Mediaboss Marketing

The coronavirus outbreak has created fear and panic among the populace as it has already infected over 2,000 people and taken the lives of at least 56 in India while its global tally has crossed the mark of over one million cases, with at least 53,000 fatalities. But what's spreading even faster than the deadly virus over the Internet is fake news and misinformation related to COVID-19, the disease that caused by the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2).

For many people, Wikipedia is the first port of call to learn about these kinds of subjects, and misinformation on the Wiki can have grave consequences. That's why the organisation is putting extra resources towards limiting fake news circulation by offering information related to the virus and its disease in Indic languages through Project SWASTHA (an abbreviation of Special Wikipedia Awareness Scheme for The Healthcare Affiliates).

Abhishek Suryawanshi, Founder and Director of Wikipedia's Project SWASTHA, spoke to Gadgets 360 over a video conference in order to detail how the initiative can help fight fake news spreading online, and provide trustworthy information to the masses in India. The project was started last year with an aim to provide health information on Wikipedia on 10 different topics in 10 different languages of India. However, while the team was yet to kick off its operations in late November and early December, the coronavirus outbreak started emerging. This shifted the team's interest towards the pandemic entirely.

Coronavirus Apps: Every App the Central Government And States Have Deployed to Track COVID-19

During the conversation, Suryawanshi highlighted that Wikipedia has the reach that is 10 times more than the traffic received by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) websites and 300 times more traffic than Indian government's official website. This opens an avenue to share what's useful for the people.

He also emphasised that Wikipedia is complementary to the government sources since it provides the reach, while the official authorities give reliable information for the masses.

Lane Rasberry, a Data Scientist at the University of Virginia, who's been editing articles on Wikipedia for over 10 years and is one of the key faces behind the team that is editing information around the coronavirus outbreak, also joined the conversation. He underlined that Wikipedia editors rely on experts such as different agencies and the Indian government to identify the most important health information that can be shared through the platform.

Edited excerpts from the conversation below.

Gadgets 360: What is the role of Wikipedia in the public health crisis like what we are facing right now?

Rasberry: Wikipedia as a media channel is highly accessible. And if experts and organisations share their information in Wikipedia, then it reaches the largest available audience that the internet has to offer.

Suryawanshi: People in India highly rely on Wikipedia starting from their early education days. And especially even recently, the Ministry of Commerce also referred to Wikipedia in the official Economic Survey. And it's not just India, it's a similar trend throughout the globe, you can see the trend. Wikipedia does not spend any money in advertising itself. People organically come to Wikipedia. This is unlike YouTube or any other platform. In terms of numbers, Wikipedia is receiving 10 times more traffic even than the sites of CDC and WHO combined. We have 300 times more traffic than Indian government's official website. It's because people feel like they belong on Wikipedia.

What are the problems in your views that misinformation can cause in case of an outbreak like the coronavirus pandemic?

Suryawanshi: Misinformation means a lot especially in India where every morning people send WhatsApp forwards to their contacts. Therefore, I don't think getting information is a challenge, at least in India. Everyone even has Information about COVID-19. But it's more about whether they have the right kind of information. That's the question right now. And that's where Wikipedia gives information in simple words.

How do you think that Wikipedia can be a helpful source for fighting misinformation right now?

Rasberry: Fake news is a problem in every Internet channel. Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, all of them have this problem in place. Wikipedia has it as well. But one way Wikipedia is different and it is that all the data in Wikipedia is free and open. So anyone can look at who has added every single sentence or comment anywhere in Wikipedia, find out who did that and do research and analysis on it. So while in Facebook, for example, most of the research is done by Facebook staff, Wikipedia lets anyone can edit also and anyone can do the research on the data to say who said what, and where misconduct or misinformation might be coming from.

Coronavirus: Celebrities Are Helping COVID-19 Misinformation Go Dangerously Viral Online

Suryawanshi: And also for all the languages on Wikipedia, there is a feature called locking the article. It simply means the article can be edited by the editors who have crossed a certain threshold, like 10 or 20 edits. There are like different categories of protecting a page. So that's not what people think like, oh, anyone can wake up in the morning and edit it. It's not as simple as that.

What's the scope of Project SWASTHA? How would it help eradicate the circulation of fake news and invalid health information that we currently have through various social media sources?

