DUP Manifesto here .

Here is the original post:
DUP Wikipedia page hacked by prankster to show Nazi party information - with Adolf Hitler as leader - Mirror.co.uk

During the James Comey hearing Thursday, someone edited the Wikipedia entry for "obstruction of justice" to list President Donald Trump as one of many "notable examples." Trump has not been convicted of obstruction, and Comey's testimony did not suggest he should be. Worse, the anonymous editor altered the entry from a congressional IP address.

"Obstruction of justice Wikipedia article edited anonymously from US House of Representatives," tweeted congress-edits, a bot account that reports on anonymous Wikipedia edits made from IP addresses in the U.S. Congress. The edits can be viewed at this link.

Democrats and the liberal media argue that Trump, in firing former FBI Director Comey, obstructed justice by attempting to prevent an FBI investigation into Michael Flynn. A reporter forThe New York Times, Adam Liptak, found examples of people being convicted of obstruction of justice for statements of hope.

But when Comey was asked point-blank if Trump asked him to stop the investigation, the former FBI director said, "Not to my understanding, no."

Former U.S. attorney Matthew Whitaker told CNN, "There is no criminal case to be made on an obstruction of justice."

"We have the star witness that testified, and quite frankly, his story doesn't rise to the level of intent necessary on behalf of the president to even substantiate a criminal case," Whitaker explained.

Indeed, liberals face a difficult situation. If Trump is guilty of obstructing justice for his statements and actions toward Comey, it is arguable that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch is also guilty. During his testimony Thursday, Comey explained that Lynch told him only to refer to the FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton as a "matter." He further revealed that he found this "concerning" and a "conflict of interest."

At the end of the day, only a court or Congress in the case of the president can convict a citizenof obstruction of justice, and no such conviction has been made in the case of President Trump.

The Wikipedia entry has since been re-edited to omit Trump from the "notable examples" of obstruction. But that does not change that someone likely a staffer in the U.S. House of Representatives deliberately altered an Internet record to slander the president, in the absence of a conviction.

This only confirms once again that Trump's enemies and perhaps especially those in government are willing to twist the truth totarnish the president's reputation. At least in this case, the fabrication was short-lived.

Originally posted here:
Wikipedia Entry on Obstruction of Justice Listed Trump - PJ Media - PJ Media