Suryawanshi: Over 10 lakh people are reading one article every day on Wikipedia, and they have the option to correct something if something is wrong. When it comes to the government agencies, we have officially listed the Ministry of Health's website which is seeing on all the language Wikipedias and most of the traffic, if you do the traffic analysis of the Ministry of Health's website, it is getting redirected from Wikipedia itself. So I feel like it's a both complimentary situation. The Government of India has authentic sources. They have a lot of information. Whereas on Wikipedia, we have the exact opposite problem. We have a wider reach, but content is an issue for us.

What were your plans with the Project SWASTHA before the COVID-19 outbreak?

Suryawanshi: We conducted workshops one in December in Mumbai, where we had Wikipedia editors from top 10 Indian languages as well as healthcare experts who talked to each other to discuss various health and wellness related topics. We were planning to conduct those in 10 different cities, and educate and empower existing Wikipedia volunteer community, government authorities, and create a new generation of volunteers who can keep writing healthcare content from Wikipedia. Moving forward, we do have the plan to conduct a lot of such workshops and give tools to people so they can contribute healthcare information.

How can the Project SWASTHA be helpful for citizens as well as for the authorities in the present scenario?

Suryawanshi: For authorities as well as citizens Wikipedia's language is very easy to use. WHO will have information about COVID-19, but Wikipedia has dedicated articles such as the COVID-19 outbreak in Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh. So we have timelines for pretty much all these states. There are three aspects, namely the virus, disease, and outbreak, We are focusing on all these three aspects and within those also we have subsections in local languages. So more emphasis is given on the local state and local languages, and local culture. We are also partnering with local universities and are in touch with different government agencies. If they see something is wrong, or if they want to push it to a larger audience, they reach out to us because many physicians as well as officials, they have a lot of knowledge.

What are the key challenges in making health-related information available to the masses in the country?

Rasberry: There's a disbalance. Wikipedia does the distribution and we don't have to concern ourselves so much with identifying the content. There are subject matter experts whose job it is to identify the most important health information. These experts could be from different agencies, the Indian government, different universities within India, and organisations like the World Health Organization. So all our job is to find out who's the leading authority in the field, then find out what information it is that they're sharing, and then we integrate it in Wikipedia.

Is there any criteria for selecting contributors for the Project?

Rasberry: Anybody can add.

Suryawanshi: Anybody can add and that's how the system works. We welcome everyone on our platform and then we connect them together in a systematic way. There are doctors as well who have busy schedules. After getting passed from the doctors, the volunteers make necessary corrections in the content. It then goes back to the healthcare professional. And after that, we also work with professional translators as well as volunteer translators. They go through the draft and then, it goes to the local healthcare professional because local sensitivity language is also there. For something which is called in a textbook say Marathi or Hindi, might not be the actual term which people will relate when they go and read it on Wikipedia. So that's where we have these different people who can come and be part of it. So depending on the interest, we are welcoming everyone, and we just work with everyone to make sure we fight this battle against misinformation on the Web.

Abhishek Suryawanshi says Wikipedia welcomes everyone for contributing information on its platformPhoto Credit: Wikipedia

How does a team of contributors decide which content they should pick for translation and which content they should avoid?

Rasberry: We try to match the Wikipedia article with whatever the authority recommends that we should share. One way to check the quality of the Wikipedia article is to look at the references at the bottom and see that this is what one would expect and often after we're finished editing Wikipedia article and ask the subject matter expert that do you think that this article is representing the sources that you would expect to see from your field as an expert. Wikipedia has a Manual of Style. And I would say that this is something that perhaps is a bit unusual for Wikipedia as compared to other outlets in that we have information from different sources. So something that you'll see in Wikipedia, and this diverges a bit from medical articles. This is also true in case of our COVID-19 content because we're not getting any traditional journals just don't have stories about how the disease is manifesting in India, we have to rely a bit on local journalism to get these kinds of stories.

Suryawanshi: In other simple words, say in order to record the number of deaths, we won't cite anyone's Facebook account or Twitter account. We always cite the Government of India's official account or official statistics.

How does the content team examine all the content that they received before making live to the public?

Suryawanshi: In terms of references, we have like these COVID-19 articles, there are only the editors who have a certain kind of expertise and trust within the system, they can edit them. But that doesn't mean like we are not welcoming anyone. People can join us in editing other articles. And then anyone can be a part of it. We have a certain criteria, which everyone needs to follow, though. Also, Wikipedia goes by references. If anyone comes up with excellent information, but there is no reference for it, then that information won't be used.

Rasberry: Anyone can edit Wikipedia and we don't check people's credentials. What we check is the reliability of the source which they cite.

COVID-19: How ISP Engineers Are Fighting to Keep the Internet Alive in the Time of Coronavirus

Are the contributors and their articles being vetted as well?

Rasberry: We never screen the contributors, anyone can create and edit content on Wikipedia. So they might be anyone in the world.

Suryawanshi: A fifth grader can write a great one sentence about COVID-19 with a reference, whereas a PhD expert can write the same sentence without the reference. The Wikipedia community will go with someone who is giving a sentence with a reference because that's the basic DNA of Wikipedia reference and citation. So we will never ask, who are you? We will, instead, ask what kind of information you have and who gave you that information? As long as these two things match the content goes live

What are the plans towards expanding language support?

Suryawanshi: We would love to expand, but we are just two months old project. When we started, the COVID-19 outbreak just happened. We started with maternal health articles and we started working with different organisations like government authorities, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as other organisations. And when it comes to languages, it is important to reach out. We are encouraging more and more people to write healthcare content. And it is very important because it's writing a history. After 10-15 years, when people come online, they are going to see what's happening right now. Let's say COVID-19, people will learn about its effect and expansion through Wikipedia. We are, thus, requesting organisations to share information.

Lastly, how is India different in terms of the information sources from the global markets?

Suryawanshi: There will be more people accessing the Web in Hindi as compared to English by 2021, as per the recent Google-KPMG survey. More and more people are already coming online. Initially, there were like more consumers and now we have more content creators as well. So moving in two to three years ahead, I feel like the Internet will be dominated by Indian languages and Indians. We are already seeing the trends everywhere and we hope the same thing will continue on Wikipedia because we have so many readers from India, but we don't have those many contributors because of lack of awareness and there are so many different aspects to it. So that's what would be a dream come true situation in upcoming years and India is very special because the internet is pretty new in most of the rural areas and more and more people are coming online.

How are we staying sane during this Coronavirus lockdown? We discussed this on Orbital, our weekly technology podcast, which you can subscribe to via Apple Podcasts or RSS, download the episode, or just hit the play button below.

View original post here:
Wikipedia Project SWASTHA Aims to Eradicate Fake News Around the Coronavirus Outbreak in India - Gadgets 360

Stuck at home during the coronavirus pandemic, with movie theaters closed and no restaurants to dine in, Americans have been spending more of their lives online.

But a New York Times analysis of internet usage in the United States from SimilarWeb and Apptopia, two online data providers, reveals that our behaviors shifted, sometimes starkly, as the virus spread and pushed us to our devices for work, play and connecting.

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

With nearly all public gatherings called off, Americans are seeking out entertainment on streaming services like Netflix and YouTube, and looking to connect with one another on social media outlets like Facebook.

In the past few years, users of these services were increasingly moving to their smartphones, creating an industrywide focus on mobile. Now that we are spending our days at home, with computers close at hand, Americans appear to be remembering how unpleasant it can be to squint at those little phone screens.

Facebook, Netflix and YouTube have all seen user numbers on their phone apps stagnate or fall off as their websites have grown, the data from SimilarWeb and Apptopia indicates. SimilarWeb and Apptopia both draw their traffic numbers from several independent sources to create data that can be compared across the internet.

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Percent change is from the average on Jan. 21 to the average on March 24. App daily traffic is measured in daily sessions. Sources: SimilarWeb, Apptopia

While traditional social media sites have been growing, it seems that we want to do more than just connect through messaging and text we want to see one another. This has given a big boost to apps that used to linger in relative obscurity, like Googles video chatting application, Duo, and Houseparty, which allows groups of friends to join a single video chat and play games together.

We have also grown much more interested in our immediate environment, and how it is changing and responding to the virus and the quarantine measures. This has led to a renewed interest in Nextdoor, the social media site focused on connecting local neighborhoods.

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

VPN Super

Unlimited Proxy

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

VPN Super Unlimited Proxy

App popularity according to iOS App Store rankings on March 16-18. Source: Apptopia

The offices and schools of America have all moved into our basements and living rooms. Nothing is having a more profound impact on online activity than this change. School assignments are being handed out on Google Classroom. Meetings are happening on Zoom, Google Hangouts and Microsoft Teams. The rush to these services, however, has brought new scrutiny on privacy practices.

Large Media Organizations

Large Media Organizations

March averages are through the 24th. Source: SimilarWeb

Amid the uncertainty about how bad the outbreak could get there are now hundreds of thousands of cases in the United States, with the number of dead multiplying by the day Americans appear to want few things more than the latest news on the coronavirus.

Among the biggest beneficiaries are local news sites, with huge jumps in traffic as people try to learn how the pandemic is affecting their hometowns.

Americans have also been seeking out more established media brands for information on the public health crisis and its economic consequences. CNBC, the business news site, has seen readership skyrocket. The websites for The New York Times and The Washington Post have both grown traffic more than 50 percent over the last month, according to SimilarWeb.

The desire for the latest facts on the virus appears to be curbing interest in the more opinionated takes from partisan sites, which have defined the media landscape in recent years. Publications like The Daily Caller, on the right, and Truthdig on the left, have recorded stagnant or falling numbers. Even Fox News has seen disappointing numbers compared to other large outlets.

Beating all of the news sites, in terms of increased popularity, is the home page for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which has been attracting millions of readers after previously having almost none. Over time, readers have also looked to more ambitious efforts to quantify the spread of the virus, like the one produced by the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center.

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb. 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Averages are over the previous seven days. Source: SimilarWeb

The single-minded focus on the virus has crowded out the broad curiosity that draws people to sites like Wikipedia, which had declining numbers before a recent uptick, data from SimilarWeb shows.

Feb 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Feb 29

First U.S. Covid-19 death

Percent change is from the average on Jan. 21 to the average on March 24. One user can have multiple sessions in a day. Sources: SimilarWeb, Apptopia

With all major-league games called off, there hasnt been much sports to consume beyond marble racing and an occasional Belarusian soccer match. Use of ESPNs website has fallen sharply since late January, according to SimilarWeb.

At the same time, several video game sites have had surges in traffic, as have sites that let you watch other people play. Twitch, the leading site for streaming game play, has had traffic shoot up 20 percent.

TikTok, the mobile app filled with short clips of pranks and lip-syncing, was taking off before the coronavirus outbreak and it has continued its steady ascent ever since. It can be nice to see that at least some things remain unchanged by the crisis.

More here:
The Virus Changed the Way We Internet - The New York Times

On March 24, Cardano (ADA) founder, Charles Hoskinson, streamed a YouTube video titled On Wikipedia, in which he berated Wikipedia for applying arbitrary commercial censorship against Cardano.

Censorship of cryptocurrency projects is as old as the industry itself. Back in 2010, even Satoshi Nakamoto was frustrated with Wikipedias editors for removing Bitcoins wiki entry several times.

After PayPal severed ties with WikiLeaks, one of Bitcoins supporters suggested that becoming the site's new source of donations would generate enough publicity to gain entry into Wikipedia. Satoshi strongly opposed WikiLeaks adoption of the cryptocurrency, but it was too late:

No, don't "bring it on". The project needs to grow gradually so the software can be strengthened along the way. I make this appeal to WikiLeaks not to try to use Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a small beta community in its infancy. You would not stand to get more than pocket change, and the heat you would bring would likely destroy us at this stage.

Hoskinson states that he does not know the rationale behind Wikipedias hostility towards his project, despite it being the most cited of all of the peer reviewed coins:

We don't know why there's hostility where coins like SpankChain can have an article on Wikipedia. A lot of other cryptocurrencies and top 15, top 20 apparently have articles and that's perfectly fine. But then we're not allowed to have an article for some reason, even though we've been mentioned by the U.S. Congress.

Cointelegraph could not find a Wikipedia article for SpankChain (SPANK). Other projects like Dogecoin (DOGE), GridCoin (GRC), and PotCoin (POT) do have one, however. Most of the top ten projects, including Bitcoin Cash (BCH), have one too.

Source: Cointelegraph

Hoskinson confirmed to Cointelegraph that the censorship comes exclusively from Wikipedias English language editors, noting that there are Cardano wiki entries in German, Estonian, Italian, Japanese, Dutch, Portuguese, Romanian and Russian.

Crypto censorship has recently been on the rise. In Wikipedias case, it is an especially surprising move, considering that the site accepts Bitcoin to help fund its mission of providing a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world

Read the original here:
Just Like Bitcoin Before It, Cardano Is Banned From Wikipedia - Cointelegraph

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of 14the largest cryptocurrency by market cap, that has lost 98% of its value since its ATH in January 2018, took to YouTube to complain about getting a fair representation on Wikipedia.

In his video, he talks about the community members having issues with editing the proof-of-stake (PoS) articles on the online encyclopedia. Hoskinson said,

Cardano, in particular, has been having a tremendously difficult time getting a fair representation on Wikipedia. Anything we do whether it be Plutus, the extended UT XL model, Oroboros the Cardano project itself or people affiliated with the project there is broad-scale commercial censorship occurring by the editors at Wikipedia.

Currently, the Wikipedia page says, The article Proof of stake, along with other articles relating to blockchains and cryptocurrencies, is currently subject to active community-authorized general sanctions.

Hoskinson, who also co-founded the second largest network Ethereum, said it is just another example of existential danger to an industry, which is controlled by a few people who are incredibly biased and not accountable to anyone else.

He has been referring here to David Gerard specifically whose anti-crypto behavior Hoskinson said is going on for years, since the Ethereum days.

Hoskinson might be the latest one to complain about the non-coiner but not the only one, as in the past Decred had a similar issue.

Hoskinson says its unfair when they have been mentioned by the US Congress, as the most cited of all the peer views, and historically have had a market cap larger than SpaceX.

While replying to a Twitter user, Hoskinson argues that Cardanos competitors that are much smaller in size, have pages while they are not allowed to have is censorship.

He further said Wikipedia won't explain the standard, but Gerard refuted these claims by saying, The problem is not that nobody told you, it's that you didn't like the answer.

These are comments directly from a Wikipedia editor commercially censoring us. He also wrote an anti-crypto book. But I'm sure he's being fair and balanced about Cardano content, pointed out Hoskinson on Gerards comment that the (crypto) space would best be advanced by not existing, and as such he is warning others about the ridiculous steaming shitpile.

Meanwhile, Wikipedia highlights that individuals with a conflict of interest are strongly advised not to directly edit the article.

View post:
Cardanos Hoskinson Warns About The Unfair Representation on Wikipedia From An Editor - Bitcoin Exchange Guide

A Christchurch man's campaign for Wikipedia to officially adopt the use of macrons in Mori words has been a success.

Axel Wilke proposed Wikipedia change its New Zealand naming conventions, saying the website is "one of the last bastions of macron resistance for place names".

Debates and editing battles have long raged on the popular site for years, with various editors repeatedly adding and removing macrons from words.

Christchurch man Axel Wilke (left) and museum curator Mike Dickison have led the campaign to make the use of macrons official on Wikipedia. Photo / Supplied

"Macrons have been used in Wikipedia for some time: every use of the word "Mori" has its macron, and articles are increasingly adopting macrons in their names . . . But place names have always been a sticking point. For some reason, people feel especially attached to towns and rivers, and resist changing their spelling," Wilke said.

"Wikipedia rules have, for years, stated that place names were 'under discussion', and macrons have not been used in the meantime for place names," Wilke said.

Wikipedia is written by volunteers, with naming conventions discussed and decided on by contributors.

He suggested the naming conventions be amended to include macrons in cases where the New Zealand Geographic Board has adopted them.

Wilke said the decision was finally made by a user in England.

"It may be surprising to some people that I, a non-New Zealander, appear to be deciding this matter," the user wrote.

"This is a red herring. As a discussion closer, my role is not to decide, but to determine what the community has decided in the discussion below.

"I determine this in the way set out at Wikipedia:Closing discussions, and my role is to evaluate what we call the 'consensus', which on Wikipedia is not unanimity but 'rough consensus'."

In the end, 33 editors voted for the adoption of the new guideline, with five against.

"This marks a big change for Wikipedia. The idea was first raised on Wikipedia discussion pages in 2007 with no clear consensus," Wilke said.

In 2018, volunteersengaged in a battleover whether the Kpiti town of Paekkriki should have macrons in its name, with editors repeatedly removing and replacing the macrons from the page.

"It's gratifying to see that after a well-researched proposal was put forward, agreement on macron use for place names has now been achieved."

Originally posted here:
Battle of the macrons: Debate about Mori words on Wikipedia ends - Newstalk ZB